RESUMO
The purpose of the study is to identify factors affecting hospital profitability and to find the optimal hospital bed size that assures maximum profit. This is a cross-sectional study using survey data obtained from acute care hospitals in South Carolina in 1997. The relationship of hospital profitability and hospital bed size revealed that when bed size increases, hospital profitability increases, decreases, and then increases again. For the patient profit proportion, the turning points in bed size are 238.22 and 560.08. For the total profit proportion, the turning points in bed size are 223.31 and 503.86. The results on the relationship between bed size and hospital profitability indicate that medium-size hospitals have less profitability.
Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar/tendências , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Diretores de Hospitais , Estudos Transversais , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Número de Leitos em Hospital/economia , Planejamento Hospitalar , Humanos , Renda/tendências , Propriedade , Análise de Regressão , South Carolina , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
A clinical and functional integration strategy has a positive influence on increasing hospital revenue, and a solely functional integration strategy has a negative influence on increasing hospital expenses. Functional integration and clinical/functional integration strategies have a positive influence on hospital profit and the overall operations of the hospital. The mechanism of influence differs, however, based on the strategy used. Clinical/functional strategy has an impact on increasing hospital revenue, while functional integration strategy has an impact on reducing hospital expenses. Overall, the study shows that a functional integration strategy is more profitable than a clinical/functional integration strategy.