Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 14(5): 212-21, 2013 Sep 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24036875

RESUMO

Until recently, the radiation dose to patients undergoing the 90Y selective internal radiation treatment (SIRT) procedure is determined by applying the partition model to 99mTc MAA pretreatment scan. There can be great uncertainty in radiation dose calculated from this approach and we presented a method to compute the 3D dose distributions resulting from 90Y SIRT based on 90Y positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Five 90Y SIRT treatments were retrospectively analyzed. After 90Y SIRT, patients had 90Y PET/CT imaging within 6 hours of the procedure. To obtain the 3D dose distribution of the patients, their respective 90Y PET images were convolved with a Monte Carlo generated voxel dose kernel. The sensitivity of the PET/CT scanner for 90Y was determined through phantom studies. The 3D dose distributions were then presented in DICOM RT dose format. By applying the linear quadratic model to the dose data, we derived the biologically effective dose and dose equivalent to 2 Gy/fraction delivery, taking into account the spatial and temporal dose rate variations specific for SIRT. Based on this data, we intend to infer tumor control probability and risk of radiation induced liver injury from SIRT by comparison with established dose limits. For the five cases, the mean dose to target ranged from 51.7 ± 28.6 Gy to 163 ± 53.7 Gy. Due to the inhomogeneous nature of the dose distribution, the GTVs were not covered adequately, leading to very low values of tumor control probability. The mean dose to the normal liver ranged from 21.4 ± 30.7 to 36.7 ± 25.9 Gy. According to QUANTEC recommendation, a patient with primary liver cancer and a patient with metastatic liver cancer has more than 5% risk of radiotherapy-induced liver disease (RILD).


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Radiometria , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Radioisótopos de Ítrio/farmacocinética , Idoso , Braquiterapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/radioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem Multimodal , Distribuição Tecidual , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(13): 2643-53, 2004 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15226332

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Ho's stage T3 or N2/N3 NPC or neck node > or = 4 cm were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to have radiotherapy (RT) or CRT with uracil and tegafur and to have AC or no AC after RT/CRT. AC comprised alternating cisplatin, fluorouracil, vincristine, bleomycin, and methotrexate for six cycles. There were four treatment groups: A, RT; B, CRT; C, RT and AC; D, CRT and AC. For CRT versus RT, groups B and D were compared with groups A and C. For AC versus no AC, groups C and D were compared with groups A and B. RESULTS: Three-year failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) for CRT versus RT were 69.3% versus 57.8% and 86.5% versus 76.8%, respectively (P =.14 and.06; n = 110 v 109). Distant metastases rate (DMR) was significantly reduced with CRT (14.8% v 29.4%; P =.026). Locoregional failure rates (LRFR) were similar (20% v 27.6%; P =.39). Three-year FFS and OS for AC versus no AC were 62.5% versus 65% and 80.4% versus 83.1%, respectively (P =.83 and.69; n = 111 v 108). DMR and LRFR were not reduced with AC (P =.34 and.15, respectively). Cox model showed CRT to be a favorable prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 0.42; P =.009). CONCLUSION: An improvement in OS with CRT was observed but did not achieve statistical significance. The improvement seemed to be associated with a significant reduction in DMR. AC did not improve outcome.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Bleomicina/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Metástase Neoplásica , Tegafur/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Uracila/administração & dosagem , Vincristina/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa