Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 36(2): 192-6, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26050359

RESUMO

AIMS: For the screening of cervical abnormalities, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is widely used along with Papanicolaou (Pap) testing. Although the sensitivity of the HPV DNA testing is good, its specificity is relatively low. In the present study, the authors evaluated the use of the Gen-Probe APTIMA HPV Assay for the detection of HPV mRNA and compared it with HPV DNA testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Liquid cervical Pap specimens collected from 410 women were assessed using the APTIMA test, the Qiagen Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA (HC2) Test, and the AMPLICOR HPV Test. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of high-risk HPV were 85.6% and 99.2% for the APTIMA test, 94.1% and 98.4% for the HC2 test, and 90.2% and 95.7% for the AMPLICOR test, respectively. As the severity of the cervical lesion progressed, the positive rate of the three tests indicated a similar increase. The clinical sensitivity and specificity for the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) were 91.2% and 84.2% for the APTIMA test, 94.5% and 80.4% for the HC2 test, and 87.9% and 78.2% for the AMPLICOR test, respectively. CONCLUSION: The APTIMA is sensitive and specific for the detection of high-risk HPV. In the specimens with SIL, the APTIMA test is more specific than the HC2 and the AMPLICOR tests. This indicates that the APTIMA test may improve patient management and reduce the cost of screening.


Assuntos
Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , RNA Mensageiro/análise , RNA Viral/análise , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Adulto , Idoso , DNA Viral/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Teste de Papanicolaou , Papillomaviridae/genética , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico
2.
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol ; 39(3): 317-20, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23157033

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: We compared modified repeated intracyclic clomiphene citrate therapy (RICCT) to gonadotropin therapy to determine whether this modified regimen was an effective alternative after conventional clomiphene therapy. METHODS: Patients with ovulation disorder received treatment with modified RICCT and gonadotropin, and ovulation, pregnancy, total drug cost, and adverse effects were compared. RESULTS: Among a total of 16 patients, 14 successfully ovulated after modified RICCT and 11 ovulated after gonadotropin therapy; two did not respond to either therapy. The total drug cost was US $36.3+/-17.9 for modified RICCT, which was significantly lower than the cost of gonadotropin therapy, US $213.9+/-100.4 (p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Because modified RICCT does not require the discomfort of daily injection and has excellent ovulation-inducing effects, it is a useful treatment after conventional clomiphene therapy.


Assuntos
Clomifeno/administração & dosagem , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/administração & dosagem , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Clomifeno/efeitos adversos , Clomifeno/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Gonadotropinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina , Menotropinas/administração & dosagem , Indução da Ovulação/economia , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa