Prevalence and incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers during treatment with vascular protective doses of aspirin.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin is valuable for preventing vascular events, but information about ulcer frequency is necessary to inform risk-benefit decisions in individual patients. AIM: To determine ulcer prevalence and incidence in a population representative of those given aspirin therapy and evaluate risk predictors. METHODS: Patients taking aspirin 75-325 mg daily were recruited from four countries. Exclusions included use of gastroprotectant drugs or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We measured point prevalence of endoscopic ulcers, after quantitating dyspeptic symptoms. Incidence was assessed 3 months later in those eligible to continue (no baseline ulcer or reason for gastroprotectants). RESULTS: In 187 patients, ulcer prevalence was 11% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3-15.1%]. Only 20% had dyspeptic symptoms, not significantly different from patients without ulcer. Ulcer incidence in 113 patients followed for 3 months was 7% (95% CI 2.4-11.8%). Helicobacter pylori infection increased the risk of a duodenal ulcer [odds ratio (OR) 18.5, 95% CI 2.3-149.4], as did age >70 for ulcers in stomach and duodenum combined (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.7). CONCLUSIONS: Gastroduodenal ulcers are found in one in 10 patients taking low-dose aspirin, and most are asymptomatic; this needs considering when discussing risks/benefits with patients. Risk factors include older age and H. pylori (for duodenal ulcer).

Current approaches to reducing gastrointestinal toxicity of low-dose aspirin.

Use of low-dose aspirin is associated with gastroduodenal mucosal damage and increased risk of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Many patients on low-dose aspirin should receive prophylactic treatment, because they often present several risk factors that may lead to upper GI complications in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users. It is reasonable to assume that effective therapy (e.g., omeprazole, misoprostol, and high-dose famotidine) in the prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers will also be effective in this setting. However, the best therapeutic approach to reducing GI toxicity in low-dose aspirin users is not defined, because only a few studies have focused on this problem. Omeprazole seems very effective in reducing both acute gastroduodenal mucosal damage and upper GI bleeding in the high-risk patient taking low-dose aspirin, but data with other antiulcer agents are lacking (misoprostol) or inconsistent (ranitidine) at present. No data are available on the effect of these drugs on dyspepsia or chronic gastroduodenal ulcers in the long-term use of low-dose aspirin. The role of Helicobacter pylori is controversial, but it may increase mucosal damage and the risk of upper GI bleeding in these patients. More data are needed to define the best therapeutic regimen in patients taking low-dose aspirin.

High incidence of clopidogrel-associated gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with previous peptic ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND: In average-risk patients, the new anti-platelet agent, clopidogrel, causes less upper gastrointestinal adverse events than aspirin. However, there are no safety data on the use of clopidogrel in high-risk patients. AIM: To evaluate the safety of clopidogrel in patients with peptic ulcer disease in a retrospective cohort longitudinal study. METHODS: During the period from January 2000 to May 2002, 70 patients who were prescribed clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for a previous history of non-aspirin-related peptic ulcer disease or a history of aspirin-related gastrointestinal complications (dyspepsia or peptic ulcer) were recruited. The occurrence of ulcer complications (bleeding/perforation/obstruction) was the primary end-point. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 1 year, nine patients (12%) developed gastrointestinal bleeding and one had a perforated peptic ulcer. Clopidogrel-associated gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly more common in patients with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding than in those without (22% vs. 0%; P = 0.007; odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel is associated with a high incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in high-risk patients. A previous history of gastrointestinal bleeding appears to be a predictor of adverse gastrointestinal events.

Aspirin renders the oesophageal mucosa more permeable to acid and pepsin.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of aspirin on the oesophageal mucosa and on acid- and pepsin-induced oesophagitis. DESIGN AND METHODS: The effects both of intraluminal (18 mg/ml) and of parenteral (100 mg/kg per h) aspirin on an in-vivo rabbit model of oesophagitis induced by acidified pepsin (pH 2) were studied. Oesophageal injury was assessed by macroscopic and microscopic scoring including the cell proliferation immunohistochemical parameter mib1. The mucosal barrier function was determined by hydrogen, potassium and haemoglobin flux rates. RESULTS: Acidified saline alone caused no damage, but the addition of aspirin induced mucosal barrier damage (P < 0.05). The exposure of the oesophageal mucosa to acidified aspirin and then acidified pepsin significantly increased mucosal injury and mucosal barrier dysfunction compared with control experiments (exposure to acidified saline and acidified pepsin). This damage was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced (> 40%) by prostaglandin cotherapy (prostaglandin E2) administered before acidified aspirin exposure. Mucosal damage was less severe (P < 0.05) when the oesophageal mucosa was exposed to a pH 6 aspirin solution. Parenterally administered aspirin also increased the oesophageal damage induced by acidified pepsin compared with control experiments, but the damage was 23% lower than that obtained with intraluminal aspirin. Cell proliferation studies showed a significant increase in the number of positive cells in those experiments with a higher degree of damage and in those treated with prostaglandins. CONCLUSION: Aspirin renders the oesophageal mucosa more permeable to acid and pepsin. These effects are in part pH-dependent and might be partially reversed by prostaglandin E2 cotherapy.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and prostaglandin effects on pepsinogen secretion by dispersed human peptic cells.

The effects of aspirin and ibuprofen on pepsinogen secretion were studied in isolated human peptic cells prepared from endoscopically obtained biopsy specimens after collagenase digestion, mechanical disruption, and percoll gradient centrifugation. Pharmacological concentrations of aspirin and ibuprofen (10(-8)-10(-4) M), potentiated histamine (10(-6)-10(-4)M) and forskolin (10(-5)M) stimulated pepsinogen secretion without affecting basal secretion, acetylcholine (10(-6)M) stimulated pepsinogen secretion or cell vitality. Augmentation of secretagogue stimulated pepsinogen secretion was dependent on extracellular calcium because potentiation was abolished by calcium depletion of the medium. Cimetidine inhibited the potentiation effect on histamine but not on forskolin stimulated pepsinogen secretion, thus suggesting that this augmentation was independent of histamine H2 receptors. Of interest, potentiation was also independent of endogenous prostaglandin inhibition because exogenous addition of prostaglandin E2 and D2 increased both basal and acetylcholine stimulated pepsinogen secretion in a dose dependent way, but they did not modify histamine or histamine plus aspirin or ibuprofen stimulated pepsinogen secretion. In conclusion, aspirin and ibuprofen potentiate secretagogue stimulated pepsinogen secretion by dispersed human peptic cells and this might be an additional mechanism of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) induced gastric injury. This potentiation effect is regulated by calcium, independent of endogenous prostaglandin inhibition and seems to act on pepsinogen secretion at a post-receptor site.

Risk factors associated with refractory peptic ulcers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The risk factors associated with refractory peptic ulcers are still undefined. The purpose of this study was to identify these factors in a multivariate context. METHODS: Clinical and endoscopic findings as well as Helicobacter pylori status, gastric secretion analysis, serum gastrin levels, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, and objective testing of aspirin use by platelet cyclooxygenase activity were studied in 60 consecutive refractory patients with peptic ulcer and 54 matched nonrefractory controls. RESULTS: Refractory patients had a longer history of symptomatic ulcer, had an earlier onset, had more frequent relapses, and smoked more during the episode of refractoriness. H. pylori status was similar in both groups, but H. pylori eradication in a subset of refractory patients (23 of 26) was highly effective in healing these ulcers (14 of 23). Globally, NSAID-analgesic abuse (including > 1500 mg/day paracetamol) was present in 40% of refractory patients (P < 0.006). Objective testing showed that 43.7% of NSAID use was surreptitious. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified only NSAID and analgesic abuse and the number of relapses as individually affecting refractoriness. CONCLUSIONS: NSAID and analgesic abuse is the single most important exogenous factor associated with refractoriness. H. pylori infection emerges as an important intrinsic factor, but almost a quarter of refractory patients cannot be linked to either NSAID use or H. pylori infection.

Cytokine effects on pepsinogen secretion from human peptic cells.

BACKGROUND: Different cytokines, including epidermal growth factor (EGF) and interleukin 1 beta (IL 1 beta), participate in the pathogenesis of gastric mucosal damage and repair by means of different mechanisms that are either paracrine or autocrine in nature. AIMS: To study whether EGF and IL 1 beta affect pepsinogen secretion in vitro. METHODS: Dispersed human peptic cells were prepared from endoscopically obtained biopsy specimens after collagenase digestion, mechanical disruption, and density gradient centrifugation. RESULTS: EGF dose dependently increased basal pepsinogen secretion and mitogenic concentrations (0.1 nM) of EGF induced submaximal stimulation. Similar effects were observed with transforming growth factor alpha. EGF effects on pepsinogen secretion were in addition to that induced by CCK-OP and db-cAMP stimulated pepsinogen secretion. EGF stimulated pepsinogen secretion was completely inhibited by a human immunospecific EGF receptor antibody and reduced by both genistein and tyrphostin-25, two different tyrosine kinase inhibitors. IL 1 beta does not affect basal, CCK-OP or acetylcholine stimulated pepsinogen secretion. However, IL 1 beta dose dependently inhibited db-cAMP and histamine stimulated pepsinogen secretion. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that both EGF and IL 1 beta modulate human pepsinogen secretion in vitro and suggest that the paracrine effects of these cytokines on pepsinogen secretion might be involved in some pathological conditions of damage and inflammation of the gastric mucosa.

Adaptation of esophageal mucosa to acid- and pepsin-induced damage: role of nitric oxide and epidermal growth factor.

To study whether the esophageal mucosa was able to elicit mucosal adaptation, we induced esophageal damage by perfusing acidified pepsin in rabbits. Mucosal adaptation was induced by preexposing the esophageal mucosa to a mild irritant (acidified saline) for 60 min prior to acidified pepsin (strong irritant). Macroscopic and microscopic esophageal injury, cell proliferation, and mucosal barrier function (H+, K+, hemoglobin flux rates) were studied. Preexposure of the esophageal mucosa to acidified saline significantly decreased both the mucosal damage and the mucosal barrier dysfunction induced by acidified pepsin. The development of this phenomenon was nondependent on cell proliferation. Concomitant treatment with either the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine, or the perfusion of immunospecific EGF-receptor antibodies or tyrphostin-25, an inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activities ligated to the intracytoplasmatic domain of the EGF receptor, during the preexposure period completely reversed the protection induced by acid. We conclude that the rabbit esophageal mucosa shows mucosal adaptation to acid and pepsin. The development of this phenomenon is fast, not dependent on cell proliferation, and dependent, at least in part, on nitric oxide and EGF-receptor-mediated mechanisms.

Effects of cholinergic, histaminergic, and peptidergic stimulation on pepsinogen secretion by isolated human peptic cells.

BACKGROUND: Whereas pepsin secretion by the human stomach has been extensively investigated, the characteristics of the peptide cell cannot be fully understood from in vivo studies. We therefore studied isolated human peptic cells to test directly cellular responses to different agents. METHODS: Eight endoscopic biopsy specimens yielded 10(6) cells, > 90% pure and > 95% viable. Secreted pepsinogen was measured with a sensitive hemoglobin digestion method at pH 2. RESULTS: Pepsinogen secretion was concentration-dependently stimulated by acetylcholine (ACh) (EC50 = 0.3 microM), cholecystokinin (CCK)-8 (2 nM), histamine (2 microM), and gastrin-I (30 nM) but not by bombesin or pentagastrin. ACh stimulation was inhibited 40 times more potently by atropine (IC50 = 12 nM) than by pirenzepine (IC50 = 0.5 microM). Histamine was inhibited by 10(-4) cimetidine. CCK-8 stimulation was inhibited 80% by the CCK-A-selective antagonist L364,718 (IC50 = 12 nM) but not by the CCK-B-selective antagonist L365,260. CONCLUSION: Isolated human peptic cells from endoscopic biopsy specimens secrete pepsinogen in response to ACh > CCK-8 > histamine > gastrin-I. The human peptic cell muscarinic-cholinergic receptor is not of the M1 subtype, and the CCK-8 response is predominantly mediated by a CCK-A receptor subtype.

Aspirin related gastrointestinal bleeders have an exaggerated bleeding time response due to aspirin use.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal bleeding is related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, especially aspirin, but only a small subset of users bleed. AIM: To look for risk factors or mechanisms whereby aspirin may promote gastrointestinal bleeding. PATIENTS: Sixty one patients with previous aspirin related upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 61 matched controls. METHODS: Patients and controls were given 375 mg of aspirin and sequential skin bleeding time and blood aspirin levels were measured. Additional studies included platelet lumiaggregation, von Willebrand factor, Factor VIII, and coagulation studies. RESULTS: Baseline skin bleeding time was similar in bleeders and controls, but bleeders had a more prolonged skin bleeding time after aspirin use. Hyper-response was more frequent in bleeders (30% v 9.3%; p < 0.01) and was associated with more than one previous separate bleeding event and a lower packed cell volume during the preceding bleeding episode. No differences were found in other factors studied. Logistic regression analysis identified prolonged skin bleeding time after aspirin use as an independent factor contributing to aspirin related gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 5.4; 95% CI: 1.8 to 17.1). CONCLUSIONS: 30% of patients with a history of aspirin related gastrointestinal bleeding have an exaggerated prolongation of skin bleeding time in response to aspirin, which may be a risk factor for bleeding. This intrinsic defect or to subclinical von Willebrand disease or different aspirin metabolism.