Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 70(2): 123-126, 2020 Apr 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32009175

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known what advice or support patients are given about return to work (RTW) after hip or knee replacement surgery. AIMS: This study aims to understand the delivery, timing and content of 'RTW' advice currently delivered by surgical teams offering hip and knee replacements across the UK. METHODS: National online survey exploring five specific areas relating to 'RTW' advice: (i) timings of interactions between hospital orthopaedic teams and patients prior to surgery, (ii) routine delivery of 'RTW' advice, (iii) methods used to deliver 'RTW' advice, (iv) confidence delivering advice and (v) need for an occupational 'RTW' advice intervention. RESULTS: A total of 152 participants including surgeons, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and nurses from 59 different public and private health providers responded. Only 20% (n = 30) of respondents reported that working patients were identified as a specific subgroup in need of additional support. Overall, 62% (n = 92) stated that they did not routinely offer 'RTW' advice. When given, 'RTW' advice was almost always verbal, generic advice using blanket timescales and based on the respondent's anecdotal experience rather than the patients individualized needs. Overall, 116 (78%) felt an occupational advice intervention was needed. CONCLUSIONS: This national survey demonstrated wide variation in the timing, content and delivery of information and advice for patients in work and intending to RTW after hip and knee replacement surgery. Current RTW advice provided to hip and knee replacement patients is inadequate.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/reabilitação , Artroplastia do Joelho/reabilitação , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Retorno ao Trabalho , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Ortopedia/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
2.
PLoS One ; 15(4): e0230235, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32240199

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder pain and can result in prolonged periods of pain, disability and absence from work. Rotator cuff repair surgery is increasingly used in an attempt to resolve symptoms but has failure rates of around 40%. There is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff repairs. Patch augmentation increasingly being used within the NHS in an attempt to reduce repair failures. The aim of this survey was to determine current UK practice and opinion relating to the factors that influence choice of patch, current patient selection and willingness to assist with generation of improved evidence. METHODS: An online survey was sent to the surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS). Questions covered respondent demographics, experience with patches, indications for patch augmentation and willingness to be involved in a randomised trial of patch augmented rotator cuff surgery. RESULTS: The response rate was 105/550 (19%). 58% of respondents had used a patch to augment rotator cuff surgery. 70% of patch users had undertaken an augmented repair within the last 6 months. A wide surgical experience in augmentation was reported (ranging 1 to 200 implants used). However, most surgeons reported low volume usage, with a median of 5 rotator cuff augmentation procedures performed. At least 10 different products had been used. Most of the patches used were constructed from human decellularised dermis tissue, although porcine derived and synthetic based patches had also been used. Only 3-5% stated they would undertake an augmented repair for small tears across ages, whereas 28-40% and 19-59% would do so for large or massive tears respectively. When assessing patient suitability, patient age seemed relevant only for those with large and massive tears. Half of the surgeons reported an interest in taking part in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the role of patch augmentation for rotator cuff surgery, with a further 22% of respondent's undecided. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of patches have been used by surgeons to augment rotator cuff repair with a wide range of operator experience. There was substantial uncertainty about which patch to use and differing views on which patients were most suitable. There is a clear need for robust clinical evaluation and further research in this area.


Assuntos
Artroplastia/métodos , Artroscopia/métodos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/cirurgia , Manguito Rotador/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Cotovelo/inervação , Cotovelo/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próteses e Implantes , Manguito Rotador/inervação , Manguito Rotador/patologia , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/patologia , Ombro/inervação , Ombro/patologia , Ombro/cirurgia , Dor de Ombro/prevenção & controle , Dor de Ombro/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suínos , Resultado do Tratamento , Incerteza , Reino Unido , Lesões no Cotovelo
3.
Bone Joint Res ; 6(10): 590-599, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29066532

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was piloted with six orthopaedic surgeons using a 'think aloud' process. The final questionnaire contained 29 items and was distributed online to surgeon members of the British Orthopaedic Association and British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Descriptive statistics summarised the sample characteristics and fracture treatment of respondents overall, and grouped them by whether they changed practice based on PROFHER trial findings. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively for emerging themes using Framework Analysis principles. RESULTS: There were complete responses from 265 orthopaedic and trauma surgeons who treat patients with proximal humeral fractures. Around half (137) had changed practice to various extents because of PROFHER, by operating on fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures. A third (43) of the 128 respondents who had not changed practice were already managing patients non-operatively. Those who changed practice were more likely to be younger, work in a trauma unit rather than a major trauma centre, be specialist shoulder surgeons and treat fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures surgically. This group gave higher scores when assessing validity and applicability of PROFHER. In contrast, a quarter of the non-changers were critical, sometimes emphatically, of PROFHER. The strongest theme that emerged overall was the endorsement of evidence-based practice. CONCLUSION: PROFHER has had an impact on surgeons' clinical practice, both through changing it, and through underpinning existing non-operative practice. Although some respondents expressed reservations about the trial, evidence from such trials was found to be the most important influence on surgeons' decisions to change practice.Cite this article: L. Jefferson, S. Brealey, H. Handoll, A. Keding, L. Kottam, I. Sbizzera, A. Rangan. Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons' clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:590-599. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0170.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa