Switching from natalizumab administration at the day hospital to administration at home. A 1 year prospective study of patient experience and quality of life in 30 consecutive patients with multiple sclerosis (TYSAD-35).

BACKGROUND: In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, French health authorities allowed the home administration of natalizumab by a healthcare-at-home service. We evaluated the patients' perception of care quality following the transition from day-hospital to home natalizumab administration. METHODS: Thirty relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with natalizumab were prospectively evaluated for one year after changing onto a home treatment procedure, using MusiCare, the first MS-specific questionnaire to evaluate patient experience and MusiQol. A numerical rating scale score for satisfaction and a dedicated questionnaire concerning patient experience were completed after each infusion. The primary endpoint was the mean difference in MusiCare score between baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: From June 2020 to November 2021, 306 infusions were performed at home. Three patients withdrew from the study (one lost to follow-up and two preferred to return at the day hospital). No worsening of patient experience or quality of life was observed. The mean scores of the Musicare dimensions were higher at 12 months than at baseline, significantly for the "relationship with healthcare professionals" (p = 0.0203). The MusiQol global score remained stable but the coping and friendship dimensions were significantly better at M12 than at baseline (p = 0.0491 and p = 0.0478, respectively). The satisfaction questionnaire highlighted some pain during the infusions (21.8%) and contradictions between healthcare professionals (17.2%). The mean score for satisfaction with care was 9.1/10. No safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSION: The positive experience of patients with home natalizumab administration provides an important opportunity to improve the quality of patient care.

Impact of automatic tools for detecting new lesions on therapeutic strategies offered to patients with MS by neurologists.

BACKGROUND: Automatic tools for detecting new lesions in patients with MS between two MRI scans are now available to clinicians. They have been assessed from the radiologist's point of view, but their impact on the therapeutic strategies that neurologists offer their patients has not yet been documented. OBJECTIVES: To compare neurologist's decisions according to whether a lesion detection support system had been used and describe variability between neurologists on decision-making for the same clinical cases. METHODS: We submitted 28 clinical cases associated with pairs of MRI images and radiological reports (produced by the same radiologist without vs. with the help of a system to detect new lesions) to 10 neurologists who regularly follow patients with MS. They examined each clinical case twice (without vs. with support system) in two sessions several weeks apart, and their patient management decisions were recorded. RESULTS: There was considerable variability between neurologists on decision-making (both with and without support system). When the support system had been used, neurologists more often made changes to patient management (75 % vs. 68 % of cases, p = 0.01) and spent significantly less time analyzing the clinical cases (249 s vs. 216 s, p == 3.10-4). CONCLUSION: The use of a lesion detection support system has an impact not only on radiologists' reports, but also on neurologists' subsequent decision-making. This observation constitutes another strong argument for promoting the wider use of such systems in clinical routine. However, despite their use, there is still considerable variability in decision-making across neurologists, which should encourage us to refine the guidelines.