Quantifying the Burden of Unmet Upper Extremity Care Need in Low-Middle Income Countries: A Four-Country, Cluster-Randomized Study.

PURPOSE: Currently, no nationally implementable survey exists to identify the burden of hand and upper extremity conditions at the household level in low-middle income countries (LMICs). This study describes a randomized cluster survey approach to estimating the burden of hand and upper extremity conditions in four LMICs using the Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) survey. Additionally, this study identifies factors associated with responses of unmet surgical need at the multinational level. METHODS: The SOSAS instrument is a cluster-randomized, cross-sectional, countrywide survey of households administered in Nepal, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, and Uganda from 2011 to 2014. We identified nationwide trends for sociodemographic, anatomic, condition type, mechanism, prevalence, subjective disability, and barriers to care for upper extremity survey responses. A multivariable model identified factors associated with unmet upper extremity need across the four nations. RESULTS: Across the four countries, 13,763 individuals participated in the survey, with 883 conditions of the upper extremity identified (7.4% of all surgical conditions surveyed). Fractures accompanied many of the injuries (32.3%). Although most conditions were acquired, congenital conditions comprised 11% of all etiologies. Overall, open fire/explosion was the most common mechanism (22.9%). Rwandans had the highest proportion of individuals seeking care (91.0%) and receiving care (88.6%). Sierra Leone indicated the fewest seeking and receiving care (71% and 63%, respectively). Chronic injuries were significantly associated with receiving care, whereas illiteracy and worsening subjective disability were barriers to receiving care. CONCLUSIONS: In this survey of upper extremity conditions from four LMICs, upper extremity conditions primarily resulted from fire/explosions, and many reported sustaining a fracture. Illiteracy and more disabling conditions decreased the odds of receiving care by 30% to 40%, respectively. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The SOSAS survey may provide a reproducible means to evaluate the unmet need for upper extremity care across similar LMICs.

Surgical Training for Civilian Surgeons Interested in Humanitarian Surgery: A Scoping Review.

INTRODUCTION: Humanitarian surgery is essential to surgical care in limited resource settings. The difficulties associated with resource constraints necessitate special training for civilian surgeons to provide care in these situations. Specific training or curricula for humanitarian surgeons are not well described in the literature. This scoping review summarizes the existing literature and identifies areas for potential improvement. METHODS: A review of articles describing established courses for civilian surgeons interested in humanitarian surgery, as well as those describing training of civilian surgeons in conflict zones, was performed. A total of 4808 abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers, and 257 abstracts were selected for full-text review. Articles describing prehospital care and military experience were excluded from the full-text review. RESULTS: Of the eight relevant full texts, 10 established courses for civilian surgeons were identified. Cadaver-based teaching combined with didactics were the most common course themes. Courses provided technical education focused on the management of trauma and burns as well as emergencies in orthopedics, neurosurgery, obstetrics, and gynecology. Other courses were in specialty surgery, mainly orthopedics. Two fellowship programs were identified, and these provide a different model for training humanitarian surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Humanitarian surgery is often practiced in austere environments, and civilian surgeons must be adequately trained to first do no harm. Current programs include cadaver-based courses focused on enhancing trauma surgery and surgical subspecialty skills, with adjunctive didactics covering resource allocation in austere environments. Fellowships programs may serve as an avenue to provide a more standardized education and a reliable pipeline of global surgeons.

Global Burden of Craniofacial Disorders: Where Should Volunteering Plastic Surgeons and Governments Focus Their Care?

PURPOSE: Approximately 11% of the global burden of disease is surgically treatable. When located within the head, face, and neck region, plastic surgeons are particularly trained to treat these conditions. The purpose of this study was to describe the etiology, disability, and barriers to receiving care for diseases of the head, face, mouth, and neck region across 4 low-and-middle-income countries. METHODS: The Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) instrument is a cluster randomized, cross-sectional, national survey administered in Nepal, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, and Uganda from 2011 to 2014. The survey identifies demographic characteristics, etiology, disease timing, proportion seeking/receiving care, barriers to care, and disability. RESULTS: Across the 4 countries, 1413 diseases of head, face, mouth, and neck region were identified. Masses (22.13%) and trauma (32.8%) were the most common etiology. Nepal reported the largest proportion of masses (40.22%) and Rwanda reported the largest amount of trauma (52.65%) (P < 0.001). Rwanda had the highest proportion of individuals seeking (89.6%) and receiving care (83.63%) while Sierra Leone reported the fewest (60% versus 47.77%, P < 0.001). In our multi-variate analysis literacy and chronic conditions were predictors for receiving care while diseases causing the greatest disability predicted not receiving care (ORa .58 and .48 versus 1.31 P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The global volunteering plastic surgeon should be prepared to treat chronic craniofacial conditions. Furthermore, governments should address structural barriers, such as health illiteracy and lack of access to local plastic surgery care by supporting local training efforts.

Directions for surgical capacity developments in Nepal: a population-based assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Lack of access to safe surgery is seen as a major issue that needs to be addressed. The aim of this study was to understand which combinations of factors relate to high occurrences of unmet needs and disability in Nepal, and consequently, how to focus future work to maximise impact in this country. METHODS: A large population-based survey was conducted in Nepal in 2014 to evaluate the unmet surgical needs that result in disability. Recorded factors included diseased anatomical areas, disease specifics, disease locations, injury types, reasons for having an unmet need and the types of disability. RESULTS: Included in the study were 2695 individuals. The anatomical areas facing the highest disabling unmet surgical need were Head (3.9% of population), Groin/Genitalia (2.2% of population) and Extremities (3.6% of population). Four focus areas could be defined. Increase affordability, availability and acceptability of surgical care to non-traumatic disabling conditions of (i) the eye, and (ii) extremities, and (iii) to traumatic disabling conditions of extremities and finally (iv) increase acceptability of having surgical care for non-traumatic conditions in the groin and genital area. For the latter, fear/no trust was the main reason for receiving no surgical care despite the resulting shame. CONCLUSIONS: This study defined four focus areas that showed the largest unmet needs that resulted in a perceived disability. For those areas, affordability, availability and acceptability of surgical need to be addressed through technical developments, capacity building and raising awareness.

OBJECTIFS: L'absence d'accès à une chirurgie sûre est considérée comme un problème majeur à résoudre. Le but de cette étude était de comprendre quelles combinaisons de facteurs étaient liées aux besoins non satisfaits et aux incapacités au Népal, et par conséquent, comment cibler les travaux futurs pour maximiser l'impact dans ce pays. MÉTHODES: Une vaste enquête de population a été menée au Népal en 2014 pour évaluer les besoins chirurgicaux non satisfaits qui entraînent une incapacité. Les facteurs enregistrés comprenaient les zones anatomiques, les spécificités, les localisations de la maladie, les types de blessures, les raisons pour lesquelles les besoins n'étaient pas satisfaits et les types d'incapacité. RÉSULTATS: 2695 personnes ont été incluses dans l'étude. Les zones anatomiques impliquées dans des besoins chirurgicaux les plus invalidants étaient les suivantes: tête (3,9% de la population), aine/organes génitaux (2,2% de la population) et extrémités (3,6% de la population). Quatre domaines cibles d'intervention pourraient être définis. Premièrement, augmenter l'accessibilité financière, la disponibilité et l'acceptabilité des soins chirurgicaux aux affections invalidantes non traumatiques de 1) l'œil, 2) des extrémités et 3) aux affections traumatisantes des extrémités, et enfin 4) augmenter l'acceptabilité des soins chirurgicaux pour les affections non traumatiques dans l'aine et les parties génitales. Pour ces derniers, la crainte/l'absence de confiance était la principale raison de ne pas recevoir de soins chirurgicaux malgré la honte qui en résultait. CONCLUSIONS: Cette étude a défini quatre domaines cibles d'intervention qui ont montré les besoins non satisfaits les plus importants ayant entraîné une incapacité perçue. Pour ces domaines, il convient de prendre en compte le caractère abordable, la disponibilité et l'acceptabilité des interventions chirurgicales par le biais de développements techniques, d'un renforcement des capacités et la sensibilisation.

Sex Differences in Civilian Injury in Baghdad From 2003 to 2014: Results of a Randomized Household Cluster Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To examine sex differences in injury mechanisms, injury-related death, injury-related disability, and associated financial consequences in Baghdad since the 2003 invasion of Iraq to inform prevention initiatives, health policy, and relief planning. BACKGROUND: Reliable estimates of injury burden among civilians during conflict are lacking, particularly among vulnerable subpopulations, such as women. METHODS: A 2-stage, cluster randomized, community-based household survey was conducted in May 2014 to determine the civilian burden of injury in Baghdad since 2003. Households were surveyed regarding injury mechanisms, healthcare required, disability, deaths, connection to conflict, and resultant financial hardship. RESULTS: We surveyed 900 households (5148 individuals), reporting 553 injuries, 162 (29%) of which were injuries among women. The mean age of injury was higher among women compared with men (34 ±â€Š21.3 vs 27 ±â€Š16.5 years; P < 0.001). More women than men were injured while in the home [104 (64%) vs 82 (21%); P < 0.001]. Fewer women than men died from injuries [11 (6.8%) vs 77 (20%); P < 0.001]; however, women were more likely than men to live with reduced function [101 (63%) vs 192 (49%); P = 0.005]. Of intentional injuries, women had higher rates of injury by shell fragments (41% vs 26%); more men were injured by gunshots [76 (41%) vs 6 (17.6%); P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Women experienced fewer injuries than men in postinvasion Baghdad, but were more likely to suffer disability after injury. Efforts to improve conditions for injured women should focus on mitigating financial and provisional hardships, providing counseling services, and ensuring access to rehabilitation services.

Are American Surgical Residents Prepared for Humanitarian Deployment?: A Comparative Analysis of Resident and Humanitarian Case Logs.

BACKGROUND: Effective humanitarian surgeons require skills in general surgery, OB/GYN, orthopedics, and urology. With increasing specialization, it is unclear whether US general surgery residents are receiving exposure to these disparate fields. We sought to assess the preparedness of graduating American surgical residents for humanitarian deployment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed cases performed by American College of Graduate Medical Education general surgery graduates from 2009 to 2015 and cases performed at select Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) facilities from 2008 to 2012. Cases were categorized by specialty (general surgery, orthopedics, OB/GYN, urology) and compared with Chi-squared testing. Non-operative care including basic wound and drain care was excluded from both data sets. RESULTS: US general surgery residents performed 41.3% MSF relevant general surgery cases, 1.9% orthopedic cases, 0.1% OB/GYN cases, and 0.3% urology cases; the remaining 56.4% of cases exceeded the standard MSF scope of care. In comparison, MSF cases were 30.1% general surgery, 21.2% orthopedics, 46.8% OB/GYN, and 1.9% urology. US residents performed fewer OB/GYN cases (p < 0.01) and fewer orthopedic cases (p < 0.01). Differences in general surgery and urology caseloads were not statistically significant. Key procedures in which residents lacked experience included cesarean sections, hysterectomies, and external bony fixation. CONCLUSION: Current US surgical training is poorly aligned with typical MSF surgical caseloads, particularly in OB/GYN and orthopedics. New mechanisms for obtaining relevant surgical skills should be developed to better prepare American surgical trainees interested in humanitarian work.

Beyond a Moral Obligation: A Legal Framework for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care and Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Access to quality and timely emergency and essential surgical care and anesthesia (EESCA) is an integral component of the right to health as reinforced by the ratification of the World Health Assembly Resolution 68.15. However, this resolution is merely a guideline and has not been able to bolster the necessary political will to promote EESCA. Our objective was to evaluate international treaties, which carry legal obligations, for EESCA-related text, and develop a human rights-based framework to support EESCA advancement and advocacy. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of all the UN Treaty Collection-Certified True Copies (CTCs) of multilateral treaties database from December 2015 to April 2016. The relevant text was manually searched to abstract and analyze to identify major themes supporting a human rights-based approach to EESCA. RESULTS: Multiple treaties in the UN database addressed EESCA in the areas of human rights, refugees and stateless persons, health, penal matters, and disarmament. A total of 13 treaties containing 23 articles had language that endorsed aspects of EESCA. The three major themes, supported by the phraseology in the treaties, included: (1) equal access to EESCA (eight articles); (2) timely care of injured and those with emergency surgical conditions (eight articles); and (3) protection, rehabilitation, psychosocial support, and social security (seven articles). CONCLUSIONS: A number of United Nations multilateral treaties support available and equitable EESCA. These findings can be used to galvanize support and encourage signatory Member States to promote and implement EESCA development initiatives.

Barriers to surgical care in Nepal.

