Choosing the right adjuvant therapy for stage III-IVA endometrial cancer: A comparative analysis of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer (EC) remains debatable. We comparatively analyzed recurrence patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage III-IVA EC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) exclusively or combined with radiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients treated for stage III-IVA EC at 2 tertiary institutions between 2010 and 2021. All patients underwent standard primary surgery and received either CT alone (n = 89) or CRT (n = 95) as an adjuvant treatment. We compared the failure patterns, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) between the CT and CRT groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 54.8 months. Most patients underwent pelvic (94.6%) or para-aortic (75.5%) lymphadenectomies. The 5-year RFS was 69.2% with CRT versus 56.3% with CT (P = 0.038), and 5-year OS was 86.1% versus 78.9% (P = 0.357). Pelvic and para-aortic recurrence rates were significantly higher in the CT group (pelvic: 29.2%; para-aortic: 20.2%) than in the CRT group (pelvic: 10.5%; para-aortic: 6.3%). The CRT group showed a higher rate of distant recurrence (CRT, 23.2% vs. CT, 14.6%) however, the 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (CRT, 28% vs. CT, 35%). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential benefits of adjuvant CRT in patients with stage III-IVA EC. The incorporation of molecular classification is necessary to derive optimal personalized adjuvant treatment strategies for this patient population.

Diagnostic assessments and treatment results of well-differentiated gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix (Adenoma malignum): A multicenter retrospective analysis of KROG 22-03 study.

OBJECTIVE: Among cervical adenocarcinomas, well-differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix (WD-GAS), previously termed adenoma malignum (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma) is not well understood. Because of its rarity and difficulty in diagnosis, there is no standard care for WD-GAS. Thus, we conducted the first multicenter retrospective study on WD-GAS to clarify prognostic factors for long-term survival and recurrence. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with WD-GAS at eight hospitals participated in this multi-center study. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, OS between the early and advanced FIGO stage groups were compared with the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify significant factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: A total of 73 patients from eight hospitals in South Korea were included in the analysis. The median follow-up period was 44.8 months, and all patients underwent curative surgical intervention as the primary treatment. Recurrence was observed in 17 patients (23.3%). Ten patients had locoregional recurrence, four patients had distant metastasis, and three patients presented with both locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis. The Cox regression analysis identified several statistically significant factors associated with RFS, including vaginal invasion (VI), parametrial invasion (PMI), resection margin (RM), and nodal and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). When considering these five factors together, patients without any of the factors exhibited recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 97.0% at three years and those with more than one of these factors had a 3-year RFS of 65.4% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: WD-GAS showed relatively high locoregional recurrence rate. Positive PMI, VI, RM, nodal involvement, and LVI were associated with a significant increase in recurrence or distant metastasis rates.

A Survey of Practice Patterns for Clinical Nodal Staging Prior to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The importance of clinical staging in breast cancer has increased owing to the wide use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). This study aimed to investigate the current practice patterns regarding clinical nodal staging in breast cancer in real-world settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey was administered to board-certified oncologists in Korea, including breast surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists, from January to April 2022. The survey included 19 general questions and 4 case-based questions. RESULTS: In total, 122 oncologists (45 radiation, 44 surgical, and 33 medical oncologists) completed the survey. Among them, 108 (88%) responded that clinical staging before NST was primarily performed by breast surgeons. All the respondents referred to imaging studies during nodal staging. Overall, 64 (52.5%) responders determined the stage strictly based on the radiology reports, whereas 58 (47.5%) made their own decision while noting radiology reports. Of those who made their own decisions, 88% referred to the number or size of the suspicious node. Of the 75 respondents involved in prescribing regimens for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 58 (77.3%) responded that the reimbursement regulations in the selection of NST regimens affected nodal staging in clinical practice. In the case-based questions, high variability was observed among the clinicians in the same cases. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse assessments by specialists owing to the lack of a clear, harmonized staging system for the clinical nodal staging of breast cancer can lead to diverse practice patterns. Thus, practical, harmonized, and objective methods for clinical nodal staging and for the outcomes of post-NST response are warranted for appropriate treatment decisions and accurate outcome evaluation.

