RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hypothermia is common in trauma victims and is associated with an increase in mortality. Its causes are not well understood. Our objective was to identify the factors influencing the onset of hypothermia during pre-hospital care of trauma victims. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, open, observational study in a pre-hospital setting. RESULTS: A total of 448 patients were included. Hypothermia (<35 °C) on hospital arrival was present in 64/448 patients (14%). Significant factors associated with the absence of hypothermia in a multivariate analysis were no intubation: Odds Ratio: 4.23 (95% confidence interval 1.62 to 1.02); RTS: 1.68 (1.29 to 2.20); mobile unit temperature: 1.20 (1.04 to 1.38); infusion fluid temperature: 1.17 (1.05 to 1.30); patient not unclothed: 0.40 (0.18 to 0.90); and no head injury: 0.36 (0.16 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The key risk factor for the onset of hypothermia was the severity of injury but environmental conditions and the medical care provided by EMS were also significant factors. Changes in practice could help reduce the impact of factors such as infusion fluid temperature and mobile unit temperature.
Assuntos
Hipotermia/etiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Adulto , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipotermia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypothermia is common in trauma victims and is associated with increased mortality, however its causes are little known. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with hypothermia in prehospital management of trauma victims. METHODS: This was an ancillary analysis of data recorded in the HypoTraum study, a prospective multicenter study conducted by the emergency medical services (EMS) of 8 hospitals in France. Inclusion criteria were: trauma victim, age over 18 years, and victim receiving prehospital care from an EMS team and transported to hospital by the EMS team in a medically equipped mobile intensive care unit. The following data were recorded: victim demographics, circumstances of the trauma, environmental factors, patient presentation, clinical data and time from accident to EMS arrival. Independent risk factors for hypothermia were analyzed in a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 461 trauma patients were included in the study. Road traffic accidents (N = 261; 57%) and falls (N = 65; 14%) were the main causes of trauma. Hypothermia (<35 °C) was present in 136/461 cases (29%). Independent factors significantly associated with the presence of hypothermia were: a low GCS (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0,87 ([0,81-0,92]; p < 0.0001), a low air temperature (OR = 0,93 [0,91-0,96]; p < 0.0001) and a wet patient (OR = 2,08 [1,08-4,00]; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The incidence of hypothermia was high on EMS arrival at the scene. Body temperature measurement and immediate thermal protection should be routine, and special attention should be given to patients who are wet. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, multicenter, open, observational study; Level IV.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Hipotermia/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Adulto , Ambulâncias , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipotermia/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicaçõesRESUMO
AIM: Evaluation of team performances during medical simulation must rely on validated and reproducible tools. Our aim was to build and validate a French version of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) score, which was developed for the assessment of team performance and non-technical skills during resuscitation. METHODS: A forward and backward translation of the initial TEAM score was made, with the agreement and the final validation by the original author. Ten medical teams were recruited and performed a standardized cardiac arrest simulation scenario. Teams were videotaped and nine raters evaluate non-technical skills for each team thanks to the French TEAM Score. Psychometric properties of the score were then evaluated. RESULTS: French TEAM score showed an excellent reliability with a Cronbach coefficient of 0.95. Mean correlation coefficient between each item and the global score range was 0.78. The inter-rater reliability measured by intraclass correlation coefficient of the global score was 0.93. Finally, expert teams had higher French TEAM score than intermediate and novice teams. CONCLUSION: The French TEAM score shows good psychometric properties to evaluate team performance during cardiac arrest simulation. Its utilization could help in the assessment of non-technical skills during simulation.
Assuntos
Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Equipe de Respostas Rápidas de Hospitais , Ressuscitação/normas , Adulto , Competência Clínica , Características Culturais , Feminino , Humanos , Idioma , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
AIM: Supraglottic devices are thought to allow efficient ventilation and continuous chest compressions during cardiac arrest. Therefore, the use of supraglottic devices could increase the chest compression fraction (CCF), a critical determinant of patient survival. The aim of this study was to assess the CCF in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients ventilated with a supraglottic device. METHODS: We conducted an open prospective multicenter study with temporal clusters. OHCA patients treated by emergency nurses received either intermittent chest compressions with bag-valve mask ventilations (30:2 rhythm; BVM group); or continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations by laryngeal tube (LT group). The primary endpoint was the CCF assessed using an accelerometer connected to the defibrillator. We also investigated the ease of use of the laryngeal tube. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (41 in each group); 68% were male and the median age was 68 (54-80) years. Patients and cardiac arrest characteristics did not differ between groups. The CCF was 75% (68-79%) in the LT group and 59% (51-68%) in the BVM group (p<0.01). LT insertion failed in nine out of 40 cases (23%). The median time of LT insertion was 26s (11-56 s). CCF was significantly lower when LT insertion failed (58% (48-74%) vs. 76% (72-80%) when LT insertion succeeded; p=0.01). CONCLUSION: The use of the LT during OHCA increases the CCF when compared to standard BVM ventilation. However, the impact of LT use on mortality remains unclear.
Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Acelerometria/métodos , Idoso , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Desfibriladores/efeitos adversos , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/prevenção & controle , França , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
PURPOSE: Mild therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is recommended as soon as possible after the return of spontaneous circulation to improve outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Preclinical data suggest that the benefit of TH could be increased if treatment is started during cardiac arrest. We aimed to study the impact of intra-arrest therapeutic hypothermia (IATH) on neurological injury and inflammation following OHCA. METHODS: We conducted a 1:1 randomized, multicenter study in three prehospital emergency medical services and four critical care units in France. OHCA patients, irrespective of the initial rhythm, received either an infusion of cold saline and external cooling during cardiac arrest (IATH group) or TH started after hospital admission (hospital-cooling group). The primary endpoint was neuron-specific enolase (NSE) serum concentrations at 24 h. Secondary endpoints included IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 concentrations, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Of the 245 patients included, 123 were analyzed in the IATH group and 122 in the hospital-cooling group. IATH decreased time to reach temperature ≤ 34 °C by 75 min (95% CI: 4; 269). The rate of patients admitted alive to hospital was not different between groups [IATH n = 41 (33%) vs. hospital cooling n = 36 (30%); p = 0.51]. Levels of NSE and inflammatory biomarkers were not different between groups [median NSE at 24 h: IATH 96.7 µg/l (IQR: 49.9-142.8) vs. hospital cooling 97.6 µg/l (IQR: 74.3-142.4), p = 0.64]. No difference in survival and cerebral performance were found at 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: IATH did not affect biological markers of inflammation or brain damage or clinical outcome.