RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib is approved as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable and/or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Lenvatinib achieved promising clinical benefits in REFLECT but was associated with clinically significant treatment-emergent hypertension (CSTE-HTN, a grouped term), a common class effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This post hoc analysis assessed the impact of CSTE-HTN on the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in HCC. METHODS: Patients from REFLECT who received lenvatinib (n = 476) were stratified according to CSTE-HTN. Tumors were assessed by mRECIST. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using landmark analyses at 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients in the lenvatinib arm developed CSTE-HTN, and 264 did not. CSTE-HTN first occurred at 3.7 weeks (median); the worst grade CSTE-HTN occurred at 4.1 weeks (median). No patients had life-threatening CSTE-HTN and/or died due to CSTE-HTN. Median OS was numerically longer in patients with versus without CSTE-HTN (at 4 weeks: 16.3 vs. 11.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.621-1.004; at 8 weeks: 13.5 vs. 11.6 months; HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.696-1.089). Median PFS was similar between patients with and without CSTE-HTN (at 4 weeks: 6.6 vs. 6.4 months; HR, 0.887; 95% CI, 0.680-1.157; at 8 weeks: 5.7 vs. 6.4 months; HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.84-1.41). Objective response rate was numerically higher in patients with (48.6%) versus without CSTE-HTN (34.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, CSTE-HTN was associated with improved OS but not PFS. CSTE-HTN did not impair the outcomes of patients with HCC treated with lenvatinib when detected early and managed appropriately.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Hipertensão , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compostos de Fenilureia , Quinolinas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/induzido quimicamente , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
In this Expert Opinion, we thoroughly analyse the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging and treatment algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that, since 1999, has standardised HCC management, offering a structured approach for the prognostic evaluation and treatment of patients with HCC. The first part of the article presents the strengths and evolutionary improvements of the BCLC staging system. Nevertheless, both patient characteristics and available treatments have changed in the last two decades, limiting the role of the BCLC criteria for treatment allocation in a growing number of patients. As therapeutic options expand and become more effective, the stage-linked treatment decision-making algorithm may lead to undertreatment and suboptimal outcomes for patients with disease beyond early-stage HCC. Consequently, strict adherence to BCLC criteria is limited in expert centres, particularly for patients diagnosed beyond early-stage HCC. Although the BCLC system remains the benchmark against which other therapeutic frameworks must be judged, the era of precision medicine calls for patient-tailored therapeutic decision-making (by a multidisciplinary tumour board) rather than stage-dictated treatment allocation. Acknowledging this conceptual difference in clinical management, the second part of the article describes a novel "multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy", which integrates a comprehensive assessment of clinical factors, biomarkers, technical feasibility, and resource availability. Lastly, considering the increasing efficacy of locoregional and systemic treatments, the concept of "converse therapeutic hierarchy" is introduced. These treatments can increase the feasibility (conversion approach) and effectiveness (adjuvant approach of systemic therapy) of potentially curative approaches to greatly improve clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Algoritmos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In the global, phase III HIMALAYA study in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) improved overall survival (OS) vs. sorafenib; durvalumab was noninferior to sorafenib. HBV is the predominant HCC aetiology in most of Asia vs. HCV or nonviral aetiologies in Western countries and Japan. This analysis evaluated safety and efficacy outcomes for STRIDE and durvalumab monotherapy vs. sorafenib, in HIMALAYA participants enrolled in Asia, excluding Japan. METHODS: In HIMALAYA, participants were randomised to STRIDE, durvalumab, or sorafenib. The Asian subgroup in this analysis included participants enrolled in Hong Kong, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. OS, objective response rate (ORR; per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1), and safety were assessed in the Asian subgroup and in an exploratory subgroup of participants in Hong Kong and Taiwan. RESULTS: The Asian subgroup included 479 participants randomised to STRIDE (n=156), durvalumab (n=167), or sorafenib (n=156). OS was improved for STRIDE vs. sorafenib (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.89]). The OS HR for durvalumab vs. sorafenib was 0.83 (95% CI 0.64-1.06). In Hong Kong and Taiwan (n=141), OS HRs for STRIDE vs. sorafenib and durvalumab vs. sorafenib were 0.44 (95% CI 0.26-0.77) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.37-1.08), respectively. In the Asian subgroup, ORR (including unconfirmed responses) was numerically higher for STRIDE (28.2%) and durvalumab (18.6%) vs. sorafenib (9.0%), and Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were numerically lower for STRIDE (19.9%) and durvalumab (13.3%) vs. sorafenib (30.5%). CONCLUSIONS: STRIDE improved outcomes vs. sorafenib in the Asian subgroup. These results support the benefits of STRIDE for participants with uHCC globally, including the Asia-Pacific region. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03298451 IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The global, phase III HIMALAYA study found that the STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) regimen improved overall survival (OS), including long-term OS, vs. sorafenib, and that durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, there are differences in the aetiology and clinical practices related to HCC in parts of Asia, compared to Western countries and Japan, which could lead to differences in treatment outcomes between these regions. The results of this analysis demonstrate the benefits of STRIDE for participants in the Asia-Pacific region, consistent with the full, global study population. Overall, these findings continue to support the use of STRIDE in a diverse population, reflective of uHCC globally.
