Subcutaneous Anti-inflammatory Therapies to Prevent Burn Progression in a Swine Model of Contact Burn Injury.

INTRODUCTION: If left untreated, burn injuries can deepen or progress in depth within the first 72 hours after injury as a result of increased wound inflammation, subsequently worsening healing outcomes. This can be especially detrimental to warfighters who are constrained to resource-limited environments with delayed evacuation times to higher roles of care and more effective treatment. Preventing this burn progression at the point of injury has the potential to improve healing outcomes but requires a field-deployable therapy and delivery system. Subcutaneous therapies known to treat inflammation delivered local to the wound site may prove to be one such avenue for success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven Yorkshire-cross swine received partial-thickness burn injuries using a previously established contact burn model. Each animal received one of the seven therapies: (1) saline, (2) heparin, (3) ibuprofen, (4) erythropoietin, (5) resolvin, (6) rapamycin, and (7) placental extract, all of which are either currently employed or are experimental in field use and indicated to treat inflammation. Treatments were delivered subcutaneously on the day of injury and 24 hours post-injury to simulate a prolonged field care scenario, before potential evacuation. Animals and wound development were observed for 28 days before euthanasia. Throughout the course of the study, wounds were observed macroscopically via non-invasive imaging. Histological analyses provided the critical metric of burn progression. Treatment success criteria were designated as the ability to prevent burn progression past 80% of the dermal depth in two of the three treated wounds, a clinically relevant metric of burn progression. RESULTS: It was determined that the applied model successfully created reproducible partial-thickness burn injuries in this porcine study. No significant differences with regard to lateral wound size or the rate of lateral wound closure were observed in any treatments. Several treatments including resolvin, rapamycin, ibuprofen, and erythropoietin successfully reduced burn progression to less than 80% of the dermal depth in two of the three wounds, 24 hours after injury. CONCLUSIONS: This report employs an established model of porcine contact burn injury in order to test the ability of local subcutaneous delivery of therapeutics to prevent burn progression at the point of injury, via what is believed to be the inhibition of inflammation. Several treatments successfully prevented burn progression to a full-thickness injury, potentially improving wound healing outcomes in a simulated battlefield scenario. Subcutaneously administered therapies combating burn-induced inflammation at the point of injury may serve as a field-deployable treatment modality to improve warfighter recovery and return to duty.

Evaluation of Topical Off-the-Shelf Therapies to Reduce the Need to Evacuate Battlefield-Injured Warfighters.

INTRODUCTION: Immediate evacuation of burn casualties can be challenging in austere environments, and it is predicted to be even more difficult in future multi-domain battlespaces against near-peer foes. Therefore, a need exists to treat burn wounds at the point of injury to protect the exposed injury for an extended period. In this study, we compare two commercially available FDA-approved therapies to the current gold standard of care (GSOC), excisional debridement followed by the application of split-thickness skin graft, and the standard for prolonged field care, silver sulfadiazine (SSD) cream. The shelf-stable therapies evaluated were irradiated human skin (IHS) allograft and polylactic acid (PLA). Our objective was to study whether they have the potential capability to reduce the need for evacuation to a burn center for surgical intervention so that the combat power can be preserved in the field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen burns (50 cm2) were created on the dorsum of four anesthetized swine. All materials were sterile, but a sterile field was not utilized in order to simulate the prolonged field care setting. The wounds were then treated with PLA, IHS, and SSD cream, and the remaining wounds (designated GSOC) were also treated with SSD cream. On post-operative day (POD) 3, sterile surgical debridement and skin grafting (1:4) were performed on the GSOC wounds. Burn healing was followed for either PODs 10, 14, 21, or 28, wherein one animal was humanely euthanized at each time point; each represented a time point of the healing process. A full-thickness excisional biopsy was taken from each wound immediately after euthanasia to give a cross-section view of the wound edge to edge. Wound healing was determined by the histological analysis of wound re-epithelialization, epidermal thickness, rete ridges, and scar elevation index and macroscopically using noninvasive imaging systems. RESULTS: The PLA and IHS treatments did not need to be reapplied to the wounds during the course of the experiment, unlike SSD, which was reapplied at each assessment time point. In terms of re-epithelialization, on POD 10, IHS and SSD were similar to the GSOC; on POD 14, all treatments were similar; on POD 21, PLA and IHS were similar to SSD; finally, on POD 28, re-epithelialization was similar in all groups. On POD 28, scar elevation index and rete ridges/mm were similar to all groups, and epidermal and dermal thickness for PLA and IHS were similar to GSOC. CONCLUSIONS: This preclinical study demonstrated that the use of the PLA and the IHS dressings resulted in similar outcomes to the GSOC-treated burns in several key metrics of wound healing. These therapies represent a potentially useful tool in current and future battlespaces, where surgical intervention is not possible. The products are lightweight and, more importantly, stable at room temperature for their entire shelf lives. This would allow for easy storage and transport by medical practitioners in the field.