Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 98(5): 873-877, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34870543

RESUMO

PURPOSE: An effective response for a mass-casualty incident requires understanding the relevant basic science and physical impact; detailed preparedness among jurisdictions; and clear, sequential response planning, including formal operational exercises, logistics, interagency, and public-private coordination, rapid activation of resilience, and continual improvement from lessons learned and new knowledge. This ConRad 2021 meeting report describes steps for civilian medical and public health response planning for a nuclear detonation; the utility of this type of planning for broader application; and extension of this planning to the international community. CONCLUSION: A nuclear detonation requires a response within minutes to what will be a large-scale disaster complicated by radiation, including some elements that are similar to a broad range of incidents. The response could be further complicated if multiple incidents occur simultaneously. Required are detailed planning, preparedness and scripting for an immediate operational response, addressing clinical manifestations of evolving radiation illness, and flexibility to adapt to a rapidly changing situation. This need translates into the use of just-in-time information; effective, credible communication; situational awareness on a global scale; and a template upon which to apply capabilities in a multi-sector response. This effort is greatly facilitated using a 'playbook' approach, the basics of which are presented.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Lesões por Radiação , Humanos
2.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 13(5-6): 995-1010, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31203830

RESUMO

A national need is to prepare for and respond to accidental or intentional disasters categorized as chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or explosive (CBRNE). These incidents require specific subject-matter expertise, yet have commonalities. We identify 7 core elements comprising CBRNE science that require integration for effective preparedness planning and public health and medical response and recovery. These core elements are (1) basic and clinical sciences, (2) modeling and systems management, (3) planning, (4) response and incident management, (5) recovery and resilience, (6) lessons learned, and (7) continuous improvement. A key feature is the ability of relevant subject matter experts to integrate information into response operations. We propose the CBRNE medical operations science support expert as a professional who (1) understands that CBRNE incidents require an integrated systems approach, (2) understands the key functions and contributions of CBRNE science practitioners, (3) helps direct strategic and tactical CBRNE planning and responses through first-hand experience, and (4) provides advice to senior decision-makers managing response activities. Recognition of both CBRNE science as a distinct competency and the establishment of the CBRNE medical operations science support expert informs the public of the enormous progress made, broadcasts opportunities for new talent, and enhances the sophistication and analytic expertise of senior managers planning for and responding to CBRNE incidents.


Assuntos
Derramamento de Material Biológico/prevenção & controle , Vazamento de Resíduos Químicos/prevenção & controle , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Substâncias Explosivas/efeitos adversos , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos/prevenção & controle , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Planejamento em Desastres/tendências , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/tendências , Humanos
3.
Health Phys ; 114(2): 128-135, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30086001

RESUMO

The goals herein are to describe and discuss existing plans for the medical preparedness and response to a radiological incident/nuclear detonation, present the systems approach to nuclear response, introduce methods to assess operational capabilities, and posit suggestions for the way forward to implementation. This discussion seeks to review where these U.S. government efforts began 10 y ago, then moves through the collective National progress in preparedness planning for an improvised nuclear device detonation and differentiates between important preparedness planning efforts and the challenges of understanding national implementation. Finally, a way forward for the immediate future is suggested.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa/prevenção & controle , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Terrorismo , Defesa Civil , Humanos
4.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 12(3): 386-395, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29911522

RESUMO

ABSTRACTOne of the biggest medical challenges after the detonation of a nuclear device will be implementing a strategy to assess the severity of radiation exposure among survivors and to triage them appropriately. Those found to be at significant risk for radiation injury can be prioritized to receive potentially lifesaving myeloid cytokines and to be evacuated to other communities with intact health care infrastructure prior to the onset of severe complications of bone marrow suppression. Currently, the most efficient and accessible triage method is the use of sequential complete blood counts to assess lymphocyte depletion kinetics that correlate with estimated whole-body dose radiation exposure. However, even this simple test will likely not be available initially on the scale required to assess the at-risk population. Additional variables such as geographic location of exposure, sheltering, and signs and symptoms may be useful for initial sorting. An interdisciplinary working group composed of federal, state, and local public health experts proposes an Exposure And Symptom Triage (EAST) tool combining estimates of exposure from maps with clinical assessments and single lymphocyte counts if available. The proposed tool may help sort survivors efficiently at assembly centers near the damage and fallout zones and enable rapid prioritization for appropriate treatment and transport. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018; 12: 386-395).