Comparison of initial and sequential salvage brain-directed treatment in patients with 1-4 vs. 5-10 brain metastases from breast cancer (KROG 16-12).

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the initial and salvage brain-directed treatment and overall survival (OS) between patients with 1-4 brain metastases (BMs) and those with 5-10 from breast cancer (BC). We also organized a decision tree to select the initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for these patients. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2014, 471 patients were diagnosed with 1-10 BMs. They were divided into two groups based on the number of BM: 1-4 BMs (n = 337) and 5-10 BMs (n = 134). Median follow-up duration was 14.0 months. RESULTS: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) was the most common treatment modality (n = 120, 36%) in the 1-4 BMs group. In contrast, 80% (n = 107) of patients with 5-10 BMs were treated with WBRT. The median OS of the entire cohort, 1-4 BMs, and 5-10 BMs was 18.0, 20.9, and 13.9 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the number of BM and WBRT were not associated with OS, whereas triple-negative BC and extracranial metastasis decreased OS. Physicians determined the initial WBRT based on four variables in the following order: number and location of BM, primary tumor control, and performance status. Salvage brain-directed treatment (n = 184), mainly SRS/FSRT (n = 109, 59%), prolonged OS by a median of 14.3 months. CONCLUSION: The initial brain-directed treatment differed notably according to the number of BM, which was chosen based on four clinical factors. In patients with ≤ 10 BMs, the number of BM and WBRT did not affect OS. The major salvage brain-directed treatment modality was SRS/FSRT and increased OS.

Study protocol for prospective multi-institutional phase III trial of standard of care therapy with or without stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer (SABR-ROC).

BACKGROUND: Efforts have been made to investigate the role of salvage radiotherapy (RT) in treating recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is a state-of-the-art therapy that uses intensity modulation to increase the fractional dose, decrease the number of fractions, and target tumors with high precision. METHODS: The SABR-ROC trial is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, prospective study to evaluate whether the addition of SABR to the standard of care significantly improves the 3-year overall survival (OS) of patients with ROC. Patients who have completed the standard treatment for primary epithelial ovarian cancer are eligible. In addition, patients with number of metastases ≤ 10 and maximum diameter of each metastatic site of gross tumor ≤ 5 cm are allowed. Randomization will be stratified by (1) No. of the following clinical factors met, platinum sensitivity, absence of ascites, normal level of CA125, and ECOG performance status of 0-1; 0-3 vs. 4; (2) site of recurrence; with vs. without lymph nodes; and (3) PARP inhibitor; use vs. non-use. The target number of patients to be enrolled in this study is 270. Participants will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio. Participants in Arm 2 will receive SABR for recurrent lesions clearly identified in imaging tests as well as the standard of care (Arm 1) based on treatment guidelines and decisions made in multidisciplinary discussions. The RT fraction number can range from 1 to 10, and the accepted dose range is 16-45 Gy. The RT Quality Assurance (QA) program consists of a three-tiered system: general credentialing, trial-specific credentialing, and individual case reviews. DISCUSSION: SABR appears to be preferable as it does not interfere with the schedule of systemic treatment by minimizing the elapsed days of RT. The synergistic effect between systemic treatment and SABR is expected to reduce the tumor burden by eradicating gross tumors identified through imaging with SABR and controlling microscopic cancer with systemic treatment. It might also be beneficial for quality-of-life preservation in older adults or heavily treated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05444270) on June 29th, 2022.

Quality-adjusted survival in women with gynecologic malignancies receiving IMRT after surgery: A Ppatient Rreported Ooutcome study of NRG oncology's RTOG 1203.

INTRODUCTION: NRG/RTOG 1203 compared 3-D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with endometrial or cervical cancer requiring post-operative radiotherapy after hysterectomy. The purpose of this study was to report the first quality-adjusted survival analysis comparing the two treatments. METHODS: NRG/RTOG 1203 randomized patients having undergone hysterectomy to either 3DCRT or IMRT. Stratification factors included RT dose, chemotherapy, and disease site. The EQ-5D, both index and visual analog scale (VAS), were obtained at baseline, 5 weeks after the start of RT, 4-6 weeks post RT and 1 and 3-years post RT. EQ-5D index and VAS scores along with quality-adjusted survival (QAS) were compared between treatment arms using the t-test at a two-sided significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: NRG/RTOG 1203 enrolled 289 patients of which 236 consented to participate in the patient reported outcome (PRO) assessments. QAS was higher in women treated with IMRT, 1374 vs 1333 days (p = 0.5) compared to patients treated with 3DCRT, but this difference was not statistically different. Patients treated with IMRT had less of a decline in VAS score 5 weeks post RT, -5.04, compared to patients treated with 3DCRT, -7.48, although not statistically significant (p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the use of the EQ-5D comparing two radiotherapy techniques in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies after surgery. While there were no significant differences in QAS and VAS scores between patients who received IMRT vs. 3DCRT, RTOG 1203 was not powered to show statistical differences in these secondary endpoints.

Radiotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer: updated results of involved-field radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to update the possible clinical benefits of radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: The medical records of 495 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after initially undergoing maximal cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy based on the pathologic stage between January 2010 and December 2020 were analyzed: 309 and 186 patients were treated without and with involved-field radiation therapy, respectively. Involved-field radiation therapy is defined as radiation therapy only to the areas of the body involved by tumor. The prescribed doses were ≥45 Gy (equivalent dose in 2 Gy/fraction). Overall survival was compared between patients treated with and without involved-field radiation therapy. The favorable group was defined as patients who satisfied at least four of the following factors: good performance, no ascites, normal CA-125, platinum-sensitive tumor, and nodal recurrence. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 56 years (range 49-63) and median time to recurrence was 11.1 months (range 6.1-15.5). 217 patients (43.8%) were treated at a single site. Radiation therapy, performance status, CA-125, platinum sensitivity, residual disease, and ascites were all significant prognostic factors. The 3-year overall survival of all patients, patients treated without radiation therapy, and patients treated with radiation therapy was 54.0%, 44.8%, and 69.3%, respectively. Radiation therapy was associated with higher overall survival rates in the unfavorable and favorable patient groups. Patient characteristics showed higher rates of normal CA-125, lymph node metastasis only, lower platinum sensitivity, and higher rates of ascites in the radiation therapy group. After propensity score matching, the radiation therapy group showed superior overall survival to the non-radiation therapy group. Normal CA-125, good performance status, and platinum sensitivity were associated with a good prognosis in patients treated with radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that higher overall survival was observed in patients treated with radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Endoscope-assisted microsurgical clipping and reduction of post-clipping cerebral infarction: historical comparison using diffusion-weighted images.

Endoscopic assistance for aneurysm clipping and its possible benefits have been suggested in previous studies, but its clinical significance has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to present the efficacy of endoscopy-assisted clipping in reducing post-clipping cerebral infarction (PCI) and clinical outcomes via a historical comparison of patients in our institution from January 2020 to March 2022. A total of 348 patients were included, 189 of whom underwent endoscope-assisted clipping. The overall incidence of PCI was 10.9% (n = 38); it was 15.7% (n = 25) before applying endoscopic assistance and decreased to 6.9% (n = 13) after endoscope application (p = 0.010). The application of a temporary clip (odds ratio [OR]: 2.673, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.291-5.536), history of hypertension (OR: 2.176, 95% CI: 0.897-5.279), history of diabetes mellitus (OR: 2.530, 95% CI: 1.079-5.932), and current smoker (OR: 3.553, 95% CI: 1.288-9.802) were independent risk factors of PCI, whereas endoscopic assistance was an independent inverse risk factor (OR: 0.387, 95% CI: 0.182-0.823). Compared to the location of the unruptured intracranial aneurysms, internal carotid artery aneurysms showed a significant decrease in the incidence of PCI (5.8% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.019). In terms of clinical outcomes, PCI was a significant risk factor for longer admission duration, intensive care unit stay, and poor clinical outcomes. However, endoscopic assistance itself was not a significant risk factor for clinical outcomes on the 45-day modified Rankin Scale. In this study, we noted the clinical significance of endoscope-assisted clipping in preventing PCI. These findings could reduce the incidence of PCI and improve the understanding of its mechanisms of action. However, a larger and longer-term study is required to evaluate the benefits of endoscopy on clinical outcomes.

Influence of blood viscosity models and boundary conditions on the computation of hemodynamic parameters in cerebral aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics.

BACKGROUND: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is widely used to calculate hemodynamic parameters that are known to influence cerebral aneurysms. However, the boundary conditions for CFD are chosen without any specific criteria. Our objective is to establish the recommendations for setting the analysis conditions for CFD analysis of the cerebral aneurysm. METHOD: The plug and the Womersley flow were the inlet boundary conditions, and zero and pulsatile pressures were the outlet boundary conditions. In addition, the difference in the assumption of viscosity was analyzed with respect to the flow rate. The CFD process used in our research was validated using particle image velocimetry experiment data from Tupin et al.'s work to ensure the accuracy of the simulations. RESULTS: It was confirmed that if the entrance length was sufficiently secured, the inlet and outlet boundary conditions did not affect the CFD results. In addition, it was observed that the difference in the hemodynamic parameter between Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid decreased as the flow rate increased. Furthermore, it was confirmed that similar tendencies were evaluated when these recommendations were utilized in the patient-specific cerebral aneurysm models. CONCLUSIONS: These results may help conduct standardized CFD analyses regardless of the research group.

Subdural hygroma and hemorrhagic conversion after microsurgical clipping for unruptured intracranial aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a unique hemorrhagic complication associated with microsurgical clipping. We aimed to investigate the risk factors of subdural hygroma (SDG) formation and its hemorrhagic conversion to cSDH. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 229 patients who underwent microsurgical clipping for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) from 2016 to 2019. Risk factors for SDG and cSDH formation were analyzed. RESULTS: Male sex, age ≥ 60 years, higher degree of arachnoid dissection, severe brain atrophy, and a large volume of subdural fluid collection (SFC) before discharge were independent risk factors for SDG formation. The risk factors for hemorrhagic conversion from SDG were continuous use or early resumption of antiplatelet drugs (odds ratio (OR): 15.367, 95% CI: 1.172-201.402) and a larger volume of SFC before discharge (OR: 0.932, 95% CI: 0.886-0.980). In the early resumption group, antiplatelet drug was resumed at a mean duration of 7.48 days postoperatively, and hemorrhagic conversion was detected earlier than that in the late resumption or no-use groups (4.09 vs. 7.18 weeks, P = 0.046). Following the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the SFC cutoff volume for hemorrhagic conversion was determined to be 23.55 mL. CONCLUSION: These findings can assist clinicians in identifying patients at a high risk of SDG and cSDH formation. Antiplatelet resumption and its timing should be determined with consideration of the risk of cSDH formation as well as individual medical conditions.

Validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of lymphedema following contemporary treatment for breast cancer: a large multi-institutional study (KROG 20-05).

PURPOSE: We previously constructed a nomogram for predicting the risk of arm lymphedema following contemporary breast cancer treatment. This nomogram should be validated in patients with different background characteristics before use. Therefore, we aimed to externally validate the nomogram in a large multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: Overall, 8835 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery during 2007-2017 were identified. Data of variables in the nomogram and arm lymphedema were collected. The nomogram was validated externally using C-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC) with 1000 bootstrap samples and by calibration plots. RESULTS: Overall, 1377 patients (15.6%) developed lymphedema. The median time from surgery to lymphedema development was 11.4 months. Lymphedema rates at 2, 3, and 5 years were 11.2%, 13.1%, and 15.6%, respectively. Patients with lymphedema had significantly higher body mass index (median, 24.1 kg/m2 vs. 23.4 kg/m2) and a greater number of removed nodes (median, 17 vs. 6) and more frequently underwent taxane-based chemotherapy (85.7% vs. 41.9%), total mastectomy (73.1% vs. 52.1%), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (71.9% vs. 54.2%), and regional nodal irradiation (70.7% vs 22.4%) than those who did not develop lymphedema (all P < 0.001). The C-index of the nomogram was 0.7887, and iAUC was 0.7628, indicating good predictive accuracy. Calibration plots confirmed that the predicted lymphedema risks were well correlated with the actual lymphedema rates. CONCLUSION: This nomogram, which was developed using factors related to multimodal breast cancer treatment and was validated in a large multi-institutional cohort, can well predict the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Protocol for the postoperative radiotherapy in N1 breast cancer patients (PORT-N1) trial, a prospective multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) could be useful for pN1 breast cancer patients who have undergone breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. However, the value of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for BCS patients, and the indications for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for pN1 breast cancer mastectomy patients, have recently been challenged due to the absence of relevant trials in the era of modern systemic therapy. "PORT de-escalation" should be assessed in patients with pN1 breast cancer. METHODS: The PORT-N1 trial is a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial for patients with pN1 breast cancer that compares the outcomes of control [whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and RNI/PMRT] and experimental (WBI alone/no PMRT) groups. PORT-N1 aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of the experimental group by comparing 7-year disease-free survival rates with the control group. Female breast cancer patients with pT1-3 N1 status after BCS or mastectomy are eligible. Participants will be randomly assigned to the two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified by surgery type (BCS vs. mastectomy) and histologic subtype (triple-negative vs. non-triple-negative). In patients who receive mastectomy, dissection of ≥5 nodes is required when there is one positive node, and axillary lymph node dissection when there are two or three positive nodes. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy are not eligible. RNI includes a "high-tangent" or wider irradiation field. This study will aim to recruit 1106 patients. DISCUSSION: The PORT-N1 trial aims to verify that PORT de-escalation after BCS or mastectomy is safe for pN1 breast cancer patients in terms of oncologic outcomes and capable of reducing toxicity rates. This trial will provide information crucial for designing PORT de-escalation strategies for patients with pN1 breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05440149) on June 30, 2022.

Incidence rate and predictors of recurrent aneurysms after clipping: long-term follow-up study of survivors of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Recurrent aneurysms are a major cause of re-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), but information on long-term clip durability and predictors is insufficient. This study aimed to present the incidence rate of > 10 years and investigate predictors of a recurrent aneurysm in aSAH survivors. We included 1601 patients admitted with aSAH and treated by microsurgical clipping between January 1993 and May 2010. Of these patients, 435 aSAH survivors were included in this study (27.2%). The total follow-up time was 5680.9 patient-years, and the overall incidence rate was 0.77% per patient-year. The cumulative probability of recurrence without residua and regrowth of the neck remnant was 0.7% and 13.9% at 10 years, respectively. Neck remnant (hazard ratio [HR], 10.311; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.233-20.313) and alcohol consumption over the moderate amount (HR, 3.166; 95% CI, 1.313-7.637) were independent risk factors of recurrent aneurysm. Current smoking and multiplicity at initial aSAH presentation were significant factors in a univariate analysis. Furthermore, de novo intracranial aneurysms (DNIAs) were more common in the recurrent group than in the non-recurrent group (40.9% vs. 11.5%, P < 0.001). In the present study, we noted the long-term clip durability and predictor of recurrence after microsurgical clipping. These findings can assist clinicians in identifying patients at a high risk of recurrent aneurysm and recommending selective long-term surveillance after microsurgical clipping.

Endovascular treatment for large (> 10 mm) basilar tip aneurysms: a retrospective case series.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of the endovascular treatment of large/giant basilar tip aneurysms (BTAs) in our institutions. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases of BTA larger than 10 mm that received endovascular treatment between January 2009 and December 2019. Data on the demographic and clinical characteristics and radiologic severity were obtained from the patients' medical records. The collected clinical follow-up data included neurological evaluation. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) was performed 6 to 12 months after the procedure, followed by once every 1 to 2 years as needed. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients with BTA were included in this study. The median age was 60.08 years (27-80 years), and the mean clinical follow-up was 66.78 months (19.00-142.87 months). Almost half of the patients presented with unruptured BTAs (58.33%, n = 7). The median maximum aneurysm diameter was 13.00 mm (10.46-20.90 mm) and the mean neck size was 8.34 mm (4.82-13.04 mm). A Modified Raymond Roy Classification (MRRC1) of 1 or 2 was observed in 66.67% of the patients (n = 8) immediately after the first procedure. Procedural morbidity and mortality were 33.33% and 8.33%, respectively. Major recanalization occurred in two patients, one of whom underwent additional coiling with the other being merely observed due to older age. CONCLUSION: It is very difficult to cure a large BTA completely at once and recanalization occurred often after endovascular treatment. Conducting long-term follow-up studies at short intervals is warranted, as well as improving existing treatment methods and developing new approaches.

