Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Phys Med Biol ; 53(2): 417-30, 2008 Jan 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18184996

RESUMO

It has been suggested for quality assurance purposes that linac output variations for helical tomotherapy (HT) be within +/-2% of the long-term average. Due to cancellation of systematic uncertainty and averaging of random uncertainty over multiple beam directions, relative uncertainties in the dose distribution can be significantly lower than those in linac output. The sensitivity of four HT cases with respect to linac output uncertainties was assessed by scaling both modeled and measured systematic and random linac output uncertainties until a dose uncertainty acceptance criterion failed. The dose uncertainty acceptance criterion required the delivered dose to have at least a 95% chance of being within 2% of the planned dose in all of the voxels in the treatment volume. For a random linac output uncertainty of 5% of the long-term mean, the maximum acceptable amplitude of the modeled, sinusoidal, systematic component of the linac output uncertainty for the four cases was 1.8%. Although the measured linac output variations represented values that were outside of the +/-2% tolerance, the acceptance criterion did not fail for any of the four cases until the measured linac output variations were scaled by a factor of almost three. Thus, the +/-2% tolerance in linac output variations for HT is a more conservative tolerance than necessary.


Assuntos
Artefatos , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Modelos Biológicos , Aceleradores de Partículas/instrumentação , Radiometria/métodos , Radioterapia Conformacional/instrumentação , Simulação por Computador , Humanos , Doses de Radiação , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Eficiência Biológica Relativa , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Med Phys ; 32(4): 1054-60, 2005 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15895590

RESUMO

A high sensitivity (HS) model of radiochromic film is receiving increasing use. The film's linear sensitometric response in the range of 0.5-40 Gy would make this film an ideal candidate for complex dosimetry applications that require tissue equivalence. This study investigates the potential use for clinical dosimetry of typical radiotherapy fractions at relatively low doses (0.5-5 Gy). The experiment involved exposing 25 pre-exposed pieces of HS film to five equal fractions of doses from 0.5 to 5 Gy 24 hours apart. The cumulative dose for each film was carefully monitored and optical density measurements were used as the sole determination of film response to dose. The average behavior of the various fractionation schemes was roughly consistent with previous observations of the MD-55 radiochromic film with about twice the overall sensitivity as expected. However, at low doses and low dose increments, unexpected variations beyond a well-documented low dose nonlinearity were observed. These unexpected variations may indicate complex polymer kinetics at low doses. This type of film would require extra care beyond that described in TG-55 for accurate use at low doses or low dose fraction schemes.


Assuntos
Dosimetria Fotográfica/métodos , Filme para Raios X , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Dosimetria Fotográfica/normas , Lasers , Doses de Radiação , Radiometria/métodos , Radioterapia/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Software , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Med Phys ; 32(5): 1414-23, 2005 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15984692

RESUMO

Inherent to helical tomotherapy is a dose variation pattern that manifests as a "ripple" (peak-to-trough relative to the average). This ripple is the result of helical beam junctioning, completely unique to helical tomotherapy. Pitch is defined as in helical CT, the couch travel distance for a complete gantry rotation relative to the axial beam width at the axis of rotation. Without scattering or beam divergence, an analytical posing of the problem as a simple integral predicts minima near a pitch of 1/n where n is an integer. A convolution-superposition dose calculator (TomoTherapy, Inc.) included all the physics needed to explore the ripple magnitude versus pitch and beam width. The results of the dose calculator and some benchmark measurements demonstrate that the ripple has sharp minima near p=0.86(1/n). The 0.86 factor is empirical and caused by a beam junctioning of the off-axis dose profiles which differ from the axial profiles as well as a long scatter tail of the profiles at depth. For very strong intensity modulation, the 0.86 factor may vary. The authors propose choosing particular minima pitches or using a second delivery that starts 180 deg off-phase from the first to reduce these ripples: "Double threading." For current typical pitches and beam widths, however, this effect is small and not clinically important for most situations. Certain extremely large field or high pitch cases, however, may benefit from mitigation of this effect.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Modelos Biológicos , Radiometria/métodos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Simulação por Computador , Humanos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Eficiência Biológica Relativa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa