Rapid Evolution of Multidrug Resistance in a Candida lusitaniae Infection during Micafungin Monotherapy.

Candida (Clavispora) lusitaniae is a rare, emerging non-albicans Candida species that can cause life-threatening invasive infections, spread within hospital settings, and rapidly acquire antifungal drug resistance, including multidrug resistance. The frequency and spectrum of mutations causing antifungal drug resistance in C. lusitaniae are poorly understood. Analyses of serial clinical isolates of any Candida species are uncommon and often analyze a limited number of samples collected over months of antifungal therapy with multiple drug classes, limiting the ability to understand relationships between drug classes and specific mutations. Here, we performed comparative genomic and phenotypic analysis of 20 serial C. lusitaniae bloodstream isolates collected daily from an individual patient treated with micafungin monotherapy during a single 11-day hospital admission. We identified isolates with decreased micafungin susceptibility 4 days after initiation of antifungal therapy and a single isolate with increased cross-resistance to micafungin and fluconazole, despite no history of azole therapy in this patient. Only 14 unique single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified between all 20 samples, including three different FKS1 alleles among isolates with decreased micafungin susceptibility and an ERG3 missense mutation found only in the isolate with increased cross-resistance to both micafungin and fluconazole. This is the first clinical evidence of an ERG3 mutation in C. lusitaniae that occurred during echinocandin monotherapy and is associated with cross-resistance to multiple drug classes. Overall, the evolution of multidrug resistance in C. lusitaniae is rapid and can emerge during treatment with only first-line antifungal therapy.

Predictors of adverse safety events and unscheduled care among an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) patient cohort.

Background: Select circumstances require outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). The potency of OPAT agents presents an increased risk of adverse events and unscheduled medical care. We analyzed these outcomes among OPAT recipients as part of the implementation of a collaborative OPAT program. Methods: Adult patients discharged home from an academic hospital with OPAT between January 2019 and June 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort; participants discharged between June 2020 and June 2021 were part of the collaborative OPAT program. Patients with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Data on patient characteristics and outcomes were collected from electronic medical records by two reviewers. Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify predictors of vascular access device (VAD) complications, adverse drug events (ADEs), and OPAT-related emergency department (ED) visits and rehospitalizations. Results: Among 265 patients included in the cohort, 57 (21.5%) patients experienced a VAD complication; obesity [odds ratio (OR): 3.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-8.73; p = 0.01) and multi-drug therapy (OR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.21-5.39; p = 0.01) were associated with an increased odds of VAD complication. Eighty-two (30.9%) participants experienced an ADE; 30 (11.3%) experienced a severe/serious ADE. Lipo/glycopeptide receipt, (OR: 5.28; 95% CI: 1.89-15.43; p < 0.01) and Black/African American race (OR: 4.85; 95% (CI): 1.56-15.45; p < 0.01) were associated with an increased odds of severe/serious ADE. Inclusion in the OPAT collaborative was associated with a decreased odds of severe/serious ADE (OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08-0.77; p = 0.01). Fifty-eight (21.9%) patients experienced an OPAT-related ED visit and 53 (20.0%) experienced an OPAT-related rehospitalization. VAD complication (OR: 2.37; 95% (CI): 1.15-4.86, p = 0.02) and ADEs (OR: 2.19; CI: 1.13-4.22; p = 0.02) were associated with OPAT-related ED visits. ADE was associated with 90-day OPAT-related rehospitalization (OR: 3.21; (CI): 1.59-6.58; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Adverse safety events and OPAT-related unscheduled care occurred often in our cohort. A structured OPAT program that includes ID pharmacist antibiotic reconciliation may reduce rates of ADEs.

Electronically Triggered Sepsis Alert in Non-Intensive Care Inpatients Using Modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria: A Retrospective Observational Study with In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Patients.

Background: Our center initiated an electronic Sepsis Best Practice Alert (sBPA) protocol to aid in early sepsis detection and treatment. However, surgery alters peri-operative physiology, which may trigger an sBPA for noninfectious causes. This study aimed to provide early evaluation of automated sBPA utility in surgical patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of the outcomes of patients admitted to the University of Minnesota Medical Center (but not to the intensive care unit) from August 2015-March 2016 and compared how the sBPA performed in those having and not having surgery. An sBPA prompted nursing to draw blood for an immediate lactate assay if two modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome (mSIRS) criteria or three mSIRS criteria within 24 hours after surgery were met. Physicians were notified if the lactate concentration was >2 mmol/L. Further review was performed of data collected prospectively on the surgical patients. Results: A total of 10,335 patients were admitted (2,158 surgery and 8,177 non-surgery). Of these, 33% of the surgery patients and 35% of the patients not having surgery triggered sBPAs. In surgery patients, 13% of lactate concentrations were >2 mmol/L versus 25% in patients not having surgery. An sBPA was triggered more frequently after procedures with a wound class of 4 (5% vs. 2%), emergency operation (23% vs. 10%), and longer operations (280 min vs. 222 min (p < 0.05 for all). Surgery patients triggering sBPAs had longer hospital stays (9.6 vs. 4.4 days; p < 0.05), more surgical site infections (7% vs. 2%; p < 0.05), and a similar mortality rate (3% vs. 4%; p = 0.15) than those who did not trigger an sBPA. Conclusion: An sBPA fired in a third of all inpatients, and an sBPA that prompted lactate measurements was less likely to be abnormal in surgery patients than in those not having surgery. There was no difference in the mortality rate in surgical patients who fired and those who did not; however, the sBPA did identify patients with a more complicated post-operative course. Further refinements of the electronic trigger should increase BPA specificity.