Assuntos
Exposição à Radiação/análise , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Triagem/métodos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Lesões por Radiação/terapia , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos , Terrorismo , Triagem/normas
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 172(1-3): 38-46, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27473694

RESUMO

The public health and medical response to a radiological or nuclear incident requires the capability to sort, assess, treat, triage and to ultimately discharge, refer or transport people to their next step in medical care. The size of the incident and scarcity of resources at the location of each medical decision point will determine how patients are triaged and treated. This will be a rapidly evolving situation impacting medical responders at regional, national and international levels. As capabilities, diagnostics and medical countermeasures improve, a dynamic system-based approach is needed to plan for and manage the incident, and to adapt effectively in real time. In that the concepts and terms can be unfamiliar and possibly confusing, resources and a concept of operations must be considered well in advance. An essential underlying tenet is that medical evaluation and care will be managed by healthcare professionals with biodosimetry assays providing critical supporting data.


Assuntos
Bioensaio/métodos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Administrativas/organização & administração , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Modelos Organizacionais , Monitoramento de Radiação/métodos , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos , Triagem/organização & administração , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração
6.
Health Phys ; 108(2): 149-60, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25551496

RESUMO

Resilience and the ability to mitigate the consequences of a nuclear incident are enhanced by (1) effective planning, preparation and training; (2) ongoing interaction, formal exercises, and evaluation among the sectors involved; (3) effective and timely response and communication; and (4) continuous improvements based on new science, technology, experience, and ideas. Public health and medical planning require a complex, multi-faceted systematic approach involving federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments; private sector organizations; academia; industry; international partners; and individual experts and volunteers. The approach developed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Nuclear Incident Medical Enterprise (NIME) is the result of efforts from government and nongovernment experts. It is a "bottom-up" systematic approach built on the available and emerging science that considers physical infrastructure damage, the spectrum of injuries, a scarce resources setting, the need for decision making in the face of a rapidly evolving situation with limited information early on, timely communication, and the need for tools and just-in-time information for responders who will likely be unfamiliar with radiation medicine and uncertain and overwhelmed in the face of the large number of casualties and the presence of radioactivity. The components of NIME can be used to support planning for, response to, and recovery from the effects of a nuclear incident. Recognizing that it is a continuous work-in-progress, the current status of the public health and medical preparedness and response for a nuclear incident is provided.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Guerra Nuclear , Comunicação , Governo Federal , Órgãos Governamentais , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Radiação , Lesões por Radiação , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos , Radiobiologia , Radiometria , Risco , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Homeland Security
7.
Health Phys ; 106(6): 645-51, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24776895

RESUMO

Effective decision making during a rapidly evolving emergency such as a radiological or nuclear incident requires timely interim decisions and communications from onsite decision makers while further data processing, consultation, and review are ongoing by reachback experts. The authors have recently proposed a medical decision model for use during a radiological or nuclear disaster, which is similar in concept to that used in medical care, especially when delay in action can have disastrous effects. For decision makers to function most effectively during a complex response, they require access to onsite subject matter experts who can provide information, recommendations, and participate in public communication efforts. However, in the time before this expertise is available or during the planning phase, just-in-time tools are essential that provide critical overview of the subject matter written specifically for the decision makers. Recognizing the complexity of the science, risk assessment, and multitude of potential response assets that will be required after a nuclear incident, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, in collaboration with other government and non-government experts, has prepared a practical guide for decision makers. This paper illustrates how the medical decision model process could facilitate onsite decision making that includes using the deliberative reachback process from science and policy experts and describes the tools now available to facilitate timely and effective incident management.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Modelos Teóricos , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos , Saúde Radiológica , Emergências , Humanos , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa
8.
Health Phys ; 106(4): 516-22, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24562072

