RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Damage biomarkers are helpful in early identification of patients who are at risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI). Investigations are ongoing to identify the optimal role of stress/damage biomarkers in clinical practice regarding AKI risk prediction, surveillance, diagnosis, and prognosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of utilizing a clinical decision support system (CDSS) to guide stress biomarker testing in intensive care unit (ICU) patients at risk for drug-induced acute kidney injury (D-AKI). METHODS: A protocol was designed utilizing a clinical decision support system (CDSS) alert to identify patients that were ordered 3 or more potentially nephrotoxic medications, suggesting risk for progressing to AKI from nephrotoxic burden. Once alerted to these high-risk patients, the pharmacist determined if action was needed by ordering a stress biomarker test, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2-insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (TIMP-2â¢IGFBP7). If the biomarker test result was elevated, the pharmacist provided nephrotoxin stewardship recommendations to the team. Pharmacists recorded the response to the clinical decision support alert, ordering, and interpreting the TIMP-2â¢IGFBP7, and information regarding clinical interventions. An alert in conjunction with TIMP-2â¢IGFBP7 as a strategy for AKI risk prediction and stimulant for patient care management was assessed. In addition, barriers and solutions to protocol implementation were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 394 total activities recorded by pharmacists for 345 unique patients. Ninety-three (93/394; 23.6%) actionable alerts resulted in a TIMP-2â¢IGFBP7 test being ordered. Thirty-one TIMP-2â¢IGFBP7 results were >0.3 (31/81; 38.3%), suggesting a high-risk of progression to AKI, which prompted 191 pharmacist/team interventions. On average, there were 1.64 interventions per patient in the low-risk patients, 3.43 in high-risk patients, and 3.75 in the highest-risk patients. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Stress biomarkers can be used in conjunction with CDSS alerts to affect therapeutic decisions in ICU patients at high-risk for D-AKI.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Humanos , Inibidor Tecidual de Metaloproteinase-2 , Biomarcadores , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Unidades de Terapia IntensivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reducing central venous catheter (CVC) utilization can reduce complications in the intensive care unit (ICU). While norepinephrine (NE) is traditionally administered via a CVC, lower concentrations may be safely administered via peripheral intravenous (PIV) lines. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the implementation of a pilot protocol utilizing PIVs to administer a low-dose and lower-concentration NE, review the number of CVCs avoided, and evaluate any adverse events. METHODS: In a quaternary medical intensive care unit (MICU), from March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020, we reviewed charts for CVC placement and adverse events from the pNE infusion. We also measured unit-level CVC utilization in all MICU patients and assessed the change in utilization associated with the peripheral norepinephrine (pNE) protocol. RESULTS: Over a 1-year period, 87 patients received a pNE infusion. Overall, 44 patients (51%) never required CVC placement during their MICU stay. Three patients (3%) experienced adverse events, none of which were documented as serious and or required antidote for treatment. Implementation of the protocol was associated with a decrease in the number of patients at the unit level who received CVCs, even if they did not receive pNE. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In this small pilot study, we pragmatically demonstrated that pNE is safe and may reduce the need for CVC placement. This information can be used to aid in pNE protocol development and implementation at other institutions, but further research should be done to confirm the safety of routine use of pNE in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Norepinefrina , Projetos PilotoAssuntos
Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Lesão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Vaping/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Leucocitose/etiologia , Lesão Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesão Pulmonar/etiologia , Lesão Pulmonar/terapia , Masculino , Oxigenoterapia , Readmissão do Paciente , Pennsylvania , Respiração Artificial , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Capacidade Vital , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Patients with sickle cell disease can develop acute chest syndrome and are at high risk of developing pulmonary thrombosis. We report a case of a young woman with sickle cell disease who was hospitalized for vaso-occlusive crisis and subsequently developed worsening acute chest syndrome and stroke, discovered on point of care ultrasound to have right heart failure and a thrombus straddling a patent foramen oval. POCUS is highly specific for the detection of right heart dilation/dysfunction and should be a routine component of the assessment of acutely decompensating patients.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Three continuous dosing strategies of cisatracurium (CIS) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have been described in the literature. After implementation of a ventilator synchrony protocol (VSP), we sought to determine which continuous CIS dosing strategy utilized the least amount of drug without compromising efficacy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with ARDS receiving continuous CIS from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018. We categorized patients into one of three dosing strategies: fixed dose (FD), titration based solely on train-of-four (TOF), or the VSP. We documented drug consumption and determined efficacy by comparing the change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F) and oxygenation index (OI) from baseline up to 48 h. RESULTS: A total of 1047 patients were screened, and 189 met inclusion criteria (VSP = 69, TOF = 99, FD = 21). Drug consumption (mg) was significantly lower in the VSP arm: 415 [IQR 318-528] compared to both the TOF: 665 [IQR 472-927] and the FD arms: 1730 [IQR 1695-1800], p < 0.001 for each. The change in P/F and OI from baseline were statistically equivalent at all time points. CONCLUSION: Without impacting efficacy of gas exchange, a protocol using ventilator synchrony for CIS titration required significantly less drug compared to TOF-based titration and a fixed dosing regimen.
Assuntos
Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Atracúrio/análogos & derivados , Uso de Medicamentos , Humanos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: First, to implement successfully a light-sedation protocol, favoring initial as-needed (prioritizing as-needed) boluses over continuous infusion sedation, and second, to evaluate if this protocol was associated with differences in patient-level sedative requirements, clinical outcomes, and unit-level longitudinal changes in pharmacy charges for sedative medications. DESIGN: Retrospective review comparing patients who received the prioritizing as-needed sedation protocol to similar patients eligible for the prioritizing as-needed protocol but treated initially with continuous infusion sedation. SETTING: Thirty-two bed medical ICUs in a large academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 254 mechanical ventilated patients with a target Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale goal of 3 or 4 were evaluated over a 2-year period. Of the evaluable patients, 114 received the prioritizing as-needed sedation protocol and 140 received a primary continuous infusion approach. INTERVENTIONS: A multidisciplinary leadership team created and implemented a light-sedation protocol, focusing on avoiding initiation of continuous sedative infusions and prioritizing prioritizing as-needed sedation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 42% of patients in the prioritizing as-needed group never received continuous infusion sedation. Compared with the continuous infusion sedation group, patients treated with the prioritizing as-needed protocol received significantly less opioid, propofol, and benzodiazepine. Patients in the prioritizing as-needed group experienced less delirium, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, and shorter ICU length of stay. Adverse events were similar between the two groups. At the unit level, protocol implementation was associated with reductions in the use of continuous infusion sedative medications. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation and use of a prioritizing as-needed protocol targeting light sedation appear to be safe and effective. These single-ICU retrospective findings require wider, prospective validation.