Topology optimization of a mandibular reconstruction plate and biomechanical validation.

OBJECTIVES: Reconstruction plates, used to bridge segmental defects of the mandible after tumor resection or traumatic bone tissue loss, are subjected to repeated stresses of mastication. High stress concentrations in these plates can result in hardware failure. Topology optimization (TO) could reduce the peak stress by computing the most optimal material distribution in a patient-specific implant (PSI) used for mandibular reconstruction. The objective of this study was biomechanical validation of a TO-PSI. METHODS: A computer-aided design (CAD) model with a segmental defect was created based on the geometry of a polyurethane mandible model. A standard-PSI was designed to bridge the defect. A TO-PSI was then designed with a maximum stress equal to the ultimate tensile stress of Ti6Al4V (930 MPa) during a loading condition of 378 N. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to analyze stresses in both PSI designs during loading. The standard-PSI and TO-PSI designs were produced in triplicate by selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V, fixated to polyurethane mandible models with segmental defects identical to the CAD model, and subsequently subjected to continuous compression with a speed of 1 mm/min on a universal testing machine, while recording the load. Peak loads before failure in the TO-PSI group within a 30% range of the predicted peak load (378 N) were considered a successful biomechanical validation. RESULTS: Fracture of the TO-PSI occurred at a median peak load of 334 N (range 304-336 N). These values are within the 30% range of the predicted peak load. Fracture of the mandible model in the standard-PSI group occurred at a median peak load of 1100 N (range 1010-1460 N). Failure locations during biomechanical testing of TO-PSI and standard-PSI samples corresponded to regions in the FEA where stresses exceeded the ultimate tensile strength of titanium and polyurethane, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a successful preliminary biomechanical validation of TO in the design process for mandibular reconstruction plates. Further work is needed to refine the finite element model, which is necessary to ultimately design TO-PSIs for clinical use.

The Priority position paper: Protecting Europe's food chain from prions.

Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) created a global European crisis in the 1980s and 90s, with very serious health and economic implications. Classical BSE now appears to be under control, to a great extent as a result of a global research effort that identified the sources of prions in meat and bone meal (MBM) and developed new animal-testing tools that guided policy. Priority ( www.prionpriority.eu ) was a European Union (EU) Framework Program 7 (FP7)-funded project through which 21 European research institutions and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) joined efforts between 2009 and 2014, to conduct coordinated basic and applied research on prions and prion diseases. At the end of the project, the Priority consortium drafted a position paper ( www.prionpriority.eu/Priority position paper) with its main conclusions. In the present opinion paper, we summarize these conclusions. With respect to the issue of re-introducing ruminant protein into the feed-chain, our opinion is that sustaining an absolute ban on feeding ruminant protein to ruminants is essential. In particular, the spread and impact of non-classical forms of scrapie and BSE in ruminants is not fully understood and the risks cannot be estimated. Atypical prion agents will probably continue to represent the dominant form of prion diseases in the near future in Europe. Atypical L-type BSE has clear zoonotic potential, as demonstrated in experimental models. Similarly, there are now data indicating that the atypical scrapie agent can cross various species barriers. More epidemiological data from large cohorts are necessary to reach any conclusion on the impact of its transmissibility on public health. Re-evaluations of safety precautions may become necessary depending on the outcome of these studies. Intensified searching for molecular determinants of the species barrier is recommended, since this barrier is key for important policy areas and risk assessment. Understanding the structural basis for strains and the basis for adaptation of a strain to a new host will require continued fundamental research, also needed to understand mechanisms of prion transmission, replication and how they cause nervous system dysfunction and death. Early detection of prion infection, ideally at a preclinical stage, also remains crucial for development of effective treatment strategies.

A treatment algorithm for patients with large skull bone defects and first results.

Large skull bone defects resulting from craniotomies due to cerebral insults, trauma or tumours create functional and aesthetic disturbances to the patient. The reconstruction of large osseous defects is still challenging. A treatment algorithm is presented based on the close interaction of radiologists, computer engineers and cranio-maxillofacial surgeons. From 2004 until today twelve consecutive patients have been operated on successfully according to this treatment plan. Titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) were used to manufacture the implants. The treatment algorithm is proved to be reliable. No corrections had to be performed either to the skull bone or to the implant. Short operations and hospitalization periods are essential prerequisites for treatment success and justify the high expenses.

A classification of cranial implants based on the degree of difficulty in computer design and manufacture.

BACKGROUND: Skull defects usually create aesthetic and functional disturbances to the patient. These defects are currently reconstructed by using computer-aided design and manufacturing processes. Classification of skull defects becomes important in discussing the complexity of reconstruction in clinical practice or comparing clinical results in scientific articles. METHODS: A more comprehensive classification, which takes into account not only the anatomical location but also the degree of difficulty in designing and manufacturing the implant, is presented here. It is not our intention to describe the different treatment modalities; therefore, only two clinical examples are presented to demonstrate the purpose of classification. RESULTS: The new classification enables a more detailed comparison of the clinical outcome of different modes of treatment for skull defects. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed classification reflects the degree of difficulty in designing and manufacturing of implants and can be very useful when comparing treatment results of skull defects for clinical or scientific purposes.