Can a structured, behavior-based interview predict future resident success?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a structured, behavior-based applicant interview predicts future success in an obstetrics and gynecology residency program. STUDY DESIGN: Using a modified pre-post study design, we compared behavior-based interview scores of our residency applicants to a postmatch evaluation completed by the applicant's current residency program director. Applicants were evaluated on the following areas: academic record, professionalism, leadership, trainability/suitability for the specialty, and fit for the program. RESULTS: Information was obtained for 45 (63%) applicants. The overall interview score did not correlate with overall resident performance. Applicant leadership subscore was predictive of leadership performance as a resident (P = .042). Academic record was associated with patient care performance as a resident (P = .014), but only for graduates of US medical schools. Five residents changed programs; these residents had significantly lower scores for trainability/suitability for the specialty (P = .020). CONCLUSION: Behavioral interviewing can provide predictive information regarding success in an obstetrics and gynecology training program.

Effect of quantitative feedback on student performance on the National Board Medical Examination in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether regular quantitative feedback improved medical student performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners Obstetrics and Gynecology subject test. STUDY DESIGN: We examined the effect of including regular quantitative feedback (in the form of biweekly quizzes) in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship on student performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners Obstetrics and Gynecology examination at the University at Buffalo. RESULTS: Students who completed the clerkship format including the regular feedback scored significantly higher than students who completed the clerkship without feedback (70.3 +/- 7.1 vs 68.2 +/- 8.6; P < .005; mean +/- SD; t test). The number of students failing the examination was significantly reduced from 6.39% to 0.47% (chi2 test; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Introduction of regular quantitative feedback significantly improved student performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners test, and resulted in a significant decrease in the number of students failing the course.

Obstetrician-gynecologists and primary care: training during obstetrics-gynecology residency and current practice patterns.

PURPOSE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologists' perceptions of their residency training in primary care, document health issues assessed at annual visits, and identify practice patterns of both generalist and specialist obstetrician-gynecologists. METHOD: Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 1,711 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Young Fellows in September 2005. Information was gathered on perceptions about adequacy of residency training, how well training prepared obstetrician-gynecologists for current practice, and typical practice patterns for various medical diagnoses. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis of variance, t tests, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Of 935 respondents (55% response rate), physicians estimated that 37% of private, nonpregnant patients rely on them for routine primary care. Approximately 22% report that they needed additional primary care training, specifically for metabolism/nutrition and dermatologic, cardiovascular, and psychosexual disorders. A wide range of topics, except for immunizations, were typically discussed at annual visits. Patients with pulmonary diseases, vascular diseases, and nongenital cancers were most often referred to specialists, whereas patients with urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, or who are menopausal are most often managed totally. Self-identification as a generalist or specialist was associated with some practice patterns. Respondents were neutral about the role of primary care in obstetrics-gynecology residency training. CONCLUSIONS: For several primary care issues, obstetrician-gynecologists assumed sole management for obstetric patients but deferred to a primary care physician for gynecological patients. There is a continuing need for primary care training in obstetrics-gynecology residency, although it is unclear whether current training is adequate to meet their needs.

Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: A mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Since mid-2013, Wisconsin abortion providers have been legally required to display and describe pre-abortion ultrasound images. We aimed to understand the impact of this law. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods study design at an abortion facility in Wisconsin. We abstracted data from medical charts one year before the law to one year after and used multivariable models, mediation/moderation analysis, and interrupted time series to assess the impact of the law, viewing, and decision certainty on likelihood of continuing the pregnancy. We conducted in-depth interviews with women in the post-law period about their ultrasound experience and analyzed them using elaborative and modified grounded theory. RESULTS: A total of 5342 charts were abstracted; 8.7% continued their pregnancies pre-law and 11.2% post-law (p = 0.002). A multivariable model confirmed the law was associated with higher odds of continuing pregnancy (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.01-1.50). Decision certainty (aOR = 6.39, 95% CI: 4.72-8.64) and having to pay fully out of pocket (aOR = 4.98, 95% CI: 3.86-6.41) were most strongly associated with continuing pregnancy. Ultrasound viewing fully mediated the relationship between the law and continuing pregnancy. Interrupted time series analyses found no significant effect of the law but may have been underpowered to detect such a small effect. Nineteen of twenty-three women interviewed viewed their ultrasound image. Most reported no impact on their abortion decision; five reported a temporary emotional impact or increased certainty about choosing abortion. Two women reported that viewing helped them decide to continue the pregnancy; both also described preexisting decision uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: This law caused an increase in viewing rates and a statistically significant but small increase in continuing pregnancy rates. However, the majority of women were certain of their abortion decision and the law did not change their decision. Other factors were more significant in women's decision-making, suggesting evaluations of restrictive laws should take account of the broader social environment.

The recruitment phoenix: strategies for attracting medical students into obstetrics and gynecology.

In less than a decade, the popularity of obstetrics and gynecology as a career choice has declined significantly. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO) are working to develop a multifaceted approach aimed at reversing this trend. We report on the findings and action plan developed by the ACOG Medical Student Recruitment Task Force as well as the current activities of APGO related to recruitment. Strategies include improving the quality of the medical student clerkship, frankly addressing gender and lifestyle issues that dissuade students from choosing obstetrics and gynecology as a career, and engaging students early in their medical school careers through student interest groups and mentoring programs.

Blueprint for action: steps toward a high-quality, high-value maternity care system.

Childbirth Connection hosted a 90th Anniversary national policy symposium, Transforming Maternity Care: A High Value Proposition, on April 3, 2009, in Washington, DC. Over 100 leaders from across the range of stakeholder perspectives were actively engaged in the symposium work to improve the quality and value of U.S. maternity care through broad system improvement. A multi-disciplinary symposium steering committee guided the strategy from its inception and contributed to every phase of the project. The "Blueprint for Action: Steps Toward a High Quality, High Value Maternity Care System", issued by the Transforming Maternity Care Symposium Steering Committee, answers the fundamental question, "Who needs to do what, to, for, and with whom to improve the quality of maternity care over the next five years?" Five stakeholder workgroups collaborated to propose actionable strategies in 11 critical focus areas for moving expeditiously toward the realization of the long term "2020 Vision for a High Quality, High Value Maternity Care System", also published in this issue. Following the symposium these workgroup reports and recommendations were synthesized into the current blueprint. For each critical focus area, the "Blueprint for Action" presents a brief problem statement, a set of system goals for improvement in that area, and major recommendations with proposed action steps to achieve them. This process created a clear sightline to action that if enacted could improve the structure, process, experiences of care, and outcomes of the maternity care system in ways that when anchored in the culture can indeed transform maternity care.