Post-operative atrial fibrillation and risk of heart failure hospitalization.

AIMS: Post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with stroke and mortality. It is unknown if POAF is associated with subsequent heart failure (HF) hospitalization. This study aims to examine the association between POAF and incident HF hospitalization among patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using all-payer administrative claims data that included all non-federal emergency department visits and acute care hospitalizations across 11 states in the USA. The study population included adults aged at least 18 years hospitalized for surgery without a prior diagnosis of HF. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the association between POAF and incident HF hospitalization after making adjustment for socio-demographics and comorbid conditions. Among 76 536 patients who underwent cardiac surgery, 14 365 (18.8%) developed incident POAF. In an adjusted Cox model, POAF was associated with incident HF hospitalization [hazard ratio (HR) 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.41]. In a sensitivity analysis excluding HF within 1 year of surgery, POAF remained associated with incident HF hospitalization (HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.01-1.31). Among 2 929 854 patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery, 23 763 (0.8%) developed incident POAF. In an adjusted Cox model, POAF was again associated with incident HF hospitalization (HR 2.02; 95% CI 1.94-2.10), including in a sensitivity analysis excluding HF within 1 year of surgery (HR 1.49; 95% CI 1.38-1.61). CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative atrial fibrillation is associated with incident HF hospitalization among patients without prior history of HF undergoing both cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. These findings reinforce the adverse prognostic impact of POAF and suggest that POAF may be a marker for identifying patients with subclinical HF and those at elevated risk for HF.

Hospital market concentration and the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: As health care markets in the United States have become increasingly consolidated, the role of market concentration on physician treatment behavior remains unclear. In cardiology, specifically, there has been evolving treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) with increasing use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). However, there remains wide variation in it use. The role of market concentration in the utilization of MCS in AMI-CS is unknown. We examined the use of MCS in AMI-CS and its effect on outcomes between competitive and concentrated markets. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the National Inpatient Sample to query patients admitted with AMI-CS between 2003 and 2009. The primary study outcome was the use of mechanical circulatory support. The primary study exposure was market concentration, measured using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, which was used to classify markets as unconcentrated (competitive), moderately concentrated, and highly concentrated. Baseline characteristics, procedures, and outcomes were compared for patients in differently concentrated markets. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between HHI and use of MCS. RESULTS: There were 32,406 hospitalizations for patients admitted with AMI-CS. Patients in unconcentrated markets were more likely to receive MCS than in highly concentrated markets (unconcentrated 46.8% [5087/10,873], moderately concentrated 44.9% [2933/6526], and high concentrated 44.5% [6676/15,007], p < 0.01). Multivariable regression showed that patients in more concentrated markets had decreased use of MCS in patients in later years of the study period (2009, OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02), with no effect in earlier years. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Multivariable analysis did not show an association with market concentration and use of MCS in AMI-CS. However, subgroup analysis did show that competitive hospital markets were associated with more frequent use of MCS in AMI-CS as frequency of utilization increased over time. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of hospital market consolidation on the use of MCS and outcomes in AMI-CS.

A hybrid endocardial-epicardial biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to circumvent the tricuspid valve.

The development of pacing and defibrillator systems that do not involve hardware traversing the tricuspid annulus can be desirable in order to minimize lead-related complications such as tricuspid regurgitation. Occasionally, primary tricuspid valve pathology (ie, infectious endocarditis, nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis, and carcinoid disease) or congenital heart disease prohibits use of transvenous leads and alternative strategies are required to provide pacing or defibrillation. We describe such a case in which a biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator was implanted using a hybrid system involving endocardial and epicardial components.

Performance of Electronic Health Record Diagnosis Codes for Ambulatory Heart Failure Encounters.

BACKGROUND: There is interest in leveraging the electronic medical records (EMRs) to improve knowledge and understanding of patients' characteristics and outcomes of patients with ambulatory heart failure (HF). However, the diagnostic performance of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) -10 diagnosis codes from the EMRs for patients with HF and with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF or HFpEF) in the ambulatory setting are unknown. METHODS: We examined a cohort of patients aged ≥ 18 with at least 1 outpatient encounter for HF between January 2016 and June 2018 and an echocardiogram conducted within 180 days of the outpatient encounter for HF. We defined HFrEF encounters as those with ICD-10 codes of I50.2x (systolic heart failure); and we defined HFpEF encounters as those with ICD-10 codes of I50.3x (diastolic heart failure). The referent definitions of HFrEF and HFpEF were based on echocardiograms conducted within 180 days of the ambulatory encounter for HF RESULTS: We examined 68,952 encounters of 14,796 unique patients with HF. The diagnostic performance parameters for HFrEF (based on ICD-10 I50.2x only) depended on LVEF cutoff, with a sensitivity ranging from 68%-72%, specificity 63%-68%, positive predictive value 47%-63%, and negative predictive value 73%-84%. The diagnostic performance parameters for HFpEF depended on left ventricular ejection fraction cut-off, with sensitivity ranging from 34%-39%, specificity 92%-94%, positive predictive value 86%-93%, and negative predictive value 39%-54%. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-10 coding abstracted from the EMR for HFrEF vs HFpEF in the ambulatory setting had suboptimal diagnostic performance and, thus, should not be used alone to examine HFrEF and HFpEF in the ambulatory setting.

Electrocardiographic Findings in Coronavirus Disease-19: Insights on Mortality and Underlying Myocardial Processes.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory syndrome with high rates of mortality, and there is a need for easily obtainable markers to provide prognostic information. We sought to determine whether the electrocardiogram (ECG) on hospital presentation provides prognostic information, specifically related to death. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients with COVID-19 who had an ECG at or near hospital admission. Clinical characteristics and ECG variables were manually abstracted from the electronic health record and first ECG. Our primary outcome was death. THERE WERE: 756 patients who presented to a large New York City teaching hospital with COVID-19 who underwent an ECG. The mean age was 63.3 ± 16 years, 37% were women, 61% of patients were nonwhite, and 57% had hypertension; 90 (11.9%) died. In a multivariable logistic regression that included age, ECG, and clinical characteristics, the presence of one or more atrial premature contractions (odds ratio [OR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-5.36, P = .01), a right bundle branch block or intraventricular block (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.32-5.18, P = .002), ischemic T-wave inversion (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.56-7.80, P = .002), and nonspecific repolarization (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.27-4.21, P = .006) increased the odds of death. ST elevation was rare (n = 5 [0.7%]). CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with ECG findings of both left-sided heart disease (atrial premature contractions, intraventricular block, repolarization abnormalities) and right-sided disease (right bundle branch block) have higher odds of death. ST elevation at presentation was rare.

A Contemporary Approach to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

In recent years, there have been major changes in the landscape of pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy with the introduction of novel agents and innovative treatment strategies for this progressive disease. The aim of this review is to discuss the evolution in trial design in this field and highlight the salient features of recently published studies. We also summarize our approach to therapy selection in this chronic disease and identify areas for future exploration. The therapeutic armamentarium now includes 13 approved therapies. While most of these agents have been studied in small, short-term trials using the 6-min walk distance as a primary endpoint, there has been a shift in recent years toward larger, long-term, event-driven trials that utilize combined morbidity and mortality endpoints. The SERAPHIN and GRIPHON trials were two such studies, which led to the approval of the dual endothelin-receptor antagonist macitentan and the selective prostacyclin receptor antagonist selexipag, respectively. Other event-driven trials, like AMBITION and COMPASS-2, have provided valuable insight into the use of combined oral therapies in symptomatic patients. In conclusion, despite being a more manageable disease in the modern treatment era, pulmonary hypertension is still associated with considerable morbidity and much more work remains to be done in this field. Important questions remain about the most optimal way to manage patients and conduct trials going forward.

Nationwide trends of balloon pulmonary angioplasty and pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (2012-2019).

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a sequela of a pulmonary embolus that occurs in approximately 1%-3% of patients. Pulmonary thromboendoarterectomy (PTE) can be a curative procedure, but balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as an option for poor surgical candidates. We used the National Inpatient Sample to query patients who underwent PTE or BPA between 2012 and 2019 with CTEPH. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, tracheostomy, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Outcomes were compared between low- and high-volume centers, defined as 5 and 10 procedures per year for BPA and PTE, respectively. During our study period, 870 BPA and 2395 PTE were performed. There was a 328% relative increase in the number of PTE performed during the study period. Adverse events for BPA were rare. There was an increase in the primary composite outcome for low-volume centers compared to high-volume centers for PTE (24.4% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.003). Patients with hospitalizations for PTE in low-volume centers were more likely to have prolonged mechanical ventilation (20.0%% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001) and tracheostomy (7.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.017). In summary, PTE rates have been rising over the past 10 years, while BPA rates have remained stable. While adverse outcomes are rare for BPA, patients with hospitalizations at low-volume centers for PTE were more likely to have adverse outcomes. For patients undergoing treatment of CTEPH with BPA or PTE, referral to high-volume centers with multidisciplinary teams should be encouraged for optimal outcomes.

Impact of Advanced Therapy Centers on Characteristics and Outcomes of Heart Failure Admissions.

BACKGROUND: Although much attention has been paid to admission and transfer patterns for cardiogenic shock, contemporary data are lacking on decompensated heart failure (HF) admissions and transfers and the impact of advanced therapy centers (ATCs) on outcomes. METHODS: HF hospitalizations were obtained from the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2016 to 2019. Centers performing at least 1 heart transplant or left ventricular assist device were classified as ATCs. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and procedural volume were compared among 3 cohorts: admissions to non-ATCs, admissions to ATCs, and transfers to ATCs. A secondary analysis evaluated outcomes for severe HF hospitalizations (cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and mechanical ventilation). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for the presence of HF decompensations and significant clinical variables during univariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2 331 690 hospitalizations (81.2%) were admissions to non-ATCs (94.5% of centers), 525 037 (18.3%) were admissions to ATCs (5.5% of centers), and 15 541 (0.5%) were transferred to ATCs. Patients treated at ATCs (especially those transferred) had higher rates of HF decompensations, procedural frequency, lengths of stay, and costs. Unadjusted mortality was 2.6% at non-ATCs and was higher at ATCs, both for directly admitted (2.9%, P<0.001) and transferred (11.2%, P<0.001) patients. However, multivariable-adjusted mortality was significantly lower at ATCs, both for directly admitted (odds ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.78-0.87]; P<0.001) and transferred (odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.57-0.78]; P<0.001) patients. For severe HF admissions, unadjusted mortality was 37.2% at non-ATCs and was lower at ATCs, both for directly admitted (25.3%, P<0.001) and transferred (25.2%, P<0.001) patients, with similarly lower multivariable-adjusted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HF treated at ATCs were sicker but associated with higher procedural volume and lower adjusted mortality.

Mortality of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction without standard modifiable risk factors among patients without known coronary artery disease: Age-stratified and sex-related analysis from nationwide readmissions database 2010-2014.

Objective: The proportion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs: hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and smoking) has increased over time. The absence of SMuRFs is known to be associated with worse outcomes, but its association with age and sex is uncertain. We sought to evaluate the association between age and sex with the outcomes of post-STEMI patients without SMuRFs among patients without preexisting coronary artery disease. Methods: Patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI were identified from the Nationwide Readmission Database of the United States. Clinical characteristics, in-hospital, and 30-day outcomes in patients with or without SMuRFs were compared in men versus women and stratified into five age groups. Results: Between January 2010 and November 2014, of 474,234 patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI, 52,242 (11.0%) patients did not have SMuRFs. Patients without SMuRFs had higher in-hospital mortality rates than those with SMuRFs. Among those without SMuRFs, the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in women than men (10.6% vs 7.3%, p<0.001), particularly in older age groups. The absence of SMuRFs was associated with higher 30-day readmission-related mortality rates (0.5% vs 0.3% with SMuRFs, p<0.001). Among patients without SMuRFs, women had a higher 30-day readmission-related mortality rates than men (0.6% vs 0.4%, p<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, the increased rates of in-hospital (odds ratio 1.89 (95% CI 1.72 to 2.07) and 30-day readmission-related mortality (hazard ratio 1.30 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.67)) in patients without SMuRFs remained significant. Conclusions: STEMI patients without SMuRFs have a significantly higher risk of in-hospital and 30-day mortality than those with SMuRFs. Women and older patients without SMuRFs experienced significantly higher in-hospital and 30-day readmission-related mortality.

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Mechanical Circulatory Device Utilization and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock.

Objectives: This study evaluates the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on utilization of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and outcomes in cardiogenic shock (CS). Background: CS is associated with significant mortality. There is increasing use of temporary MCS devices in CS, and its impact on outcomes is currently under investigation. There is a lack of data on the effect of SES on the utilization of MCS devices in CS. Methods: CS hospitalizations were obtained from the State Inpatient Databases in 2016 from 9 states representing various regions in the United States. The study had exempt institutional review board status as the database includes deidentified data. Hospitalizations were separated into SES cohorts based on the median household income of the patient residence zip code. Utilization of MCS devices and revascularization procedures along with clinical outcomes with CS were compared across the quartiles. Results: There were 38,520 hospitalizations identified with CS, 42.6% of which were secondary to acute myocardial infarction. Patients from higher SES areas were significantly older but had lower burden of comorbidities. Utilization of temporary MCS devices was higher for hospitalizations from higher SES regions (frequency from the lowest SES quartile to the highest SES quartile: 21.3%, 21.5%, 23.5, and 24.1%, P < .01), though revascularization rates were similar. However, there was no significant difference in overall mortality from CS among the 4 quartiles. Patients from regions of higher SES experienced increased hospital costs. Conclusions: Higher SES regions had increased use of temporary MCS. There was no difference in mortality between SES cohorts.

Impact of hospital transfer to hubs on outcomes of cardiogenic shock in the real world.

AIMS: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with significant mortality, and there is a movement towards regional 'hub-and-spoke' triage systems to coordinate care and resources. Limited data exist on outcomes of patients treated at CS transfer hubs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiogenic shock hospitalizations were obtained from the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2010-2014. Centres receiving any interhospital transfers with CS in a given year were classified as CS transfer 'hubs'; those without transfers were classified as 'spokes.' In-hospital mortality was compared among three cohorts: (A) direct admissions to spokes, (B) direct admissions to hubs, and (C) interhospital transfer to hubs. Among hospitals treating CS, 70.6% were classified as spokes and 29.4% as hubs. A total of 130 656 (31.7%) hospitalizations with CS were direct admission to spokes, 253 234 (61.4%) were direct admissions to hubs, and 28 777 (7.0%) were transfer to hubs. CS mortality was 47.8% at spoke hospitals and was lower at hub hospitals, both for directly admitted (39.3%, P < 0.01) and transferred (33.4%, P < 0.01) patients. Hospitalizations at hubs had higher procedural frequency (including coronary artery bypass graft, right heart catheterization, mechanical circulatory support), greater length of stay, and greater costs. On multivariable analysis, direct admission to CS hubs [odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.89, P < 0.01] and transfer to hubs (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.69-0.76, P < 0.01) were both associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSION: While acknowledging the limited ability of the Nationwide Readmissions Database to classify CS severity on presentation, treatment of CS at transfer hubs was associated with significantly lower mortality within this large real-world sample.

Thirty-Day Readmission Rates after Takotsubo Syndrome with or without Malignancy: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis.

The association between malignancy and readmission after Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) hospitalization has not been fully described. We sought to examine the rates, cause, and cost of 30-day readmissions of TTS, with or without malignancy, by utilizing Nationwide Readmissions Databases from 2010 to 2014. We identified 61,588 index hospitalizations for TTS. TTS patients with malignancy tended to be older (70.6 ± 0.2 vs. 66.1 ± 0.1, p < 0.001), and the overall burden of comorbidities was higher than in those without malignancy. TTS patients with malignancy had significantly higher 30-day readmission rates than those without malignancy (15.9% vs. 11.0%; odds ratio (OR), 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-1.56). Non-cardiac causes were the most common causes of readmission for TTS patients with malignancy versus without malignancy (75.5% vs. 68.1%, p < 0.001). The 30-day readmission rate due to recurrent TTS was very low in both groups (0.4% and 0.5%; p = 0.47). The total costs were higher by 25% (p < 0.001) in TTS patients with vs. without malignancy. In summary, among patients hospitalized with TTS, the presence of malignancy was associated with increased risk of 30-day readmission and increased costs. These findings highlight the importance of optimized management for TTS patients with malignancy.

A Challenging Case of Extensive Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

The detection of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) causing myocardial infarction is integral in pursuing the appropriate management. Our case posed a diagnostic challenge, with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy and coronary embolism among the potential differential diagnoses upon the initial presentation. Extensive propagation of spontaneous coronary artery dissection subsequently resulted in a significant challenge to management requiring surgical revascularization. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

A case series on inflammatory cardiomyopathy and suspected cardiac sarcoidosis: role of cardiac PET in management.

BACKGROUND: Presentation of life-threatening arrhythmias concomitantly with a new-onset non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy raises concern for an inflammatory cardiomyopathy such as cardiac sarcoidosis or cardiac manifestations of connective tissue disease. Comprehensive workup for specific aetiologies may be unrevealing except for signs of myocardial inflammation identified on cardiac positron emission tomography (PET). Here, we present five cases of such subjects and their clinical course. CASE SUMMARY: We collected clinical, imaging, pathological, and follow-up data of five subjects presenting with arrhythmias and unexplained new-onset cardiomyopathy. Mean age was 56.2 ± 5.8 years. Three subjects presented with ventricular tachycardia and two with atrial arrhythmias. Echocardiography showed a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 37 ± 9%. Significant coronary artery disease was ruled out in all cases as the cause of the cardiomyopathy. All patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PET scan at presentation and follow-up. In all patients, cardiac MRI revealed hyperenhancement in epicardial and mid-myocardial pattern in a non-coronary distribution, while PET scan revealed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) mismatch defects in multiple foci in a non-coronary distribution. Right ventricular biopsy was obtained in all patients and revealed interstitial fibrosis and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. On median follow-up of 210 days, all subjects had improvement in both heart failure symptoms and arrhythmias and repeat PET in four out of five patients showed decreased inflammation. DISCUSSION: A high level of suspicion for inflammatory cardiomyopathy is needed in patients presenting with new unexplained cardiomyopathy and arrhythmias. A cardiac FDG-PET should be considered for diagnosis if cardiac inflammation is in the differential. This can inform further decisions regarding targeted immunomodulation therapy that may be helpful in this cohort.

Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Cardiogenic Shock at Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Non-Left Ventricular Assist Device Centers.

Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome associated with high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, many US hospitals have formed multidisciplinary shock teams capable of rapid diagnosis and triage. Because of preexisting collaborative systems of care, hospitals with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) programs may also represent "centers of excellence" for CS care. However, the outcomes of patients with CS at LVAD centers have not been previously evaluated. Methods and Results Patients with CS were identified in the 2012 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample. Clinical characteristics, revascularization rates, and use of mechanical circulatory support were analyzed in LVAD versus non-LVAD centers. The association between hospital type and in-hospital mortality was examined using multivariable logistic regression models. Of 272 075 hospitalizations, 26.0% were in LVAD centers. CS attributable to causes other than acute myocardial infarction represented most cases. In-hospital mortality was lower in LVAD centers (38.9% versus 43.3%; P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, the odds of mortality remained significantly lower for hospitalizations in LVAD centers (odds ratio, 0.89; P<0.001). In patients with CS secondary to acute myocardial infarction, revascularization rates were similar between LVAD and non-LVAD centers. The use of intra-aortic balloon pump (18.7% versus 18.8%) and Impella/TandemHeart (2.6% versus 1.9%) was similar between hospital types, whereas extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used more frequently in LVAD centers (4.3% versus 0.2%; P<0.001). Conclusions Risk-adjusted mortality was lower in patients with CS who were hospitalized at LVAD centers. These centers likely represent specialized, shock team capable institutions across the country that may be best suited to manage patients with CS.

Relation of a Simple Cardiac Co-Morbidity Count and Cardiovascular Readmission After a Heart Failure Hospitalization.

Although several risk calculators are available to determine risk for readmission following a heart failure (HF) hospitalization, none provide information on cause-specific readmission. Understanding risk for cause-specific readmission could aid in developing a targeted approach to reducing readmissions. We sought to determine if a simple cardiac co-morbidity count could identify individuals at high risk for a cardiovascular (CV) readmission following a HF hospitalization. Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we examined nonfatal hospital discharges with a principal diagnosis of HF. We calculated a 0 to 3 cardiac co-morbidity count based on the presence of coronary artery disease, atrial arrhythmia, and/or ventricular arrhythmia. We used a multinomial logistic regression to determine if the cardiac co-morbidity count was independently associated with CV readmission or non-CV readmission, adjusting for patient- and hospital-level confounders. In 380,075 discharges, 28% had a co-morbidity count of 0, 47% had a count of 1, 23% had a count of 2, and 2% had a count of 3. In a fully adjusted model, cardiac co-morbidity count was independently associated with CV readmission: compared with individuals with a count of 0, the relative risk for those with a count of 1 was 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23 to 1.31); for those with a count of 2 was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.35 to 1.46); and for those with a count of 3 was 1.36 (95% CI: 1.23 to 1.51). Cardiac co-morbidity count was not independently associated with non-CV readmission. In conclusion, we found that a simple cardiac co-morbidity count was independently associated with increased risk of CV but not non-CV readmission.

Myocarditis with tremelimumab plus durvalumab combination therapy for endometrial cancer: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Fulminant myocarditis has been reported in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We present the first described case of acute immune-mediated myocarditis and myositis associated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy. The patient was undergoing treatment for advanced endometrial cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old Caucasian female presented with difficulty ambulating due to neck protraction, imbalance, and increased shortness of breath with exertion 3 weeks after her first durvalumab and tremelimumab administration for advanced endometrial cancer. While the patient's initial laboratory data showed an acute transaminitis and elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK), consistent with myositis, she developed complete heart block and ventricular dysfunction, with elevated troponins. Endomyocardial biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of immune-mediated myocarditis. She was treated with high-dose steroids and mycophenolate mofetil, which led to eventual native conduction and left ventricular ejection fraction recovery. Upon discharge, she was titrated off of steroids over 8 weeks and her mycophenolate was subsequently stopped. A follow-up computed tomography scan revealed progression of metastatic disease. The patient remains alive using supplemental oxygen 3 months after admission. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy can lead to fulminant immune-mediated myocarditis. This patient's myocarditis was amenable to treatment with high-dose intravenous steroids and mycophenolate.

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights on a unique clinical phenotype from a nationally-representative United States cohort.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure often occur concomitantly, representing a clinical phenotype at high-risk for poor outcomes. Differences in the characteristics, management, and in-hospital outcomes of AF among those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are not well characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the National Inpatient Sample, we identified hospitalizations in 2008-2012 for HFpEF and for HFrEF, with and without AF based on ICD-9-CM codes. We examined patient characteristics, procedural rates, and in-hospital outcomes. AF was common among both HFpEF and HFrEF, and increased in prevalence over the study period. A very low proportion of the cohort underwent either direct-current cardioversion or catheter-ablation. Compared to those without AF, those with AF experienced higher in-hospital mortality regardless of heart failure subtype. In multivariable regression analysis, AF was associated with in-hospital mortality in HFpEF (OR 1.10, CI [1.08-1.11]), but not in HFrEF (OR 0.93 [0.92-0.94], p-for-interaction < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that the prevalence and adverse impact of AF on those with HFpEF is substantial, providing a rationale to rigorously investigate strategies, such as rhythm-control, to improve outcomes for this particularly vulnerable subpopulation.

Temporal Trends in the Clinical Acuity of Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) systems of care over the last decade, studies have shown no improvement in risk-adjusted mortality. It has been hypothesized that the population presenting to the catheterization laboratory has become sicker over time, in ways not accurately captured by current mortality models. The objective of this study was to examine changes in the clinical characteristics and in-hospital case fatality rate of the STEMI population treated with early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a nationwide inpatient database for the period 2004-2012. All patients with a diagnosis of STEMI who underwent PCI within 24 hours of admission were identified. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2012 there was a consistent increase in unadjusted in-hospital mortality (3.9% in 2004 and 4.7% in 2012, odds ratioyear 1.03; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.04). During this time there was an increase in the proportion of patients with ≥3 Elixhauser comorbidities (14.8% vs 29.0%, Ptrend < .001). Intubation or cardiac arrest on presentation increased from 3.2% to 7.8% (Ptrend < .001) and had a strong, independent association with mortality. After multivariable adjustment using a model that incorporated the increasing trend in intubation/cardiac arrest, mortality decreased over time (odds ratioyear 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: During a period that corresponds to improvement in STEMI quality of care, risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality declined. An increase in comorbidities, and more importantly in the proportion of patients presenting with extreme-risk features, may explain the overall "null" effect regarding in-hospital mortality despite improvements in timely reperfusion.