On the impact of surveillance test strategies: a cost-benefit modelling analysis based upon real-world data from SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVES: Active regular surveillance testing of asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals can reduce infection and onward transmission rates, as demonstrated for SARS-CoV-2. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-benefit analysis based on real-world data. METHODS: Two different surveillance-testing strategies using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) performed in 14,177 hospital employees were compared for their costs and their effectiveness in preventing secondary infections. RESULTS: Compared to not testing, NAAT-based testing twice a week accompanied by contact tracing or testing five times a week without tracing of contacts were more effective in preventing infections through early identification of infected individuals. While expansion of the test frequency from two to five times per week increased the initial costs, importantly, a 49.6 % higher inhibitory effect on infection growth with a 11.1-fold reduction of potentially averted infections and resulting workforce loss was observed, demonstrating a substantial cost-benefit of the 5-tests-per-week strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptation of the test frequency of SARS-CoV-2 and possibly of other pathogens with epidemic potential according to the prevailing incidences and reproduction rates in high-prevalence situations may not only be beneficial in averting potential infections in hospital employees and, subsequently, on a population level but may also represent the most cost-effective method.

The effect of cilengitide in combination with irradiation and chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Integrins are highly attractive targets in oncology due to their involvement in angiogenesis in a wide spectrum of cancer entities. Among several integrin inhibitors under clinical evaluation, cilengitide is the most promising compound. However, little is known about the cellular processes induced during cilengitide therapy in combination with irradiation and cisplatin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cytostatic effect of cilengitide was assessed by proliferation assay in the three HNSCC cell lines SCC25, FaDu and CAL27. Combination experiments with cisplatin and irradiation were performed. Possible synergistic effects were calculated in combination index (CI) analyses. Colony forming inhibition was investigated in clonogenic assays. Real-time PCR arrays were used to evaluate target protein gene expression patterns. Flow cytometry was used to detect apoptosis. RESULTS: Used alone, cilengitide has only minor cytotoxic effects in HNSCC cell lines. However, combination with cisplatin resulted in synergistic growth inhibition in all three cell lines. Irradiation showed synergism in short-term experiments and in colony forming assays, an additive effect was detected. Real-time PCR assay detected downregulation of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 after exposure of cells to cilengitide. CONCLUSION: Cilengitide in combination with cisplatin and irradiation may be a feasible option for the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer. However, further investigations are required to understand the exact mechanism that leads to synergistic cytotoxicity.

HCRP1 expression status is a significant prognostic marker in oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The hepatocellular carcinoma-related protein 1 (HCRP1) is a key factor in the degradation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. In this study, we assessed the prognostic significance of HCRP1 expression in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC). METHODS: HCRP1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry on tissue biopsy sections of 111 patients with locally advanced OOSCC undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models were used for survival analyses. RESULTS: Low HCRP1 expression was associated with poor recurrence-free survival (P = 0.046) and overall survival (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that low HCRP1 expression remained an independent risk factor for relapse (HR 2.98, 95% CI 1.19-7.49, P = 0.02) and death (HR 3.04, 95% CI 1.19-7.79, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Low HCRP1 expression was found to be of adverse prognostic significance in patients with OOSCC who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Re-irradiation combined with capecitabine in locally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A prospective phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: We performed a prospective phase II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with capecitabine in patients suffering from a recurrence of a squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) within a previously irradiated field. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 31 evaluable patients with recurrent SCCHN received re-irradiation with a total dose of 50 Gy (25 fractions over 5 weeks) up to a maximum of 60 Gy combined with 900 mg/m(2)/day capecitabine given on the days of radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median time to relapse after the first course of radiotherapy was 15 months. The overall response rate in our study was 68% including 6 patients with a complete response. The median overall survival was 8.4 months. Grade 3 or 4 mucositis occurred in 4 patients and 1 patient, respectively. No grade 4 hematological toxicities were observed; 1 patient had grade 3 anemia. The cumulative median lifetime dose was 116 Gy. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine combined with re-irradiation is a well-tolerated treatment in patients with recurrent SCCHN. In light of its good tolerability, it appears to be a potential option for patients with a reduced performance status and may also serve as a basis for novel treatment concepts, such as in combination with targeted therapies.

Consensus guidelines for the management of radiation dermatitis and coexisting acne-like rash in patients receiving radiotherapy plus EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Radiation dermatitis occurs to some degree in most patients receiving radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who receive radiotherapy in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, such as cetuximab, may develop a characteristic acne-like rash in addition to dermatitis. DESIGN: An advisory board of 11 experienced radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and dermatologists discussed the management options for skin reactions in patients receiving EGFR inhibitors and radiotherapy for SCCHN. Skin toxicity was categorised according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3) grading. RESULTS: Both general and grade-specific approaches for the management of dermatitis in this patient group are presented. It was concluded that where EGFR inhibitor-related acne-like rash and dermatitis coexist within irradiated fields, management should be based on the grade of dermatitis: for grade 1 (or no dermatitis), treatment recommendations for EGFR-related acne-like rash outside irradiated fields should be followed; for grades 2 and above, treatment recommendations for dermatitis were proposed. CONCLUSIONS: This paper presents comprehensive consensus guidelines for the treatment of dermatitis in patients with SCCHN receiving EGFR inhibitors in combination with radiotherapy.

Importance of chewing, saliva, and swallowing function in patients with advanced oral cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a prospective study of quality of life.

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the quality of life (QOL) of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing curative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical tumour resection and simultaneous oral cavity reconstruction, using two validated questionnaires. A secondary objective was to assess clinical variables predicting post-treatment dysfunction in chewing, saliva, and swallowing. Thirty-five patients with locally advanced OSCC who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy were recruited prospectively. All patients completed both the University of Washington Quality of Life version 4 questionnaire (UW-QOL) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head & Neck version 4 questionnaire (FACT-H&N). UW-QOL and FACT-H&N items were associated with clinical variables. Nearly three-quarters of OSCC patients perceived good to excellent levels of overall QOL after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Chewing difficulties, decreased salivary function, and swallowing dysfunction were the most frequent complaints of OSCC patients. Items related to food intake were significantly worse in OSCC patients older than 60 years and those with T4 tumours, as well as those without alcohol intake. Chewing, saliva, and swallowing are the most significant issues in patients with OSCC undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The results of this study may help guide treatment decisions for OSCC patients based on more accurate expectations of adverse effects of cancer treatment.

Combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer pretreated with leucovorin-modulated fluoropyrimidines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who progressed while receiving or within 6 months after discontinuing palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines/leucovorin, were enrolled onto this study. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on days 1 + 15 and irinotecan 80 mg/m2 on days 1 + 8 + 15 every 4 weeks. Depending on the absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) on the day of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration, a 5-day course of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 microg/kg/d was given. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 42% for all 36 assessable patients (95% confidence interval, 26% to 59%), including two complete remissions (6%). Thirteen additional patients (36%) had stable disease, and only eight (22%) progressed. The median time to treatment failure was 7.5 months (range, 1 to 13.5+ months). After a median follow-up time of 14 months, 19 patients (53%) are still alive. Hematologic toxicity was commonly observed, although according to the ANC-adapted use of G-CSF (in 31 patients during 81 of 174 courses), it was generally mild: grade 3 and 4 granulocytopenia occurred in only five and two cases, respectively. The most frequent nonhematologic adverse reactions were nausea/emesis and diarrhea, which were rated severe in 17% and 19%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the combination of irinotecan and oxaliplatin with or without G-CSF has substantial antitumor activity in patients with progressive fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated colorectal cancer. Overall toxicity was modest, with gastrointestinal symptoms constituting the dose-limiting side effects. Further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine and docetaxel with or without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: A multicenter phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of docetaxel, vinorelbine with or without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1998 and March 1999, 57 patients participated in this trial. Forty-two patients received this combination as first-line and 15 patients as second-line chemotherapy, including 10 patients who had failed anthracyclines. Therapy consisted of vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 and docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Depending on the absolute neutrophil counts on the day of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration, a 5-day course of G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d was given. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 64.3% (95% confidence interval, 48.1% to 78.4%) in patients receiving docetaxel plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy, including eight complete (19%) and 19 partial remissions (45.3%); 11 patients (26.2%) had disease stabilization, and only four (9.5%) progressed. Second-line treatment with this regimen resulted in eight (53.3%) of 15 objective responses, four had stable disease, and three had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 12 months in the first-line and 9.8 months in the second-line setting, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 18 months, 38 patients (65%) were still alive with metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was commonly observed; World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 neutropenia both occurred in 18 patients (32%) and was complicated by septicemia in four cases; grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in two patients (4%), and grade 3 anemia was seen in only one patient (2%). Severe (grade 3) nonhematologic toxicity, except for alopecia, was rarely observed and included nausea/vomiting in two patients (4%), and stomatitis, peripheral neuropathy, and skin toxicity each in one patient. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that docetaxel and vinorelbine with or without G-CSF is an effective and fairly well tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. It might be particularly useful in patients previously exposed to adjuvant or palliative anthracyclines and/or alkylating agents.

