Evaluation of respiratory motion-corrected cone-beam CT at end expiration in abdominal radiotherapy sites: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for radiotherapy image guidance suffers from respiratory motion artifacts. This limits soft tissue visualization and localization accuracy, particularly in abdominal sites. We report on a prospective study of respiratory motion-corrected (RMC)-CBCT to evaluate its efficacy in localizing abdominal organs and improving soft tissue visibility at end expiration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an IRB approved study, 11 patients with gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer and five with pancreatic cancer underwent a respiration-correlated CT (4DCT), a respiration-gated CBCT (G-CBCT) near end expiration and a one-minute free-breathing CBCT scan on a single treatment day. Respiration was recorded with an external monitor. An RMC-CBCT and an uncorrected CBCT (NC-CBCT) were computed from the free-breathing scan, based on a respiratory model of deformations derived from the 4DCT. Localization discrepancy was computed as the 3D displacement of the GEJ region (GEJ patients), or gross tumor volume (GTV) and kidneys (pancreas patients) in the NC-CBCT and RMC-CBCT relative to their positions in the G-CBCT. Similarity of soft-tissue features was measured using a normalized cross correlation (NCC) function. RESULTS: Localization discrepancy from the end-expiration G-CBCT was reduced for RMC-CBCT compared to NC-CBCT in eight of eleven GEJ cases (mean ± standard deviation, respectively, 0.21 ± 0.11 and 0.43 ± 0.28 cm), in all five pancreatic GTVs (0.26 ± 0.21 and 0.42 ± 0.29 cm) and all ten kidneys (0.19 ± 0.13 and 0.51 ± 0.25 cm). Soft-tissue feature similarity around GEJ was higher with RMC-CBCT in nine of eleven cases (NCC =0.48 ± 0.20 and 0.43 ± 0.21), and eight of ten kidneys (0.44 ± 0.16 and 0.40 ± 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study of motion-corrected CBCT in GEJ and pancreas, RMC-CBCT yielded improved organ visibility and localization accuracy for gated treatment at end expiration in the majority of cases.

Investigation of gated cone-beam CT to reduce respiratory motion blurring.

PURPOSE: Methods of reducing respiratory motion blurring in cone-beam CT (CBCT) have been limited to lung where soft tissue contrast is large. Respiration-correlated cone-beam CT uses slow continuous gantry rotation but image quality is limited by uneven projection spacing. This study investigates the efficacy of a novel gated CBCT technique. METHODS: In gated CBCT, the linac is programmed such that gantry rotation and kV image acquisition occur within a gate around end expiration and are triggered by an external respiratory monitor. Standard CBCT and gated CBCT scans are performed in 22 patients (11 thoracic, 11 abdominal) and a respiration-correlated CT (RCCT) scan, acquired on a standard CT scanner, from the same day serves as a criterion standard. Image quality is compared by calculating contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for tumors in lung, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tissue, and pancreas tissue, relative to surrounding background tissue. Congruence between the object in the CBCT images and that in the RCCT is measured by calculating the optimized normalized cross-correlation (NCC) following CBCT-to-RCCT rigid registrations. RESULTS: Gated CBCT results in reduced motion artifacts relative to standard CBCT, with better visualization of tumors in lung, and of abdominal organs including GEJ, pancreas, and organs at risk. CNR of lung tumors is larger in gated CBCT in 6 of 11 cases relative to standard CBCT. A paired two-tailed t-test of lung patient mean CNR shows no statistical significance (p = 0.133). In 4 of 5 cases where CNR is not increased, lung tumor motion observed in RCCT is small (range 1.3-5.2 mm). CNR is increased and becomes statistically significant for 6 out of 7 lung patients with > 5 mm tumor motion (p = 0.044). CNR is larger in gated CBCT in 5 of 7 GEJ cases and 3 of 4 pancreas cases (p = 0.082 and 0.192). Gated CBCT yields improvement with lower NCC relative to standard CBCT in 10 of 11, 7 of 7, and 3 of 4 patients for lung, GEJ, and pancreas images, respectively (p = 0.0014, 0.0030, 0.165). CONCLUSIONS: Gated CBCT reduces image blurring caused by respiratory motion. The gated gantry rotation yields uniformly and closely spaced projections resulting in improved reconstructed image quality. The technique is shown to be applicable to abdominal sites, where image contrast of soft tissues is low.