Preferences for Depression Help-Seeking Among Vietnamese American Adults.

Culture impacts help-seeking preferences. We examined Vietnamese Americans' help-seeking preferences for depressive symptoms, through a telephone survey (N = 1666). A vignette describing an age- and gender-matched individual with depression was presented, and respondents chose from a list of options and provided open-ended responses about their help-seeking preferences. Results showed that 78.3% would seek professional help, either from a family doctor, a mental health provider, or both; 54.4% preferred to seek help from a family doctor but not from a mental health provider. Most (82.1%) would prefer to talk to family or friends, 62.2% would prefer to look up information, and 50.1% would prefer to get spiritual help. Logistic regression analysis revealed that preferences for non-professional help-seeking options (such as talking to friends or family, looking up information, and getting spiritual help), health care access, and perceived poor health, were associated with increased odds of preferring professional help-seeking. This population-based study of Vietnamese Americans highlight promising channels to deliver education about depression and effective help-seeking resources, particularly the importance of family doctors and social networks. Furthermore, addressing barriers in access to care remains a critical component of promoting professional help-seeking.

Effect of polyethylene fiber reinforcement on marginal adaptation of composite resin in Class II preparations.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of polyethylene fibers incorporated in a composite resin matrix on the gingival marginal adaptation of Class II slot restorations. Sixty Class II slot cavity preparations were divided into 2 groups. A fiber-reinforced resin (FRR) group received restorations of composite resin mixed with strips of polyethylene fiber, and an unreinforced resin (UR) group was restored with only composite resin. The groups were subdivided on the basis of the adhesive system (etch-and-rinse or self-etch) that was used. Shrinkage stress was evaluated by placing a strain gauge at the buccal surface of the teeth. A scanning electron microscope was used to evaluate marginal adaptation in terms of a continuous margin (CM) at the gingival margin. Statistical analysis included a 2-way analysis of variance with the Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons at a significance level of 0.05. The mean strain value was significantly smaller in the FRR group (185 [SD 37] µm/m) than in the UR group (295 [SD 21] µm/m). The FRR group presented with a mean CM value of 80.2% (SD 4.6%), which was significantly higher than that of the UR group, which had an overall CM value of 64.4% (SD 4.2%). There was no statistically significant difference between the adhesive subgroups with regard to strain or percentage of CM. The results showed that the incorporation of polyethylene fibers in a composite resin matrix can help to improve gingival marginal adaptation in Class II cavities.

A Comparison of Psychosocial Services for Enhancing Cultural Adaptation and Global Functioning for Immigrant Survivors of Torture.

Forced migrants suffer from significant psychological distress. However, they often prioritize urgent practical resettlement needs over mental health needs. The present study used a quasi-experimental design to compare pathways of treatment for survivors of torture (N = 369) from 42 different counties receiving care from a refugee health clinic. Random intercept ANOVAs were used to compare combined case management services and psychological treatment (CM-PT) to case management services only (CM) on changes in cultural adaptation and global functioning over time. Results showed that both groups improved on each outcome. Importantly, the CM-PT group endorsed greater improvements in cultural adaptation (b = 0.28, 95% CI 0.14, 0.41, p ≤ 0.001) and global functioning (b = 3.29, 95% CI 1.33, 5.25, p = 0.001) compared to the CM group. These findings suggest that treatment for survivors of torture should be multifaceted and include case management and psychological treatment. Case management services alone may be beneficial when socio-cultural and resource barriers exist for mental health treatment.

Stressors and barriers to using mental health services among diverse groups of first-generation immigrants to the United States.

This study examined stressors and barriers to using mental health services among first-generation immigrants in San Jose, California. Focus groups for 30 immigrants from Cambodia, Eastern Europe, Iran, Iraq, Africa, and Vietnam were audio-recorded, translated and transcribed. Two researchers coded the data and identified themes pertaining to mental health stressors and barriers. Six primary stressors were identified: economic, discrimination, acculturation due to language differences, enculturation, parenting differences, and finding suitable employment. Primary barriers included: stigma, lack of a perceived norm in country of origin for using mental health services, competing cultural practices, lack of information, language barriers, and cost. A conceptual model is presented that may be used to inform the design and implementation of mental health services for this population.

Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of structurally compromised canals restored with different dowel methods.