Fluorouracil plus racemic leucovorin versus fluorouracil combined with the pure l-isomer of leucovorin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of fluorouracil (FU) and racemic leucovorin (d,l-LV) versus FU combined with the l-isomer of leucovorin (l-LV) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 248 patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer previously unexposed to chemotherapy were randomly assigned to treatment with either FU (400 mg/m2/d by intravenous [I.V.] infusion for 2 hours) and racemic LV (100 mg/m2/d by I.V. bolus injection) given for 5 consecutive days, or the combination of FU and the pure l-isomer of LV using the same dose schedule. In both treatment arms, courses were administered every 28 days if toxicity allowed for a total of 6 months, unless evidence of tumor progression was documented earlier. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the FU/racemic LV and the FU/l-LV arm in the overall response rate (25% v 32%), duration of response (7.2 v 8.0 months), median time to progression or death (6.25 v 8.0 months), or median overall survival time (14.5 v 15.0 months). Except for minor myeloid toxic effects associated with FU/l-LV, there was also no significant difference in terms of adverse reactions. Gastrointestinal symptoms, specifically mucasitis and diarrhea, were less frequent and less severe in both treatment arms compared with other trials with FU/racemic LV reported in the literature, which might be because of the prolonged administration of FU used in both arms. CONCLUSION: The combination of FU/l-LV produced response rates, response durations, and survival times similar to those with FU/d,l-LV. Biochemical modulation of FU by either pure l-LV or racemic LV thus appears to result in equivalent clinical efficacy.

Preoperative radiochemotherapy and radical resection for stages II-IV oral and oropharyngeal cancer: outcome of 222 patients.

To analyse survival and locoregional control in patients with advanced oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after multimodal therapy with preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) and radical surgery. We included in this analysis 222 patients who underwent multimodal therapy between 1990 and 2000. Eligible were patients with UICC disease stages II-IV (T2: 33.3%; T3: 12.6%; T4: 54.1%; N0: 45.9%; N1: 17.6%; N2: 33.3%; N3: 3.2%; stage II: 21.1%; stage III: 14.9%; stage IV: 64%). Patients received preoperative radiochemotherapy consisting of Mitomycin C (15-20 mg/m2, day 1) plus 5-Fluorouracil (750 mg/m2/24 h-infusion, days 1-5) and concomitant radiotherapy for a total dose of 50 Gy. Radical locoregional en bloc-resection according to the pretherapeutic tumour extension was carried out in all patients. After a median surveillance period of 72.3 months (24-152 months), 131 patients (59%) were alive, and 91 (41%) patients died; 12 (5%) of them died postoperatively, 46 (21%) due to tumour recurrence, and 33 (15%) deaths were not directly related to the primary tumour. Overall survival probability was 76% after 2 years, and 62% after 5 years. Two- and 5-year local control probability were 88 and 81%, respectively. Regarding the high percentage of stage IV disease in the reported patients, the multimodal concept is an effective therapy offering excellent survival and local control probability.

Upregulation of osteoprotegerin expression correlates with bone invasion and predicts poor clinical outcome in oral cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the prognostic significance of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), RANK and osteoprotegerin (OPG) in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The protein expression of RANKL, RANK and OPG was assessed by immunohistochemistry on pretreatment biopsies of 93 patients with locally advanced OSCC who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The primary endpoint was cancer-specific survival. Secondary endpoints were correlation of biomarkers with bone invasion and pathological tumor response. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for survival analyses. RESULTS: A significantly higher OPG expression was demonstrated in patients with malignant bone invasion and non-responders to CRT as compared to patients without bone invasion and responders (p=0.032 and p=0.033, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that higher OPG expression was independently associated with shorter cancer-specific survival (p=0.04). The expression status of RANKL and RANK was not significantly related to clinicopathological characteristics and had no impact on survival of OSCC patients. CONCLUSION: Upregulation of OPG expression is associated with bone invasion, poor pathological tumor regression to neoadjuvant CRT, and worse long-term cancer-specific survival in patients with locally advanced OSCC. Our results indicate that OPG may be a novel prognostic biomarker in oral cancer.