RESUMO
The American College of Radiology Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) standardizes the imaging technique, reporting lexicon, disease categorization, and management for patients with or at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). LI-RADS encompasses HCC surveillance with US; HCC diagnosis with CT, MRI, or contrast-enhanced US (CEUS); and treatment response assessment (TRA) with CT or MRI. LI-RADS was recently expanded to include CEUS TRA after nonradiation locoregional therapy or surgical resection. This report provides an overview of LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024, including a lexicon of imaging findings, techniques, and imaging criteria for posttreatment tumor viability assessment. LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024 takes into consideration differences in the CEUS appearance of viable tumor and posttreatment changes within and in close proximity to a treated lesion. Due to the high sensitivity of CEUS to vascular flow, posttreatment reactive changes commonly manifest as areas of abnormal perilesional enhancement without washout, especially in the first 3 months after treatment. To improve the accuracy of CEUS for nonradiation TRA, different diagnostic criteria are used to evaluate tumor viability within and outside of the treated lesion margin. Broader criteria for intralesional enhancement increase sensitivity for tumor viability detection. Stricter criteria for perilesional enhancement limit miscategorization of posttreatment reactive changes as viable tumor. Finally, the TRA algorithm reconciles intralesional and perilesional tumor viability assessment and assigns a single LI-RADS treatment response (LR-TR) category: LR-TR nonviable, LR-TR equivocal, or LR-TR viable.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Meios de Contraste , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Ultrassonografia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Sistemas de Informação em Radiologia , Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Overweight is a negative prognostic factor in the general population in the long term. However, the role of body mass index (BMI) in the short-mid term in advanced tumours is unclear. The present analysis investigates the role of BMI weight classes in a large sample of patients affected by HCC and receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib as first-line treatment. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The cohort included consecutive patients affected by BCLC-c and BCLC-B HCC patients from a multicenter international study group who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib as first-line therapy. Population was stratified according to the BMI in under-, over- and normal-weight according to the conventional thresholds. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive impact of BMI in patients affected by advanced or intermediate HCC. Survival curves were estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan-Meier. The role of stratification factors was analysed with log-rank tests. RESULTS: 1292 consecutive patients with HCC were analysed. 466 (36%) patients were treated with lenvatinib and 826 (64%) patients were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab arm, 510 (62%) patients were normal-weight, 52 (6%) underweight and 264 (32%) overweight. At the univariate analysis for OS, underweight patients had significantly shorter OS compared to normal-weight patients, whereas no differences were found between normal-weight versus overweight. Multivariate analysis confirmed that underweight patients had significantly shorter OS compared to normal-weight patients (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.0-2.8; p = .0323). In the lenvatinib arm, 26 patients (5.6%) were categorized as underweight, 256 (54.9%) as normal-weight, and 184 (39.5%) as overweight. At the univariate analysis for OS, no significant differences were found between normal-weight versus underweight and between normal-weight versus overweight, which was confirmed at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our analysis highlighted a prognostic role of BMI in a cohort of patients with advanced HCC who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, while no prognostic role for low BMI was apparent in patients who received lenvatinib.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compostos de Fenilureia , Quinolinas , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Índice de Massa Corporal , Sobrepeso , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Prognóstico , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , MagrezaRESUMO
Hepatocellular carcinoma, historically, has had a poor prognosis with very few systemic options. Furthermore, most patients at diagnosis are not surgical candidates. Therefore, locoregional therapy (LRT) has been widely used, with strong data supporting its use. Over the last 15 years, there has been progress in the available systemic agents. This has led to the updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) algorithm's inclusion of these new systemic agents, with advocacy of earlier usage in those who progress on LRT or have tumor characteristics that make them less likely to benefit from LRT. However, neither the adjunct of LRT nor the specific sequencing of combination therapies is addressed directly. This Research Consensus Panel sought to highlight research priorities pertaining to the combination and optimal sequencing of LRT and systemic therapy, assessing the greatest needs across BCLC stages.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/normas , Consenso , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant global health burden with a high mortality rate. Over the past 40 years, significant progress has been achieved in the prevention and management of HCC. SUMMARY: Hepatitis B vaccination programs, the development of direct acting antiviral drugs for Hepatitis C, and effective surveillance strategies provide a profound basis for the prevention of HCC. Advanced surgery and liver transplantation along with local ablation techniques potentially offer cure for the disease. Also, just recently, the introduction of immunotherapy opened a new chapter in systemic treatment. Finally, the introduction of the BCLC classification system for HCC, clearly defining patient groups and assigning reasonable treatment options, has standardized treatment and become the basis of almost all clinical trials for HCC. With this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of HCC management and also touch on current challenges. KEY MESSAGE: A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach is crucial for effective HCC management. Continued research and clinical trials are imperative to further enhance treatment options and will ultimately reduce the global burden of this devastating disease.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Transplante de Fígado , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Imunoterapia/métodos , Antivirais/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