BACKGROUND: Various barriers exist that preclude individuals from undergoing surgical care in low-income countries. Our study assessed the main barriers in Nepal, and identified individuals most at risk for not receiving required surgical care. METHODS: A countrywide survey, using the Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) survey tool, was carried out in 2014, surveying 2,695 individuals with a response rate of 97%. Our study used data from a subset, namely individuals who required surgical care in the last twelve months. Data were collected on individual characteristics, transport characteristics, and reasons why individuals did not undergo surgical care. RESULTS: Of the 2,695 individuals surveyed, 207 individuals needed surgical care at least once in the previous 12 months. The main reasons for not undergoing surgery were affordability (n = 42), accessibility (n = 42) and fear/no trust (n = 34). A factor significantly associated with affordability was having a low education (OR = 5.77 of having no education vs. having secondary education). Living in a rural area (OR = 2.59) and a long travel time to a secondary and tertiary health facility (OR = 1.17 and 1.09, respectively) were some of the factors significantly associated with accessibility. Being a woman was significantly associated with fear/no trust (OR = 3.54). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the individuals who needed surgical care did not undergo surgery due to affordability, accessibility, or fear/no trust. Providing subsidised transport, introducing mobile surgical clinics or organising awareness raising campaigns are measures that could be implemented to overcome these barriers to surgical care.

Rectal bleeding and endoscopy need in Sierra Leone: results of a nationwide, community-based survey.

BACKGROUND: Low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) face a large burden of gastrointestinal diseases that benefit from prompt endoscopic diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of gross rectal bleeding among adults in Sierra Leone. METHODS: A cluster randomised, cross-sectional household survey using the SOSAS tool was undertaken in Sierra Leone. 75 clusters of 25 households with two randomly selected respondents in each were sampled to estimate the prevalence of and disability from rectal bleeding. Barriers to care were also assessed. FINDINGS: 3645 individuals responded to the survery, 15 with rectal bleeding. Nine responders (64%) had been bleeding for more than a year. The prevalence of rectal bleeding was 412 per 100 000 people. In view of these findings, an estimated 24 604 individuals with rectal bleeding are in need of evaluation in Sierra Leone. Eight (53%) of the 15 people with rectal bleeding sought care from a traditional healer. If medical care was not sought, the most common reason was absence of financial resources (ten people; 77%), followed by no capable facility availability (two; 15%), and inability to leave work or family for the time needed (one; 8%). Seven (54%) of those with rectal bleeding reported some form of disability, including five (39%) that had bleeding that prevented usual work. INTERPRETATION: The high prevalence of rectal bleeding identified in Sierra Leone represents a major unmet health-care need. This study did not examine the cause of bleeding. However, the high prevalence, chronicity, and disability among respondents with bleeding suggest a substantial burden of disease. Additionally, because microscopic haematochezia was not assessed, these data represent a bare-minimum estimate of rectal bleeding in need of evaluation and treatment. In view of the substantial burden of conditions that can be diagnosed, treated, or palliated with timely endoscopic therapy, it is appropriate to consider endoscopy among efforts to develop health system capacity in LMICs. FUNDING: Surgeons OverSeas, the Thompson Family Foundation, and the Fogarty International Center.

Surgical need in an ageing population: a cluster-based household survey in Nepal.

BACKGROUND: With an ageing global population comes major non-communicable disease burden, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. An unknown proportion of this burden is treatable or palliated with surgery. This study aimed to estimate the surgical needs of individuals aged 50 years or older in Nepal. METHODS: A two-stage, 30 randomised cluster by 30 households, community-based survey was performed in Nepal with the validated Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS). Respondents aged older than 50 years were included. After verbal informed consent was obtained, SOSAS collected household demographics, completed a verbal autopsy, and randomly selected household members for verbal head-to-toe examinations for surgical conditions. The Nepal Health Research Council in Kathmandu and the Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, OH, USA, granted ethical approval. FINDINGS: The survey sampled 1350 households, totalling 2695 individuals (97% response rate); 49% were aged 50-59 years, 33% were 60-69 years, and 17% were 70 years and older. Of these, 273 surgical conditions were reported by 507 individuals. A growth or mass (including hernias and goiters) was the most commonly reported potentially surgical condition (25%), injuries and fractures were also common and had the greatest disability. Acquired deformities (13%), incontinence (11%), non-injury wounds (9%), and pelvic organ prolapse were also prevalent. Together, head and neck (24%) and back and extremity conditions (32%) were responsible for more than half of the conditions potentially treatable with surgery. These were followed by genitourinary (28%), abdominal (14%) and chest and breast conditions (2%). Extrapolated nationwide, roughly 1·25 million elderly individuals have a surgically treatable condition (32 150 per 100 000 people). There were 108 deaths in the year before to the survey. 20 (19%) were potentially preventable with surgery. Half of the deaths were due to a growth or mass, 20% to injury, 20% to abdominal pain or distension, and 10% to a non-injury wound. The age-standardised death rate of those with a potentially surgical condition was 24 per 1000 persons for individuals in their 6th decadte, 60 per 1000 for those in their 7th, and 44 per 1000 for those in their 8th. One in five deaths were potentially treatable or palliated by surgery. Literacy and distance to secondary and tertiary health facilities were associated with not receiving care for surgical conditions (p<0·05). INTERPRETATION: Surgical need is largely unmet among elderly individuals in Nepal. Literacy and distance from a capable health facility are the greatest barriers to care. Although verbal examination findings were used as proxies for surgical conditions, the survey tool has been previously validated. Also, there is potential for recall bias with overestimation of tragic deaths and underestimation of unknown or forgotten surgical causes of death and disease. However, this is the most comprehensive evaluation of surgical need in a developing country among the elderly. As the global population ages, there is an increasing need to improve access to surgical services and strengthen health systems to care for this group. FUNDING: The Association for Academic Surgery, Surgeons OverSeas, and the Fogarty International Center.

