Relapsing pneumonitis due to two distinct inhibitors of the MAPK/ERK pathway: report of a case.

BACKGROUND: BRAF and MEK are component of the MAPK/ERK pathway and inhibitors of these proteins have significantly improved the outcome of metastatic melanoma. We report for the first time two sequential episodes of pneumonitis presumably induced by trametinib (a MEK inhibitor) and vemurafenib (a BRAF inhibitor) in a 50 year-old man. CASE PRESENTATION: While receiving trametinib for a metastatic melanoma, the patient developed non-febrile acute respiratory failure in the context of bilateral ground-glass opacities and sub pleural reticulations on high resolution computed tomography. An excess of lymphocytes was found in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Outcome was favorable after simple drug discontinuation. He subsequently developed a similar clinical-imaging picture 6 months into vemurafenib. A transthoracic lung biopsy disclosed interstitial lymphocytic infiltrate, poorly-formed granulomas with multinucleated giant cells and scattered eosinophils. Outcome was again favorable after simple drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: These two episodes in the same patient suggest that MAPK/ERK inhibitors may cause interstitial lung disease and may exert cross toxicity. This side effect is of particular interest for physicians in charge of patients with melanoma but this drug family is currently under development for several other solid tumors.

Sequential ctDNA whole-exome sequencing in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with initial durable tumor response on immune checkpoint inhibitor and late progression.

BACKGROUND: Despite prolonged tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for a subset of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a secondary resistance will occur for a majority of these patients. The understanding of late progression mechanisms with ICIs is important to improve future treatment strategies. METHODS: We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) on circulating tumor DNA and compared molecular profiles between the beginning of ICI treatment and tumor progression in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs and who had initial and prolonged tumor response with secondary progression, after at least 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: We identified eight patients who experienced initial and durable tumor response, and secondary tumor progression after 6 months of treatment, with available paired blood samples (diagnosis and progression). All had lung adenocarcinoma, three had programmed-death ligand-1 expression ≥50% in immunohistochemistry and all presented low blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB). Seven patients received nivolumab in second-line or more, and one received pembrolizumab as first-line treatment. WES at progression showed clonal selection with molecular alterations of Wnt pathway-related genes, increase of copy number aberrations in cancer-related genes and loss of tumor-suppressor genes (such as PTEN) or of genes associated with immune response (such as B2M). No difference in term of bTMB was observed at progression. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study describing putative molecular mechanisms associated with late progression under ICI in lung cancer. Studies on treatment strategies adapted to these mechanisms are needed.

Role of antibiotic use, plasma citrulline and blood microbiome in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggested a role of gut microbiota and antibiotic use on immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the impact of early use of antibiotic (EUA), blood microbiome and plasmatic citrulline (marker of the intestinal barrier) on nivolumab efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We included all consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab in our Department between 2014 and 2017. Blood microbiome was analyzed at month (M) M0 and M2. Citrulline rates were evaluated at M0, M2, M4 and M6. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included (EUA in 42%). Overall survival (OS) was longer without EUA (median 13.4 months) than with EUA (5.1 months, p = 0.03). Thirty-five patients (49%) had plasma samples available. High citrulline rate (≥20 µM) at M0 was associated with tumor response (p = 0.084) and clinical benefit (nivolumab > 6 months) (p = 0.002). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months (high citrulline) vs 1.6 months (low citrulline) (p < 0.0001), and median OS were respectively non reached vs 2.2 months (p < 0.0001). Patients with EUA had lower median citrulline rates at M0: 21 µM (IQR 15.0-30.8) vs 32 µM (IQR 24.0-42.0) without EUA (p = 0.044). The presence of specific bacterial DNA in blood at M0 was associated with response and clinical benefit (Peptostreptococcae, Paludibaculum, Lewinella) or with tumor progression (Gemmatimonadaceae). Multivariate analyses on PFS and OS confirmed the prognostic role of citrulline and blood microbiome. CONCLUSIONS: EUA is associated with shorter OS with nivolumab and lower citrulline rates. Plasma citrulline and blood microbiome appear to be promising predictive factors of nivolumab efficacy.

Positive plasma cotinine during platinum-based chemotherapy is associated with poor response rate in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are most of the time treated with a first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy. Tobacco use is responsible for 90% of lung cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of smoking continuation during first-line chemotherapy on tumor response in advanced-stage NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with an advanced-stage NSCLC (IIIb or IV), treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in our Department between June 2013 and July 2017 were included. Smoking status was assessed at inclusion by self-report, then at the tumor assessment consultation after 2 months of treatment, by both self-report and plasmatic cotinine measurement. Chemotherapy response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and stage 3-4 toxicity were registered. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were included: 8 (8%) declared to be non-smokers, 56 (58%) current smokers and 33 (34%) former smokers at diagnosis. At the first tumor evaluation, 24 (25%) self-reported as active smokers and 73 (75%) as non-smokers; overall response rate (ORR) was respectively 38% and 48% (p = 0.373). Fifty-four patients had a plasmatic cotinine evaluation at the first tumor evaluation. Seventeen patients (32%) had a positive cotinine rate (median 108ng/mL, IQR 31-236). Six patients (35%) had positive cotinine rate whereas declaring to be non-smokers at the first tumor evaluation. ORR was 18% in case of positive cotinine rate, and 57% when negative (p = 0.007). Regardless of the method for smoking status evaluation, PFS, OS and grade 3-4 toxicities were similar between smoker and non-smoker patients at the first tumor evaluation. CONCLUSION: Smoking continuation during platinum-based chemotherapy, reflected by positive plasma cotinine rate, was associated with a poor ORR.

Clinical factors associated with early progression and grade 3-4 toxicity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancers treated with nivolumab.

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been improved by development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as nivolumab for second-line treatment. As phase III trials include only selected patients, we here investigated the clinical factors associated with efficacy and safety of nivolumab in 'real life' patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Clinical and histological characteristics, therapies and survival data of all consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC included prospectively and treated by nivolumab in two French academic hospitals between February 2015 and December 2016 were examined. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included, mostly male (69%), current or former smokers (87%) with PS <2 (73%). Median age was 68.5 years and 42% were aged ≥70 years. According to uni- and multi-variate analyses, only PS 2 (OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.99, p = 0.049) and number of previous treatment lines (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.85, p = 0.022) were significantly negatively associated with tumor control. Worse progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly associated with PS 2 (HR = 5.17, 95% CI 1.99-13.43, p = 0.001) and use of steroids (HR = 3.27, 95% CI 1.39-7.69, p = 0.006). Worse overall survival was associated with symptomatic brain metastasis (HR = 3.15, 95% CI 1.23-8.85, p = 0.029). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47 patients (70%), symptomatic brain metastasis being significantly associated with Grade ≥3 toxicity (OR = 8.13, 95% CI 1.21-55.56, p = 0.031). Age and nutritional status were not associated with response, PFS, OS or toxicity. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that nivolumab is not beneficial or safe for patients with PS 2 and symptomatic brain metastases.

Predictive role of plasmatic biomarkers in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated by nivolumab.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, as nivolumab, are used in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no associated biomarker is validated in clinical practice with this drug. We investigated herein immune-related blood markers in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab. Plasma of 43 consecutive patients were prospectively collected at time of the diagnosis of cancer, at the initiation of nivolumab and at the first tumour evaluation (2 months). Concentrations of PD-L1 (sPD-L1), soluble PD-L2 (sPD-L2), Interleukine-2 (sIl-2), Interferon-gamma (sIFN-γ), and Granzyme B (sGranB) were quantified by ELISA. Cell free RNA was quantified by Reverse Transcriptase -PCR), and plasmatic microRNAs (miRNAs) were evaluated by targeted sequencing. Expression of PD-L1 on tumour biopsies was performed by immunohistochemistry using E13LN. High sPD-L1 at 2 months and increase of sPD-L1 concentrations were associated with poor response and absence of clinical benefit (nivolumab treatment less than 6 months). The variation of sPD-L1 concentrations were confirmed by RNA quantification. sPD-L1 concentrations were not correlated with PD-L1 expression on corresponding tumour samples. Low sGranB at nivolumab initiation was also associated with poor response. High sPD-L1 and low sGranB were associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Low sPD-L2, low sIl-2 and high sIFN-γ were associated with grade 3-4 toxicities. Finally, miRNA screening showed that patients with clinical benefit (n = 9) had down-expression of miRNA-320b and -375 compared to patients with early progression at 2 months (n = 9). In conclusion, our results highlight the interest of circulating biomarkers in patients treated with nivolumab.

Circulating tumor DNA evaluated by Next-Generation Sequencing is predictive of tumor response and prolonged clinical benefit with nivolumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Nivolumab is an anti-PD1 antibody, given in second-line or later treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to describe the predictive value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) on the efficacy of nivolumab in advanced NSCLC. We prospectively included all consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab in our Department between June 2015 and October 2016. Plasma samples were obtained before the first injection of nivolumab and at the first tumor evaluation with nivolumab. ctDNA was analyzed by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), and the predominant somatic mutation was followed for each patient and correlated with tumor response, clinical benefit (administration of nivolumab for more than 6 months), and progression-free survival (PFS). Of 23 patients, 15 had evaluable NGS results at both times of analysis. ctDNA concentration at the first tumor evaluation and ctDNA change correlated with tumor response, clinical benefit and PFS. ROC curve analyses showed good diagnostic performances for tumor response and clinical benefit, both for ctDNA concentration at the first tumor evaluation (tumor response: positive predictive value (PPV) at 100.0% and negative predictive value (NPV) at 71.0%; clinical benefit: PPV at 83.3% and NPV 77.8%) and the ctDNA change (tumor response: PPV 100.0% and NPV 62.5%; clinical benefit: PPV 100.0% and NPV 80.0%). Patients without ctDNA concentration increase >9% at 2 months had a long-term benefit of nivolumab. In conclusion, NGS analysis of ctDNA allows the early detection of tumor response and long-term clinical benefit with nivolumab in NSCLC.

Immunotherapy revolutionises non-small-cell lung cancer therapy: Results, perspectives and new challenges.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antibodies that target key signalling pathways such as programmed death 1 (PD1)/programmed death-ligands 1 and 2 (PDL1 and PDL2) to improve anti-tumour immune responses. Until recently, nivolumab was the only ICI validated for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a second-line treatment setting. Results from recent phase II and phase III randomised trials testing other ICIs have been presented. In Keynote-024, pembrolizumab, an anti-PD1 antibody, was reported to have great efficacy in the first-line treatment of PDL1 ≥ 50% tumours (30% of screened tumours), with a progression-free survival (PFS, median) of 10.4 months versus 6.0 months with chemotherapy (CT; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.37-0.68, P < 0.001), overall response rate (ORR) of 45% versus 28% with CT (P = 0.0011), and a 1-year overall survival (OS) of around 70%. In contrast, Checkmate-026 reported that nivolumab failed to show any benefit compared with standard platinum-based CT, with a PFS (median) in the PDL1 ≥ 5% NSCLC group of 4.2 months (nivolumab) versus 5.9 months (CT; HR = 1.15: 95% CI 0.91-1.45, P = 0.25). No benefit was observed in the PDL1 ≥ 50% subgroup. An encouraging report of the efficacy of pembrolizumab in addition to CT in first-line treatment in unselected NSCLC was also presented (Keynote-021) with an ORR of 55% versus 29% with CT alone (P = 0.0016). Atezolizumab, an anti-PDL1 antibody, showed efficacy for second-line treatment compared with docetaxel (OAK phase III study) with an OS (median) of 13.8 months versus 9.6 months with docetaxel. These results suggest a new paradigm for the treatment of advanced NSCLC using pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of PDL1 ≥ 50% tumours.

Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in lung cancer: moving beyond enumeration.