AIM: Recent genome-wide association studies of European populations have identified rs16906115, a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the interleukin-7 gene, as a predictor of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We evaluated this single-nucleotide polymorphism in a Japanese population. METHODS: From January 2021, we stored host DNA from individuals who received various types of immune checkpoint inhibitors. From this population, we categorized 510 participants into cases (grade ≥2 irAEs) and controls (received ≥3 immune checkpoint inhibitor doses, follow-up ≥12 weeks, no irAEs), and divided 339 hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab into responders and non-responders, evaluated using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. We compared the minor allele frequencies of rs16906115 between cases and controls, and responders and non-responders. RESULTS: In the irAE prediction analysis of 234 cases and 276 controls, the minor allele frequency was 0.244 in the case group and 0.265 in the control group. This difference is not significant. In the analysis predicting the therapeutic efficacy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients, the responders had a significantly lower minor allele frequency of 0.220, compared with 0.300 for the non-responders (p = 0.022). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the minor allele homozygosity as a significant predictor of treatment response, with odds ratios of 0.292 (p = 0.015) in the univariate analysis and 0.315 (p = 0.023) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In our Japanese cohort, no association was found between the rs16906115 minor allele and irAEs or treatment efficacy. The minor allele homozygosity may be associated with a negative therapeutic outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry with the number UMIN000043798.
RESUMO
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is a standard of care, first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Myeloid and T regulatory cells are key immunosuppressive cell types within the hepatic tumor microenvironment associated with clinical resistance to atezolizumab and bevacizumab therapy for HCC and overall poor prognosis. Therapeutic targeting of TIGIT, which is highly expressed in these cells, with tiragolumab may overcome the immunosuppressive environment and improve clinical benefit, a hypothesis supported by positive efficacy signals in the Phase Ib/II MORPHEUS-Liver study. This paper describes the rationale and design of IMbrave152/SKYSCRAPER-14, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III study comparing atezolizumab and bevacizumab with tiragolumab or placebo in patients with HCC and no prior systemic treatment.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05904886 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
This research study is designed to test a new treatment combination for liver cancer, specifically for patients whose cancer cannot be removed with surgery or has spread. The treatment involves three medications: atezolizumab, bevacizumab and tiragolumab.Atezolizumab and bevacizumab are already used together as a standard treatment for liver cancer. Tiragolumab is designed to block the TIGIT receptor, which is normally involved in holding back the immune cells that would attack the tumor. Because tiragolumab may restore the immune response against the tumor, adding tiragolumab might make the treatment more effective.The study is being done worldwide and includes patients who have not received any previous systemic treatment for their advanced liver cancer. Patients participating in the study will be randomly placed into two groups. One group will receive the new combination of three medications, while the other group will receive the standard treatment of two medications plus a placebo (a treatment with no active ingredient). The main goal is to see if the new combination helps patients live longer and slows the cancer's growth compared with the standard treatment. Safety and how patients feel during the treatment are also important parts of the study.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Detection of a common channel outside the duodenal wall is important in diagnosing pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM). The present study evaluated the utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) in diagnosing PBM. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study enrolled 45 patients who were diagnosed with PBM or high confluence of pancreatobiliary ducts (HCPBD) between January 2007 and December 2021. The diagnostic sensitivities of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and CH-EUS for diagnosing PBM were analyzed. Imaging findings were evaluated by two reviewers blinded to the clinicopathological results. RESULTS: Based on diagnostic criteria, 33 patients were diagnosed with PBM and 12 with HCPBD. Compared with the patients with HCPBD, those with PBM had significantly longer common channel (12.5 mm vs. 8.1 mm, P = 0.018) and common bile duct (13.0 mm vs. 8.6 mm, P = 0.049) lengths. The κ-coefficients for differentiating PBM and HCPBD were 0.871 between CE-CT and MRI, 0.330 between CE-CT and CH-EUS, and 0.611 between MRI and CH-EUS. The diagnostic sensitivity of CH-EUS (95.2%) was higher than that of CE-CT (83.3%) and MRI (82.8%), although the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: CH-EUS may be useful for the diagnosis of PBM.
Assuntos
Meios de Contraste , Endossonografia , Má Junção Pancreaticobiliar , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Endossonografia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Má Junção Pancreaticobiliar/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto Jovem , Ductos Pancreáticos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ductos Pancreáticos/anormalidades , AdolescenteRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of native T1 and T2 mapping in the bowel to evaluate disease activity in Crohn disease (CD) using endoscopy as the reference standard. METHODS: This was a prospective study. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed by using a 1.5-T Philips scanner. We used a modified look-locker inversion recovery and a multiecho gradient-spin-echo sequences for single breath-hold native T1 and T2 maps, respectively, for the short-axis image of the intestine, and the measurement at the most severe site was compared with partial Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (pSES-CD, assessed by an expert endoscopist). A pSES-CD ≥ 4 indicated active disease. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student t test, Spearman correlation, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 37 ± 18 years; 20 men, 7 women) were included in this study. The native T1 value of active disease was significantly higher than that of inactive disease (1170.8 ± 100.5 milliseconds vs 924.5 ± 95.3 milliseconds; P = 0.018), but the T2 value was not significantly different between active and inactive disease (76.1 ± 7.8 milliseconds vs 69.3 ± 10.9 milliseconds; P = 0.424). A good correlation was found between native T1 value and pSES-CD (ρ = 0.71; P < 0.001) but not between T2 value and pSES-CD (ρ = 0.06; P = 0.790). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differentiating the disease activity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-1.00) for T1 values and 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.96) for T2 values. CONCLUSIONS: Native T1 mapping could be potentially used as a noninvasive method to differentiate disease activity in patients with CD and may be superior to T2 mapping for this purpose.
RESUMO
Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) is an intracellular sensor for muramyl dipeptide (MDP), a degradation product of bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan (PGN). PGN stimulates cell-surface Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) independently of NOD2, indicating the presence of crosstalk between extracellular TLR2 and intracellular NOD2 upon exposure to PGN. NOD2-deficient mice were sensitive, while TLR2-deficient mice were resistant to experimental colitis induced by intrarectal administration of PGN. Severe colitis in NOD2-deficient mice was accompanied by increased expression of nuclear factor-kappa B-dependent cytokines and decreased expression of autophagy-related 16-like 1 (ATG16L1). MDP activation of NOD2 enhanced autophagy mediated by TLR2 in human dendritic cells. mRNA expression of TLR2 tended to be higher in the colonic mucosa of patients with active ulcerative colitis compared to that of those in remission. Induction of remission was associated with increased mRNA expression of ATG16L1 in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients. Conversely, mRNA expression of receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 2 was higher in the inflammatory colonic mucosa of patients with active disease than in the non-inflamed mucosa of patients in remission, in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. These findings highlight the role of NOD2-TLR2 crosstalk in the immunopathogenesis of colitis.
RESUMO
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are highly effective; however, vaccine-related adverse events, including autoimmunity, have been reported. Case reports describing relapse or new-onset of ulcerative colitis (UC) after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination are available. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of colonic inflammation associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccination are poorly understood. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the relapse of UC after COVID-19 vaccination is driven by unique cytokine responses that differ from those of UC not associated with vaccination. mRNAs derived from COVID-19 vaccines are potent inducers of type I IFN response. We encountered three cases of UC relapse after COVID-19 vaccination. mRNA expressions of IFN-α, IFN-ß, IL-1ß, and IL-12/23p40 showed higher tendency in the colonic mucosa of patients with UC associated with vaccination compared with those not associated with vaccination. In contrast, the expressions of C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9) and CXCL10 were comparable. Immunofluorescence analyses also showed higher expression of IFN-α in the colonic mucosa of patients with UC associated with COVID-19 vaccination than in those not associated with vaccination. Taken together, these data suggest that the colonic mucosa of patients with UC who relapsed after COVID-19 vaccination was characterized by enhanced type I IFN responses.
RESUMO
Neutrophils express protein arginine deiminase 2 and PAD4, both of which mediate the citrullination of target proteins to induce production of neutrophil extracellular traps. Although PAD-dependent NETs trigger inflammatory bowel disease, the mechanisms governing the expression of PAD2 and PAD4 are poorly understood. In this study, we tried to clarify expression mechanisms of PAD2 and PAD4 in the colonic mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Administration of Cl-amidine, a pan PAD-inhibitor, attenuated the development of dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis, the effects of which were accompanied by reduced IL-6 and TNF-α production by colonic lamina propria mononuclear cells upon exposure to Toll-like receptor ligands. The mRNA expression of colonic PAD2 and PAD4 was negatively and positively correlated with disease activity and pro-inflammatory cytokine responses in patients with UC, respectively. Reciprocal regulation of PAD2 and PAD4 mRNA expression was observed in the colonic mucosa of UC patients, but not in those of CD patients. PAD4 mRNA expression was correlated with disease activity and pro-inflammatory cytokine responses in patients with CD. Collectively, these data suggest that reciprocal regulation of PAD2 and PAD4 expression is associated with disease activity in UC patients.