RESUMO

In the moments immediately following a nuclear detonation, casualties with a variety of injuries including trauma, burns, radiation exposure, and combined injuries would require immediate assistance. Accurate and timely radiation dose assessments, based on patient history and laboratory testing, are absolutely critical to support adequately the triage and treatment of those affected. This capability is also essential for ensuring the proper allocation of scarce resources and will support longitudinal evaluation of radiation-exposed individuals and populations. To maximize saving lives, casualties must be systematically triaged to determine what medical interventions are needed, the nature of those interventions, and who requires intervention immediately. In the National Strategy for Improving the Response and Recovery for an Improvised Nuclear Device (IND) Attack, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security recognized laboratory capacity for radiation biodosimetry as having a significant gap for performing mass radiation dose assessment. The anticipated demand for radiation biodosimetry exceeds its supply, and this gap is partly linked to the limited number and analytical complexity of laboratory methods for determining radiation doses within patients. The dicentric assay is a key component of a cytogenetic biodosimetry response asset, as it has the necessary sensitivity and specificity for assessing medically significant radiation doses. To address these shortfalls, the authors have developed a multimodal strategy to expand dicentric assay capacity. This strategy includes the development of an internet-based cytogenetics network that would address immediately the labor intensive burden of the dicentric chromosome assay by increasing the number of skilled personnel to conduct the analysis. An additional option that will require more time includes improving surge capabilities by combining resources available within the country's 150 clinical cytogenetics laboratories. Key to this intermediate term effort is the fact that geneticists and technicians may be experts in matters related to identifying chromosomal abnormalities related to genetic disorders, but they are not familiar with dosimetry for which training and retraining will be required. Finally, long-term options are presented to improve capacity focus on ways to automate parts of the dicentric chromosome assay method.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos , Radiometria/métodos , Triagem/métodos , Automação , Aberrações Cromossômicas/efeitos da radiação , Citogenética , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Explosões , Humanos , Armas Nucleares , Doses de Radiação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos
9.
Health Phys ; 105(6): 540-54, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24162058

RESUMO

Following a mass-casualty nuclear disaster, effective medical triage has the potential to save tens of thousands of lives. In order to best use the available scarce resources, there is an urgent need for biodosimetry tools to determine an individual's radiation dose. Initial triage for radiation exposure will include location during the incident, symptoms, and physical examination. Stepwise triage will include point of care assessment of less than or greater than 2 Gy, followed by secondary assessment, possibly with high throughput screening, to further define an individual's dose. Given the multisystem nature of radiation injury, it is unlikely that any single biodosimetry assay can be used as a standalone tool to meet the surge in capacity with the timeliness and accuracy needed. As part of the national preparedness and planning for a nuclear or radiological incident, the authors reviewed the primary literature to determine the capabilities and limitations of a number of biodosimetry assays currently available or under development for use in the initial and secondary triage of patients. Understanding the requirements from a response standpoint and the capability and logistics for the various assays will help inform future biodosimetry technology development and acquisition. Factors considered include: type of sample required, dose detection limit, time interval when the assay is feasible biologically, time for sample preparation and analysis, ease of use, logistical requirements, potential throughput, point-of-care capability, and the ability to support patient diagnosis and treatment within a therapeutically relevant time point.


Assuntos
Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos , Radiometria/métodos , Triagem/métodos , Bioensaio , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Fenômenos Biofísicos , Cromossomos Humanos/genética , Cromossomos Humanos/efeitos da radiação , Análise Citogenética , Citocinese/efeitos da radiação , Dano ao DNA , Hematologia , Humanos , Linfócitos/citologia , Linfócitos/efeitos da radiação , MicroRNAs/genética , Testes para Micronúcleos , Neutrófilos/citologia , Neutrófilos/efeitos da radiação , Transcriptoma/efeitos da radiação
10.
Biosecur Bioterror ; 10(4): 346-71, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23244500

RESUMO

This article summarizes major points from a newly released guide published online by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR). The article reviews basic principles about radiation and its measurement, short-term and long-term effects of radiation, and medical countermeasures as well as essential information about how to prepare for and respond to a nuclear detonation. A link is provided to the manual itself, which in turn is heavily referenced for readers who wish to have more detail.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Planejamento em Desastres , Guerra Nuclear , Vigilância da População , Lesões por Radiação/terapia , Defesa Civil/educação , Abrigo de Emergência , Humanos , Agências Internacionais , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Radiometria , Transporte de Pacientes , Triagem , Estados Unidos
11.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 5 Suppl 1: S89-97, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21402817

RESUMO

For efficient and effective medical responses to mass casualty events, detailed advanced planning is required. For federal responders, this is an ongoing responsibility. The US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) prepares playbooks with formal, written plans that are reviewed, updated, and exercised regularly. Recognizing that state and local responders with fewer resources may be helped in creating their own event-specific response plans, subject matter experts from the range of sectors comprising the Scarce Resources for a Nuclear Detonation Project, provided for this first time a state and local planner's playbook template for responding to a nuclear detonation. The playbook elements are adapted from DHHS playbooks with appropriate modification for state and local planners. Individualization by venue is expected, reflecting specific assets, populations, geography, preferences, and expertise. This playbook template is designed to be a practical tool with sufficient background information and options for step-by-step individualized planning and response.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres , Guias como Assunto , Planejamento em Saúde , Governo Local , Armas Nucleares , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos , Governo Estadual , Humanos , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Lesões por Radiação/classificação , Lesões por Radiação/terapia , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos/classificação , Padrão de Cuidado , Terrorismo , Triagem , Estados Unidos , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa