Acitretin Use in Dermatology.

BACKGROUND: Acitretin has been used for the treatment of severe psoriasis for over 20 years. OBJECTIVE: The current project was conceived to optimise patient care by recognising the role acitretin can play in the treatment of patients with psoriasis and those with other disorders of keratinisation. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to explore the role of acitretin and to assess its value for dermatologic disorders other than severe psoriasis. A panel of Canadian dermatologists developed a clinical pathway using a case-based approach, focusing on specific patient features. RESULTS: The clinical pathway covers plaque psoriasis with hyperkeratotic plantar disease, palmoplantar pustulosis, hyperkeratotic hand dermatitis, lichen planus, lamellar ichthyosis, and hidradenitis suppurativa. CONCLUSION: The recommendations in our clinical pathway reflect the current use of acitretin in Canada for severe psoriasis and other disorders of keratinisation.

Immune response to pneumococcus and tetanus toxoid in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis following long-term ustekinumab use.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of long-term use of immunosuppressive agents on immune response. OBJECTIVES: Assess the impact of continuous maintenance ustekinumab treatment on patients' ability to mount immune responses to pneumococcal (T-cell-independent) and tetanus toxoid (T-cell-dependent) vaccines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ustekinumab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated in the long-term extension of the Phase 3 PHOENIX 2 trial (n=60) were compared with control psoriasis patients not receiving systemic therapy (n=56). Patients were vaccinated with both 23-valent pneumococcal and tetanus toxoid vaccines. Serum samples collected pre-vaccination and 4 weeks post-vaccination were assessed for antibody responses. RESULTS: No differences in the ability of ustekinumab-treated patients to respond to pneumococcal or tetanus toxoid vaccinations were observed compared with controls. A ≥2-fold increase in antibody levels in ≥7 of 14 serotypes of the pneumococcal vaccine was observed in ustekinumab-treated (96.6%) and untreated control (92.6%) patients following vaccination. Ustekinumab-treated patients achieved a ≥4-fold increase (84.7%) in anti-tetanus antibody vs. 77.8% in the control group. No differences were detected in ex-vivo responses to anti-CD3/CD28 or tetanus toxoid between ustekinumab-treated and control groups. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment (≥3 years) with ustekinumab does not compromise the immune response to T-cell-dependent/-independent vaccines in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Quality of life in plaque psoriasis patients treated with voclosporin: a Canadian phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life assessments are important in the evaluation of new therapies for psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of voclosporin (VCS) treatment on quality of life in patients with psoriasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 451 plaque psoriasis patients with ≥  10% body surface area involvement were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to 1 of 4 treatment groups (placebo, VCS 0.2 mg kg(-1) BID, VCS 0.3 mg kg(-1) BID, and VCS 0.4 mg kg(-1) BID) for up to 12 weeks of treatment. Quality of life was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI). RESULTS: At 12 weeks, patients treated with VCS 0.4 mg kg(-1) BID had statistically significantly more favourable assessments than placebo-treated patients in all domains of the DLQI and the PDI. Patients treated with VCS 0.3 mg kg(-1) BID had statistically significant improvements in 5 of 10 domains of the DLQI and all domains of the PDI. Patients treated with VCS 0.2 mg kg(-1) BID had statistically significant improvements in 4 of 10 domains of the DLQI and 2 of 4 domains of the PDI. CONCLUSION: Treatment with VCS 0.4 mg kg(-1) BID significantly improves the quality of life of patients with psoriasis.

Ustekinumab, a human interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody, for psoriatic arthritis: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Since some patients with psoriatic arthritis do not respond to typical drug treatments, alternatives are needed. Findings suggest that interleukins 12 and 23 might affect clinical symptoms and pathological joint changes of psoriatic arthritis. Ustekinumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits receptor-binding of these cytokines. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for psoriatic arthritis in this phase II study. METHODS: We undertook a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study at 24 sites in North America and Europe. Patients with active psoriatic arthritis were randomly allocated via interactive voice response system to either ustekinumab (90 mg or 63 mg) every week for 4 weeks (weeks 0-3) followed by placebo at weeks 12 and 16 (n=76; Group 1) or placebo (weeks 0-3) and ustekinumab (63 mg) at weeks 12 and 16 (n=70; Group 2). The first 12 weeks of the study were placebo-controlled. Masking was maintained to week 16, and patients were followed up to week 36 [corrected]. The primary endpoint was ACR20 response at week 12. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00267956. FINDINGS: At week 12, 32 (42%) patients in Group 1 and ten (14%) in Group 2 achieved the primary endpoint (difference 28% [95% CI 14.0-41.6]; p=0.0002). Of 124 (85%) participants with psoriasis affecting 3% or more body surface area, 33 of 63 (52%) in Group 1 and three of 55 (5%) in Group 2 had a 75% or greater improvement in psoriasis area and severity index score at week 12 (47% [33.2-60.6]; p<0.0001). During the placebo-controlled period (weeks 0-12), adverse events arose in 46 (61%) patients in Group 1 and 44 (63%) in Group 2; serious adverse events were recorded in three (4%) Group 2 patients (none in Group 1). INTERPRETATION: Ustekinumab significantly reduced signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis and diminished skin lesions compared with placebo, and the drug was well tolerated. Larger and longer term studies are needed to further characterise ustekinumab efficacy and safety for treatment of psoriatic arthritis.

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel group study to compare relative efficacies of the topical gels 3% erythromycin/5% benzoyl peroxide and 0.025% tretinoin/erythromycin 4% in the treatment of moderate acne vulgaris of the face.

BACKGROUND: Combination treatments for acne vulgaris, such as Benzamycin (3% erythromycin/5% benzoyl peroxide) and Stievamycin (0.025% tretinoin/erythromycin 4%), reduce bacterial growth, which contributes to the inflammatory lesions typical of adolescent acne, and also decrease the epidermal cell compaction which may form the characteristic noninflammatory comedone. Both agents contain erythromycin to reduce the growth of Propionibacterium acnes in skin. Benzoyl peroxide has antibiotic activity as well as anticomedogenic properties. Tretinoin may increase the turnover of epidermal cells and loosen the cells compacted to form comedones. A combination preparation containing the two antibiotics may reduce the development of resistance; the combination preparation containing tretinoin and erythromycin will have an antibiotic effect as well as acting on differentiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study compared the effectiveness of 3% erythromycin/5% benzoyl peroxide and 0.025% tretinoin/erythromycin 4%, each applied twice daily in patients with moderate acne vulgaris. Overall physician and patient ratings of severity of acne symptoms were performed at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. RESULTS: At baseline the two treatment groups had similar disease severity. The number of papules, pustules, and comedones was reduced in both treatment groups at week 12, and the reductions were not significantly different between the two comparators. Global physician rating of improvement was significantly higher in the 3% erythromycin/5% benzoyl peroxide group compared with the 0.025% tretinoin/erythromycin 4% group; however, there was no significant difference in global patient ratings between the two treatment groups. An aggregate score was produced, for both physician rating and patient rating, by adding up individual symptom severity ratings. Compared with 0.025% tretinoin/erythromycin 4%, 3% erythromycin/5% benzoyl peroxide provided significantly greater reduction in both physician- and patient-rated severity of acne symptoms; there was a significant difference between the two groups as early as week 2. The 3% erythromycin/5% benzoyl peroxide demonstrated significantly greater reduction of erythema and scaling, as evaluated by the study physician, compared with tretinoin 0.025%/erythromycin 4%. Patients judged 3% erythromycin/5% benzoyl peroxide to have a significantly greater effect on redness, dryness, oiliness, and burning. CONCLUSION: In moderate acne vulgaris, 3% erythromycin/5% benzoyl peroxide may provide a greater beneficial effect than 0.025% tretinoin/erythromycin 4%.