Prognostic role of pretreatment plasma fibrinogen in patients with solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Plasma fibrinogen may be involved in several stages of cancer progression. Clinical studies have demonstrated that pretreatment plasma fibrinogen is associated with poor survival in various cancers. The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine the prognostic effect of circulating fibrinogen in solid tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and meeting proceedings to identify studies assessing the effect of pretreatment plasma fibrinogen on survival of cancer patients. Pooled multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Data from 52 observational studies and 15,371 patients were summarized. An elevated baseline plasma fibrinogen was significantly associated with worse OS (pooled HR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.48­1.92). The highest negative effect of elevated plasma fibrinogen on OS was demonstrated in renal cell carcinoma (pooled HR = 2.22), followed by head and neck cancer (pooled HR = 2.02), and colorectal cancer (pooled HR = 1.89). The adverse prognostic impact of high plasma fibrinogen remained in both non-metastatic and metastatic disease and patients of different ethnicity. Patients with high baseline fibrinogen had a significantly shorter DFS (pooled HR = 1.52) and CSS (pooled HR = 2.50). CONCLUSIONS: An elevated pretreatment plasma fibrinogen significantly correlates with decreased survival in patients with solid tumors. Future clinical trials are warranted to determine whether plasma fibrinogen could be incorporated in cancer staging systems and whether fibrinogen-lowering therapies have a favorable effect on disease recurrence and mortality.

Combined intraperitoneal plus intravenous chemotherapy after curative resection for colonic adenocarcinoma.

Patients who underwent potential curative surgery for colonic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a prospectively randomised, controlled clinical trial of combined intraperitoneal (i.p.) plus systemic intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). We investigated whether this adjuvant treatment approach, specifically addressing the risk of peritoneal and hepatic recurrence, could improve disease-free and overall survival. Between May 1988 and December 1990, 121 patients with resected stage III or high-risk stage II (T4N0M0) colon cancer were randomly assigned for observation (which was considered standard care until the NIH consensus conference) or adjuvant chemotherapy with LV (200 mg/m2) plus 5-FU (350 mg/m2), both given i.v. (days 1-4) and i.p. (days 1 and 3) every 4 weeks for a total of six courses. After a median follow-up time of 4.6 years, a comparative analysis between the two groups of patients suggested both an improvement in disease-free survival (75% versus 58%; P = 0.06) and a survival advantage (78% versus 63%; P = 0.05) in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy. The sites of recurrence were also different, i.e. local regional and intrahepatic tumour recurrences were observed in only 6/58 (10%) and 5/58 (9%) adjuvant treated patients as compared to 11/60 (18%) and 10/60 (17%) observed patients. The overall benefit of adjuvant therapy appeared to be greatest in patients with stage III colon cancer. Treatment-associated toxicity was infrequent and generally mild with only 5% experiencing severe (WHO grade 3) adverse reactions. Interim results of this adjuvant trial suggest that combined i.p. plus systemic i.v. chemotherapy with 5-FU and LV represents a potentially effective adjuvant regimen in stage II/III colon cancer.

Amonafide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

In a phase II study, 32 patients with advanced breast cancer previously unexposed to palliative cytotoxic chemotherapy were treated with amonafide, 800-900 mg intravenously over 3 h repeated every 4 weeks. Objective response was seen in 8 patients including 1 complete response, 10 patients had stable disease and 14 patients progressed so the overall response was 25% (95% confidence interval, 11-43%). The most frequently encountered side-effects were haematological (granulocytopenia > or = WHO grade 3 was encountered in 7/24 patients at 800 mg/m2 and in 3/8 patients at 900 mg/m2 amonafide) and nausea/vomiting (62%), despite prophylactic use of ondansetron. Non-haematological severe adverse reactions included neurotoxicity WHO grade 3 in 1 patient and orthostatic hypotension WHO grade 4 in another. In summary, the results of this trial suggest a limited therapeutic index of amonafide if used at this dose with this administration schedule.

Treatment of advanced gastric cancer with oral etoposide, leucovorin and tegafur: experience with an oral modification of the etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ELF) regimen.

Recent data have suggested enhanced therapeutic activity with prolonged administration of both etoposide as well as fluoropyrimidines in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Based on this rationale, we investigated the clinical effectiveness and tolerance of an oral modification of the widely applied etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ELF) regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer. 32 patients with advanced gastric cancer were treated with oral etoposide (100 mg), leucovorin (3 x 100 mg), and tegafur (3 x 200 mg) over 14-21 days for a maximum of six cycles. Objective response was seen in only 5 patients (16%), stable disease was documented in 7 (22%), while the remaining patients progressed during therapy. The median time to progression was 2.8 months (range 0.7-12 months) and median overall survival was 6 months (range 1-18+ months). Due to grade 3 nausea/emesis, 8 patients discontinued treatment prematurely, while 12 patients experienced anorexia and progressive weight loss. Haematological toxicity was modest, with 4 patients developing asymptomatic grade 3-4 granulocytopenia. We conclude that this oral combination regimen cannot be recommended for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Dose intensification of epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer: a randomised study with two schedules of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor.

A randomised phase II/III study was conducted in patients with advanced breast cancer to determine the dose intensity achievable through an acceleration of administration of chemotherapy with epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) alone, as compared with the combination of this regimen with two different schedules of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). 73 patients received EC intravenous (i.v.) (epidoxorubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) on day 1 (group A), or the same chemotherapy plus sub-cutaneous (s.c.) GM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day) either from days 3 to 12 (group B) or from days -6 to -3 (group C). The primary objective of the study was the investigation of dose intensity delivered in the three treatment arms, whereas the secondary objective was response rate. A significant increase (P = 0.006) in dose intensity of 21% was observed for treatment group B, whereas the increase in dose intensity achieved in group C (7%) was not significant (P = 0.086). Response rates (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)) of 56% were observed in group A, 65% in group B, and 57% in group C, respectively. This difference in response rates did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.271). We thus conclude that an acceleration of the EC regimen over the standard schedule could be accomplished with postchemotherapeutic GM-CSF support, leading to an increase in dose intensity, whereas pretherapeutic short-term GM-CSF administration did not reach this goal.

Impact of hemoglobin level and use of recombinant erythropoietin on efficacy of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

PURPOSE: We assessed the influence of hemoglobin level and r-HuEPO administration on response to chemoradiotherapy, locoregional tumor control, and overall survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for a squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 191 study patients were treated with mitomycin C (15 mg/m(2) day 1), 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5), and radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions weeks 1-5), followed by resection of the primary tumor bed and neck dissection at the General Hospital Vienna, Austria, between November 1989 and October 1998 for a T2-4, N0-3, M0 SCC of the oral cavity or oropharynx. Starting in May 1996, patients with a low hemoglobin (Hgb) before or during chemoradiotherapy received r-HuEPO 10,000 IU/kg s.c. 3-6 times/week until the week of surgery. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, Hgb level and use of r-HuEPO were independent prognostic factors for response to chemoradiotherapy and locoregional tumor control (p < 0.01). Pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy was also predictive of locoregional control (p < 0.001). Patients with a pretreatment Hgb > or = 14.5 g/dL had significantly higher complete response, locoregional control, and survival rates than the patients with a pretreatment Hgb < 14.5 g/dL who did not receive r-HuEPO (p < 0.05). The response, control, and survival rates in patients with a pretreatment Hgb < 14.5 g/dL given r-HuEPO were significantly higher than in low Hgb patients not given r-HuEPO (p < or = 0.001) and equivalent to patients with a pretreatment Hgb > 14.5 g/dL (p > or = 0.3). CONCLUSION: Low pretreatment Hgb is a negative prognostic factor for oral cavity and oropharyngeal SCCA patients, but was completely abrogated by r-HuEpo administration during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Randomized trials of radiation and/or chemotherapy with or without r-HuEPO for patients whose Hgb level is either low at the start of therapy or is anticipated to become low during therapy are indicated.

Combined radiochemotherapy of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma with mitomycin C plus 24-hour continuous infusional gemcitabine.

