Efficacy of a strict surveillance policy towards inappropriateness of plasma transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Plasma transfusion is not without risks. Despite a limited spectrum of indications, plasma is frequently used as prophylaxis in non-bleeding patients, to correct altered coagulation tests. A high rate of inappropriate use of plasma transfusion is frequently reported, as well as underdosage. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Since 2010 we started an education program that occurred in several phases to disseminate the knowledge of plasma transfusion guidelines. Since 2014 a 'zero tolerance' policy was applied: except for massive bleedings, plasma requests were prospectively evaluated, rejecting those without an appropriate indication. When indicated, at least 10 mL/Kg b.w.were issued. The previous five year period (2005-2009) served as control. RESULTS: The number of patients transfused/year decreased by 67.6% vs the control period (149 vs 460), and the liters of plasma issued/year decreased by 70.4% (233 vs 795). The deepest fall was observed in acute care wards (-70.8%). The mean volume transfused per episode raised from 731 mL ±â€¯70 to 879 mL ±â€¯154. The Prothrombin Time ratio at the moment of transfusion request increased from a mean of 1.35 (Interquartile range 1.20-2.64) in the control period to 1.62 (Interquartile range 1.43-1.98) in the last period (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With a proactive educational approach a remarkable reduction of plasma order and administration has been obtained, without any consequence on morbidity and mortality and with an estimated saving since 2014 of 750,000 €. A 'zero tolerance' policy can be effectively implemented only with a thorough workup with the local physicians, including repeated rounds of information and refreshing of the updated transfusion practice and knowledge of the established guidelines over the time.

Prevalence of markers of hepatitis B virus infection or vaccination in HBsAg-negative subjects.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of mass vaccinations against hepatitis B virus (HBV) has significantly reduced the prevalence of HBsAg-positive subjects. At the same time, the prevalence of the other markers of infection has decreased, but there has been an increase in the percentage of subjects with markers of a successful vaccination. It has been suggested that increasing immigration from countries in which this virus is highly endemic is changing the epidemiology of HBV infection. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of the serological markers of HBV in Italian and non-Italian HBsAg-negative subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the years 2007-2008, 8,018 samples from HBsAg-negative subjects (7,521 Italians and 497 non-Italians) were received for detection of anti-HBs and/or anti-HBc. The findings in the 1,358 samples from candidate blood donors were compared with those obtained in 1991 and 1999. RESULTS: The rate of anti-HBc positivity was 18.3% in the Italian samples and 32.8% in the non-Italian samples; the corresponding percentages of anti-HBs/anti-HBc positive samples (indicating past infection), anti-HBs positive only samples (vaccination) and anti-HBc positive only were, 11.3% vs. 22.5%, 25.8% vs. 17.2%, and 6.9% vs. 9.9% in Italians and non-Italians, respectively. The differences were more marked when stratified by age. In relation to candidate blood donors, simultaneous positivity for anti-HBs and anti-HBc decreased from 11.0% in 1991 to 8.1% in 1999 and 3.9% in 2007-2008, whereas isolated anti-HBs positivity increased from 2.2% in 1991 to 21.4% in 1999 and 42.9% in 2007-2008. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of markers of past infection among Italians has decreased over time as a result of mass vaccination and is significantly lower than that observed in non-Italians. The increasing number of immigrants from countries in which HBV is highly endemic is changing the epidemiology of HBV infection in Italy.