Molecular characterization of tumor cells is a key step in the diagnosis and optimal treatment of lung cancer. However, analysis of tumor samples, often corresponding to small biopsies, can be difficult and does not accurately reflect tumor heterogeneity. Recent studies have shown that isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is feasible in non-small cell lung cancer patients, even at early disease stages. The amount of CTCs corresponds to the metastatic potential of the tumor and to patient prognosis. Moreover, molecular analyses, even at the single-cell level, can be performed on CTCs. This review describes the technologies currently available for detecting and capturing CTCs, the potential for downstream molecular diagnostics, and the clinical applications of CTCs isolated from lung cancer patients as screening, prognostic, and predictive tools. Main limitations of CTCs are also discussed.

Bilateral pneumothorax complicating cystic metastases of bronchial squamous cell carcinoma under erlotinib.

Cystic lung metastases are a rare presentation in non-small cell lung cancer and occurs mainly in squamous cell carcinoma. We present the case of a 57-year-old woman with a lung squamous cell carcinoma and cystic lung metastases, who developed bilateral metachronous pneumothorax while being administered erlotinib in third-line treatment. The apparition of a pneumothorax under chemotherapy is most often the result of tumor necrosis and formation of bronchopleural fistula. However, very few cases have been reported under targeted therapies, and to our knowledge this is the first case under erlotinib. This complication is potentially life-threatening, especially due to the possibility of pneumothorax bilateralization.

Delay between the initial symptoms, the diagnosis and the onset of specific treatment in elderly patients with lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The proportion of elderly patients with lung cancer is increasing. The objectives of this study were to describe the initial symptoms in elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with lung cancer and to describe the diagnostic and treatment delays. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all consecutive patients with lung cancer that were diagnosed between 2006 and 2008 in our department. The initial symptoms and delays in the diagnosis and treatment in elderly patients were compared with those of younger patients. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients were included (26 small-cell cancers and 167 non-small-cell lung cancers [NSCLCs]). Ninety-two patients (47.7%) were ≥ 70 years old. No statistical differences were identified between the 2 groups concerning initial symptoms. In elderly patients, the delay between the initial symptoms and the first visit with a thoracic oncologist (median 1.6 months [IQR 23 days-3.3 months]), the delay between the first visit and the specific treatment (median 1.1 months [IQR 18 days-1.8 months]), and the delay between initial symptoms and the specific treatment (median 3 months [IQR 2-5.7 months]) were similar to those in the younger patients (P = .101, P = .084, and P = .671, respectively). Eighty-four percent of the elderly patients were actively treated vs. 98% of the younger patients (P = .001). CONCLUSION: We identified no differences regarding the initial symptoms in elderly patients with lung cancer compared with those in younger patients. The delays in diagnosis and treatment were similar between the 2 groups.

Use of a simplified geriatric evaluation in thoracic oncology.

Management of elderly patients with bronchial cancer should take into account specific factors linked to the patient's age, and the presence of co-morbidities. A geriatric evaluation enables us to use relevant information in the therapeutic decision-making process. However, the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment described in the literature is tedious and time-consuming. We describe the use of a simplified geriatric evaluation (SGE), in 57 patients aged >/=75 years (mean age: 80.8 years) with thoracic cancer, before discussing therapeutic options with colleagues from various departments. This evaluation enabled us to classify the patients into four groups: group 1 consisted of patients in a good general state; group 2+ comprised patients with no more than two stabilized co-morbidities or one poorly or non-stabilized co-morbidity; group 2- comprised patients with more than two stabilized co-morbidities, or at least two poorly or non-stabilized co-morbidities; group 3 consisted of frail patients. The three patients in group 1 did not have any negative factors that could complicate their management and therefore received anti-tumor therapy. The 15 patients in group 3 were considered to have co-morbidities or functional alterations that were too advanced for them to benefit from anti-tumor therapy, and received symptomatic treatment only. Among the 39 patients in the intermediary groups 2+ and 2-, 24 underwent surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy (21 (87.5%) patients in group 2+ and 3 (20.0%) patients in group 2-). These data suggest that the SGE is an important aid to decision-making in the management of elderly patients with bronchial cancer.