Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Natalizumab 6-Week Dosing vs Continued 4-Week Dosing for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Exposure to natalizumab, an efficacious treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Compared with every-4-week (Q4W) dosing, extended-interval dosing of natalizumab is associated with decreased risk of PML. Clinical efficacy was maintained in the majority of patients switched to every-6-week (Q6W) dosing in the phase 3b NOVA clinical trial. In this article, we report pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Q6W vs Q4W dosing in NOVA. METHODS: In NOVA study Part 1, participants with RRMS (aged 18-60 years) and Expanded Disability Status Scale score <5.5, who were stable on IV natalizumab Q4W dosing for ≥12 months, were randomized to continue IV Q4W dosing or switched to IV Q6W dosing of natalizumab and followed for 72 weeks. Exploratory outcomes were measurements of trough serum natalizumab concentration, α4-integrin saturation, and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) concentration. A mixed model of repeated measures was used to estimate mean treatment differences between groups. Patient-level PK and PD data were examined in those with relapse or radiologic disease activity. RESULTS: In NOVA, 486 (Q6W, n = 245; Q4W, n = 241) and 487 (Q6W, n = 246; Q4W, n = 241) participants were included in the PK and PD populations, respectively. Mean trough natalizumab concentrations ranged from 10 to 21 µg/mL (Q6W) and 33-38 µg/mL (Q4W), and mean α4-integrin saturation remained above 65.5% (Q6W) and above 77.9% (Q4W). In the Q6W group, mean sVCAM-1 levels increased 23.6% by week 24 and remained elevated throughout the study, while mean sVCAM-1 levels remained generally stable in the Q4W group. Most participants with T2 lesion activity or relapse activity, in either treatment arm, maintained trough natalizumab levels >10 µg/mL and trough α4-integrin saturation >50%. DISCUSSION: Compared with Q4W dosing, Q6W dosing was associated with a 60%-70% decrease in mean trough natalizumab levels and a 9%-16% decrease in mean α4-integrin saturation. At the patient level, neither natalizumab concentration nor α4-integrin saturation was consistently predictive of lesion or relapse activity, suggesting that trough natalizumab and α4-integrin saturation measurements should be interpreted with caution in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03689972; EudraCT, 2018-002145-11. Submitted 2018-09-27. First patient enrolled: 2018-12-26. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03689972.

Patient Preference for Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Administration with Every-6-Week Natalizumab (Tysabri®) Dosing: NOVA Phase IIIb Extension Study (Part 2).

INTRODUCTION: Following NOVA (part 1) and the approval of the subcutaneous (SC) route of administration of natalizumab by the European Medicines Agency, an extension phase of the NOVA phase IIIb study (part 2) was initiated to collect patient preference data for SC versus intravenous (IV) dosing in patients receiving every-6-week (Q6W) dosing of natalizumab. This study was performed to evaluate patient preference for SC versus IV natalizumab administration and explore the efficacy, safety, and pharmacology characteristics of both routes of administration. METHODS: In part 2, participants received natalizumab (Tysabri®) 300 mg via IV infusion Q6W for 36 weeks and then were randomized to 48 weeks of crossover treatment (24 weeks SC Q6W and 24 weeks IV Q6W, or vice versa). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who indicated a preference for natalizumab SC administration on the Patient Preference Questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 153 participants were randomized in NOVA part 2. Of 123 with patient preference data, 108 (87.8%) preferred the SC route of administration for natalizumab over the IV route; 102 (82.9%) specified "requires less time in the clinic" as the reason for the SC preference. CONCLUSION: In NOVA (part 2), most participants on Q6W dosing of natalizumab preferred SC administration versus IV administration. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT03689972. INFOGRAPHIC.

Exploratory clinical efficacy and patient-reported outcomes from NOVA: A randomized controlled study of intravenous natalizumab 6-week dosing versus continued 4-week dosing for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab (TYSABRI®) 300 mg administered intravenously every-4-weeks (Q4W) is approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis but is associated with increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Extended natalizumab dosing intervals of approximately every-6-weeks (Q6W) are associated with a lower risk of PML. Primary and secondary clinical outcomes from the NOVA randomized clinical trial (NCT03689972) suggest that effective disease control is maintained in patients who were stable during treatment with natalizumab Q4W for ≥12 months and who then switched to Q6W dosing. We compared additional exploratory clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from NOVA to assess the efficacy of Q6W dosing. METHODS: Prespecified exploratory clinical efficacy endpoints in NOVA included change from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), dominant- and nondominant-hand 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Exploratory patient-reported outcome (PRO) efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), Neuro-QoL fatigue questionnaire, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5 L) index score, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Improvement (patient- and clinician-assessed) and CGI-Severity (clinician-assessed) rating scales. Estimated proportions of patients with confirmed EDSS improvement were based on Kaplan-Meier methods. Estimates of mean treatment differences for Q6W versus Q4W in other outcomes were assessed by least squares mean (LSM) and analyzed using a linear mixed model of repeated measures or ordinal logistic regression (CGI-scale). RESULTS: Exploratory clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of randomly assigned study treatment and had ≥1 postbaseline efficacy assessment (Q6W group, n = 247, and Q4W group, n = 242). Estimated proportions of patients with EDSS improvement at week 72 were similar for Q6W and Q4W groups (11.7% [19/163] vs 10.8% [17/158]; HR 1.02 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-1.98]; P = 0.9501). At week 72, there were no significant differences between Q6W and Q4W groups in LSM change from baseline for T25FW (0.00, P = 0.975), 9HPT (dominant [0.22, P = 0.533] or nondominant [0.09, P = 0.862] hand), or SDMT (-1.03, P = 0.194). Similarly, there were no significant differences between Q6W and Q4W groups in LSM change from baseline for any PRO (TSQM, -1.00, P = 0.410; Neuro-QoL fatigue, 0.52, P = 0.292; MSIS-29 Psychological, 0.67, P = 0.572; MSIS-29 Physical, 0.74, P = 0.429; EQ-5D-5 L, 0.00, P = 0.978). For the EQ-5D-5 L, a higher proportion of Q6W patients than Q4W patients demonstrated worsening (≥0.5 standard deviation increase in the EQ-5D-5 L index score; P = 0.0475). From baseline to week 72 for Q6W versus Q4W, odds ratio (ORs) of LSM change in CGI scores did not show meaningful differences between groups (CGI-Improvement [patient]: OR [95% CI] 1.2 [0.80-1.73]; CGI-Improvement [physician]: 0.8 [0.47-1.36]; CGI-Severity [physician]: 1.0 [0.71-1.54]). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed in change from baseline to week 72 between natalizumab Q6W and Q4W groups for all exploratory clinical or PRO-related endpoints assessed. For the EQ-5D-5 L, a higher proportion of Q6W than Q4W patients demonstrated worsening.