Flow diverter for the treatment of large (> 10 mm) vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of flow-diverting device (FDD) treatment for large vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs). METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 12 patients with 12 VADAs who were treated using FDD between 2013 and 2020. Clinical and radiographic data, including procedure-related complications and clinical outcomes assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the time of the last follow-up, were collected and reviewed. RESULTS: All 12 patients had unruptured aneurysms. There were 3 (25%) female and 9 (75%) male patients, and the mean patient age was 54.6 years. The mean size of the aneurysm was 15.9 ± 4.8 mm. The mean follow-up duration was 15.8 months. Single FDD without additional coils was used in all patients. One patient underwent second-line treatment with FDD for recurrence of large VADA after stent-assisted coiling. Immediate follow-up angiography after placement of the FDD demonstrated intra-aneurysmal contrast stasis. There were 2 (17%) patients who had peri-procedural stroke. Angiography at the 6-month follow-up in 10 patients showed favorable occlusion (OKM grade C3 + D). A total of 11 (92%) patients had good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2) at the last follow-up. No re-treatment or delayed aneurysm rupture occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstructive technique with FDD is a feasible and effective modality for the treatment of large VADAs, showing favorable occlusion rate and clinical outcome.

Speech Outcomes of Treatment for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: Combined Use of an Overlapping Intravelar Veloplasty and Dynamic Sphincter Pharyngoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Velopharyngeal insufficiency involving a large velopharyngeal gap and poor lateral wall movement is referred to as a "black hole" and remains a challenging problem for cleft surgeons. The effect of the pharyngeal flap on this form of velopharyngeal insufficiency is still debatable because a wide pharyngeal flap is associated with a high incidence of airway obstruction. The present study aimed to evaluate the speech outcomes of combined overlapping intravelar veloplasty and dynamic sphincter pharyngoplasty for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency. METHODS: Between March 2016 and June 2019, 15 patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency were treated with a combination of overlapping intravelar veloplasty and dynamic sphincter pharyngoplasty. Preoperative speech evaluation was performed on the basis of perceptual speech evaluation, nasometry, and nasoendoscopy. Postoperative speech evaluation using the same approach as that used preoperatively was performed after completion of speech therapy. RESULTS: All 15 patients achieved satisfactory velopharyngeal port closure and speech phonation after completion of speech therapy. No additional procedures were performed to improve velopharyngeal port closure and speech production. The preoperative and postoperative results of perceptual speech evaluation, nasometry, and nasoendoscopy evaluation were significantly different (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with overlapping intravelar veloplasty and dynamic sphincter pharyngoplasty can correct the velopharyngeal insufficiency "black hole" with highly reliable results and minimal risk of airway obstruction.

Nasal Reconstruction of a Frontonasal Dysplasia via Septal L-Strut Reconstruction Using Costal Cartilage.

OBJECTIVE: Frontonasal dysplasia (FND) is a rare congenital condition. Its major features include hypertelorism, a large and bifid nasal tip, and a broad nasal root. We present our technique of septal L-strut reconstruction using costal cartilage. DESIGN: Retrospective review from June 2008 and August 2017. METHODS: Under general anesthesia, 6 patients with FND underwent septal reconstruction using costal cartilage via open rhinoplasty. We reconstructed the nasal and septal cartilaginous framework by placing columellar struts and cantilever-type grafts. RESULTS: The patients ranged in age from 6 to 13 years old. All were female. The follow-up period ranged from 8 months to 2 years; we encountered no postoperative complications (infection, nasal obstruction, or recurrence). All patients were satisfied with their nasal appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results were not entirely satisfactory from an esthetic point of view, we found that FND can be treated via septal reconstruction with costal cartilage and that the clinical outcomes are reliable and satisfactory. Our approach is a useful option for FND patients.

Hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy for breast cancer: A propensity-score-weighted comparison of radiation-related toxicity.

We assessed the clinical benefit of combining volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF-RT) considering the incidence of radiation-related toxicities. After a retrospective review for breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT between 2005 and 2017, a total of 4209 patients treated with three-dimensional conventional fractionation (CF-3D, 50.4 Gy/28 fractions) and 1540 patients treated with HF-RT (768 received HF-3D; 772, HF-VMAT; 40 Gy/15 fractions) were included. A total of 2229 patients (38.8%) received regional node irradiation (RNI): 1642 (39.0%), 167 (21.7%) and 420 (54.4%) received RNI via CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively. Acute/subacute and late toxicities were evaluated. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic regression. Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities was the highest in CF-3D group (15.0%, 2.6% and 1.6% in CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively; P < .001). HF-VMAT reduced Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities significantly compared to CF-3D (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, P < .001) and HF-3D (OR 0.45, P = .010). The 3-year cumulative rate of late toxicities was 18.0% (20.1%, 10.9% and 13.4% in CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively; P < .001). On sensitivity analysis, the benefit of HF-VMAT was high in the RNI group. Acute and late toxicities were fewer after HF-VMAT than after HF-3D or CF-3D, especially in women who underwent RNI.

Risk of Lymphedema Following Contemporary Treatment for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of 7617 Consecutive Patients From a Multidisciplinary Perspective.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the comprehensive risk factors for lymphedema, thereby enabling a more informed multidisciplinary treatment decision-making. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Lymphedema is a serious long-term complication in breast cancer patients post-surgery; however, the influence of multimodal therapy on its occurrence remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively collected treatment-related data from 5549 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2015 at our institution. Individual radiotherapy plans were reviewed for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) field design and fractionation type. We identified lymphedema risk factors and used them to construct nomograms to predict individual risk of lymphedema. Nomograms were validated internally using 100 bootstrap samples and externally using 2 separate datasets of 1877 Asian and 191 Western patients. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-nine patients developed lymphedema during a median follow-up of 60 months. The 3-year lymphedema incidence was 10.5%; this rate increased with larger irradiation volumes (no RNI vs RNI excluding axilla I-II vs RNI including axilla I-II: 5.7% vs 16.8% vs 24.1%) and when using conventional fractionation instead of hypofractionation (13.5% vs 6.8%). On multivariate analysis, higher body mass index, larger number of dissected nodes, taxane-based regimen, total mastectomy, larger irradiation field, and conventional fractionation were strongly associated with lymphedema (all P < 0.001). Nomograms constructed based on these variables showed good calibration and discrimination internally (concordance index: 0.774) and externally (0.832 for Asian and 0.820 for Western patients). CONCLUSIONS: Trimodality breast cancer treatment factors interact to promote lymphedema. Lymphedema risk can be decreased by deintensifying node dissection, chemotherapy regimen, and field and dose of radiotherapy. Deescalation strategies on a multidisciplinary basis might minimize lymphedema risk.

New brain metastases after whole-brain radiotherapy of initial brain metastases in breast cancer patients: the significance of molecular subtypes (KROG 16-12).

PURPOSE: To identify the risk factors leading to new brain metastases (BM) following brain-directed treatment for initial BM resulting from breast cancer (BC). METHODS: In this multi-institutional study, 538 BC patients with available follow-up imaging after brain-directed treatment for initial BM were analyzed. Tumor molecular subtypes were classified as follows: hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-, n = 136), HER2-positive (HER2+, n = 253), or triple-negative BC (TNBC, n = 149). RESULTS: In 37.4% of patients, new BM emerged at a median of 10.5 months after brain-directed treatment for initial BM. The 1-year actuarial rate of new BM for HR+/HER2-, HER2+, and TNBC were 51.9%, 44.0%, and 69.6%, respectively (p = 0.008). Initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) reduced new BM rates (22.5% reduction at 1 year, p < 0.001) according to molecular subtype (HR+/HER2-, 42% reduction at 1 year, p < 0.001; HER2+, 18.5%, p = 0.004; TNBC, 16.9%, p = 0.071). Multivariate analysis revealed an increased risk of new BM for the following factors: shorter intervals between primary BC diagnoses and BM (p = 0.031); TNBC (relative to HR+/HER2-) (p = 0.016); presence of extracranial metastases (p = 0.019); number of BM (>4) (p < 0.001); and BM in both tentorial regions (p = 0.045). Anti-HER2 therapy in HER2+ patients (p = 0.013) and initial use of WBRT (p < 0.001) significantly lowered new BM development. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor molecular subtypes were associated with both rates of new BM development and the effectiveness of initial WBRT. Anti-HER2 therapy in HER2+ patients significantly lowered new BM occurrence.