Use of a bDMARD or tsDMARD for the management of inflammatory arthritis under checkpoint inhibitors: an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited experience regarding the use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) and JAK inhibitor (JAKi) for the management of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-induced inflammatory arthritis. We aimed to assess their efficacy and safety in this setting. METHODS: Using the Club Rhumatismes and Inflammation French network, we conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational study of patients with cancer diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis under ICI(s) and treated with bDMARD or JAKi. Clinical data were collected using a standardised case report form. RESULTS: Twenty patients (60% men, median age 69.5 years) were included, with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-like (n=16), polymyalgia rheumatica-like (n=2) or psoriatic arthritis-like (n=2) clinical presentation. Two patients had pre-existing RA. 90% were treated with glucocorticoids as first-line therapy and 60% received methotrexate prior to bDMARD or JAKi. Anti-interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) therapy was used in 13/20 patients (65%), leading to clinical improvement in 11/13 patients (85%), but one patient experienced intestinal perforation and cancer progression was noticed in 6/13 patients (46%). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors were used in 5/20 patients (25%), with improvement in 4/5 patients (80%) and cancer progression was observed in 3/5 patients (60%). Two infections (diverticulitis and pneumonitis) were reported. Anakinra, baricitinib and ustekinumab were each used in one patient. Median duration of the bDMARD or JAKi was 17 weeks. CONCLUSION: Anti-IL-6R therapy is currently the most common strategy in patients with ICI-induced inflammatory arthritis and insufficient response to glucocorticoids and methotrexate, leading to improvement in >80%. Overall, cancer progression occurred in about half of patients and whether the bDMARD/JAKi impacted the tumour response remains to be determined.

Effects of successive switches to different biosimilars infliximab on immunogenicity in chronic inflammatory diseases in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluatre the risk of immunogenicity in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases who experienced successive non-medical swiches to different biosimilars infliximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational study over a 3-year observation period assessing the risk of immunogenicity in i) patients in maintenance therapy with innovator infliximab who were successively switched to CT-P13, then to SB2 (cohort-1) and ii) biologic-naive patients initiated with CT-P13 before being switched to SB2 (cohort-2). A propotion meta-analysis was also performed, integrating our results to 16 additional studies. RESULTS: Cohort-1 included 265 patients who switched to CT-P13, and 140 patients were subsequently switched to SB2. Among the 235 anti-drug antibody (ADA)-free patients at baseline, 20 patients (8.5%) developed ADA over the 3-year observation period (rate of 3 for 100 patient years). Cohort-2 included 44 patients, of whom 29 subsequently switched to SB2. A total of 11 patients (25%) developed ADA within 3 years (rate of 14 for 100 patients years). We found no influence of the number of biosimilars infliximab received on ADA deveopment in both cohorts. The risk of treatment discontinuation was significantly higher in patients with positive ADA in both cohorts. The meta-analysis including our data exposed an incidence of immunogenicity of 4.7% (95% CI 3.5-6.1%) after the switch from innovator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab and 21.1% (95% CI 13.1-30.3%) in patients initiating biosimilar infliximab. CONCLUSION: Immunogenicity was not favored by successive non-medical switches to biosimilars infliximab in our study, but was associated with treatment discontinuation.