Cost-effectiveness of pre-operative Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization.

OBJECTIVE: We developed a decision analytic model to evaluate the impact of a preoperative Staphylococcus aureus decolonization bundle on surgical site infections (SSIs), health-care-associated costs (HCACs), and deaths due to SSI. METHODS: Our model population comprised US adults undergoing elective surgery. We evaluated 3 self-administered preoperative strategies: (1) the standard of care (SOC) consisting of 2 disinfectant soap showers; (2) the "test-and-treat" strategy consisting of the decolonization bundle including chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) soap, CHG mouth rinse, and mupirocin nasal ointment for 5 days) if S. aureus was found at any of 4 screened sites (nasal, throat, axillary, perianal area), otherwise the SOC; and (3) the "treat-all" strategy consisting of the decolonization bundle for all patients, without S. aureus screening. Model parameters were derived primarily from a randomized controlled trial that measured the efficacy of the decolonization bundle for eradicating S. aureus. RESULTS: Under base-case assumptions, the treat-all strategy yielded the fewest SSIs and the lowest HCACs, followed by the test-and-treat strategy. In contrast, the SOC yielded the most SSIs and the highest HCACs. Consequently, relative to the SOC, the average savings per operation was $217 for the treat-all strategy and $123 for the test-and-treat strategy, and the average savings per per SSI prevented was $21,929 for the treat-all strategy and $15,166 for the test-and-treat strategy. All strategies were sensitive to the probability of acquiring an SSI and the increased risk if SSI if the patient was colonized with SA. CONCLUSION: We predict that the treat-all strategy would be the most effective and cost-saving strategy for preventing SSIs. However, because this strategy might select more extensively for mupirocin-resistant S. aureus and cause more medication adverse effects than the test-and-treat approach or the SOC, additional studies are needed to define its comparative benefits and harms.

Randomized controlled trial of a self-administered five-day antiseptic bundle versus usual disinfectant soap showers for preoperative eradication of Staphylococcus aureus colonization.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus (SA) carriage of a 5-day preoperative decolonization bundle compared to 2 disinfectant soap showers, with both regimens self-administered at home. DESIGN: Open label, single-center, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Ambulatory orthopedic, urologic, neurologic, colorectal, cardiovascular, and general surgery clinics at a tertiary-care referral center in the United States.ParticipantsPatients at the University of Minnesota Medical Center planning to have elective surgery and not on antibiotics. METHODS: Consenting participants were screened for SA colonization using nasal, throat, axillary, and perianal swab cultures. Carriers of SA were randomized, stratified by methicillin resistance status, to a decolonization bundle group (5 days of nasal mupirocin, chlorhexidine gluconate [CHG] bathing, and CHG mouthwash) or control group (2 preoperative showers with antiseptic soap). Colonization status was reassessed preoperatively. The primary endpoint was absence of SA at all 4 screened body sites. RESULTS: Of 427 participants screened between August 31, 2011, and August 9, 2016, 127 participants (29.7%) were SA carriers. Of these, 121 were randomized and 110 were eligible for efficacy analysis (57 decolonization bundle group, 53 control group). Overall, 90% of evaluable participants had methicillin-susceptible SA strains. Eradication of SA at all body sites was achieved for 41 of 57 participants (71.9%) in the decolonization bundle group and for 13 of 53 participants (24.5%) in the control group, a difference of 47.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.1%-65.7%; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: An outpatient preoperative antiseptic decolonization bundle aimed at 4 body sites was significantly more effective in eradicating SA than the usual disinfectant showers (ie, the control).Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02182115.

Isolated intradural-extramedullary spinal cysticercosis: a case report.

Spinal cysticercosis is an uncommon manifestation of neurocysticercosis (NCC). We present a case of isolated lumbar intradural-extramedullary NCC. The patient was treated successfully with the surgical removal of the cyst. Spinal NCC should be considered in the differential diagnosis in high-risk populations with new symptoms suggestive of a spinal mass lesion.

Transfusion-transmitted babesiosis in an immunocompromised patient: a case report and review.

Babesiosis is a tick- and transfusion-borne disease caused by intraerythrocytic Babesia parasites. In 2009, a 61-year-old Minnesota woman with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and a history of recent chemotherapy and numerous blood transfusions for gastrointestinal bleeding became febrile and anemic 12 days postsplenectomy. Babesia were visualized on blood smears, confirmed by polymerase chain reaction as B. microti. She developed respiratory failure despite initiation of clindamycin and quinine, and required 12 weeks of azithromycin and atovaquone before blood smear and polymerase chain reaction findings were negative. Serologic evidence of B. microti infection was identified in 1 associated blood donor and 1 other recipient of that donor's blood. Babesia infection can be asymptomatic or cause mild to fulminant disease resulting in multiorgan failure or death. Patients with advanced age, asplenia, or other immune compromise are at risk for severe babesiosis and may require prolonged treatment to eradicate parasitemia. Incidence of transfusion-transmitted babesiosis has increased over the past decade.