A first-in-human study of the novel immunology antibody-drug conjugate, ABBV-3373, in healthy participants.

AIMS: ABBV-3373, an immunology antibody-drug conjugate composed of adalimumab conjugated to a proprietary glucocorticoid receptor modulator (the small-molecule payload), has the potential to treat immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. This first-in-human study investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics (PD) using a safety PD marker, and safety/tolerability of ABBV-3373 in healthy adults. METHODS: Fifty-five participants were randomly assigned to single-dose subcutaneous (SC; 30, 100 or 300 mg) or intravenous (IV; 30, 300 or 900 mg) ABBV-3373 or placebo. Eight additional participants received a single dose of 10 mg oral prednisone for evaluation of systemic glucocorticoid effects. Blood samples were collected for up to 85 days postdose for PK, anti-drug antibody and serum cortisol (safety PD marker) assessments. RESULTS: ABBV-3373 and total antibody displayed antibody-like SC/IV PK profiles and the unconjugated/free payload in circulation exhibited formation rate-limited kinetics with exposure several fold lower than ABBV-3373 or total antibody. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody incidence was 69%, with loss of exposure in 6% (SC) and 5% (IV) of participants, but without any impact on safety. ABBV-3373 up to 300 mg SC/IV had no apparent impact on serum cortisol, and only caused a transient decrease at 900 mg IV. Treatment-emergent adverse events were primarily mild in severity, and no pattern emerged with respect to dose or route of administration. CONCLUSIONS: ABBV-3373 had favourable PK profiles, manageable immunogenicity, and was generally well-tolerated. Except for a transient effect at 900 mg IV, there was no apparent impact on serum cortisol. Study results supported further clinical development of ABBV-3373.

Genetic markers associated with clinical and radiographic response in adalimumab plus methotrexate- or methotrexate-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients in OPTIMA.

OBJECTIVES: Biologics, including tumour necrosis factor inhibitors such as adalimumab (ADA), have significantly improved outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because the clinical course of RA and response to therapy may be influenced by the genetic background of the patient, the objective of this retrospective parallel-assigned case-control analysis was to evaluate the associations between candidate genetic markers for RA with clinical and radiographic responses to ADA + methotrexate (MTX) or MTX monotherapy in the Optimal Protocol for Treatment Initiation with MTX and ADA (OPTIMA) study. METHODS: Three candidate genetic markers were tested: HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE), interleukin 4 receptor (IL4R) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1805010, and Fc gamma receptor IIb (FcgRIIb) SNP rs1050501. Genetic associations with week 26 clinical and radiographic responses during treatment with ADA + MTX or MTX monotherapy were assessed using summary statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exact test, correlation, regression models, and corrected for multiple-comparisons. RESULTS: Low disease activity (p=0.008) and improvement in American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50% and 70% response criteria (p=0.02, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively) were associated with HLA-DRB1 SE copy numbers in the ADA + MTX treatment arm, and the FcgRIIb SNP was a predictor of remission. The IL4R SNP correlated with radiographic progression in patients receiving MTX monotherapy, supporting previous findings. CONCLUSIONS: This pharmacogenetic analysis identified genetic components that contribute to clinical responses to anti-rheumatic therapy.

Testing treat-to-target outcomes with initial methotrexate monotherapy compared with initial tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (adalimumab) plus methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare responses in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initially treated with the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) adalimumab+methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX monotherapy who may have continued receiving MTX or switched to adalimumab rescue therapy after inadequate response to MTX. METHODS: OPTIMA enrolled MTX-naive patients with active RA for <1 year. This post hoc analysis determined the proportion of patients, stratified by initial treatment, who achieved 28-joint modified Disease Activity Score based on C reactive protein <3.2, normal function and/or no radiographic progression at weeks 26, 52 and 78. RESULTS: Significantly greater proportions of patients initially treated with adalimumab+MTX (n=466) compared with MTX monotherapy (n=460) achieved good clinical (53% vs 30%), functional (45% vs 33%) and radiographic (87% vs 72%) outcomes at week 26. From weeks 26 to 78, adalimumab rescue patients achieved similar clinical and functional outcomes versus patients initially treated with adalimumab+MTX. However, significantly more patients initially treated with adalimumab+MTX had no radiographic progression at weeks 52 and 78 versus patients initially treated with MTX (both timepoints: 86% vs 72%). CONCLUSIONS: In early RA, starting with MTX monotherapy and adding TNFi after 26 weeks yields similar longer term clinical results as starting with TNFi+MTX combination therapy but allows a small but significant accrual of radiographic damage.

Effect of adalimumab on the work-related outcomes scores in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of adalimumab plus MTX (ADA + MTX) vs MTX monotherapy on work-related outcomes in early RA patients with elevated risk of employment loss. METHODS: A post hoc analysis at weeks 26 and 24 from the Optimal Protocol for Treatment Initiation with Methotrexate and Adalimumab (OPTIMA) and PRevention Of Work Disability (PROWD) trials, respectively, was conducted in MTX-naïve RA patients randomized to ADA + MTX or placebo (PBO) + MTX. Work instability was assessed using the RA-Work Instability Scale (RA-WIS) and work productivity was measured with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Employed patients with a baseline RA-WIS score ⩾10, indicating medium to high risk for job loss, were included (OPTIMA, n = 320; PROWD, n = 124). RESULTS: Patients receiving ADA + MTX in OPTIMA had significantly greater improvements in RA-WIS compared with PBO + MTX (mean change -7.22 vs -5.23, respectively). Significantly higher percentages of patients in the ADA + MTX group experienced improvements in one or more risk category (58 vs 47%) and ⩾5 (55 vs 43%), ⩾7 (47 vs 35%) and ⩾9 (42% vs 26%) points in their RA-WIS score. These trends were seen in PROWD but were not significant. In OPTIMA, patients receiving ADA + MTX showed significant changes in percentage points from baseline vs PBO + MTX in activity impairment, presenteeism and overall work impairment (-32.0 vs -23.7, -24.6 vs -17.1, -27.3 vs -18.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among early RA patients with elevated risk of employment loss, ADA + MTX therapy was associated with a significant reduction in work instability vs PBO + MTX. Significantly greater percentages of patients receiving ADA + MTX therapy achieved clinically meaningful improvements in their RA-WIS scores.

Adjustment of therapy in rheumatoid arthritis on the basis of achievement of stable low disease activity with adalimumab plus methotrexate or methotrexate alone: the randomised controlled OPTIMA trial.

