Comparison between bilateral cochlear implants and Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant: speech perception, sound localization and patient self-assessment.

An alternative to bilateral cochlear implantation is offered by the Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant, which allows stimulation of both cochleae within a single device. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare a group of Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural implant users (denoted BINAURAL group, n = 7) with a group of bilateral adult cochlear implant users (denoted BILATERAL group, n = 6) in terms of speech perception, sound localization, and self-assessment of health status and hearing disability. Speech perception was assessed using word recognition at 60 dB SPL in quiet and in a 'cocktail party' noise delivered through five loudspeakers in the hemi-sound field facing the patient (signal-to-noise ratio = +10 dB). The sound localization task was to determine the source of a sound stimulus among five speakers positioned between -90° and +90° from midline. Change in health status was assessed using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and hearing disability was evaluated with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Speech perception was not statistically different between the two groups, even though there was a trend in favor of the BINAURAL group (mean percent word recognition in the BINAURAL and BILATERAL groups: 70 vs. 56.7% in quiet, 55.7 vs. 43.3% in noise). There was also no significant difference with regard to performance in sound localization and self-assessment of health status and hearing disability. On the basis of the BINAURAL group's performance in hearing tasks involving the detection of interaural differences, implantation with the Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural implant may be considered to restore effective binaural hearing. Based on these first comparative results, this device seems to provide benefits similar to those of traditional bilateral cochlear implantation, with a new approach to stimulate both auditory nerves.

Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report speech performance in quiet and in noise, sound localization with cochlear implanted children bilaterally. Their performances were compared also in unilateral conditions. In addition, speech and language evaluation was analyzed. METHODS: Twenty-three children implanted with Neurelec Digisonic SP devices in 3 tertiary centres were tested on a battery of speech perception tests in quiet and in noise. Localization was assessed by lateralization tasks (90° and 30°). Progress in speech and language development and subjective assessment of benefit were assessed using several rating scales and questionnaires (categories of auditory perception, speech intelligibility rating, family participating rating scale). RESULTS: Children scored better when tested in bilateral conditions rather than in unilateral conditions. In quiet, the mean scores for the poorer and better side were 52% and 73%, respectively. In the bilateral condition, the mean score increased to 83%. In noise, the mean scores were 39% and 57% respectively, which increased to a mean of 70% in the bilateral condition. Nine children (<9 years) completed the ±90° lateralization task. For both unilateral conditions performance was not significantly different from chance level. In the bilateral condition, the mean score was 86%. The ±30° lateralization score was completed by eight of the older children (>9 years). The scores in the unilateral conditions were closed to chance level, but significantly better in the bilateral condition (mean of 86%). CONCLUSIONS: Performances in bilateral conditions were significantly better than in unilateral conditions on speech perception in quiet and in noise. Localization was significantly better when tested in the bilateral condition for ±90° lateralization task for the younger children and the ±30° task for the older children. All these results supported the hypothesis than bilateral cochlear implantation is more beneficial than unilateral implantation in children.