Blood Vessel Invasion Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma Compared to Lymph Vessel Invasion and Myometrial Invasion Pattern.

We studied 115 cases of EEC diagnosed on hysterectomy specimens. Double immunohistochemical staining (D2-40/CD31) was performed in all 115 cases to show LVI and BVI on the same slide. MELF pattern invasion was present in 24/115 (21%) cases. MELF-positive tumors had a higher frequency of LVI than MELF-negative tumors (58% and 23%, respectively); the frequency of BVI was twice as high in MELF-positive tumors in comparison to MELF-negative tumors (25% and 12%, respectively). These differences were significant (p ˂ 0.0001). All tumors with positive BVI also had a concomitant LVI. The presence of MELF invasion had no impact on overall survival, confirming previous studies. 5-year survival rates were almost equal in cases with negative LVSI and cases with positive isolated LVI (98% vs. 97%). However, in cases where BVI was also present, the 5-year survival rate was significantly lower, 63% (p ˂ 0.0001). Furthermore, BVI proved to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence in the multivariate analysis. In conclusion, MELF pattern invasion is a good predictor of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion but has no prognostic value. Our results suggest that BVI in EEC has greater clinical value than isolated LVI or myometrial invasion patterns, and the therapeutic approach should be guided by BVI presence. Therefore, we hope this study will promote the routine evaluation of BVI in the context of EEC diagnostic procedures.

Pitfalls in Gynecological Cytology: Review of the Common and Less Frequent Entities in Pap Test.

BACKGROUND: Pitfalls in Pap test could be defined as false positive, false negative, or underdiagnosed results which can lead to unnecessary diagnostic procedures or delayed and inadequate treatment. It can be a consequence of misinterpretation of certain morphological entities which are described in this paper. SUMMARY: The paper presents an overview of the morphological features and look-alikes of the common sources of pitfalls such as atrophy, repair, intrauterine device change, tubal metaplasia, hyperchromatic crowded groups, and radiation changes. Rare causes of pitfalls such as Arias-Stella changes, pemphigus, tumor diathesis per se, rare types of cervical cancer, including verrucous and papillary squamous cell cancer, gastric type, and endometrioid adenocarcinoma are also described. KEY MESSAGES: The awareness of pitfalls in cervical cytology is important for cytopathologists and clinicians to avoid future errors. Review of Pap tests with erroneous diagnosis is important for quality control in cytology laboratory, and it must be considered an educational- and experience-building procedure. Cytopathologist should not pull back in significant diagnoses, especially in human papillomavirus-negative cases.