Femoral Artery Closure Devices vs Manual Compression During Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background: Femoral arterial access remains widely used despite recent increase in radial access for cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Various femoral artery closure devices have been developed and are commonly used to shorten vascular closure times, with variable rates of vascular complications observed in clinical trials. We sought to examine the rates of contemporary outcomes during diagnostic catheterization and PCI with the most common femoral artery closure devices. Methods: We identified patients who had undergone either diagnostic catheterization alone (n = 14,401) or PCI (n = 11,712) through femoral artery access in the Indiana University Health Multicenter Cardiac Cath registry. We compared outcomes according to closure type: manual compression, Angio-Seal, Perclose, or Mynx. Access complications and bleeding outcomes were measured according to National Cardiovascular Data â€‹Registry standard definitions. Results: The use of any vascular closure device as compared to manual femoral arterial access hold was associated with a significant reduction in vascular access complications and bleeding events in patients who underwent PCI. No significant difference in access-site complications was observed for diagnostic catheterization alone. Among closure devices, Perclose and Angio-Seal had a lower rate of hematoma than Mynx. Conclusions: The use of femoral artery access closure devices is associated with a reduction in vascular access complication rates as compared to manual femoral artery compression in patients who undergo PCI.

Chronic kidney disease and dipstick proteinuria are risk factors for stent thrombosis in patients with myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Kidney failure (stage 5 chronic kidney disease [CKD]) is an independent risk factor for stent thrombosis (ST). Moderate (stage 3-4) CKD and proteinuria are both associated with adverse cardiovascular events, including worse outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI). Whether moderate CKD and proteinuria increase the risk of ST after MI is not known. This study evaluated the risk of ST associated with moderate CKD and dipstick proteinuria. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data from 956 non-stage 5 CKD patients who were admitted with MI and received intracoronary stenting. Clinical follow-up was collected at 1 year for definite or probable ST, as well as for all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI or death, and target vessel revascularization or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. RESULTS: After adjustment for multiple clinical and biochemical covariates, patients with both estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 15 to 59 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) and > or =30 mg/dL dipstick proteinuria had increased cumulative incidence of ST (hazard rate [HR] 3.69, 95% CI 1.54-8.89), all-cause mortality (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.34-5.37), and nonfatal MI or death (HR 3.20, 95% CI 1.77-5.81) at 1 year. In addition, estimated GFR of 15 to 59 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) was a significant independent predictor of ST (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.33-5.10). Dipstick proteinuria > or =30 mg/dL was associated with a trend toward increased risk for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In an acute MI population, moderate CKD was identified as a novel prognostic marker for ST. In addition, patients with both decreased GFR and proteinuria had higher incidences of all-cause mortality and nonfatal MI or death than patients with either condition alone.

Measuring and treating serum lipids in patients in a chest pain observation unit.

We evaluated opportunities to initiate statin therapy in 574 consecutive subjects admitted to a chest pain observation unit (CPOU). Ten-year Framingham risk scores were retrospectively calculated for all patients according to the National Cholesterol Education Program and Adult Treatment Panel III 2001 recommendations. Subjects were then stratified according to (1) recommendations for initiation of a lipid-lowering medication and (2) whether they received lipid-lowering drug therapy at discharge. Of 574 subjects, we excluded 50 with previously established coronary heart disease or who were already taking a statin medication on presentation, 23 with missing data, and 80 who did not have a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) measurement at admission. Of the remaining 421 subjects, the mean age was 47 years, 40% were men, 57% were white, 31% had hypertension, 27% were current smokers, and 6% had diabetes. Ten-year risk calculation classified 47% (n=199) at low risk (<2 risk factors), 32% (n=134) at moderate risk (>or=2 risk factors and <10% risk), 11% (n=48) at moderate-high risk (10% to 20% risk), and 10% (n=40) at high risk (>20% risk). Of the entire cohort, 23% of subjects (n=96) had hypercholesterolemia, of which 52% (n=50) met indications for initiation of lipid-lowering medication. Only 6% of patients with an indication for treatment (n=3) were prescribed a lipid-lowering medication on discharge, leaving 94% (n=47) untreated for their hypercholesterolemia. In conclusion, patients admitted to a CPOU have a high prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, and therefore, an increased long-term risk for cardiovascular events. In addition to their primary role, CPOUs should focus on primary prevention and reduction of long-term risk.

The comparative safety of bare-metal and drug-eluting intracoronary stents.

Bare-metal stents were a significant advance over percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. However, bare-metal stents are plagued by a restenosis rate of approximately 30%. First-generation drug-eluting stents greatly reduce restenosis but are associated with a troublesome persistence of late thrombotic events. Stent thrombosis is a devastating clinical event, with high mortality rates. While the superior efficacy of drug-eluting stents is unquestioned, the relative safety of bare-metal and drug-eluting stents has been hotly debated. This article will address the safety of bare-metal and drug-eluting stents, and will describe current and future stent systems that promise to maintain current efficacy, while reducing thrombosis risk even further.