CheckPOINT: a simple tool to measure Surgical Safety Checklist implementation fidelity.

INTRODUCTION: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a communication tool that improves teamwork and patient outcomes. SSC effectiveness is dependent on implementation fidelity. Administrative audits fail to capture most aspects of SSC implementation fidelity (ie, team communication and engagement). Existing research tools assess behaviours during checklist performance, but were not designed for routine quality assurance and improvement. We aimed to create a simple tool to assess SSC implementation fidelity, and to test its reliability using video simulations, and usability in clinical practice. METHODS: The Checklist Performance Observation for Improvement (CheckPOINT) tool underwent two rounds of face validity testing with surgical safety experts, clinicians and quality improvement specialists. Four categories were developed: checklist adherence, communication effectiveness, attitude and engagement. We created a 90 min training programme, and four trained raters independently scored 37 video simulations using the tool. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to assess inter-rater reliability (ICC>0.75 indicating excellent reliability). We then trained two observers, who tested the tool in the operating room. We interviewed the observers to determine tool usability. RESULTS: The CheckPOINT tool had excellent inter-rater reliability across SSC phases. The ICC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.98) for the sign-in, 0.77 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.92) for the time-out and 0.79 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.99) for the sign-out. During field testing, observers reported CheckPOINT was easy to use. In 98 operating room observations, the total median (IQR) score was 25 (23-28), checklist adherence was 7 (6-7), communication effectiveness was 6 (6-7), attitude was 6 (6-7) and engagement was 6 (5-7). CONCLUSIONS: CheckPOINT is a simple and reliable tool to assess SSC implementation fidelity and identify areas of focus for improvement efforts. Although CheckPOINT would benefit from further testing, it offers a low-resource alternative to existing research tools and captures elements of adherence and team behaviours.

To evaluate the prevalence of spontaneous portosystemic shunts in decompensated cirrhosis patients and its prognostic significance.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are frequent in liver cirrhosis and their prevalence increases as liver function deteriorates, probably as a consequence of worsening portal hypertension, but without achieving an effective protection against cirrhosis complications. This study was conducted to detect the prevalence of portosystemic shunts in liver cirrhosis patients and analyze its prognostic role. METHOD: We conducted a prospective observational study, where 92 patients with decompensated cirrhosis were evaluated based on history, physical examination, biochemical tests and abdominal computed tomography (CT) angiography findings. A follow-up was done after six months for the development of cirrhosis-related complications. RESULTS: Of the 92 cirrhotic patients, 57.6% had SPSS (large SPSS + small SPSS) detected by multi-detector computed tomographic angiography. Overall, we found large SPSS in 24 (26.1%) patients, small SPSS in 29 (31.5%) patients and no shunt in 39 (42.4%) patients. Among the shunts, the splenorenal shunt is the most frequent type (25, 27.2%) followed by the paraumbilical shunt (20.7%). Previous decompensating events, including hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and gastrointestinal bleed, were experienced more frequently by the large SPSS group followed by the small SPSS and without SPSS groups. Regarding follow-up, decompensating episodes of hepatic encephalopathy developed more frequently in patients with large SPSS (41.7%) than in patients with small SPSS (24.1%) followed by patients without SPSS (12.8%). CONCLUSION: In summary, all cirrhotic patients should be studied with radiological imaging to detect the presence of portosystemic shunts. In several cases, patients with large SPSS had a more impaired liver function and more frequent complications of portal hypertension. So, these patients would probably benefit from a closer surveillance and more intensive therapy.

A Review of the MINDSPACE Framework for Nudging Health Promotion During Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the link between individual behavior and public health, along with the importance of evidence-based efforts to promote prosocial individual behavior. Insights from behavioral science can inform the design of effective behavior change techniques, or nudges, to influence individual behavior. The MINDSPACE framework organizes 9 behavioral science principles that can be used to guide policy design: Messenger, Incentives, Norms, Defaults, Salience, Priming, Affect, Commitments, and Ego. Using MINDSPACE as an organizing framework, this article provides a review of the literature on nudges to influence prosocial behaviors relevant during a pandemic: handwashing, avoidance of social gatherings, self-isolation and social distancing, and sharing public health messages. Additionally, empirical evidence on the use of nudges during the first several months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 is summarized. Recommendations regarding the use of nudges to achieve public health policy goals during pandemics are provided. Organizational leaders, policymakers, and practitioners can use nudges to promote public health when mandates are not politically feasible or enforceable.