Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Patients 1 to 11 Years of Age.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 pathways and has shown efficacy in five different atopic diseases marked by type 2 inflammation, including eosinophilic esophagitis in adults and adolescents. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 2:2:1:1 ratio, patients 1 to 11 years of age with active eosinophilic esophagitis who had had no response to proton-pump inhibitors to 16 weeks of a higher-exposure or lower-exposure subcutaneous dupilumab regimen or to placebo (two groups) (Part A). At the end of Part A, eligible patients in each dupilumab group continued the same regimen and those in the placebo groups were assigned to higher-exposure or lower-exposure dupilumab for 36 weeks (Part B). At each level of exposure, dupilumab was administered in one of four doses tiered according to baseline body weight. The primary end point was histologic remission (peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count, ≤6 per high-power field) at week 16. Key secondary end points were tested hierarchically. RESULTS: In Part A, histologic remission occurred in 25 of the 37 patients (68%) in the higher-exposure group, in 18 of the 31 patients (58%) in the lower-exposure group, and in 1 of the 34 patients (3%) in the placebo group (difference between the higher-exposure regimen and placebo, 65 percentage points [95% confidence interval {CI}, 48 to 81; P<0.001]; difference between the lower-exposure regimen and placebo, 55 percentage points [95% CI, 37 to 73; P<0.001]). The higher-exposure dupilumab regimen led to significant improvements in histologic, endoscopic, and transcriptomic measures as compared with placebo. The improvements in histologic, endoscopic, and transcriptomic measures between baseline and week 52 in all the patients were generally similar to the improvements between baseline and week 16 in the patients who received dupilumab in Part A. In Part A, the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019, nausea, injection-site pain, and headache was at least 10 percentage points higher among the patients who received dupilumab (at either dose) than among those who received placebo. Serious adverse events were reported in 3 patients who received dupilumab during Part A and in 6 patients overall during Part B. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab resulted in histologic remission in a significantly higher percentage of children with eosinophilic esophagitis than placebo. The higher-exposure dupilumab regimen also led to improvements in measures of key secondary end points as compared with placebo. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; EoE KIDS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04394351.).

Dupilumab for COPD with Blood Eosinophil Evidence of Type 2 Inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation, has shown efficacy and safety in a phase 3 trial involving patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 inflammation and an elevated risk of exacerbation. Whether the findings would be confirmed in a second phase 3 trial was unclear. METHODS: In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with COPD who had a blood eosinophil count of 300 cells per microliter or higher to receive subcutaneous dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations. Key secondary end points, analyzed in a hierarchical manner to adjust for multiplicity, included the changes from baseline in the prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at weeks 12 and 52 and in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ; scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better quality of life) total score at week 52. RESULTS: A total of 935 patients underwent randomization: 470 were assigned to the dupilumab group and 465 to the placebo group. As prespecified, the primary analysis was performed after a positive interim analysis and included all available data for the 935 participants, 721 of whom were included in the analysis at week 52. The annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.06) with dupilumab and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.60) with placebo; the rate ratio as compared with placebo was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; P<0.001). The prebronchodilator FEV1 increased from baseline to week 12 with dupilumab (least-squares mean change, 139 ml [95% CI, 105 to 173]) as compared with placebo (least-squares mean change, 57 ml [95% CI, 23 to 91]), with a significant least-squares mean difference at week 12 of 82 ml (P<0.001) and at week 52 of 62 ml (P = 0.02). No significant between-group difference was observed in the change in SGRQ scores from baseline to 52 weeks. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups and consistent with the established profile of dupilumab. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation as indicated by elevated blood eosinophil counts, dupilumab was associated with fewer exacerbations and better lung function than placebo. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; NOTUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04456673.).

Blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide are prognostic and predictive biomarkers in childhood asthma.

BACKGROUND: Blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) are prognostic biomarkers for exacerbations and predict lung function responses to dupilumab in adolescents and adults with asthma. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the relationship between baseline blood eosinophils and Feno and response to dupilumab in children with asthma. METHODS: Children aged 6 to 11 years with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma (n = 408) were randomized to receive dupilumab 100/200 mg by body weight or volume-matched placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. Annualized exacerbation rate (AER) reduction and least squares mean change in prebronchodilator percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) at week 12 were assessed according to cutoff baseline levels for Feno (<20 ppb vs ≥20 ppb) and blood eosinophil count (<150, ≥150 to <300, ≥300 to <500, and ≥500 cells/µL). Quadrant analyses in populations defined by biomarker thresholds and spline models across continuous end points assessed the relationship with Feno and eosinophil count. Interaction testing evaluated the independent roles of Feno and blood eosinophils as predictive markers. RESULTS: Exacerbation risk and magnitude of AER reduction increased in subgroups with higher baseline biomarker levels. Quadrant analyses revealed that disease of patients with either elevated Feno or eosinophil counts demonstrated a clinical response to dupilumab. Interaction testing indicated blood eosinophil counts or Feno independently added value as predictive biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: In children with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma, blood eosinophil counts and Feno are clinically relevant biomarkers to identify those at risk for asthma exacerbations, as well as those with disease with clinical response to dupilumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Liberty Asthma VOYAGE ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02948959.

Dupilumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (LIBERTY-CSU CUPID): Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by recurrent pruritic wheals (hives) and/or angioedema. Patients with CSU could remain symptomatic despite standard-of-care H1 antihistamines (H1-AH) or anti-IgE (omalizumab) treatment. Dupilumab blocks IL-4/IL-13 signaling and is approved for multiple type 2/atopic indications. OBJECTIVE: We conducted two phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials comparing dupilumab with placebo in patients with symptomatic CSU despite H1-AH. METHODS: In LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study A, patients were omalizumab-naive (n = 138, aged ≥6 years). In Study B, patients were omalizumab-intolerant/incomplete responders (n = 108, aged ≥12 years). The primary end point was either change from baseline over 7 days in the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) or Itch Severity Score (ISS7) at week 24, with the other as a key secondary end point, depending on regional regulatory requirements. Studies were pooled for safety assessment. RESULTS: In Study A, UAS7 and ISS7 improved with dupilumab versus placebo (difference -8.5 [95% CI, -13.2 to -3.9; P = .0003] and -4.2 [95% CI, -6.6 to -1.8; P = .0005]). In Study B, tested at α = 0.043 after interim analysis, UAS7 improved (difference -5.8 [95% CI, -11.4 to -0.3; P = .0390]), with a numerical trend in ISS7 (difference -2.9 [95% CI, -5.7 to -0.07; nominal P = .0449, not significant]). Pooled safety data were consistent between dupilumab and placebo and with the known dupilumab safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab reduced urticaria activity by reducing itch and hives severity in omalizumab-naive patients with CSU uncontrolled with H1-AH. Although the primary end point for Study B was not met, dupilumab effects were small in patients who were omalizumab-intolerant/incomplete responders.

Differential modulation of allergic rhinitis nasal transcriptome by dupilumab and allergy immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Nasal epithelial cells are important regulators of barrier function and immune signaling; however, in allergic rhinitis (AR) these functions can be disrupted by inflammatory mediators. We aimed to better discern AR disease mechanisms using transcriptome data from nasal brushing samples from individuals with and without AR. METHODS: Data were drawn from a feasibility study of individuals with and without AR to Timothy grass and from a clinical trial evaluating 16 weeks of treatment with the following: dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds interleukin (IL)-4Rα and inhibits type 2 inflammation by blocking signaling of both IL-4/IL-13; subcutaneous immunotherapy with Timothy grass (SCIT), which inhibits allergic responses through pleiotropic effects; SCIT + dupilumab; or placebo. Using nasal brushing samples from these studies, we defined distinct gene signatures in nasal tissue of AR disease and after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) and assessed how these signatures were modulated by study drug(s). RESULTS: Treatment with dupilumab (normalized enrichment score [NES] = -1.73, p = .002) or SCIT + dupilumab (NES = -2.55, p < .001), but not SCIT alone (NES = +1.16, p = .107), significantly repressed the AR disease signature. Dupilumab (NES = -2.55, p < .001), SCIT (NES = -2.99, p < .001), and SCIT + dupilumab (NES = -3.15, p < .001) all repressed the NAC gene signature. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate type 2 inflammation is an important contributor to the pathophysiology of AR disease and that inhibition of the type 2 pathway with dupilumab may normalize nasal tissue gene expression.

Dupilumab treatment improves signs, symptoms, quality of life, and work productivity in patients with atopic hand and foot dermatitis: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite high disease burden, systemic treatment options for patients with atopic hand and/or foot dermatitis (H/F AD) are limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of dupilumab in H/F AD using specific instruments for assessing disease severity on hands and feet. METHODS: In this multicenter phase 3 trial, adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe H/F AD were randomized to dupilumab monotherapy (regimen approved for generalized AD), or matched placebo. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving Hand and Foot Investigator's Global Assessment score 0 or 1 at week 16. Secondary prespecified endpoints assessed the severity and extent of signs, symptom intensity (itch, pain), quality of life, and sleep. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients (adults = 106, adolescents = 27) were randomized to dupilumab (n = 67) or placebo (n = 66). At week 16, significantly more patients receiving dupilumab (n = 27) than placebo (n = 11) achieved Hand and Foot Investigator's Global Assessment score 0 or 1 (40.3% vs 16.7%; P = .003). All other prespecified endpoints were met. Safety was consistent with the known AD dupilumab profile. LIMITATIONS: Short-term, 16-week treatment period. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab monotherapy resulted in significant improvements across different domains of H/F AD with acceptable safety, supporting dupilumab as a systemic treatment approach for this often difficult to treat condition.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids in Japanese pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to <18 years old with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis not adequately controlled with existing therapies. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients received dupilumab (n = 30) or placebo (n = 32) with concomitant topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks, then all patients received dupilumab from 16 to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from baseline (EASI-75) to Week 16. Key secondary endpoints included changes in EASI score, proportion of patients with investigator global assessment (IGA) scores of 0/1, and changes in worst daily itch numerical rating scale (NRS) scores (evaluated in patients aged ≥6 to <12 years [n = 35]). RESULTS: At Week 16, more patients achieved EASI-75 with dupilumab than placebo (43.3% vs 18.8%; P = 0.0304), and the least squares mean (LSM) difference in percent change in EASI scores at Week 16 of dupilumab vs placebo was -39.4% (P = 0.0003). However, no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving IGA scores of 0/1 at Week 16 with dupilumab versus placebo were seen (10.0% vs 9.4%; P = 0.8476). The percent change in worst daily itch NRS scores at Week 16 was higher with dupilumab (LSM difference: -33.3%; nominal P = 0.0117). Dupilumab was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab showed consistent efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to <18 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis previously insufficiently controlled with existing therapies.

Dupilumab Reduces Urticaria Activity, Itch, and Hives in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Regardless of Baseline Serum Immunoglobulin E Levels.

INTRODUCTION: In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 may promote mast cell activation directly via IL-4 receptor expression, or indirectly via upregulated immunoglobulin E (IgE) production. Dupilumab significantly improved CSU signs and symptoms in the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study A. This analysis explores the impact of dupilumab on CSU signs and symptoms and serum IgE levels in patients from LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study A with serum total IgE above and below 100 IU/mL at baseline. METHODS: Patients with H1-antihistamine-refractory CSU received dupilumab (n = 70) or placebo (n = 68) for 24 weeks. Efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 in serum total IgE levels, Itch Severity Score over 7 days (ISS7), Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7), and Hives Severity Score over 7 days (HSS7) in dupilumab- or placebo-treated patients with serum total IgE above and below 100 IU/mL at baseline. RESULTS: Dupilumab treatment significantly reduced median (interquartile range) IgE levels at week 12 [dupilumab: -31.9% (-41.9; -22.6); placebo: -6.3% (-21.3; 14.9)] and week 24 [dupilumab: -48.2% (-56.8; - 39.5); placebo: - 6.3% (-34.5; 14.8)]. Similar IgE reductions relative to baseline were observed in dupilumab-treated patients regardless of baseline IgE level. Dupilumab treatment improved ISS7, UAS7, and HSS7 over 12 and 24 weeks, regardless of baseline serum IgE level (interaction p ≥ 0.59 for all treatment by subgroup comparisons), with weak correlations (r < 0.2) observed between IgE level changes and ISS7, UAS7, and HSS7 outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab significantly improved CSU signs and symptoms and reduced serum IgE, regardless of baseline IgE levels. In the current analysis, baseline total IgE had no predictive value as a dupilumab treatment response biomarker in CSU. Downregulation of IgE, a key mediator of mast cell activation and histamine release, may at least partially explain the effectiveness of dupilumab in reducing CSU signs and symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04180488.

Dupilumab improves pediatric type 2 asthma outcomes independent of patient baseline characteristics.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dupilumab, a biological therapy that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukins-4/13, reduced exacerbations and improved lung function in children with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma independent of most baseline patient and asthma characteristics.

Dupilumab sustains lung function improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: TRAVERSE (NCT02134028), a phase 3 open-label extension study, assessed dupilumab safety and efficacy in patients with asthma aged ≥12 years who completed a previous dupilumab asthma study. This analysis evaluated changes in multiple lung function parameters in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma with elevated type 2 biomarkers (baseline eosinophils ≥150 cells·µL-1 or fractional exhaled nitric oxide ≥25 ppb) who completed QUEST (parent study) and 2 years of dupilumab treatment in TRAVERSE. METHODS: Endpoints analyzed included: pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75 %), and pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC at parent study baseline (PSBL) at Weeks 0, 2, 48, and 96 in TRAVERSE, as well as pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1 slopes in QUEST and TRAVERSE. Statistical analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Dupilumab improved pre-bronchodilator FEV1, FVC, and FEF25-75 % in QUEST; these improvements were sustained in TRAVERSE. In QUEST patients who received placebo, dupilumab initiation in TRAVERSE resulted in rapid lung function improvements. Mean (standard deviation) changes from PSBL at TRAVERSE Weeks 48 and 96 in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 were 0.52 (0.59) and 0.45 (0.49) L in the dupilumab/dupilumab group and 0.47 (0.42) and 0.44 L (0.45) in the placebo/dupilumab group, respectively. Similar trends were observed for FVC and FEF25-75 %. Dupilumab also improved FEV1 slopes in QUEST and TRAVERSE. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab demonstrated sustained improvements across multiple spirometric lung function measurements for up to 3 years; patients who received placebo in QUEST experienced rapid lung function improvement upon initiation of dupilumab in TRAVERSE.

Long-Term Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Asthma: TRAVERSE Continuation Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical trials have demonstrated dupilumab efficacy and safety in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma for up to 3 years. OBJECTIVE: The TRAVERSE continuation study (NCT03620747), a single-arm, open-label study, assessed safety and tolerability of dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks up to an additional 144 weeks (∼3 years) in patients with moderate to severe asthma who previously completed TRAVERSE (NCT02134028). METHODS: Primary end points were incidence and event rates per 100 patient-years of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary end points included adverse events (AEs) of special interest, serious AEs, and AEs leading to study discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 393 patients participated in the TRAVERSE continuation study (cumulative dupilumab exposure, 431.7 patient-years; median treatment duration, 309 days). A total of 29 patients (7.4%) received more than 958 days of treatment. A total of 214 (54.5%) patients reported at least 1 TEAE (event rate: 171.4); 37 (9.4%) experienced at least 1 treatment-related TEAE, none of which were considered severe; 2 patients reported 6 TEAEs of moderate intensity. A total of 22 (5.6%) patients reported serious AEs (event rate: 6.9). AEs of special interest were reported in 24 patients (6.1%; event rate: 6.0). Five (1.3%) deaths occurred (event rate: 1.2) following serious AEs of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related pneumonia (3 patients), pancreatitis (1 patient), and pulmonary embolism (1 patient). None of the TEAEs leading to death were considered treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab treatment was well tolerated for up to an additional 3 years. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of dupilumab. These findings further support the long-term use of dupilumab in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

Study Design of a Phase 2/3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Dupilumab in Adults with Bullous Pemphigoid: LIBERTY-BP ADEPT.

BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare, autoimmune, blistering skin disease associated with high disease burden, profoundly decreased quality of life and increased morbidity. Emerging evidence supports an important role for type 2 inflammation in disease pathogenesis. Current management relies on topical and/or systemic corticosteroids, non-selective immunosuppressants and antibiotics with anti-inflammatory properties, which are all limited by side effects and toxicities. Therefore, targeted, efficacious and safe therapies are needed. Dupilumab blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. Several reports of patients successfully treated with dupilumab have been published; however, dupilumab has not been formally assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: We report the design of LIBERTY-BP ADEPT, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults with BP. METHODS: LIBERTY-BP ADEPT comprises a 35-day screening, 52-week treatment and 12-week follow-up period. Approximately 98 adults aged 18-90 years with moderate-to-severe BP are being enrolled at 51 sites on 4 continents and randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous dupilumab or placebo every 2 weeks. All participants will receive concomitant oral corticosteroids (OCS). PLANNED OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving complete remission off steroid therapy at week 36. Key secondary endpoints include total cumulative OCS dose to week 36, percent change and proportion of patients with ≥ 4-point reduction in the weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline to week 36 and percent change in Bullous Pemphigoid Area Index score from baseline to week 36. CONCLUSION: The trial results will provide evidence on whether the efficacy and safety of dupilumab support its use as a potential novel treatment approach for BP and will provide new insights into the role of type 2 inflammation in BP pathogenesis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04206553.

Dupilumab improves pruritus and skin lesions in patients with prurigo nodularis: Pooled results from 2 phase 3 trials (LIBERTY-PN PRIME and PRIME2).

Background: Phase 3 PRIME/PRIME2 trials independently demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable safety profile of dupilumab adults with moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis. Objective: To obtain a more precise estimate of onset and magnitude of treatment effect using PRIME/PRIME2 pooled data. Methods: In PRIME/PRIME2, patients were randomized to dupilumab or placebo for 24 weeks. Pooled analysis assessed proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvement in itch, clear/almost-clear skin, or both; at weeks 12 and 24; overall and by demographic subgroups and changes from baseline to week 24 in symptoms, signs, and quality of life. Results: Patients receiving dupilumab (n = 153) vs placebo (n = 158) experienced significant improvements in all tested endpoints. At week 24, 90 (58.8%) dupilumab-treated vs 30 (19.0%) placebo-treated patients achieved clinically meaningful improvement in itch, 71 (46.4%) vs 27 (17.1%) clear/almost clear skin, and 54 (35.3%) vs 14 (8.9%) achieved both (P < .0001 for all). Treatment benefits were independent of baseline demographics. Safety to week 36 was generally consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. Limitations: On-treatment data limited to 24 weeks. Conclusions: Pooled analysis confirmed improvements reported in individual trials and revealed earlier effect onset in itch and skin pain. Dupilumab treatment showed benefits across demographics.