Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Vietnam.

PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea are two common respiratory diseases. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients co-morbid with obstructive sleep apnea are associated with increased cardiovascular adverse events, frequent acute exacerbations, and higher mortality. Only a few studies on obstructive sleep apnea among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are available in Vietnam. The study aims to determine the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Vietnam. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at multi-sites in Vietnam: the People's Hospital of Gia Dinh, Bach Mai Hospital, Phoi Viet Clinics, and Lam Dong Medical College using type 3 sleep monitoring device at sleep labs to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea in all study participants. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were enrolled. Among the patients, 93.2% were male, with an average age of 66.9 ± 9.3 and a BMI of 21.9 ± 3.8 kg/m2; 82.0% were symptomatic including 44.6% in group B and 37.4% in group D with average post-FEV1 of 49.8 ± 18.3% predicted values. One hundred seventeen patients (42.1%) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease presented obstructive sleep apnea defined by AHI ≥ 15 events/h. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Vietnam was 42.1% for an AHI of ≥ 15 events/h.

SABAs as Reliever Medications in Asthma Management: Evidence-Based Science.

The role of as-needed inhaled short-acting ß2-agonists (SABAs) in the management of asthma has become a subject of debate due to differing opinions in the professional community relating to the use of SABAs. In this article, we summarize the current position of SABAs when used as reliever medications and examine the challenges to appropriate use including a critique of the data that have led to the condemnation of SABA used as a reliever. We consider the evidence for the appropriate use of SABA as a reliever together with practical solutions to ensure such use, including identifying patients at risk of misusing their SABA relievers and managing issues of inhaler technique and treatment adherence. We conclude that inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based maintenance treatment with SABA used as-needed as a reliever is an effective and safe treatment for patients with asthma, with no scientific evidence of a causal link between SABA use as a reliever and mortality or serious adverse events (including exacerbations). Increased SABA use warns of a deterioration in asthma control, and patients at risk of misusing their ICS and SABA medication should be rapidly identified to ensure they are receiving adequate ICS-based controller therapy. Appropriate use of ICS-based controller therapy and as-needed SABA should be encouraged and promoted with educational activities.