Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of pathological T3a upstaging in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma undergoing partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate predictive factors and oncological outcomes of pathological T3a upstaging in renal cell carcinoma patients who were initially diagnosed as clinical T1 and treated with partial nephrectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The clinical records and survival data of 1617 patients, who had undergone partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma at Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan between January 2011 and December 2020, were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of 1617 clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma patients who underwent partial nephrectomy, 28 (1.73%) had pathological T3a upstaging. In the multivariable analysis for pathological T3a upstaging using logistic regression models, male sex and clinical T1b were significant factors associated with pathological T3a upstaging (male sex: odds ratio = 5.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-21.8, clinical T1b: odds ratio = 8.36, 95% confidence interval: 3.56-19.6). The Kaplan-Meier method of the recurrence-free survival showed shorter recurrence-free survival in patients with pathological T3a upstaging than in those with pathological T1 (P < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression models, pathological T3a upstaging was no longer significantly associated with recurrence-free survival after adjustment for other pathological factors (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 0.58-4.36). In a sensitivity analysis that analyzed its components individually instead of whole pathological T3a, neither perinephric fat invasion, sinus fat invasion, nor renal vein invasion was associated with recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Male sex and clinical T1b were significant predictors for pathological T3a upstaging after partial nephrectomy in clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma patients. Although patients with pathological T3a upstaging had worse recurrence-free survival compared with those without upstaging, multivariable analyses revealed that pathological T3a upstaging was not an independent predictor for poor recurrence-free survival.

Renal cell carcinoma outcomes in end-stage renal disease: A 40-year study from two Japanese institutions.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to analyze the outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over a 40-year span. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data of patients with ESRD-RCC diagnosed between 1979 and 2020 at two institutions. We assessed changes in stage, surgical approaches, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) following nephrectomy according to era between ESRD-RCC and sporadic RCC. Furthermore, perioperative outcomes in patients with ESRD-RCC were compared between laparoscopic and open surgery. RESULTS: Patients with ESRD-RCC (n = 549) were diagnosed at an earlier stage (p = 0.0276), and the ratio of laparoscopic nephrectomy was increased (p < 0.0001) according to eras. Since 2000 (i.e., after implementation of laparoscopic nephrectomy), patients with ESRD-RCC (n = 305) had significantly shorter CSS (p = 0.0063) after nephrectomy than sporadic RCC (n = 2732). After adjustment by multivariate analysis and propensity score matching, ESRD status was independently associated with shorter CSS (p = 0.0055 and p = 0.0473, respectively). Improved CSS in sporadic RCC (p < 0.0001), but not ESRD-RCC (p = 0.904), according to era contributed to this difference. Laparoscopic nephrectomy showed favorable outcomes, including shorter surgery time, lower estimated bleeding volumes, transfusion rates, and readmission rates, and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open nephrectomy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Advances in diagnostic and treatment modalities potentially enable early diagnosis and minimally invasive surgery for patients with ESRD-RCC. As ESRD-RCC may not present indolently, careful post-operative monitoring is needed.

Surgical and functional outcomes of repeat robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy compared with repeat open partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the surgical and functional outcomes of patients who have undergone repeat open partial nephrectomy (reOPN) or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (reRAPN). METHODS: Until May 2022, 3310 patients with renal tumors underwent nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) at affiliated institutions. Of these, 22 and 17 patients who underwent reOPN and reRAPN, respectively, were included in this study. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of sex, age, comorbidities, recurrent tumor size at repeat NSS, interval from recurrence to initial NSS, and nephrometry score. ReRAPN had a shorter operative time (median: 138.0 vs. 214.0 min; p = 0.0023) and less estimated blood loss (median: 50.0 vs. 255.0 mL; p = 0.0261) than reOPN. The incidence of complications with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 was higher in the reOPN group than in the reRAPN group (31.8 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.0467). The mean decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups. The trifecta achievement rates in the reRAPN (64.7%) and reOPN (27.3%) groups were significantly different (p = 0.0194). On multivariate analysis, age and surgical method were significant predictors of trifecta achievement after partial nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in postoperative renal functional outcomes between reOPN and reRAPN. ReRAPN is superior to reOPN in terms of surgical burden. Therefore, ReRAPN is an important minimally invasive surgery for recurrent renal cell carcinoma.

Real-world efficacy and safety of cabozantinib following immune checkpoint inhibitor failure in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data of cabozantinib after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japanese population are limited. Additionally, prognostic factors of cabozantinib in this setting are still unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data of 56 patients treated with cabozantinib subsequent to failed immune checkpoint inhibitors at four institutions. Regarding the efficacy profile, progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate were assessed. In terms of the safety profile, rate of adverse events, dose reduction and treatment interruption were assessed. Furthermore, risk factors of progression-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (52%) were treated with cabozantinib as second-line therapy. Most frequent prior immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy as first-line therapy (n = 30, 54%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.76 and 25.5 months, respectively, and objective response rate was 34%. All patients experienced at least one adverse event, and grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 31 patients (55%). Forty-four (79%) and 31 (55%) patients needed dose reduction and treatment interruption, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that reduced initial dose (i.e. <60 mg) (hazard ratio: 2.50, P = 0.0355) and presence of lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.50, P = 0.0172) were independent factors of shorter progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: Cabozantinib in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who failed immune checkpoint inhibitors was efficacious and had a manageable safety profile. These results appear to be similar to those of previous clinical trials.

Impact of sex on prognosis in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic impact of sex in patients with malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors has been intensively discussed but remains unclear, especially in advanced renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a total of 184 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with either nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined treatment as first-line therapy (n = 73) or nivolumab as later-line therapy (n = 111) at our affiliated institutions. Progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate as well as adverse event profile were compared between sexes. RESULTS: Of the total 184 patients, 48 (26%) were female. Female patients had a significantly shorter progression-free survival than male patients (median: 3.8 vs. 8.3 months, P = 0.0005), but overall survival (median: 39.2 vs. 45.1 months, P = 0.283) and objective response rate (29% vs. 42%, P = 0.119) were not different between them. Similar findings were observed when analyzing within each treatment; in both patient groups treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined therapy and nivolumab monotherapy, progression-free survival was significantly shorter in female than in male patients (P = 0.007, P = 0.017), but overall survival (P = 0.914, P = 0.117) and objective response rate (P = 0.109, P = 0.465) were comparable between them. Moreover, in a more restricted cohort consisting of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, a shorter progression-free survival in female patients was also observed (3.8 vs. 11.0 months, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study showed that immune checkpoint inhibitors-based treatment for renal cell carcinoma exhibited less marked effects in female than in male patients. Thus, sex may be an important factor for decision-making on systemic therapy as renal cell carcinoma treatment, although further studies are required to validate the present findings.

Outcomes of nivolumab monotherapy for previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a real-world multi-institution data with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term follow-up outcomes of nivolumab monotherapy for previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma, using real-world data. METHODS: A total of 121 patients were treated with nivolumab monotherapy as subsequent therapy after the failure of prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy between January 2013 and December 2021 at four affiliated institutions. To evaluate the outcome after 2 years or more, we selected patients in whom nivolumab therapy was started in December 2019 or earlier because data collection was performed until the end of December 2021. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were evaluated. During the median follow-up period of 25.8 months, 62 (84%) and 40 (54%) patients had disease progression and died, respectively. Nivolumab was administered as second-line therapy in 43 patients (58%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.52 and 31.1 months, respectively, and objective response rate was 36%. There was no difference in progression-free survival or overall survival based on the treatment line of nivolumab (P = 0.915, P = 0.559). The magnitude of tumor response and development of immune-related adverse events were significantly associated with progression-free survival (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, respectively) and overall survival (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0002, respectively). Treatment-related adverse events developed in 38 patients (51%), including 33 (45%) who had immune-related adverse events. Steroid administration was needed in nine patients (12%). CONCLUSIONS: The present real-world multi-institution study with long-term follow-up data demonstrates that nivolumab monotherapy is effective for previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma, prolonging survival, improving tumor response and has a manageable safety profile.

Therapeutic role of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the therapeutic role of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line systemic therapy at our affiliated institutions were retrospectively evaluated. We focused on the prognosis, including tumor responses in primary kidney and metastatic lesions in patients treated with deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy. In addition, the overall survival according to nephrectomy status (i.e. deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy vs. upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy vs. without cytoreductive nephrectomy) was compared. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 12.0 months, seven (30%) patients received deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy at a median time of 10.4 months after nivolumab plus ipilimumab initiation. All the patients showed tumor shrinkage in their primary kidney lesions, including six (86%) patients with ≥30% of shrinkage. Metastatic lesions were also shrunk by ≥30% in six (86%) patients, including two (29%) obtaining complete response. At the last time of follow-up, three (43%) patients were disease-free. The overall survival rate after nivolumab plus ipilimumab initiation tended to be higher in patients with deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy compared with those with upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (1-year survival rate: 100% vs. 72.4%, P = 0.0587) and those without cytoreductive nephrectomy (vs. 58.2%, P = 0.0613). CONCLUSIONS: The present retrospective data showed that deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy had the potential to exert a therapeutic effect in a subset of patients who obtained favorable tumor responses to nivolumab plus ipilimumab for a certain period. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the prognostic impact of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy after frontline immunotherapy in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Surgical and functional outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in adolescents and young adults: a propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer development in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) has elicited recent interest. We investigated the surgical and functional outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in AYAs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1023 patients with clinical stage I RCC who underwent RAPN before January 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: AYAs (aged 18-39 years) and non-AYAs (aged 40-89 years). The trifecta criteria, defined as a negative surgical margin, no perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade > 2), and preserved postoperative renal function (1-year postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate > 90% of baseline), were used to compare outcomes. We performed 1:1 propensity-score matching on the patient cohort. RESULTS: There were initially 125 and 898 patients in the AYAs and non-AYAs groups, respectively, and 108 patients were included in each group after propensity score matching. There were no significant differences in surgical factors (operation time, clamping ischemia time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, surgical complication rate) or renal function in the early postoperative period. The mean postoperative renal function was better (p = 0.0200) and the decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower (p = 0.0026) in AYAs than in non-AYAs 12 months postoperatively. The trifecta achievement rates in the AYAs and non-AYAs groups were significantly different (67.6% and 53.7%, respectively, p = 0.0220). CONCLUSION: Although there was no difference in surgical burden between the groups, the estimated glomerular filtration rate was better preserved in AYAs than in non-AYAs at 6 and 12 months post-RAPN.

Prognostic Impact of Trial-Eligibility Criteria in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of trial-eligibility criteria on outcome in real-world metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: mRCC patients treated with TKIs as first-line systemic therapy were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were determined as trial-ineligible when they met at least 1 following trial-ineligible criteria; Karnofsky performance status score <70, hemoglobin <9.0 g/dL, creatinine >2.4 mg/dL (male) or >2.0 mg/dL (female), calcium >12.0 mg/dL, platelet <100,000 /µL, neutrophil <1,500 /µL, nonclear-cell histology, and brain metastasis. RESULTS: Of 238 patients, 101 patients (42%) were determined as trial-ineligible. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the TKI initiation were significantly shorter in the trial-ineligible patients than in the trial-eligible patients (median PFS: 5.53 vs. 15.8 months, p < 0.0001; OS: 13.8 vs. 43.4 months, p < 0.0001). Objective response rate was also significantly lower in the trial-ineligible patients (15% vs. 37%, p = 0.0003). Multivariate analysis further showed that the trial-eligibility was an independent factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.46, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR: 2.39, p < 0.0001). In addition, the number of trial-ineligible factors were negatively correlated with PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: In real-word, the substantial number of mRCC patients did not meet the trial-eligibility criteria, and their outcome was worse than that in the trial-eligible patients. Further studies focusing on the outcome in real-world trial-ineligible patients in the immune checkpoint inhibitor era are warranted.

Hypopituitarism in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the incidence of hypopituitarism in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who received ipilimumab and nivolumab (I-P) therapy and compared patient characteristics and survival rates between patients with hypopituitarism and those without. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with mRCC who received I-P therapy as first-line treatment were the subjects of this retrospective study. The diagnosis of hypopituitarism was based on the hormone loading test. RESULTS: Hypopituitarism occurred in 41% (9/22) patients who received I-P therapy. Median time of diagnosis was 12 weeks (IQR: 9.5-20). Clinical symptoms, such as fatigue, weakness or fever, were observed in 7 patients, while 2 patients had no clinical presentation. The following deficiency patterns were observed: isolated ACTH in 4 patients, ACTH and GH in 2 patients, ACTH and TSH in 2 patients and triple deficiency (ACTH, GH and TSH) in 1 patient. All patients with hypopituitarism were in the IMDC intermediate group, while 46% of those without hypopituitarism were in the IMDC intermediate group. Other patient characteristics were not different between the two groups. Object response rate was 33% (3/9) in patients with hypopituitarism and 23% (3/13) in those without (P = 0.5954). Progression free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in those with hypopituitarism than those without (median: 24.7 vs. 4.5 months, P = 0.0008), while overall survival did not differ (P = 0.136). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the clinical trial, the incidence of hypopituitarism was higher than expected. Patients with hypopituitarism tended to have longer PFS, which may suggest that optimal management of hypopituitarism results in better prognosis.

Impact of sarcopenia on post-operative outcomes following nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus.

OBJECTIVE: Sarcopenia is associated with oncological outcomes in various types of cancer. However, the impact of sarcopenia in renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus remains unclear. We herein evaluated the prognostic significance of sarcopenia for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus following nephrectomy and thrombectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent nephrectomy and thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus at our department between 2004 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Their sarcopenic status, determined by sex, body mass index and skeletal muscle index, was calculated using pre-surgical radiographic imaging. We compared the post-operative cancer-specific survival and overall survival, surgical data and duration of post-operative hospitalization of sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. RESULTS: Out of 83 patients, 54 (65%) were sarcopenic. Sarcopenic patients had significantly shorter cancer-specific survival (median: 33.3 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0323) and overall survival (32.0 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0173) than non-sarcopenic patients. Furthermore, multivariate analyses showed that sarcopenia was an independent factor for cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio: 2.76, P = 0.0212) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.93, P = 0.014). The incidence rate of surgical complications (any grade: 35.2% vs. 27.6%, P = 0.482; grades ≥ 3: 7.4% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.648) or duration of post-operative hospitalization (median: 11 vs. 10 days, P = 0.148) was not significantly different between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study showed that sarcopenia was an independent prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus after nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy. Thus, sarcopenia evaluation can be utilized as an effective prognosticator of post-operative survival.

Prognostic impact of systemic therapy change in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Limited data are available regarding the effect of systemic therapy change in the post-cytokine era on survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). METHODS: Overall, 161 patients with synchronously mRCC were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were classified into three groups based on the time of diagnosis: (i) early molecular-targeted therapy (mTT) (2008-2011), (ii) late mTT (2012-8/2016) and (iii) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) eras (9/2016-2018). Overall survival (OS) after the diagnosis was compared among the eras. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients, 52 (32%), 75 (46%), and 34 patients (21%) were classified into the early mTT, late mTT and ICI eras, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the ICI and late mTT eras than that in the early mTT era (P = 0.0065 and P = 0.0010, respectively) but did not significantly differ between the ICI and late mTT eras (P = 0.389). In 112 patients undergoing CN and systemic therapy, OS was significantly longer in the ICI and late mTT eras than that in the early mTT era (P = 0.0432 and P = 0.0498, respectively) but did not significantly differ between the ICI and late mTT eras (P = 0.320). Multivariate analysis of OS in the 161 synchronous mRCC patients revealed that the era was an independent factor (P < 0.0001), together with the histopathological type (P = 0.0130), CN status (P = 0.0010), International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk (P = 0.0002) and liver metastasis status (P = 0.0124). CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis showed that systemic therapy change in the post-cytokine era improved OS of mRCC patients undergoing CN.

Assessing improvements in metastatic renal cell carcinoma systemic treatments from the pre-cytokine to the immune checkpoint inhibitor eras: a retrospective analysis of real-world data.

OBJECTIVE: Studies assessing outcome improvements over a long period according to systemic therapy strategies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma using real-world data, including the results of the recent era of immune checkpoint inhibitors, are limited. Herein, we retrospectively evaluated patients who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma over a 40-year span. METHODS: Patients were classified into four groups based on when their metastases were diagnosed as follows: (i) the pre-cytokine era (1980-1986), (ii) the cytokine era (1987-2007), (iii) the molecular-targeted therapy (mTT) era (2008 to August 2016) and (iv) the immune checkpoint inhibitor era (September 2016 to 2018). The immune checkpoint inhibitor era consisted of second- or later-line nivolumab. Overall survival from the diagnoses of metastases was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 576 patients were evaluated, including 22 (3.82%), 231 (40.1%), 253 (43.9%) and 70 (12.2%) patients from the pre-cytokine, cytokine, molecular-targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor eras, respectively. The overall survival significantly improved with each successive era (median: 13.1 vs. 24.5 vs. 44.4 months vs. not reached in pre-cytokine vs. cytokine vs. molecular-targeted therapy vs. immune checkpoint inhibitor eras, P < 0.0001). The implementation of molecular-targeted therapy improved overall survival compared with that of cytokine (cytokine vs. molecular-targeted therapy eras, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the era was an independent factor for overall survival (P < 0.0001), together with histopathological type; metastasis status (i.e. synchronous or metachronous); systemic therapy status (i.e. absence or presence) and bone, liver or lymph node metastasis status (all, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study of real-world data indicated that metastatic renal cell carcinoma outcomes improved with successive systemic therapy paradigms.

Modest efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Combined immunotherapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma showed prolonged progression-free survival and high objective response rate in a randomized phase III clinical trial. However, the efficacy of this treatment for papillary renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. In the present study, we analysed the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy for papillary renal cell carcinoma compared with that for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 30 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received nivolumab and ipilimumab as first-line therapy between December 2015 and May 2020. The objective response rate, progression-free survival and toxicity were compared between the two groups (clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma). RESULTS: Out of 30 patients, 7 and 23 were diagnosed with papillary renal cell carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma, respectively. With a median follow-up of 7.2 months, the median progression-free survival was significantly shorter in papillary renal cell carcinoma than in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (2.4 vs. 28.1 months, P = 0.014). Of the seven patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma, one had partial response, one had stable disease and five had progressive disease, resulting in an objective response rate of 14.2%, which was lower compared to that of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (14.2 vs. 52.1%, P = 0.06). Discontinuation due to toxicity was not observed with papillary renal cell carcinoma, meanwhile 60.8% of patient with clear cell renal cell carcinoma discontinued treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had modest efficacy for papillary renal cell carcinoma compared with that for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab remains an option for a limited number of patients with intermediate- or poor-risk papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Association of tumor burden with outcome in first-line therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prognostic impact of tumor burden in patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy for previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 62 patients with IMDC intermediate- or poor-risk mRCC, treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy at five affiliated institutions. Tumor burden was defined as the sum of diameters of baseline targeted lesions according to the RECIST version.1.1. We categorized the patients into two groups based on the median value of tumor burden (i.e., high vs. low). The association of tumor burden with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment was analyzed. RESULTS: The median tumor burden was 63.0 cm (interquartile range: 34.2-125.8). PFS was significantly shorter in patients with high tumor burden (n = 31) than in those with low tumor burden (n = 31) (median: 6.08 [95% CI: 2.73-9.70] vs. 12.5 [4.77-24.0] months, P = 0.0134). In addition, OS tended to be shorter in patients with high tumor burden; however, there was no statistically significant difference (1-year rate: 77.3 vs. 96.7%, P = 0.166). ORR was not significantly different between patients with high and low tumor burden (35 vs. 55%, P = 0.202). Multivariate analysis of PFS further showed that tumor burden was an independent factor (HR: 2.22 [95% CI: 1.11-4.45], P = 0.0242). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor burden might be a useful factor for outcome prediction, at least for PFS prediction, in patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab for mRCC. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Preoperative autologous blood donation for kidney transplant and end-stage renal disease patients: A single-center study.

Although preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) has many advantages, there has been a decrease in the performance due to a decrease in the residual risk of allogeneic blood transfusion. In allogeneic blood transfusion, anti HLA antibodies and donor-specific antibodies mediate antibody-mediated rejection, which results in graft failure. PABD for anemic patients such as those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and a kidney transplant is relatively contraindicated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients who underwent PABD and elucidate the safety and feasibility of PABD. We performed PABD safely in ten ESRD patients and nine kidney transplant patients and retrospectively analyzed medical records of the hospital. All kidney transplant patients avoided allogeneic blood transfusion, but 4 out of 10 ESRD patients had allogeneic blood transfusion, even if their blood donation volume was larger than those of the kidney transplant patients. It depends on the type of operation; cardiovascular surgery was more common in ESRD patients, and orthopedic surgery was more common in kidney transplant patients. There was profuse bleeding in cardiovascular surgery compared to orthopedic surgery because of longer operation time of the former. Completely avoiding allogeneic blood transfusion in major surgery was rather difficult even if PABD was performed. To prevent the formation of anti- HLA antibodies, PABD would be considered for ESRD patients undergoing kidney transplantation and kidney transplant patients that are potential candidates for secondary kidney transplantation.

Outcome of advanced renal cell carcinoma arising in end-stage renal disease: comparison with sporadic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The data regarding oncological outcome in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are limited. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with advanced RCC on maintenance dialysis therapy (ESRD-RCC) and treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were retrospectively evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) after initiation of first-line TKI therapy in ESRD-RCC patients were compared to those in RCC arising in the general population (sporadic RCC). RESULTS: A total of 36 and 240 patients were diagnosed with advanced ESRD-RCC and sporadic RCC, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with ESRD-RCC than in those with sporadic RCC (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0045). After adjusting for histopathological type, MSKCC risk and liver metastasis status, ESRD status (ESRD-RCC vs. sporadic RCC) was not an independent risk factor for PFS or OS (both, p > 0.05). The ORR tended to be lower in patients with ESRD-RCC than in those with sporadic RCC (11% vs. 28%, p = 0.0833). In 34 patients with ESRD-RCC treated with sorafenib, longer duration of dialysis was an independent prognostic factor for shorter OS (hazard ratio 3.21, p = 0.0370). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome of advanced ESRD-RCC was poorer than that of sporadic RCC, but this finding was affected by other prognostic factors. Nevertheless, the study suggested that advanced ESRD-RCC was not an indolent disease. Additionally, patients with a longer duration of dialysis therapy might require careful monitoring.

