RESUMO
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare skeletal disorder that increases a patient's susceptibility to bone fracture. One complication commonly associated with fractures in this population is the occurrence of non-union leading to pseudoarthrosis. In this case series, three cases of non-union of the distal humerus leading to pseudoarthrosis in the pediatric OI population are presented. One case presents a successful attempt at treatment, one case presents a failed attempt at treatment, and the third case presents a patient's refusal to get treated. Furthermore, a literature review highlighting other institutions' attempts, successes, and failures at treating this clinical entity is presented. Combining the data retrieved from our institution and others, this review demonstrates that there is currently no standard for treating these patients. Additionally, based on the small case series and literature review presented in this article, definitive guidelines for the treatment of pseudoarthrosis of the distal humerus in pediatric OI patients cannot be outlined. However, our findings suggest that both non-surgical and surgical treatments could be viable options for patients with asymptomatic pseudoarthrosis of the distal humerus.
RESUMO
This systematic review, registered with Prospero, aims to identify an optimal animal model for meniscus repair research, moving from ex vivo experimentation to in vivo studies. Data sources included PubMed, Medline, all Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Web of Science, and Embase searched in March 2023. Studies were screened using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Extracted data including animal model, type of experiment, type of tear, surgical techniques, and measured outcomes, were recorded, reviewed, and analyzed by four independent reviewers. The SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) Rob tool was used for critical appraisal and risk of bias assessment. Out of 11,719 studies, 72 manuscripts were included for data extraction and analysis; 41 ex vivo extra-articular studies, 20 ex vivo intra-articular studies, and only 11 in vivo studies. Six animal models were employed: porcine, bovine, lapine, caprine, canine, and ovine. Longitudinal lesions were the most frequently studied tear pattern and sutures the most common repair technique. Studied outcomes focused mainly on biomechanical assessments and gross observations. This systematic review can guide researchers in their choice of animal model for meniscus repair research; it highlighted the strengths of the porcine, caprine, and bovine models for ex vivo cadaveric studies, while the porcine and caprine models were found to be more suited to in vivo studies due to their similarities with human anatomy. Research teams should familiarize themselves with the advantages and disadvantages of various animal models before initiating protocols to improve standardization in the field.