A community-based strategy for improving asthma management and outcomes for preschoolers.

Although almost one in ten (8.6%) preschool children has been diagnosed with asthma, few asthma management programs are designed for parents of preschool children. The Asthma Basics for Children program addressed this need in 2003-2008 by implementing a multi-layered approach that offered educational activities to center staff, parents, and children and PACE training to physicians in 31 Northern Manhattan daycare centers. Following program participation, 85% of parents reported reducing their child's triggers, 89% said it was easier to talk to their child's physician, and 80% were confident in their ability to manage their child's asthma. Children's any daytime symptoms dropped from 78% to 42%, any nighttime symptoms from 81% to 49%, any daycare absences from 56% to 38%, any asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits from 74% to 47%, and any asthma-related hospitalizations from 24% to 11% (p < .001 for all differences). Outcomes varied by level of exposure. In the Center-Only group (no parent participation), the only reduction was from 19% to 10% (McNemar = 3.77, p = .052) in hospitalizations. Children whose parents participated in the program had significant reductions in daycare absences (62% to 38%, McNemar = 11.1, p < .001), ED visits (72% to 43%, McNemar = 19.2, p < .001), and hospitalizations (24% to 11%, McNemar = 5.54, p = .018). Children whose parents and healthcare provider participated had the greatest improvements with asthma-related daycare absences dropping from 62% to 32% (McNemar = 9.8, p = .001), ED visits from 72% to 37% (McNemar = 14.4, p < .001), and hospitalizations from 35% to 15% (McNemar = 8.33, p = .003). This study demonstrates that a multi-layered approach can improve asthma outcomes among preschoolers with a combination of parent and provider education having the greatest impact.

The implementation of Medicare's outpatient prospective payment system and specific concerns for rural hospitals.

The transition to Medicare's new prospective payment system for hospital outpatient services has arguable been the most complex and difficult programmatic change in the history of Medicare (Federal Register, 2002). Concern about its adverse effects led to holding rural hospitals with 100 beds or fewer harmless from the financial consequences of the new payment system for the first three years. However, small rural hospitals were not held harmless from implementing the outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS). Many outside observers felt that small rural hospitals would be ill-equipped to handle the immensity of change required, and that claim denials or delays caused by inaccurate claims submissions might have a disproportionate effect on smaller hospitals. There were also reports about difficulties with the interim payment system that had been designed to ensure small hospitals did not lose money during the first three years. This policy brief describes issues that arose in implementing OPPS during the first years of the program, identifies specific implementation concerns for small rural hospitals, and raises issues that may warrant further research or policy action.