Maladaptive behaviors in individuals with Angelman syndrome.

Maladaptive behaviors are challenging and a source of stress for caregivers of individuals with Angelman Syndrome (AS). There is limited information on how these maladaptive behaviors vary over time among individuals with AS due to different genetic etiologies. In this study, caregivers of 301 individuals with AS were asked questions about their child's behavior and completed the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community version (ABC-C). Developmental functioning was evaluated with either the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III) or the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL). Family functioning was assessed using the parent-completed Parenting Stress Index (PSI) and the Family Quality of Life questionnaire (FQoL). Approximately 70% of participants had AS due to a deletion on the maternally-inherited copy of chromosome 15q11q13. Results revealed that at baseline, individuals with AS had low scores in the domains of lethargy (mean: 2.6-4.2 depending on genotype) and stereotypy (mean: 2.3-4.2 depending on genotype). Higher cognitive functioning was associated with increased irritability (r = 0.32, p < .01). Hyperactivity (p < .05) and irritability (p < .05) increased with age across all genotypes and should be ongoing targets for both behavioral and pharmacological treatment. Concerns for short attention span were endorsed by more than 70% of caregivers at baseline. Maladaptive behaviors, particularly hyperactivity, irritability and aggression, adversely affected parental stress, and family quality of life.

Efficacy of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic comparison.

The treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has become more effective over the last decade with the advent of the currently available disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Pivotal clinical studies differ in many characteristics, such that cross-comparisons of relative risk reductions are of limited value and can be misleading. Our objective was to compare the clinical efficacy of currently approved first-line DMTs in patients with RRMS, applying an evidence-based medicine approach. We reviewed all phase III pivotal trials of DMTs. Six clinical trials of Avonex, Betaseron, Copaxone, Rebif and Tysabri in patients with RRMS were identified for analysis. Only randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies were included. The clinical efficacy endpoints compared were: proportion of relapse-free patients at 1 and 2 years; annualized relapse rate at 2 years; proportion of progression-free patients at 2 years, and proportion of patients free of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at 1 year or 9 months. Based on these analyses, Betaseron, Rebif, and Tysabri show comparable effects, whereas for several endpoints Avonex or Copaxone did not significantly differ from placebo. In the absence of head-to-head studies for all products used to treat RRMS, it still may be possible to compare treatment effects by applying evidence-based medicine principles.

Intranasal loteprednol etabonate in healthy male subjects: pharmacokinetics and effects on endogenous cortisol.

Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a glucocorticoid soft drug that is currently in development for intranasal use. The main objectives of this study were to examine the pharmacokinetics and potential effects on systemic cortisol of two intranasal suspension formulations of LE and to compare these findings with placebo and fluticasone propionate (FP, Flonase) control treatments. In this randomized, double-blind (except for FP), parallel-group study (n = 8/group), all subjects received for 14 days once daily in the morning two puffs of the following nasal spray formulations into each nostril: LE 0.1% (400 microg/day), LE 0.2% (800 microg/day), FP 0.05% (200 microg/day), and placebo. Drug trough levels were determined on days 1, 5, 12, 13, and 14, and a full pharmacokinetic profile was established on day 14, and 24-hour serum cortisol profiles were assessed prior to treatment (i.e., at baseline) and after the last dose. All subjects completed the protocol without treatment-emergent adverse findings. All formulations were rapidly absorbed (t(max) less than 1 h). The rather short mean terminal half-lives of 2.2 +/- 1.5 hours and 1.8 +/- 1.0 hours for LE 400 microg and LE 800 microg, respectively, and 4.2 +/- 1.8 hours for the 200-microg FP treatment explained the lack of any accumulation. Mean peak concentrations (C(max)) were 139 +/- 57 pg/mL with LE 400 microg and 164 +/- 54 pg/mL with LE 800 microg and thus fairly independent from dose. The 200-microg FP treatment resulted in a C(max) of only 15.5 +/- 5.9 pg/mL. Mean measured AUC(0-t) values (193 +/- 87 pg/h/mL(-1), 300 +/- 183 pg/h/mL(-1), and 40 +/- 34 pg/h/mL(-1) for LE 400 microg, LE 800 microg, and FP 200 microg, respectively) showed high variability and suggested nonlinear pharmacokinetics for the LE formulations, indicative of a less complete systemic uptake of LE from the 0.2% concentration. None of the treatments (LE 400 microg, LE 800 microg, and FP 200 microg) showed evidence for serum cortisol suppression when compared with placebo, respectively. The uptake and systemic exposure appears less complete from the 0.2% LE concentration, which principally favors this formulation for further clinical development.

A comparison of 5-day courses of dirithromycin and azithromycin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Short-term use of antibiotics has become a common component of the management of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), particularly in complex cases with productive cough or purulent phlegm. The macrolide antibiotics, particularly second-generation agents such as dirithromycin and azithromycin, are among the antibiotic classes frequently recommended and used to treat upper and lower respiratory infections, including AECB. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the clinical efficacy and tolerability of 5-day courses of dirithromycin and azithromycin given once daily for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This randomized, investigator-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted at 5 centers in the United States. Eligible patients were adult (age >35 years) smokers or ex-smokers (smoking history of at least 10 pack-years) with chronic bronchitis and an acute exacerbation, defined by the occurrence of increased dyspnea and/or productive cough and feverishness within 48 hours of enrollment. Before randomization, an attempt was made to obtain a sputum specimen from each patient for Gram's staining and culture. Patients were randomized to receive dirithromycin 500 mg QD for 5 days or azithromycin 500 mg QD on day 1 and 250 mg QD on days 2 to 5. Clinical efficacy was assessed separately by patients and physicians at early (days 7-10) and late (days 25-35) posttreatment visits. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients (48 women, 38 men; mean age, 55 years) with a mean smoking history of 31 pack-years were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Forty-six (54%) patients were randomized to dirithromycin and 40 (47%) patients to azithromycin. Clinical efficacy was reported in a high proportion of patients in both treatment groups, both at the early posttreatment visit (84.8% dirithromycin, 75.7% azithromycin; difference dirithromycin - azithromycin, 9.1%; 95% CI, -8.2 to 26.4) and the late posttreatment visit (95.5% and 86.5%, respectively; difference dirithromycin - azithromycin, 9.0%; 95% CI, -3.7 to 21.6). A similar proportion of patients required a second course of antibiotics over the study period (20.5% dirithromycin, 27.0% azithromycin; difference dirithromycin - azithromycin, -6.6%; 95% CI, -25.2 to 12.1). Only 42 (48.8%) patients were able to produce a sputum sample before receiving study treatment, and of these, only 20 (47.6%) demonstrated a preponderance of neutrophils on Gram's staining. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest comparable clinical efficacy between 5-day courses of once-daily dirithromycin and azithromycin in acute exacerbations of COPD. There were insufficient data to permit meaningful comparison of the bacteriologic efficacy of these macrolide antibiotics.

Efficacy of zileuton controlled-release tablets administered twice daily in the treatment of moderate persistent asthma: a 3-month randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: A controlled-release (CR) formulation of zileuton was developed to simplify administration from 600 mg 4 times daily (Zyflo) to 1,200 mg twice daily. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of zileuton CR, two 600-mg tablets twice daily, compared with placebo. METHODS: Patients with moderate asthma treated with short-acting beta-agonists only were randomized to receive zileuton CR, 1,200 mg twice daily (n = 206); placebo CR, twice daily (n = 203); zileuton immediate-release (IR), 600 mg 4 times daily (n = 101); or placebo IR, 4 times daily (n = 103), for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in morning trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). RESULTS: Improvement in trough FEV1 was observed after 2 weeks of treatment (P = .001) and was maintained throughout the study. After 12 weeks of dosing, FEV1 improved by a mean of 0.39 L (20.8%) in the zileuton CR group vs 0.27 L (12.7%) in the placebo CR group (P = .02). A significant decline in beta-agonist use and a smaller proportion of patients reporting asthma exacerbations were observed in the zileuton CR group vs the placebo CR group. Adverse event profiles were similar across treatment groups. Elevations in alanine aminotransferase levels at least 3 times the upper limit of normal that reversed after drug withdrawal were seen in 5 zileuton CR-treated patients (2.5%) vs 1 placebo CR-treated patient (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with zileuton CR, 1,200 mg twice daily, resulted in a significant improvement in asthma control, and the safety and efficacy profile was similar to that observed with zileuton IR, 600 mg 4 times daily (Zyflo).