Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Med ; 12(3): 2658-2665, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36000584

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few therapeutic options are approved as second-line treatment after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Topotecan widespread use remains challenged by the risk of severe toxicities in a pretreated population. Little is known about the efficacy and safety of epirubicin-paclitaxel doublet in second-line and beyond and especially cerebral outcomes. METHODS: EpiTax is a retrospective multicenter observational real-life study. We evaluated the efficacy of epirubicin 90 mg/m2 combined with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks in SCLC patients after failure of at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), intracranial control rate (ICR), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were included. The median of previous systemic therapy lines was 2 (1-4). Eleven patients received the treatment in the second line. Characteristics of patients were a median age of 60 years (45-77), 65.5% of males with 72.4% of PS 0-1. Fifteen patients had a history of brain metastases. Median PFS and OS achieved 11.0 (95% CI, 8.1-16.3) and 23 (95% CI, 14.1-29.6) weeks, respectively. ORR was 34.5% and DCR was 55.2%. ICR was 3/15 (20%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were mainly hematological and concerned 7 patients. No case of febrile neutropenia or toxic death was reported. CONCLUSION: Epirubicin-paclitaxel association highlighted promising efficacy with PFS and OS of 11 and 23 weeks, respectively, ORR of 34.5%, and a tolerable safety profile. This doublet could represent another valuable therapeutic option for ES-SCLC patients treated in the second line and beyond.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Paclitaxel , Epirubicina , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Platina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia
2.
Arthritis Rheumatol ; 71(12): 2100-2111, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31379105

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer therapy frequently induce immune-related adverse effects (IRAEs). Therefore, most patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases have been excluded from clinical trials of ICIs. This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICIs in patients with preexisting autoimmune disease and cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 to January 2018 via 3 French national networks of experts in oncology and autoimmunity. Adults with preexisting autoimmune disease who were receiving ICIs were assessed for the occurrence of flare of preexisting autoimmune disease, other IRAEs, and cancer response. RESULTS: The study included 112 patients who were followed up for a median of 8 months. The most frequent preexisting autoimmune diseases were psoriasis (n = 31), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 20), and inflammatory bowel disease (n = 14). Twenty-four patients (22%) were receiving immunosuppressive therapy at ICI initiation. Autoimmune disease flare and/or other IRAE(s) occurred in 79 patients (71%), including flare of preexisting autoimmune disease in 53 patients (47%) and/or other IRAE(s) in 47 patients (42%), with a need for immunosuppressive therapy in 48 patients (43%) and permanent discontinuation of ICI in 24 patients (21%). The median progression-free survival was shorter in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy at ICI initiation (3.8 months versus 12 months; P = 0.006), confirmed by multivariable analysis. The median progression-free survival was shorter in patients who experienced a flare of preexisting autoimmune disease or other IRAE, with a trend toward better survival in the subgroup without immunosuppressant use or ICI discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that flares or IRAEs occur frequently but are mostly manageable without ICI discontinuation in patients with a preexisting autoimmune disease. Immunosuppressive therapy at baseline is associated with poorer outcomes.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Autoimunes/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Autoimunes/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/imunologia , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Exacerbação dos Sintomas , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa