Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol ; 14 Suppl 1: S34-40, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15118743

RESUMO

Continuous laser particle counters collocated with time-integrated filter samplers were used to measure personal, indoor, and outdoor particulate matter (PM) concentrations for a variety of prescribed human activities during a 5-day experimental period in a home in Redwood City, CA, USA. The mean daytime personal exposures to PM(2.5) and PM(5) during prescribed activities were 6 and 17 times, respectively, as high as the pre-activity indoor background concentration. Activities that resulted in the highest exposures of PM(2.5), PM(5), and PM(10) were those that disturbed dust reservoirs on furniture and textiles, such as dry dusting, folding clothes and blankets, and making a bed. The vigor of activity and type of flooring were also important factors for dust resuspension. Personal exposures to PM(2.5) and PM(5) were 1.4 and 1.6 times, respectively, as high as the indoor concentration as measured by a stationary monitor. The ratio of personal exposure to the indoor concentration was a function of both particle size and the distance of the human activity from the stationary indoor monitor. The results demonstrate that a wide variety of indoor human resuspension activities increase human exposure to PM and contribute to the "personal cloud" effect.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Exposição Ambiental , Movimentos do Ar , Coleta de Dados , Poeira , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Filtração , Habitação , Humanos , Tamanho da Partícula
2.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc ; 54(9): 1188-96, 2004 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15468671

RESUMO

This study compares an indoor-outdoor air-exchange mass balance model (IO model) with a chemical mass balance (CMB) model. The models were used to determine the contribution of outdoor sources and indoor resuspension activities to indoor particulate matter (PM) concentrations. Simultaneous indoor and outdoor measurements of PM concentration, chemical composition, and air-exchange rate were made for five consecutive days at a single-family residence using particle counters, nephelometers, and filter samples of integrated PM with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to 2.5 microm (PM2.5) and PM with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to 5 microm (PM5). Chemical compositions were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass-spectrometry. During three high-activity days, prescribed activities, such as cleaning and walking, were conducted over a period of 4-6 hr. For the remaining two days, indoor activities were minimal. Indoor sources accounted for 60-89% of the PM2.5 and more than 90% of the PM5 for the high-activity days. For the minimal-activity days, indoor sources accounted for 27-47% of PM2.5 and 44-60% of the PM5. Good agreement was found between the two mass balance methods. Indoor PM2.5 originating outdoors averaged 53% of outdoor concentrations.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Modelos Teóricos , Movimentos do Ar , Monitoramento Ambiental , Tamanho da Partícula
3.
Environ Sci Technol ; 38(6): 1759-64, 2004 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15074686

RESUMO

A mathematical model was applied to continuous indoor and outdoor particulate matter (PM) measurements to estimate source strengths for a variety of prescribed human activities that resuspend house dust in the home. Activities included folding blankets, folding clothes, dry dusting, making a bed, dancing on a rug, dancing on a wood floor, vacuuming, and walking around and sitting on upholstered furniture. Although most of the resuspended particle mass from these activities was larger than 5 microm in diameter, the resuspension of PM2.5 and PM5 was substantial, with source strengths ranging from 0.03 to 0.5 mg min(-1) for PM2.5 and from 0.1 to 1.4 mg min(-1) for PM5. Source strengths for PM > 5 microm could not be quantified due to instrument limitations. The source strengths were found to be a function of the number of persons performing the activity, the vigor of the activity, the type of activity, and the type of flooring.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Modelos Teóricos , Roupas de Cama, Mesa e Banho , Poeira , Pisos e Cobertura de Pisos , Habitação , Humanos , Tamanho da Partícula
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa