Genotype Characterization and MiRNA Expression Profiling in Usher Syndrome Cell Lines.

Usher syndrome (USH) is an inherited disorder characterized by sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), retinitis pigmentosa (RP)-related vision loss, and vestibular dysfunction. USH presents itself as three distinct clinical types, 1, 2, and 3, with no biomarker for early detection. This study aimed to explore whether microRNA (miRNA) expression in USH cell lines is dysregulated compared to the miRNA expression pattern in a cell line derived from a healthy human subject. Lymphocytes from USH patients and healthy individuals were isolated and transformed into stable cell lines using Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). DNA from these cell lines was sequenced using a targeted panel to identify gene variants associated with USH types 1, 2, and 3. Microarray analysis was performed on RNA from both USH and control cell lines using NanoString miRNA microarray technology. Dysregulated miRNAs identified by the microarray were validated using droplet digital PCR technology. DNA sequencing revealed that two USH patients had USH type 1 with gene variants in USH1B (MYO7A) and USH1D (CDH23), while the other two patients were classified as USH type 2 (USH2A) and USH type 3 (CLRN-1), respectively. The NanoString miRNA microarray detected 92 differentially expressed miRNAs in USH cell lines compared to controls. Significantly altered miRNAs exhibited at least a twofold increase or decrease with a p value below 0.05. Among these miRNAs, 20 were specific to USH1, 14 to USH2, and 5 to USH3. Three miRNAs that are known as miRNA-183 family which are crucial for inner ear and retina development, have been significantly downregulated as compared to control cells. Subsequently, droplet digital PCR assays confirmed the dysregulation of the 12 most prominent miRNAs in USH cell lines. This study identifies several miRNA signatures in USH cell lines which may have potential utility in Usher syndrome identification.

Preanalytical considerations for clinical assays of circulating human miRNA-451a, miRNA-423-5p and miRNA-199a-3p for diagnostic purposes.

Circulating miRNA has recently emerged as important biomolecules with potential clinical values as diagnostic markers for several diseases. However, to be used as such, it is critical to accurately quantify miRNAs in the clinic. Yet, preanalytical factors that can affect an error-free quantification of these miRNAs have not been explored. This study aimed at investigating several of these preanalytical factors that may affect the accurate quantification of miRNA-451a, miRNA-423-5p and miRNA-199a-3p in human blood samples. We initially evaluated levels of these three miRNAs in red blood cells (RBCs), white blood cells (WBCs), platelets, and plasma by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Next, we monitored miRNA levels in whole blood or platelet rich plasma (PRP) stored at different temperatures for different time periods by ddPCR. We also investigated the effects of hemolysis on miRNA concentrations in platelet-free plasma (PFP). Our results demonstrate that more than 97% of miRNA-451a and miRNA-423-5p in the blood are localized in RBCs, with only trace amounts present in WBCs, platelets, and plasma. Highest amount of the miRNA-199a-3p is present in platelets. Hemolysis had a significant impact on both miRNA-451a and miRNA-423-5p concentrations in plasma, however miRNA-199a levels remain unaffected. Importantly, PRP stored at room temperature (RT) or 4°C showed a statistically significant decrease in miRNA-451a levels, while the other two miRNAs were increased, at days 1, 2, 3 and 7. PFP at RT caused statistically significant steady decline in miRNA-451a and miRNA-423-5p, observed at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours. Levels of the miRNA-199a-3p in PFP was stable during first 72 hours at RT. PFP stored at -20°C for 7 days showed declining stability of miRNA-451a over time. However, at -80°C miRNA-451a levels were stable up to 7 days. Together, our data indicate that hemolysis and blood storage at RT, 4°C and -20°C may have significant negative effects on the accuracy of circulating miRNA-451a and miRNA-423-5p quantification.

Analysis of human blood plasma cell-free DNA fragment size distribution using EvaGreen chemistry based droplet digital PCR assays.

BACKGROUND: Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragment size distribution provides important information required for diagnostic assay development. We have developed and optimized droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays that quantify short and long DNA fragments. These assays were used to analyze plasma cfDNA fragment size distribution in human blood. METHODS: Assays were designed to amplify 76,135, 490 and 905 base pair fragments of human ß-actin gene. These assays were used for fragment size analysis of plasma cell-free, exosome and apoptotic body DNA obtained from normal and pregnant donors. RESULTS: The relative percentages for 76, 135, 490 and 905 bp fragments from non-pregnant plasma and exosome DNA were 100%, 39%, 18%, 5.6% and 100%, 40%, 18%,3.3%, respectively. The relative percentages for pregnant plasma and exosome DNA were 100%, 34%, 14%, 23%, and 100%, 30%, 12%, 18%, respectively. The relative percentages for non-pregnant plasma pellet (obtained after 2nd centrifugation step) were 100%, 100%, 87% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Non-pregnant Plasma cell-free and exosome DNA share a unique fragment distribution pattern which is different from pregnant donor plasma and exosome DNA fragment distribution indicating the effect of physiological status on cfDNA fragment size distribution. Fragment distribution pattern for plasma pellet that includes apoptotic bodies and nuclear DNA was greatly different from plasma cell-free and exosome DNA.

A novel approach to stabilize fetal cell-free DNA fraction in maternal blood samples for extended period of time.

This study was undertaken to evaluate a novel method for stabilizing and preserving the original proportion of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood for extended periods of time without using crosslinking agents, such as formaldehyde, which compromise DNA integrity and extraction efficiency. Blood was drawn from pregnant donors into K3EDTA and Blood Exo DNA ProTeck® (ProTeck) tubes. Blood drawn into both tubes were aliquoted and stored at three different temperatures. At indicated times sample aliquots were processed for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extraction. Plasma cfDNA and cffDNA quantified by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay which amplify RASSF1A gene promoter region. ProTeck reagent is formaldehyde free and inhibits blood cell metabolism in blood samples during storage. Cell-free DNA concentration increased over time in blood plasma stored in K3EDTA tubes at 4, 22 and 30°C. Blood stored in ProTeck tubes, cfDNA concentration was stable at 4, 22 and 30°C for 21, 28 and 7 days, respectively. In K3EDTA tubes cffDNA proportion decreases steadily over time whereas in ProTeck tubes cffDNA proportion remained stable. This novel technology stabilizes cffDNA proportion in maternal blood samples at 4, 22 and 30°C for 21, 28 and 7 days, respectively.

New evidence that a large proportion of human blood plasma cell-free DNA is localized in exosomes.

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in blood is used as a source of genetic material for noninvasive prenatal and cancer diagnostic assays in clinical practice. Recently we have started a project for new biomarker discovery with a view to developing new noninvasive diagnostic assays. While reviewing literature, it was found that exosomes may be a rich source of biomarkers, because exosomes play an important role in human health and disease. While characterizing exosomes found in human blood plasma, we observed the presence of cfDNA in plasma exosomes. Plasma was obtained from blood drawn into K3EDTA tubes. Exosomes were isolated from cell-free plasma using a commercially available kit. Sizing and enumeration of exosomes were done using electron microscopy and NanoSight particle counter. NanoSight and confocal microscopy was used to demonstrate the association between dsDNA and exosomes. DNA extracted from plasma and exosomes was measured by a fluorometric method and a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method. Size of extracellular vesicles isolated from plasma was heterogeneous and showed a mean value of 92.6 nm and a mode 39.7 nm. A large proportion of extracellular vesicles isolated from plasma were identified as exosomes using a fluorescence probe specific for exosomes and three protein markers, Hsp70, CD9 and CD63, that are commonly used to identify exosome fraction. Fluorescence dye that stain dsDNA showed the association between exosomes and dsDNA. Plasma cfDNA concentration analysis showed more than 93% of amplifiable cfDNA in plasma is located in plasma exosomes. Storage of a blood sample showed significant increases in exosome count and exosome DNA concentration. This study provide evidence that a large proportion of plasma cfDNA is localized in exosomes. Exosome release from cells is a metabolic energy dependent process, thus suggesting active release of cfDNA from cells as a source of cfDNA in plasma.

Stabilization of cellular RNA in blood during storage at room temperature: a comparison of cell-free RNA BCT(®) with K3EDTA tubes.

BACKGROUND: Messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels in blood cells are important in disease diagnosis, prognosis and biomarker discovery research. Accurate measurements of intracellular mRNA levels in blood cells depend upon several pre-analytical factors, including delays in RNA extraction from blood after phlebotomy. Dramatic changes in mRNA expression levels caused by delays in blood sample processing may render such samples unsuitable for gene expression analysis. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate a blood collection tube, cell-free RNA-BCT(®) (RNA-BCT), for its ability to stabilize mRNA expression level in blood cells post-phlebotomy using indicator mRNAs in reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays. METHODS: Blood samples from presumed healthy donors were drawn into both RNA-BCT and K3EDTA tubes and maintained at room temperature (18-22°C). The samples were processed to obtain white blood cells (WBCs) at days 0, 1, 2 and 3. Total cellular RNA was extracted from WBCs and mRNA concentrations were quantified by RT-qPCR for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), c-fos, and p53 transcripts. RESULTS: While blood cells isolated from K3EDTA tubes showed significant changes in cellular mRNA concentrations for GAPDH, c-fos, and p53, these mRNAs concentrations were stable in blood drawn into RNA-BCT. CONCLUSION: The reagent in the RNA-BCT device stabilizes cellular mRNA concentrations for GAPDH, c-fos and p53 for at least three days at room temperature.

Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of formaldehyde free preservatives.

Preservation of biomolecules is pivotal in increasingly important molecular diagnostics. Traditionally, formaldehyde is employed for such biomolecular preservation in spite of its carcinogenicity. Moreover, formaldehyde induced cross-linking during fixation is reported to alter structural and functional properties of the preserved biomolecules. Therefore, formaldehyde-free preservatives are advantageous because they are safer for laboratory personnel and they protect the structural and functional integrity of the biomolecules. Streck Cell Preservative and Cell-Free DNA BCT reagents are used as formaldehyde alternative preservatives. However, no studies have been carried out to evaluate formaldehyde concentrations in these preservatives. In this study, we evaluated the free formaldehyde concentrations of these reagents by carbon-13 ((13)C) NMR spectroscopic analysis. Chemically non-invasive NMR analysis is more reliable than the traditional derivatization based techniques in formaldehyde detection. (13)C NMR technique can be used for quantitative measurement by using (13)C NMR-relaxation agents. In this manuscript, we report an optimized NMR analysis method using Gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetate. Additionally the data reported herein provide spectral analyses that indicate Streck Cell Preservative and Cell-Free DNA BCT reagents do not contain detectable free formaldehyde. Therefore, these preservatives are safer alternatives than formaldehyde for laboratory use, which can protect the overall integrity of the biomolecules within preserved samples.