BACKGROUND: Biological agents offer good control of rheumatoid arthritis, but the long-term benefits of achieving low disease activity with a biological agent plus methotrexate or methotrexate alone are unclear. The OPTIMA trial assessed different treatment adjustment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis attaining (or not) stable low disease activity with adalimumab plus methotrexate or methotrexate monotherapy. METHODS: This trial was done at 161 sites worldwide. Patients with early (<1 year duration) rheumatoid arthritis naive to methotrexate were randomly allocated (by interactive voice response system, in a 1:1 ratio, block size four) to adalimumab (40 mg every other week) plus methotrexate (initiated at 7·5 mg/week, increased by 2·5 mg every 1-2 weeks to a maximum weekly dose of 20 mg by week 8) or placebo plus methotrexate for 26 weeks (period 1). Patients in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group who completed period 1 and achieved the stable low disease activity target (28-joint disease activity score with C-reactive protein [DAS28]<3·2 at weeks 22 and 26) were randomised to adalimumab-continuation or adalimumab-withdrawal for an additional 52 weeks (period 2). Patients achieving the target with initial methotrexate continued methotrexate-monotherapy. Inadequate responders were offered adalimumab plus methotrexate. All patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation in period 1. During period 2, treatment reallocation of patients who achieved the target was masked to patients and investigators; patients who did not achieve the target remained masked to original randomisation, but were aware of the subsequent assignment. The primary endpoint was a composite measure of DAS28 of less than 3·2 at week 78 and radiographic non-progression from baseline to week 78, compared between adalimumab-continuation and methotrexate-monotherapy. Adverse events were monitored throughout period 2. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00420927. FINDINGS: The study was done between Dec 28, 2006, and Aug 3, 2010. 1636 patients were assessed and 1032 were randomised in period 1 (515 to adalimumab plus methotrexate; 517 to placebo plus methotrexate). 466 patients in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group completed period 1; 207 achieved the stable low disease activity target, of whom 105 were rerandomised to adalimumab-continuation. 460 patients in the placebo plus methotrexate group completed period 1; 112 achieved the stable low disease activity target and continued methotrexate-monotherapy. 73 of 105 (70%) patients in the adalimumab-continuation group and 61 of 112 (54%) patients in the methotrexate-monotherapy group achieved the primary endpoint at week 78 (mean difference 15% [95% CI 2-28%], p=0·0225). Patients achieving the stable low disease activity target on adalimumab plus methotrexate who withdrew adalimumab mostly maintained their good responses. Overall, 706 of 926 patients in period 2 had an adverse event, of which 82 were deemed serious; however, distribution of adverse events did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Treatment to a stable low disease activity target resulted in improved clinical, functional, and structural outcomes, with both adalimumab-continuation and methotrexate-monotherapy. However, a higher proportion of patients treated with initial adalimumab plus methotrexate achieved the low disease activity target compared with those initially treated with methotrexate alone. Outcomes were much the same whether adalimumab was continued or withdrawn in patients who initially responded to adalimumab plus methotrexate. FUNDING: AbbVie.

Efficacy and safety of ascending methotrexate dose in combination with adalimumab: the randomised CONCERTO trial.

OBJECTIVE: CONCERTO was a randomised, double-blind, parallel-armed study of methotrexate (MTX) in combination with adalimumab to assess whether an increasing trend of efficacy and decreased safety exists when increasing MTX dose in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Early, biologic and MTX-naive RA patients (N=395) were evenly randomised to open-label adalimumab (40 mg every other week) plus weekly blinded 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg MTX for 26 weeks. Clinical, radiographic and functional outcomes were analysed using two-sided linear trend tests or one-way analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Statistically significant increasing trends were observed in the proportion of patients achieving the primary endpoint, 28-joint count disease activity score with C reactive protein (DAS28(CRP)) <3.2 (42.9%, 44.0%, 56.6% and 60.2% for 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg/week MTX, respectively), DAS28(CRP) <2.6 and American College of Rheumatology 50/70/90 responses with increasing doses of MTX in combination with adalimumab. No statistical differences in minimal clinically important differences in physical function were detected. Statistically significant trends for achieving low disease activity and remission were demonstrated with increasing MTX dose by validated clinical indices; differences comparing 10 and 20 mg MTX were minimal. Adalimumab serum concentrations increased with ascending dose up to 10 mg MTX. More patients experienced infectious adverse events with increasing MTX dose. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing doses of MTX in combination with adalimumab demonstrated a statistically significant trend in improved clinical outcomes that mimicked the adalimumab pharmacokinetic profile. In early RA patients initiating adalimumab combination therapy, efficacy of 10 and 20 mg/week MTX appeared equivalent.

Final 10-year effectiveness and safety results from study DE020: adalimumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to standard therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of 10 years of adalimumab (ADA) treatment in DMARD-refractory RA patients and to analyse efficacy based on RF status and baseline disease duration. METHODS: DE020 was a multicentre, phase 3, open-label continuation study. Adult RA patients who received s.c. ADA (40 mg every other week or monthly) in one of four early assessment studies could receive ADA for ≤10 years in DE020. Assessments included the 28-joint DAS with CRP (DAS28-CRP), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and safety as events per 100 patient-years. RESULTS: Of 846 enrolled patients, mean age at baseline was 55.6 years, 78.1% were women, mean disease duration was 11.7 years and 27.0% were RF(-). Among 286 (33.8%) patients who completed 10 years of ADA, 168/236 (71.2%) achieved DAS28-CRP ≤3.2, 101/238 (42.4%) achieved HAQ-DI <0.5 and 90/241 (37.3%) achieved DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 plus HAQ-DI <0.5. DAS28-CRP- or SDAI-based remission was observed in 135/236 (57.2%) and 70/236 (29.7%) patients, respectively. Effectiveness outcomes were similar regardless of RF status. Higher proportions of patients with shorter vs longer baseline disease duration (≤2 vs >2 years) achieved HAQ-DI <0.5 (60.6% vs 39.5%; P = 0.023) and DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 plus HAQ-DI <0.5 (58.1% vs 32.5%; P = 0.006). Adverse events (317.2 events per 100 patient-years) during ADA exposure were consistent with the expected safety profile for TNF inhibitors. CONCLUSION: ADA led to sustained clinical and functional responses in the 33.8% of treatment-refractory RA patients who completed 10 years of treatment. Patients with shorter disease duration achieved better outcomes, highlighting the need for early treatment. No unexpected safety findings were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00195650.

Maintenance of improvement in spinal mobility, physical function and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 5 years in a clinical trial of adalimumab.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain and progressive loss of physical function with AS may adversely affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The objective of this study was to assess the 5-year data regarding spinal mobility, physical function and HRQoL in patients with AS who participated in the Adalimumab Trial Evaluating Long-term Efficacy and Safety for AS (ATLAS) study. METHODS: Patients received blinded adalimumab 40 mg or placebo every other week for 24 weeks, then open-label adalimumab for up to 5 years. Spinal mobility was evaluated using linear BASMI (BASMIlin). BASDAI, total back pain, CRP, BASFI, Short Form-36 and AS quality of life (ASQoL) were also assessed. Correlations between BASMIlin and clinical, functional and ASQoL outcomes after 12 weeks and after 5years of adalimumab exposure were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation. Associations were further analysed using multivariate regression. RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven patients received ≥1 dose of adalimumab; 125 of the 208 patients originally randomized to adalimumab received treatment for 5 years. Improvements in BASMIlin were sustained through 5 years, with a mean change of -0.6 from baseline in the population who completed 5 years of treatment with adalimumab. Improvements in disease activity, physical function and ASQoL were also sustained through 5 years. BASMIlin was significantly correlated with all evaluated clinical outcomes (P < 0.001). The highest correlation was with BASFI at 12 weeks (r = 0.52) and at 5 years (r = 0.65). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed this association (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with adalimumab for up to 5 years demonstrated sustained benefits in spinal mobility, disease activity, physical function and HRQoL in patients with active AS. Spinal mobility was significantly associated with short- and long-term physical function in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT00085644.

Adalimumab, a human anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, outcome study for the prevention of joint damage in Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: the HOPEFUL 1 study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab+methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received MTX or biologics. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study evaluated adalimumab 40 mg every other week+MTX 6-8 mg every week versus MTX 6-8 mg every week alone for 26 weeks in patients with RA (≤2-year duration). The primary endpoint was inhibition of radiographic progression (change (Δ) from baseline in modified total Sharp score (mTSS)) at week 26. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients received adalimumab+MTX (mean dose, 6.2±0.8 mg/week) and 163 patients received MTX alone (mean dose, 6.6±0.6 mg/week, p<0.001). The mean RA duration was 0.3 years and 315 (94.3%) had high disease activity (DAS28>5.1). Adalimumab+MTX significantly inhibited radiographic progression at week 26 versus MTX alone (ΔmTSS, 1.5±6.1 vs 2.4±3.2, respectively; p<0.001). Significantly more patients in the adalimumab+MTX group (62.0%) did not show radiographic progression (ΔmTSS≤0.5) versus the MTX alone group (35.4%; p<0.001). Patients treated with adalimumab+MTX were significantly more likely to achieve American College of Rheumatology responses and achieve clinical remission, using various definitions, at 26 weeks versus MTX alone. Combination therapy was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab in combination with low-dose MTX was well tolerated and efficacious in suppressing radiographic progression and improving clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with early RA and high disease activity.

Recovery of clinical but not radiographic outcomes by the delayed addition of adalimumab to methotrexate-treated Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: 52-week results of the HOPEFUL-1 trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare efficacy outcomes of initial treatment with adalimumab + MTX vs adalimumab addition following 26 weeks of MTX monotherapy in Japanese early RA patients naive to MTX with high disease activity. METHODS: Patients completing the 26-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adalimumab + MTX were eligible to receive 26 weeks of open-label adalimumab + MTX. Patients were assessed for mean change from baseline in the 28-joint DAS with ESR (DAS28-ESR) and modified total Sharp score (mTSS), and for the proportions of patients achieving clinical, functional or radiographic remission. RESULTS: Of 333 patients assessed, 278 (137 from the initial adalimumab + MTX and 141 from the initial placebo + MTX groups) completed the 52-week study. Significant differences in clinical and functional parameters observed during the 26-week blinded period were not apparent following the addition of open-label adalimumab to MTX. Open-label adalimumab + MTX slowed radiographic progression through week 52 in both groups, but patients who received adalimumab + MTX throughout the study exhibited less radiographic progression than those who received placebo + MTX during the first 26 weeks (mean ΔmTSS at week 52 = 2.56 vs 3.30, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Delayed addition of adalimumab in Japanese MTX-naive early RA patients did not impact clinical and functional outcomes at week 52 compared with the earlier addition of adalimumab. However, the accrual of significant structural damage during blinded placebo + MTX therapy contributed to the persistence of differences between the treatment strategies, suggesting that Japanese patients at risk for aggressive disease should benefit from the early inclusion of adalimumab + MTX combination therapy. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/), NCT00870467.

Clinical, functional and radiographic consequences of achieving stable low disease activity and remission with adalimumab plus methotrexate or methotrexate alone in early rheumatoid arthritis: 26-week results from the randomised, controlled OPTIMA study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate (ADA+MTX) compared with methotrexate monotherapy in achieving stable low disease activity (LDA; disease activity score (DAS28(CRP)) <3.2 at weeks 22 and 26) and clinical, radiographic and functional outcomes in methotrexate-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: 1032 patients with active RA were randomly assigned 1:1 to ADA+MTX or placebo plus methotrexate (PBO+MTX) for 26 weeks. Treatment modifications were to be made in a subsequent study period based on the achievement of DAS28(CRP) <3.2 at weeks 22 and 26. Post-hoc analyses compared patients achieving stable remission using DAS28 and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria with those achieving LDA but not remission. RESULTS: Among patients completing 6 months, 44% (207/466) ADA+MTX versus 24% (112/460) PBO+MTX patients achieved stable LDA at weeks 22 and 26 (p<0.001). Combination therapy was statistically superior to methotrexate in obtaining higher ACR20/50/70 responses, more clinical remissions, greater mean reductions in DAS28(CRP), no radiographic progression, and normal functional status at week 26 (p<0.001 for all). The only factor predicting stable LDA was disease activity at week 12. Patients achieving ACR/EULAR remission, particularly in the PBO+MTX group, had some advantage in radiographic outcomes compared with patients who only achieved LDA (but not remission). The overall frequency of adverse events was comparable between groups. There were more serious infections and deaths in the ADA+MTX group, with a possible age effect. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ADA+MTX was significantly superior to methotrexate alone with respect to clinical, radiographic and functional outcomes in patients with early active RA. Before initiating treatment with adalimumab, individual patient evaluation of the benefit/risk ratio should be carefully considered.

Efficacy and Safety of ABBV-3373, a Novel Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Proof-of-Concept Phase IIa Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of ABBV-3373, a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of the anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monoclonal antibody adalimumab linked to a glucocorticoid receptor modulator (GRM), compared to adalimumab, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, proof-of-concept trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823391), adults with moderate-to-severe RA receiving background methotrexate were administered intravenously (IV) ABBV-3373 100 mg every other week for 12 weeks, followed by placebo for 12 weeks, or subcutaneous adalimumab 80 mg every other week for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) at week 12, with 2 prespecified primary comparisons of ABBV-3373 versus historical adalimumab (80 mg every other week or equivalent dose) and versus combined in-trial/historical adalimumab. Secondary end points included change from baseline in the Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index, and DAS28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate, as well as the proportion of patients achieving a DAS28-CRP of ≤3.2 and the American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were randomized to receive either ABBV-3373 (n = 31) or adalimumab (n = 17). At week 12, ABBV-3373 demonstrated a reduction in DAS28-CRP compared to historical adalimumab (-2.65 versus -2.13; P = 0.022) and compared to combined in-trial/historical adalimumab (-2.65 versus -2.29; probability 89.9%), with numerically greater improvement than in-trial adalimumab (-2.51). For secondary end points, greater efficacy was observed with ABBV-3373 compared to historical adalimumab; ABBV-3373 was predicted with 79.3-99.5% probability to be more effective than adalimumab based on combined in-trial/historical adalimumab data. Of the ABBV-3373-treated patients who achieved DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 at week 12, 70.6% maintained this response at week 24 despite switching to placebo. Four serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported with ABBV-3373 (noncardiac chest pain, pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection, and anaphylactic shock) and 2 SAEs with adalimumab (breast abscess and bronchitis). After increasing the duration of IV ABBV-3373 administration from 3 minutes to 15-30 minutes, no similar events of anaphylactic shock were reported. CONCLUSION: Data from this proof-of-concept trial support the continued development of a TNF-GRM ADC for the treatment of RA, with the potential to achieve superior outcomes compared to currently available therapies.

Is the Health Utilities Index 3 valid for patients with ankylosing spondylitis?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the convergent and discriminative validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Data were derived from the Adalimumab Trial evaluating Long-term efficacy and safety for Ankylosing Spondylitis (ATLAS). The study team specified 90 a priori hypotheses regarding the direction and magnitude of the expected associations between the overall and single-attribute scores of the HUI-3 and other health status and quality-of-life measures: Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, and Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments of Disease Activity. With baseline data, correlation coefficients were calculated and interpreted according to the guidelines suggested by Guyatt for negligible (0-0.19), weak (0.20-0.34), moderate (0.35-0.50), and strong (>0.5) associations. The a priori hypotheses were tested using Pearson's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 315 patients with active AS were randomized and enrolled in ATLAS. The correlation coefficients between the HUI-3 scores and other health-related quality-of-life instruments confirmed 61.1% of the a priori hypotheses, with an additional 35.5% being under- or overestimated by one correlation category. CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence of the cross-sectional, convergent, and discriminative validity of the HUI-3 for deriving utility scores in patients with AS.

Clinical manifestations and responsiveness to adalimumab are similar in patients with ankylosing spondylitis with and without concomitant psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical manifestations of spinal disease, peripheral arthritis and enthesitis, and to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab in a large cohort of patients with AS in relation to the presence or absence of psoriasis. METHODS: Patients aged > or = 18 years with active AS were enrolled in an open-label study of adalimumab 40 mg every other week. Clinical symptoms were measured at baseline and Week 12 using standard assessment criteria. Differences between patients with and those without psoriasis were assessed. The relationship between changes in skin and AS symptoms was also analysed. RESULTS: Of 1250 patients with AS who were enrolled in the study, 148 (11.8%) had a history of psoriasis, including 108 patients with current (active) psoriasis at entry. Baseline disease characteristics, including spinal structural damage, peripheral arthritis (> or = 1 swollen joints) and enthesitis (> or = 1 inflamed entheses), were similar in both groups. At Week 12, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% response was achieved by 46.7 and 54.7% and Bath AS Disease Activity Index 50% response by 58.6 and 57.0% of patients with and without psoriasis, respectively. Median changes in swollen joint scores and Maastricht AS Enthesitis Scores were similar in both groups. Skin changes during adalimumab treatment in AS patients with a history of psoriasis did not correlate with changes in AS symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of psoriasis had no influence on the other clinical manifestations of patients with AS. Treatment with adalimumab markedly improved axial disease, peripheral arthritis and enthesitis, regardless of history of psoriasis.

Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire in AS (WPAI:SpA). METHODS: Baseline and Week-24 data from a randomized, double-blind study of adalimumab in patients with AS were used. Discriminative validity of WPAI:SpA absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work productivity loss and activity impairment scores was assessed relative to patient-reported outcomes: Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), AS Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQOL), Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), Physical and Mental Component Summaries (PCS and MCS, respectively) and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3). Responsiveness of the WPAI:SpA instrument was assessed for patients meeting the minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for ASQOL and BASDAI (i.e. quality of life and clinical responders, respectively) and quantified with standardized response mean (SRM) calculations. RESULTS: Of 315 patients, 205 were employed at baseline. Patients with more severe AS (BASDAI > median) showed significantly greater impairment in work and daily activities than patients with lesser disease severity (P < 0.001). This trend was consistent for ASQOL, SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS and HUI-3. There were significant differences in WPAI:SpA scores for patients achieving BASDAI clinical response and ASQOL quality of life response vs non-responders. For responders, SRMs were large for work presenteeism, overall work impairment and activity impairment (-0.86 to -1.29 for BASDAI; -0.89 to -1.18 for ASQOL) and small for absenteeism (-0.25 for BASDAI; -0.31 for ASQOL). CONCLUSIONS: The WPAI:SpA is a valid, reliable and responsive tool for assessing work productivity for patients with AS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home, NCT00085644.

Safety and Effectiveness of Adalimumab in Patients With Polyarticular Course of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: STRIVE Registry Seven-Year Interim Results.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of adalimumab (ADA) in polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in the STRIVE registry. METHODS: STRIVE enrolled patients with polyarticular-course JIA into 2 arms based on treatment with methotrexate (MTX) alone or ADA with/without MTX (ADA ± MTX). Adverse events (AEs) per 100 patient-years of observation time were analyzed by registry arm. Patients who entered the registry within 4 weeks of starting MTX or ADA ± MTX, defined as new users, were evaluated for change in disease activity assessed by the 27-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score with the C-reactive protein level (JADAS-27CRP ). RESULTS: At the 7-year cutoff date (June 1, 2016), data from 838 patients were available (MTX arm n = 301, ADA ± MTX arm n = 537). The most common AEs were nausea (10.3%), sinusitis (4.7%), and vomiting (4.3%) in the MTX arm and arthritis (3.9%), upper respiratory tract infection (3.5%), sinusitis, tonsillitis, and injection site pain (3.0% each) in the ADA ± MTX arm. Rates of serious infection were 1.5 events/100 patient-years in the MTX arm and 2.0 events/100 patient-years in the ADA ± MTX arm. AE and serious AE rates were similar in patients receiving ADA with versus without MTX. No deaths or malignancies were reported. New users in the ADA ± MTX arm showed a trend toward lower mean JADAS-27CRP compared with new users in the MTX arm in the first year of STRIVE. CONCLUSION: The STRIVE registry 7-year interim results support the idea that ADA ± MTX is well tolerated by most children. Registry median ADA exposure was 2.47 (interquartile range 1.0-3.6) years, with 42% of patients continuing ADA at the 7-year cutoff date.

Adalimumab is effective and well tolerated in treating patients with ankylosing spondylitis who have advanced spinal fusion.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in treating patients with AS and advanced structural damage. METHODS: Patients with active AS [Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) > or =4] received 40 mg of adalimumab every other week plus their standard anti-rheumatic therapies in this 12-week, open-label study. Investigators documented the presence or absence of advanced ankylosis based on previous radiographs. Stages IV (from 50 to <80% involvement in more than two spinal segments) and V (> or =80% spinal involvement, including bamboo spine) disease were considered as advanced AS. Effectiveness parameters included Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria, BASDAI response and achievement of optimal sleep. Adverse events were reported throughout therapy and at a 70-day follow-up. RESULTS: The analysis population included 897 patients whose AS was not advanced (i.e. Stages I-III), 31 with Stage IV disease and 41 with Stage V disease. At Week 12, ASAS40/BASDAI 50 responses were achieved by 54%/57% of patients with AS Stages I-III, 48%/58% with AS Stage IV and 54%/66% with AS Stage V, respectively. ASAS partial remission rates were 30, 26 and 7% for patients with Stages I-III, IV and V disease, respectively. Serious infections occurred in three (<1%) patients with AS Stages I-III and in one (1%) patient with AS Stage V. CONCLUSIONS: After 12 weeks of adalimumab therapy, patients with advanced but active AS, including those with structural damage of > or =80% of the vertebrae, achieved improvements in signs and symptoms similar to those attained by patients whose AS was not advanced.

An open-label pilot study of the effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and previous infliximab treatment: relationship to reasons for failure and anti-infliximab antibody status.

This prospective open-label pilot study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab and the relationship to antibodies against infliximab (IFX) in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had been treated previously with IFX and experienced treatment failure owing to lack or loss of response or intolerance. Patients self-administered adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week for 16 weeks, followed by maintenance therapy for up to Week 56. Measures of effectiveness included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index. Serum IFX concentrations, human antichimeric antibody against IFX (HACA), adalimumab serum concentrations, antiadalimumab antibody, and safety also were assessed. Of the 41 enrolled patients, 37 completed 16 weeks and 30 completed 56 weeks of treatment. Patients experienced clinically meaningful improvements in all measures of RA activity, with greater response rates observed for patients who had experienced loss of initial response to or intolerance of IFX. At Week 16, 46% of patients achieved an ACR20 and 28% achieved an ACR50; 61% achieved an at least moderate and 17% achieved a good EULAR response. Clinical benefit was maintained through Week 56 in all effectiveness parameters. Baseline HACA status did not significantly impact effectiveness. No new safety signals were observed; neither former IFX intolerance status nor baseline HACA status had a clinically relevant impact on adverse event frequency or severity. Adalimumab was effective and well-tolerated in patients with RA who previously failed IFX therapy, irrespective of reason for discontinuation and of HACA status.

Low Hemoglobin and Radiographic Damage Progression in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Secondary Analysis From a Phase III Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study low blood hemoglobin concentrations as a predictor of radiographic damage progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Post hoc analyses were performed in patients from the PREMIER trial with early RA undergoing 2 years of adalimumab (ADA), methotrexate (MTX), or ADA + MTX combination therapy. Low disease activity was defined as a score <3.2 on the 28-joint Disease Activity Score using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP), and clinical response by the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement at week 24. Baseline or mean hemoglobin concentrations over time, or anemia as defined using sex-specific World Health Organization criteria, were analyzed in mixed-effects models for longitudinal data in men and women as predictors of progressive joint damage, as measured by the modified total Sharp/van der Heijde score (ΔSHS). Data were adjusted for treatment and other patient characteristics, including the DAS28-CRP. RESULTS: Baseline hemoglobin was inversely associated with ΔSHS in adjusted analyses (P < 0.05 for both sexes). Baseline anemia predicted greater ΔSHS in MTX-treated patients over 104 weeks, and in ADA- and combination-treated patients over 26 weeks. Lower hemoglobin concentrations over time, as well as time with anemia, were associated with greater damage progression (P < 0.001). The effect of low hemoglobin concentrations on joint damage progression remained significant, even in patients achieving low disease activity. CONCLUSION: Low hemoglobin is a DAS28-CRP-independent predictor of radiographic joint damage progression in MTX-treated patients with early RA. This effect decreases over time in ADA- and combination-treated patients, and in clinical responders irrespective of treatment modality.