Burden of road traffic injuries in Nepal: results of a countrywide population-based survey.

BACKGROUND: Road traffic injury has emerged as a leading cause of mortality, contributing to 2·1% of deaths globally and is predicted to be the third highest contributor to the global burden of mortality by 2020. This major public health problem disproportionately affects low-income and middle-income countries, where such incidents are too often underreported. Our study aims to explore the epidemiology of road traffic injurys in Nepal at a population level via a countrywide study. METHODS: The Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) tool, a cluster randomised, cross-sectional nationwide survey, was conducted in Nepal between May 25, and June 12, 2014. Two-stage cluster sampling was performed: 15 of 75 districts were chosen randomly proportional to population; within each district, after stratification for urban and rural, and three clusters were randomly chosen. Questions were structured anatomically and designed around a representative spectrum of surgical conditions. Road traffic injury-related results were reported. FINDINGS: 1350 households and 2695 individuals were surveyed with a response rate of 97%. 75 road traffic injuries were reported in 72 individuals (2·67% [95% CI 2·10-3·35] of the study population), with a mean age of 33·2 years (SD 1·85). The most commonly affected age group was 30-44 years, with females showing significantly lower odds of sustaining a road traffic injury than men (crude odds ratio 0·29 [95% CI 0·16-0·52]). Road traffic injuries composed 19·8% of the injuries reported. Motorcycle crashes were the most common road traffic injuries (48·0%), followed by car, truck, or bus crashes (26·7%), and pedestrian or bicycle crashes (25·3%). The extremity was the most common anatomic site injured (74·7%). Of the 80 deaths reported in the previous year, 7·5% (n=6) were due to road traffic injuries. INTERPRETATION: This study provides the epidemiology of road traffic injuries at a population-based level in the first countrywide surgical needs assessment in Nepal. WHO reported that mortality due to road traffic injuries in Nepal in 2011 was 1·7%, whereas our study reported 7·5%, consistent with the concept of underreporting of deaths in police and hospital level data noted in previous literature. Road traffic injuries continue to be a significant problem in Nepal, probably greater than previously reported; future efforts should focus on addressing this growing epidemic through preventive and mitigating strategies. FUNDING: The Association for Academic Surgery and Surgeons OverSeas.

Injury assessment in three low-resource settings: a reference for worldwide estimates.