BACKGROUND: In locally advanced pancreatic cancer, the combination of chemotherapy with radiotherapy is gaining increasing importance; although, in view of the reported long-term results of several contemporary trials, further improvements are certainly warranted. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined-treatment modality consisting of systemic chemotherapy with 24-h continuous infusional gemcitabine and mitomycin C, plus external beam radiotherapy in patients with localized unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Systemic chemotherapy consisted of mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 given as i.v. bolus injection on day 1 and gemcitabine administered as a 24-h continous infusion once weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. The starting dose of gemcitabine was 100 mg/m2 and dose levels were escalated in consecutive cohorts of 3-6 patients to 130 and 160 mg/m2, utilizing an escalating-dose Phase I trial design. Radiation therapy using megavolt irradiation (total dose, 45 Gy, 1.8 Gy/day) of 6 MV photons or greater with a 3- or 4-field technique was delivered concurrently for 5-6 weeks. RESULTS: Between January 1997 and August 1998, a total of 15 patients were enrolled in this trial, all of whom were assessable for toxicity, response, and survival. The dose-limiting toxicities at the 160 mg/m2 gemcitabine level were myelosuppression, specifically neutropenia +/- thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal symptoms, including stomatitis, vomiting, and diarrhea. Only 1 partial response was observed (7%), and disease was stabilized in 10 additional patients (67%). The median time to progression was 5.5 months (range, 2-12 months). Whereas all patients developed distant metastases, locoregional failure occurred in only 3. The median survival time was 8.3 months (range, 2.5 to 22.0+ months), and the 1-year survival rate was 13.3%. CONCLUSION: The MTD of gemcitabine when given as prolonged infusion in combination with mitomycin C and radiation therapy was 130 mg/m2/week. Therapeutic results suggest that combined chemoradiation with this regimen is feasible and effective for local control of pancreatic cancer, but essentially ineffective in counteracting metastatic tumor growth.

Serum tumor markers after renal transplantation.

The overall incidence of malignancy in renal transplant recipients is 100-fold higher compared with age matched controls. Routine clinical evaluation therefore often includes the determination of serum tumor markers AFP, CA19-9, CEA, CA125, CA15-3, PSA, and calcitonin. We evaluated the specificity and the sensitivity of these markers in 575 renal allograft recipients. Specificity varied between 0.69 (CA 125) and 0.96 (PSA) in 532 patients without cancer. Cyclosporine therapy and excretory allograft function did not affect marker concentration; impaired liver function was associated with significantly elevated AFP, CA19-9, CA125, and CA15-3 levels. In 43 patients with malignancies the sensitivity of the markers ranged between 0.2 (CEA) and 1 (CA 125, CA 15-3). We therefore conclude that routine screening of the transplant population with serum tumor markers is not useful because of the low sensitivity and specificity of these tests.

Comparison of iodine-123-vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor scintigraphy and indium-111-CYT-103 immunoscintigraphy.

UNLABELLED: Recently, we have shown that the expression of receptors for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) on intestinal adenocarcinomas can be used for in vivo targeting of primary or metastatic tumor sites using 123I-labeled VIP. Several other receptors and antigens including the TAG-72 protein have also been implemented for in vivo localization purposes. In this study, we have compared the in vitro and in vivo binding of 123I-VIP and of the 111In-labeled monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against TAG-72 (OncoScint; 111In-CR-103) in patients with intestinal adenocarcinomas in a single-blinded, prospectively randomized trial. METHODS: Twenty patients were administered either 123I-VIP (150-200 MBq; 1 microgram) or 111In-CYT-103 (150 MBq; 1 mg) for one imaging study. After interim analysis demonstrated superior imaging with 123I-VIP, the next 10 patients (accounting for a total of 50 patients) enrolled in this trial underwent both studies in random order to allow for a direct comparison. RESULTS: In total, 123I-VIP scans were true-positive in 28 of 30 patients (93%) versus 17 of 30 patients administered 111In-CYT-103 (56%). In the subgroup of 10 patients enrolled in the second part of the study, primary intestinal adenocarcinomas were imaged in five of five patients with 123I-VIP and in only two of these patients with 111In-CYT-103. Liver metastases were visualized in five of six patients by 123I-VIP receptor scanning and in four of these patients with 111In-CYT-103. The in vitro results indicated significant binding of 123I-VIP to primary colorectal tumors as well as to HT29 and COLO320 adenocarcinoma cells. In vitro, adenocarcinoma cells also expressed abundant numbers of the TAG-72 antigen. CONCLUSION: Intestinal adenocarcinomas co-express VIP receptors and the IAG-72 antigen. Despite significant in vitro binding of both agents, however, the VIP receptor scan is more sensitive in localizing intestinal adenocarcinomas and metastatic spread.