Cutaneous warmth and hotness thresholds to radiation heat exposure at a distance of 10 cm from 17 body regions.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate body regional differences in cutaneous warmth and hotness thresholds in relation to radiant heat exposure. Fourteen male subjects participated in this study (age: 25 ± 5 y, height: 176.6 ± 5.5 cm, body weight: 70 ± 5.8 kg). Cutaneous warmth and hotness thresholds were measured on the forehead, neck, chest, abdomen, upper back, lower back, upper arm, forearm, palm, back of hand, front thigh, shin, top of foot, buttock, back thigh, calf, and sole. The forehead (34.8 ± 0.2 °C), lower back (34.1 ± 1.2 °C) and palm (34.3 ± 0.7 °C) had the highest warmth thresholds, whereas the foot (29.8 ± 1.9 °C) and sole (28.0 ± 2.1 °C) had the lowest values among the 17 regions (P<0.001). Higher warmth thresholds were related to higher initial skin temperatures (Tsk) (r=0.972, P<0.001). Increases in Tsk for detecting warmth sensation were smaller for the lower back with a rise of 0.2 ± 0.4 °C and the abdomen (0.3 ± 0.3 °C) than for the buttock (0.9 ± 0.8 °C) and sole (0.8 ± 0.6 °C) (P<0.05). Increases in Tsk for detecting hotness sensation ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 °C. Warmth and hotness thresholds on the abdomen or sole had significant relationships with body mass index, indicating that the overweight are less sensitive to detecting radiant heat on the abdomen or sole. Thermal thresholds from radiant heat exposure of 100 cm2 were lower than the values from conductive heat exposure of 6.25 cm2, which might be explained by the effect of spatial summation.

The relationship between environmental temperature and clothing insulation across a year.

People adapt to thermal environments, such as the changing seasons, predominantly by controlling the amount of clothing insulation, usually in the form of the clothing that they wear. The aim of this study was to determine the actual daily clothing insulation on sedentary human subjects across the seasons. Thirteen females and seven males participated in experiments from January to December in a thermal chamber. Adjacent months were grouped in pairs to give six environmental conditions: (1) January/February = 5°C; (2) March/April = 14°C; (3) May/June = 25°C; (4) July/August = 29°C; (5) September/October = 23°C; (6) November/December = 8°C. Humidity(45 ± 5%) and air velocity(0.14 ± 0.01 m/s) were constant across all six experimental conditions. Participants put on their own clothing that allowed them to achieve thermal comfort for each air temperature, and sat for 60 min (1Met). The clothing insulation (clo) required by these participants had a significant relationship with air temperature: insulation was reduced as air temperature increased. The range of clothing insulation for each condition was 1.87-3.14 clo at 5°C(Jan/Feb), 1.62-2.63 clo at 14°C(Mar/Apr), 0.87-1.59 clo at 25°C(May/Jun), 0.4-1.01 clo at 29°C(Jul/Aug), 0.92-1.81 clo at 23°C (Sept/Oct), and 2.12-3.09 clo at 8°C(Nov/Dec) for females, and 1.84-2.90 clo at 5°C, 1.52-1.98 clo at 14°C, 1.04-1.23 clo at 25°C, 0.51-1.30 clo at 29°C, 0.82-1.45 clo at 23°C and 1.96-3.53 clo at 8°C for males. The hypothesis was that thermal insulation of free living clothing worn by sedentary Korean people would vary across seasons. For Korean people, a comfortable air temperature with clothing insulation of 1 clo was approximately 27°C. This is greater than the typical comfort temperature for 1 clo. It was also found that women clearly increased their clothing insulation level of their clothing as winter approached but did not decrease it by the same amount when spring came.

Impacts of gender, weather, and workplace differences in farm worker's gear.

BACKGROUND: The farmers cannot help working in outdoor conditions which have high humidity and solar radiation during the harvest period. Wearable items including clothing are the nearest environment of human body, and to understand the current state of them can be a way to set up an active prevention strategy against the health risk from heat stress in summertime agriculture. The aim of this study was to investigate the work wear and accessories which the elderly farmers used during agricultural working. METHODS: One hundred twenty farmers (49 males and 71 females) working in nine separate sites on different days took part in this study. The average age of subjects was 61 years old. We examined the types of working posture, clothing, and items that the farmers used and/or wore. We also interviewed the farmers to know why they used such items while working. RESULTS: The results of this study were as follows: (1) Farmers worked in the thermal environment which was over wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) reference value, and the farmers could suffer heat stress due to workload induced from wearing conventional long-sleeved shirts and long trousers which were 0.66 clo in average under this summertime working thermal condition. (2) The farmers tended to change the layer of upper clothing for adapting to weather condition. (3) The types of footwear used seemed to be related with facilities as well as weather, and farmers tended to wear lighter footwear when the weather is hotter or when they work in PVC greenhouse. The majority of elderly farmers wore loafers and rubber shoes which had indistinguishable thin soles. (4) The types of hats showed the difference between facilities as well as gender and only 31.7% of all participants used long brims. (5) Korean elderly farmers did not use any active cooling item as agricultural auxiliary tools in summer harvesting time. CONCLUSIONS: Korean elderly farmers worked in poor surroundings which could threaten their health and safety and seemed not to adjust their workload and clothing during summer harvest season. Thus, it would be necessary to monitor individual responses in order to ensure that the risk of heat stress is prevented.

Clothing insulation and temperature, layer and mass of clothing under comfortable environmental conditions.

This study was designed to investigate the relationship between the microclimate temperature and clothing insulation (Icl) under comfortable environmental conditions. In total, 20 subjects (13 women, 7 men) took part in this study. Four environmental temperatures were chosen: 14°C (to represent March/April), 25°C (May/June), 29°C (July/August), and 23°C (September/October). Wind speed (0.14ms-1) and humidity (45%) were held constant. Clothing microclimate temperatures were measured at the chest (Tchest) and on the interscapular region (Tscapular). Clothing temperature of the innermost layer (Tinnermost) was measured on this layer 30 mm above the centre of the left breast. Subjects were free to choose the clothing that offered them thermal comfort under each environmental condition. We found the following results. 1) All clothing factors except the number of lower clothing layers (Llower), showed differences between the different environmental conditions (P<0.05). The ranges of Tchest were 31.6 to 33.5°C and 32.2 to 33.4°C in Tscapular. The range of Tinnermost was 28.6 to 32.0°C. The range of the upper clothing layers (Lupper) and total clothing mass (Mtotal) was 1.1 to 3.2 layers and 473 to 1659 g respectively. The range of Icl was 0.78 to 2.10 clo. 2) Post hoc analyses showed that analysis of Tinnermost produced the same results as for that of Icl. Likewise, the analysis of Lupper produced the same result as the analysis of the number of total layers (Ltotal) within an outfit. 3) Air temperature (ta) had positive relationships with Tchest and Tscapular and with Tinnermost but had inverse correlations with Icl, Mtotal, Lupper and Ltotal. Tchest, Tscapular, and Tinnermost increased as ta rose. 4) Icl had inverse relationships with Tchest and Tinnermost, but positive relationships with Mtotal, Lupper and Ltotal. Icl could be estimated by Mtotal, Lupper, and Tscapular using a multivariate linear regression model. 5) Lupper had positive relationships with Icl and Mtotal, but Llower did not. Subjects hardly changed Llower under environmental comfort conditions between March and October. This indicates that each of the Tchest, Mtotal, and Lupper was a factor in predicting Icl. Tinnermost might also be a more influential factor than the clothing microclimate temperature.