RESUMO
There is no standard of care for unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Chemotherapy, alone or combined with radiotherapy, is commonly used mostly as palliative treatment; moreover, its poor safety profile limits its use most of the time, especially in elderly patients. Thus, alternative options are needed. Targeted molecular inhibitors, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab, seem promising, but data are limited. We retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes of cetuximab as a single agent in this indication. The primary endpoint was the Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 6 weeks according to RECIST criteria. Secondary endpoints included DCR at 12 weeks, objective response rate (ORR) at 6 and 12 weeks, progression-free-survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile. Fifty-eight patients received cetuximab as monotherapy. The median age was 83.2 (range, 47.4 to 96.1). The majority of patients was chemotherapy naïve. The median follow-up was 11.7 months (95% CI: 9.6-30.1). The DCR at 6 and 12 weeks was 87% and 70%, respectively. The ORR was 53% and 42%, respectively, at 6 and 12 weeks. The median PFS and OS were 9.7 months (95% CI: 4.8-43.4) and 17.5 months (95% CI: 9.4-43.1), respectively. Fifty-one patients (88%) experienced toxicity, and 67 adverse events related to cetuximab occurred. Most of them (84%) were grade 1 to 2. Our study shows that cetuximab is safe and efficient for the treatment of patients, even elderly ones, with advanced cSCC. These results indicate that cetuximab is a promising agent to test in new combinations, especially with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1 agents.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: FDG PET (PET)±computed tomography (CT) has increasingly been used in some areas of oncology imaging. It is sometimes performed outside recommendations, at diagnosis or monitoring of sarcomas. We assessed the value of PET-CT in routine practice in sarcomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive sarcoma adult patient charts presented at the multidisciplinary sarcoma meeting in a tertiary care center over a period of 10months were examined in order to analyze the performances of PET-CT when available. RESULTS: Of 232 patients, 50 (21 %) underwent a PET-CT. Sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT were 94.7 %, 57.1 %, respectively. SUV values were highly variable, including for a given histology or grade. PET-CT resulted in practice changing in 14 % of cases. When extrapulmonary metastases are suspected and for some subtypes of sarcomas, PET-CT could provide additional information because in view of its good sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Given the most frequent pulmonary tropism, first hand chest CT may be sufficient at first diagnostic work-up for the detection of pulmonary metastases. However, the relatively poor specificity suggests that further analyses should be performed to identify clinical situations where PET-CT may be of added value compared to current standards.