PURPOSE: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated teeth with wide root canals restored with various dowel methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty human uniradicular mandibular premolar teeth were decoronated and endodontically treated. The canals were widened with diamond points. The specimens were divided into five groups on the basis of type of dowel method used: conventional custom-made cast metal dowel; single glass fiber-reinforced resin dowel; glass fiber-reinforced resin dowel with accessory fiber dowels; relined glass fiber-reinforced resin dowel; and dowels formed with the help of polyethylene fiber ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Specimens were restored with indirect composite crowns, and 150,000 cycles of cyclic loading were applied. The specimens were loaded to test the fracture resistance and fracture mode (repairable and nonrepairable). RESULTS: The cast metal dowel groups had the highest fracture resistance but showed nonrepairable fracture in 90% of specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Cast metal dowels had the highest fracture resistance but led to nonrepairable fracture while restoring the wide root canals under cyclic loading. Specimens restored with fiber dowels, accessory dowels, relined dowels, and ribbon-reinforced resin provided adequate fracture resistance with increased incidence of repairable fractures.

Effect of different root canal obturating materials on push-out bond strength of a fiber dowel.

PURPOSE: During dowel space preparation, the instrumentation forms a thick smear layer along with sealer-occluded dentinal tubules. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different obturating materials on push-out bond strength of a fiber dowel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty human uniradicular teeth were decoronated and prepared using the step-back technique. The specimens were divided into five groups on the basis of obturating materials: group I received no obturation; group II (ZOE) gutta-percha and zinc oxide eugenol sealer; group III (ZOAH) gutta-percha and AH plus sealer; group IV (GF) GuttaFlow; and group V (RE) with Resilon Epiphany system. Dowel spaces were made with manufacturer's provided drills, and a fiber dowel was luted. Horizontal slices were obtained from the middle third, and push-out bond strength (S) was evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test. RESULTS: The push-out bond strength values in the control group, ZOE, ZOAH, GF, and RE were 9.303 ± 0.565 MPa, 8.859 ± 0.539 MPa, 8.356 ± 0.618 MPa, 9.635 ± 0.435 MPa, and 8.572 ± 0.256 MPa, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the S values of all the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no effect of different tested obturating materials on the push-out bond strength of fiber dowels; however, further studies should be conducted.

Efficacy of Articaine Versus Lidocaine Administered as Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Double-blind Study.

INTRODUCTION: The present study comparatively evaluated the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine given as supplemental intraligamentary injections after a failed inferior alveolar nerve block. METHODS: One hundred six adult patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in a mandibular first or second molar received an initial inferior alveolar nerve block with 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. Pain during the endodontic treatment was assessed using the Heft-Parker visual analog scale. Eighty-two patients with unsuccessful anesthesia were randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups: 1 group received 0.6 mL/root of supplementary intraligamentary injection of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and the second group received 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. Endodontic treatment was reinitiated. Success after the primary injection or supplementary injection was defined as no or mild pain (less than 55 mm on the Heft-Parker visual analog scale) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation. Patients' heart rate was monitored using a finger pulse oximeter. The anesthetic success rates were analyzed with the Pearson chi-square test at 5% significance levels. The heart rate changes were analyzed using the t test. RESULTS: The patients receiving supplementary intraligamentary injections of 4% articaine had a success rate of 66%, whereas 2% lidocaine injections were successful in 78% of cases. The difference was statistically nonsignificant (χ2 = 1.51, P = .2). There was no significant effect of the different anesthetic agents on the heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Both 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine improved the success rates after a failed primary anesthetic injection, with no significant difference between them.

Comparative Evaluation of Mental Incisal Nerve Block, Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block, and Their Combination on the Anesthetic Success Rate in Symptomatic Mandibular Premolars: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of mental incisive nerve block (MINB) and inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) that were given alone or in combination to provide anesthesia to symptomatic mandibular premolars. METHODS: One hundred fifty-three patients participated in this randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The patients were divided into 3 groups; first group received MINB with 2 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and a mock IANB with 2 mL sterile saline, patients in group 2 received mock MINB and an IANB with 2 mL 2% lidocaine, and patients in group 3 received both MINB and IANB with 2 mL each of 2% lidocaine. Access cavity preparation was initiated after 10 minutes. Success was defined as no pain or faint/weak/mild pain during endodontic access preparation and instrumentation. The anesthetic success rates were analyzed with Pearson χ(2) test at 5% significance levels. RESULTS: The MINB and IANB gave 53% and 47% anesthetic success rates, respectively, with no significant difference between them. Adding an IANB to MINB significantly improved the success rates to 82%. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of MINB and IANB can provide improved local anesthesia for symptomatic mandibular premolars.

Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and MTA Plus in furcation perforation repair.

PURPOSE: Few studies have comparatively evaluated the push-out bond strength of different calcium silicate-based materials (CSMs) used in furcal perforation repair. The objective of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the push-out bond strength of commercially available CSMs used as furcation repair materials, in the presence of blood contamination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Furcal perforations were made in 120 molars and were divided on the basis of the repair material used (ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and MTA Plus), blood contamination, and duration of setting time (24 h vs. 7 days). Push-out bond strength was measured and analyzed by three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. RESULTS: Push-out bond strength increased with time. The 24-h push-out strength of MTA was less than that of Biodentine. Blood contamination affected the push-out bond strength of MTA Plus irrespective of the setting time. CONCLUSION: Caution should be taken while condensing restorative materials over furcation repair materials.

A prospective, randomized single-blind evaluation of effect of injection speed on anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

INTRODUCTION: Speed of injection may affect the solution spread in the pterygomandibular space. It was hypothesized that speed of injection will affect the anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. METHODS: Fifty-nine adult volunteers who were actively experiencing pain participated in this prospective, randomized, single-blind study. The patients were divided into 2 groups on a random basis and received either slow or rapid IANB with 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Endodontic access preparation was initiated after 15 minutes of the initial IANB. Pain during treatment was recorded by using the Heft-Parker visual analogue scale. The primary outcome measure, and the definition of success, was the ability to undertake pulp access and canal instrumentation with no or mild pain (Heft-Parker visual analog scale score < 55 mm). Secondary outcome measure was the solution deposition pain. Statistical analysis was performed by using Mann-Whitney U test and χ(2) test. RESULTS: Slow and rapid injections gave 43% and 51% success rates, respectively. The difference was statistically insignificant. Slow injections produced less solution deposition pain than rapid injections. CONCLUSIONS: Rate of injection has no effect on anesthetic success of IANB, but slow injections were more comfortable than rapid injections.

Comparative evaluation of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized single-blind study.

INTRODUCTION: There is a decrease in the anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with irreversible pulpitis. It was hypothesized that the increasing the volume of anesthetic solution may improve the success rates of dental pulp anesthesia in patients with pulpal pain. METHODS: Fifty-five adult volunteers, actively experiencing pain, participated in this prospective, randomized, single-blind study. The patients were divided into 2 groups on a random basis and received an inferior alveolar nerve block with either 1.8 mL or 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Endodontic access preparation was initiated after 15 minutes of the initial IANB. Pain during treatment was recorded using the Heft-Parker visual analog scale (HP VAS). The primary outcome measure, and the definition of "success," was the ability to undertake pulp access and canal instrumentation with no or mild pain (HP VAS score <55 mm). Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: All patients included in the final analysis had profound lip anesthesia. There were no significant differences in sex, age, or preoperative pain scores of the experimental groups. IANBs of 1.8 mL lidocaine with epinephrine had a success rate of 26%, whereas the administration of 3.6 mL had a 54% success rate. The difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the volume of 2% lidocaine to 3.6 mL improved the success rate as compared with 1.8 mL but did not give a clinical success rates of 100%.

A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of posterior superior alveolar nerve blocks, buccal infiltrations, and buccal plus palatal infiltrations in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the anesthetic efficacy of posterior superior alveolar (PSA) nerve blocks, buccal infiltrations, and buccal plus palatal infiltrations with 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine in maxillary first molars with irreversible pulpitis. METHODS: Ninety-four adult patients participated in this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. The patients were divided into 3 treatment groups on a random basis. Twenty-eight patients received a PSA nerve block, 33 patients received buccal infiltrations, and 33 patients received buccal plus palatal infiltrations with 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Endodontic access preparation was initiated 15 minutes after injection. Pain during treatment was recorded using a Heft-Parker visual analog scale. Success was recorded as "none" or "mild" pain. RESULTS: Statistical analysis using nonparametric chi-square tests revealed that there was no statistical difference between the anesthetic success of PSA nerve blocks (64%), buccal infiltrations (54%), and buccal plus palatal infiltrations (70%). CONCLUSIONS: None of the tested methods gave 100% anesthetic success rates in maxillary first molars with irreversible pulpitis.