Infant liver biochemistry is different than current laboratory accepted norms.

The purpose is to study liver biochemistry in a well-defined cohort of term infants. The methods include healthy term infants (n = 619) provided blood samples at 3 and 6 months of age when participating to the DIABIMMUNE study. The infants were followed up at clinical study visits 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months the participation rate being 88.6% at the end of follow-up, while none disclosed any signs of a liver disease. The serum levels of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), total bilirubin (BIL), and conjugated bilirubin (BIL-conj) were determined using Siemens Atellica CH 930 analyzers. The results are at 3 months of age, the upper 90% CI for ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, BIL, and BIL-conj were higher than the current upper reference limits in our accredited hospital laboratory. At 6 months, the upper 90% CIs for ALT had declined but was still higher than the cut-offs for a raised value. The upper 90% CI for AST remained as high as at 3 months, whereas ALP, BIL-conj, and GGT had decreased close to the current cut-offs. The type of feeding was associated with the levels of liver biochemistry. Exclusively or partially breastfed infants showed higher ALT, AST, BIL, and BIL-conj values at 3 months than formula-fed. Breastfed infants had higher AST, Bil, and Bil-conj values also at 6 months.  Conclusion: We encourage setting appropriate reference ranges for liver biochemistry for the first year of life and to note the type of feeding. What is Known: • Healthy infants may show higher values of liver biochemistry during their first year of life than in later life. • It has been speculated that type of feeding may play a role in liver biochemistry levels among infants. What is New: • In a cohort of healthy infants, several analytes of liver biochemistry were higher than the currently used upper reference limits at 3 and 6 months of age, and exclusively or partially breastfed infants showed higher values than formula-fed. • The findings address the importance of setting appropriate reference ranges for liver biochemistry for the first year of life.

Paraproteins and electrolyte assays: exclusion effect and effect of paraprotein elimination.

Paraproteins are a potential source of error for electrolyte analyses. The exclusion effect itself causes a discrepancy between direct and indirect ion selective electrode assays (dISE and iISE, respectively). We tested the applicability of different pretreatment methods and the difference of dISE and iISE with paraprotein-rich samples. We analysed chloride (Cl-), potassium (K+), and sodium (Na+) on 46 samples with paraproteins up to 73 g/L. We compared pretreatment methods of preheating, precipitation, and filtration to the native sample. All induced a statistically significant difference (p-value <0.05). Clinically significant difference was induced by precipitation for all analytes, and filtration for Cl- and Na+, but for none by preheating. The difference in electrolyte measurements with either dISE or iISE on native samples was explained by total protein concentration (TP). There was a statistically significant difference in all electrolyte measurements. On average, there was a clinically significant difference in Na + but not in Cl- and K + measurements. Paraprotein concentration (PP) or heavy chain class did not induce a statistically significant effect. The regression analysis and comparison to the theoretical exclusion effect supported the conclusion that TP is the only explanatory factor in the difference between dISE and iISE. We conclude that preheating is a suitable pretreatment method for all the studied analytes. Precipitation is not valid for any of them, and filtration can be considered only for K+. Because the difference between dISE and iISE was explained by the exclusion effect caused by TP, dISE is the more suitable method to analyse paraprotein-rich samples.

Anaemia and enhancement of coagulation are associated with severe COVID-19 infection.

Coagulation disturbances are common in severe COVID-19 infection. We examined laboratory markers in COVID-19 patients during the first wave of the pandemic in Finland. We analysed a wide panel of coagulation tests (IL ACL TOP 750/500®) from anonymously collected samples of 78 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in intensive care units (ICUs; n = 34) or medical wards (n = 44) at Helsinki University Hospital in April-May 2020. These coagulation data were supplemented with the laboratory information system results, including complete blood count and C reactive protein (CRP). Coagulation and inflammatory markers were elevated in most: FVIII in 52%, fibrinogen 77%, D-dimer 74%, CRP 94%, platelet count 37%. Anaemia was common, especially in men (73% vs. 44% in women), and overall weakly correlated with FVIII (women R2 = 0.48, men R2 = 0.24). ICU patients had higher fibrinogen and D-dimer levels (p < .01). Men admitted to the ICU also had higher platelet count, leukocytes and FVIII and lower haemoglobin than the non-ICU patients. None of the patients met the disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) criteria, but 31% had a D-dimer level of at least 1.5 mg/L. Presence of both anaemia and high D-dimer together with FVIII is independently associated with ICU admission. Antithrombin was reduced in 47% of the patients but did not distinguish severity. Overall, CRP was associated with coagulation activation. Elevated FVIII, fibrinogen and D-dimer reflected a strong inflammatory response and were characteristic of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The patients were often anaemic, as is typical in severe inflammation, while anaemia was also associated with coagulation activity.