BACKGROUND: Trauma has become a worldwide pandemic. Without dedicated public health interventions, fatal injuries will rise 40% and become the 4th leading cause of death by 2030, with the burden highest in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of traumatic injuries and injury-related deaths in low-resource countries worldwide, using population-based data from the Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS), a validated survey tool. METHODS: Using data from three resource-poor countries (Nepal, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone), a weighted average of injury prevalence and deaths due to injury was calculated and extrapolated to low-resource countries worldwide. Injuries were defined as wounds from road traffic injuries (bus, car, truck, pedestrian, and bicycle), gunshot or stab or slash wounds, falls, work or home incidents, and burns. The Nepal study included a visual physical examination that confirmed the validity of the self-reported data. Population and annual health expenditure per capita data were obtained from the World Bank. Low-resource countries were defined as those with an annual per capita health expenditure of US$100 or less. FINDINGS: The overall prevalence of lifetime injury for these three countries was 18·03% (95% CI 18·02-18·04); 11·64% (95% CI 11·53-11·75) of deaths annually were due to injury. An estimated prevalence of lifetime injuries for the total population in 48 low-resource countries is 465·7 million people; about 2·6 million fatal injuries occur in these countries annually. INTERPRETATION: The limitations of this observational study with self-reported data include possible recall and desirability bias. About 466 million people at a community level (18%) sustain at least one injury during their lifetime and 2·6 million people die annually from trauma in the world's poorest countries. Trauma care capacity should be considered a global health priority; the importance of integrating a coordinated trauma system into any health system should not be underestimated. FUNDING: None.

Care of surgical infections by Médecins Sans Frontières Operations Centre Brussels in 2008-14.

BACKGROUND: Surgical infections represent a substantial yet undefined burden of disease in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides surgical care in LMICs and collects data useful to describe the operative epidemiology of surgical need that would otherwise be unmet by national health services. We aimed to describe the experience of MSF Operations Centre Brussels surgery for infections during crisis; aid effective resource allocation; prepare humanitarian surgical staff; and further characterise unmet surgical needs in LMICs. METHODS: We reviewed all procedures undertaken in operating theatres at facilities run by the MSF Operations Centre Brussels between July, 2008, and June, 2014. Projects providing only specialty care were excluded. Procedures for infections were quantified, related to demographics and reason for humanitarian response was described. FINDINGS: 96 239 operations were undertaken at 27 MSF Operations Centre Brussels sites in 15 countries. Of 61 177 general operations, 7762 (13%) were for infections. Operations for skin and soft tissue infections were the most common (64%), followed by intra-abdominal (26%), orthopaedic (6%), and tropical infections (3%). The proportion of operations for skin and soft tissue infections was highest during natural disaster missions, intra-abdominal infections during hospital support missions, and orthopaedic infections during conflict missions. Most procedures for skin and soft tissue infections were minor (76%), whereas most operations for intra-abdominal infections were major (98%). INTERPRETATION: Surgical infections are among the most common causes for operation in LMICs. Although many procedures were minor, they represent substantial use of perioperative resources. Growing evidence shows the need for improved perioperative capacity to aptly care for the volume and variety of conditions comprising the global burden of surgical disease. FUNDING: Médecins Sans Frontières.

An estimate of hernia prevalence in Nepal from a countrywide community survey.

BACKGROUND: Herniorrhaphy is one of the most frequently performed general surgical operations worldwide; however, most low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) are unable to provide this essential surgery resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of, barriers to care for, and disability from untreated hernias in Nepal. METHODS: A cluster randomised, cross-sectional household survey was performed in Nepal using the validated Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical (SOSAS) tool. Sample size was based on a pilot study that reported a 5% prevalence of unmet surgical need. 15 clusters consisting of 30 households each were sampled proportional to population. In each, two randomly selected family members underwent a verbal head-to-toe physical examination and answered questions about barriers to care and disability. FINDINGS: The survey sampled 1350 households, totalling 2695 individuals (97% response rate). 1434 (53%) of responders were men and 1·5% (95% CI 1·8-4·0) had a mass or swelling in the groin at time of survey. The age-standardised rate for inguinal hernias in men ranged from 1144 per 100 000 persons between age 5 and 49 years and 2941 per 100 000 persons aged 50 years and older. 29 respondents were not able to have surgery due to lack of surgical services (nine; 31%), fear or mistrust of the surgical system (nine; 31%), and inability to afford care (six; 21%). 10 respondents (20%) were unable to work as previous or perform self-care due to their hernia. INTERPRETATION: Despite the lower than expected prevalence of inguinal hernias, more than 300 000 people in Nepal are currently in need of herniorrhaphy. In view that essential surgery is a necessary component in health systems, the prevalence of inguinal hernias and the cost-effectiveness of herniorrhaphy, this disease is an important target for LMICs planning surgical capacity improvements. FUNDING: Surgeons OverSeas, Association for Academic Surgery, and the Fogarty International Center.

Surgical care needs of low-resource populations: an estimate of the prevalence of surgically treatable conditions and avoidable deaths in 48 countries.

BACKGROUND: Surgical care needs in low-resource countries are increasingly recognised as an important aspect of global health, yet data for the size of the problem are insufficient. The Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) is a population-based cluster survey previously used in Nepal, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone. METHODS: Using previously published SOSAS data from three resource-poor countries (Nepal, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone), a weighted average of overall prevalence of surgically treatable conditions was estimated and the number of deaths that could have been avoided by providing access to surgical care was calculated for the broader community of low-resource countries. Such conditions included, but were not limited to, injuries (road traffic incidents, falls, burns, and gunshot or stab wounds), masses (solid or soft, reducible), deformities (congenital or acquired), abdominal distention, and obstructed delivery. Population and health expenditure per capita data were obtained from the World Bank. Low-resource countries were defined as those with a per capita health expenditure of US$100 or less annually. The overall prevalence estimate from the previously published SOSAS data was extrapolated to each low-resource country. Using crude death rates for each country and the calculated proportion of avoidable deaths, a total number of deaths possibly averted in the previous year with access to appropriate surgical care was calculated. FINDINGS: The overall prevalence of surgically treatable conditions was 11·16% (95% CI 11·15-11·17) and 25·6% (95% CI 25·4-25·7) of deaths were potentially avoidable by providing access to surgical care. Using these percentages for the 48 low-resource countries, an estimated 288·2 million people are living with a surgically treatable condition and 5·6 million deaths could be averted annually by the provision of surgical care. In the Nepal SOSAS study, the observed agreement between self-reported verbal responses and visual physical examination findings was 94·6%. Such high correlation helps to validate the SOSAS tool. INTERPRETATION: Hundreds of millions of people with surgically treatable conditions live in low-resource countries, and about 25% of the mortality annually could be avoided with better access to surgical care. Strengthening surgical care must be considered when strengthening health systems and in setting future sustainable development goals. FUNDING: None.

Consensus recommendations for essential vascular care in low- and middle-income countries.

OBJECTIVE: Many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are ill equipped to care for the large and growing burden of vascular conditions. We aimed to develop essential vascular care recommendations that would be feasible for implementation at nearly every setting worldwide, regardless of national income. METHODS: The normative Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on essential vascular care resources among 27 experts in multiple areas of vascular care and public health as well as with experience in LMIC health care. Five anonymous, iterative rounds of survey with controlled feedback and a statistical response were used to reach consensus on essential vascular care resources. RESULTS: The matrices provide recommendations for 92 vascular care resources at each of the four levels of care in most LMICs, comprising primary health centers and first-level, referral, and tertiary hospitals. The recommendations include essential and desirable resources and encompass the following categories: screening, counseling, and evaluation; diagnostics; medical care; surgical care; equipment and supplies; and medications. CONCLUSIONS: The resources recommended have the potential to improve the ability of LMIC health care systems to respond to the large and growing burden of vascular conditions. Many of these resources can be provided with thoughtful planning and organization, without significant increases in cost. However, the resources must be incorporated into a framework that includes surveillance of vascular conditions, monitoring and evaluation of vascular capacity and care, a well functioning prehospital and interhospital transport system, and vascular training for existing and future health care providers.

Water availability at hospitals in low- and middle-income countries: implications for improving access to safe surgical care.

INTRODUCTION: Although two billion people now have access to clean water, many hospitals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) do not. Lack of water availability at hospitals hinders safe surgical care. We aimed to review the surgical capacity literature and document the availability of water at health facilities and develop a predictive model of water availability at health facilities globally to inform targeted capacity improvements. METHODS: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search for surgical capacity assessments in LMICs in MEDLINE, PubMed, and World Health Organization Global Health Library was performed. Data regarding water availability were extracted. Data from these assessments and national indicator data from the World Bank (e.g., gross domestic product, total health expenditure, and percent of population with improved access to water) were used to create a predictive model for water availability in LMICs globally. RESULTS: Of the 72 records identified, 19 reported water availability representing 430 hospitals. A total of 66% of hospitals assessed had water availability (283 of 430 hospitals). Using these data, estimated percent of water availability in LMICs more broadly ranged from under 20% (Liberia) to over 90% (Bangladesh, Ghana). CONCLUSIONS: Less than two-thirds of hospitals providing surgical care in 19 LMICs had a reliable water source. Governments and nongovernmental organizations should increase efforts to improve water infrastructure at hospitals, which might aid in the provision of safe essential surgical care. Future research is needed to measure the effect of water availability on surgical care and patient outcomes.