Efficacy of nivolumab versus molecular-targeted therapy as second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Real-world data from two Japanese institutions.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of nivolumab with that of molecular-targeted therapy as a second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma using real-world data. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who received nivolumab or molecular-targeted therapy after the failure of first-line molecular-targeted therapy between January 2008 and December 2019 at two Japanese institutions. Progression-free survival and overall survival after the initiation of second-line therapy were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Objective response rate was assessed based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: Among 159 patients, 43 (27%) and 116 (73%) patients received nivolumab and molecular-targeted therapy as second-line therapy, respectively. During follow up (median 11.1 months), 129 (81%) and 98 (62%) patients had disease progression and died, respectively. Progression-free survival was comparable between the two treatments (median 5.06 vs 5.95 months, P = 0.881), whereas overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab than with molecular-targeted therapy (not reached vs 13.0 months, P = 0.0008). Multivariate analysis further showed that nivolumab therapy was an independent favorable factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 0.33, P = 0.0007). In 151 patients with eligible radiographic data, the objective response rate was significantly higher in nivolumab than in molecular-targeted therapy (n = 14/41 [34%] vs n = 20/110 [18%], P = 0.0485). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data analysis suggests superior efficacy of nivolumab over molecular-targeted therapy as second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Clinical outcomes of repeat partial nephrectomy compared to initial partial nephrectomy of a solitary kidney.

BACKGROUND: When local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) occurs after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) on the ipsilateral side, some surgeons hesitate to perform reoperative surgery because of possible difficulties. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of repeat partial nephrectomy (RePN) compared with those of initial partial nephrectomy (iPN) for RCC of a solitary kidney. METHODS: Until September 2017, 1671 patients with renal tumors underwent NSS. Of these, 79 patients who underwent NSS for sporadic RCC of a solitary kidney were included. Parameters were compared using the Mann-Whitney U, Pearson Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent RePN and 68 underwent iPN. The RePN group had a relatively smaller tumor size (p = 0.0432), longer operative time (p = 0.0432), and higher estimated blood loss (p = 0.0002) than the iPN group. No significant differences in the other clinical factors were found between the groups. The rates of perioperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade II were 18.2% and 17.6% in the RePN group and iPN group, respectively. The mean decreasing rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate was not different between the groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant differences were found in hemodialysis-free survival (p = 0.7392) and intrarenal recurrence-free survival (p = 0.4924) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes of RePN were not significantly different compared with those of iPN for patients with sporadic RCC of a solitary kidney. RePN is technically feasible with acceptable complication and local recurrence rates with better postoperative kidney function.

Comparable efficacy and safety between second-line and later-line nivolumab therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab as second-line and later-line (third-line or thereafter) therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: Sixty-seven patients who received nivolumab after the failure of at least one molecular-targeted therapy were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups based on the line of nivolumab: second-line and later-line groups. Efficacy was assessed using progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) after nivolumab initiation, and objective response rate. Safety was assessed using the incidence of immune-related adverse events. These outcomes were compared between the second-line and later-line groups. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (62.7%) received nivolumab as second-line therapy. There was no significant difference in the progression-free survival (median: 5.06 vs. 6.28 months, p = 0.691) or objective response rate (35.7% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.757) between the second-line and later-line groups. The OS tended to be longer in the second-line group (not reached vs. 26.0 months, p = 0.118), and the rate of patients who received subsequent therapy after nivolumab failure was significantly higher in the second-line group (90.9% vs. 55.0%, p = 0.0025). There was no difference in the incidences of immune-related adverse events between the second-line and later-line groups (any grade: 54.8% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.592; grade ≥ 3: 19.1% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.924). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of nivolumab did not deteriorate and the tolerability was also maintained even in later-line therapy. However, a tendency of longer OS and a higher chance of subsequent therapy after nivolumab failure were observed with nivolumab as second-line therapy.