Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurocrit Care ; 16(1): 123-9, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21674278

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pneumonia in the hospital setting is a challenge due to the absence of a generally accepted pneumonia definition. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated six different clinical criteria for diagnosing pneumonia--physician's diagnosis (A), was compared to common methods, i.e., general surveillance method (B), consensus clinical criteria (C), and other three criteria (D, E, and F) among 390 neurosurgical patients treated in either the intensive care unit or the neurosurgical ward in a university hospital. RESULTS: The frequencies of pneumonia cases were: group A, 66 (16.9%); group B, 41 (10.1%); and group C, 55 (14.1%). Only 28 pneumonia cases were identified by all three criteria. The kappa values were: between A and B, 0.42 (95% confidence interval, CI; 0.27-0.57); between A and C, 0.49 (95% CI; 0.35-0.63); and between B and C, 0.68 (95% CI; 0.55-0.80). In group A, there were 34 false positive cases according to criterion B and 25 according to criterion C. Pneumonia cases were identified according to criterion D in 13 (3.3%), E in 35 (9.0%), and F in 51 (13.1%) cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was great variability in the presence of pneumonia among neurosurgical patients, depending on the criteria used. Our results support the idea that a more exact method for pneumonia diagnosis should be implemented to obtain more reliable results in this important infection of hospitalized patients, which is also used for benchmarking purposes. Furthermore, it seems important to treat all clinically suspected pneumonia cases whether or not the surveillance criteria are fulfilled.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Pneumonia/classificação , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/classificação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia Torácica
2.
Vet Hum Toxicol ; 46(4): 216-8, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15303400

RESUMO

Accidental hydrofluoric acid (HF) splashes often occur in industrial settings. HF easily penetrates into tissues by initial acid action allowing fluoride ions to penetrate deeply, chelating calcium and magnesium. Resultant hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia can be fatal. This report describes the utilization of Hexafluorine--a hypertonic, amphoteric, chelating decontamination solution--in workplaces where water decontamination followed by calcium gluconate inunction failed to prevent HF burns and systemic toxicity. Between 1998 and 1999, 16 cases of ocular and dermal HF splashes with either 70% HF or 6% HF/15% nitric acid (HNO3) were decontaminated with Hexafluorine at the worksite. HF burns did not develop and medical treatment other than initial decontamination was not reQuired in 12/16 (75%). In 7/16 (44%) cases, lost work time corresponded to duration of hospital observation (mean < 1 d).


Assuntos
Queimaduras Químicas/diagnóstico , Queimaduras Oculares/diagnóstico , Ácido Fluorídrico/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Adulto , Queimaduras Químicas/epidemiologia , Queimaduras Químicas/patologia , Descontaminação , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Tratamento de Emergência , Queimaduras Oculares/epidemiologia , Queimaduras Oculares/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Indústrias , Masculino , Metalurgia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/patologia , Suécia/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa