Analyzing the most frequent disease loci in targeted patient categories optimizes disease gene identification and test accuracy worldwide.

BACKGROUND: Our genomewide studies support targeted testing the most frequent genetic diseases by patient category: (1) pregnant patients, (2) at-risk conceptuses, (3) affected children, and (4) abnormal adults. This approach not only identifies most reported disease causing sequences accurately, but also minimizes incorrectly identified additional disease causing loci. METHODS: Diseases were grouped in descending order of occurrence from four data sets: (1) GeneTests 534 listed population prevalences, (2) 4129 high risk prenatal karyotypes, (3) 1265 affected patient microarrays, and (4) reanalysis of 25,452 asymptomatic patient results screened prenatally for 108 genetic diseases. These most frequent diseases are categorized by transmission: (A) autosomal recessive, (B) X-linked, (C) autosomal dominant, (D) microscopic chromosome rearrangements, (E) submicroscopic copy number changes, and (F) frequent ethnic diseases. RESULTS: Among affected and carrier patients worldwide, most reported mutant genes would be identified correctly according to one of four patient categories from at-risk couples with <64 tested genes to affected adults with 314 tested loci. Three clinically reported patient series confirmed this approach. First, only 54 targeted chromosomal sites would have detected all 938 microscopically visible unbalanced karyotypes among 4129 karyotyped POC, CVS, and amniocentesis samples. Second, 37 of 48 reported aneuploid regions were found among our 1265 clinical microarrays confirming the locations of 8 schizophrenia loci and 20 aneuploidies altering intellectual ability, while also identifying 9 of the most frequent deletion syndromes. Third, testing 15 frequent genes would have identified 124 couples with a 1 in 4 risk of a fetus with a recessive disease compared to the 127 couples identified by testing all 108 genes, while testing all mutations in 15 genes could have identified more couples. CONCLUSION: Testing the most frequent disease causing abnormalities in 1 of 8 reported disease loci [~1 of 84 total genes] will identify ~ 7 of 8 reported abnormal Caucasian newborn genotypes. This would eliminate ~8 to 10 of ~10 Caucasian newborn gene sequences selected as abnormal that are actually normal variants identified when testing all ~2500 diseases looking for the remaining 1 of 8 disease causing genes. This approach enables more accurate testing within available laboratory and reimbursement resources.

Discordant circulating fetal DNA and subsequent cytogenetics reveal false negative, placental mosaic, and fetal mosaic cfDNA genotypes.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) and Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) Societies recommended that abnormal cfDNA fetal results should be confirmed by amniocentesis and karyotyping. Our results demonstrate that normal cfDNA results inconsistent with high-resolution abnormal ultrasounds should be confirmed by karyotyping following a substantial frequency of incorrect cfDNA results. METHODS: Historical review of our ~4,000 signed prenatal karyotypes found ~24% of reported abnormalities would not have been detected by cfDNA. Akron Children's Hospital Cytogenetics Laboratory has completed 28 abnormal cfDNA cases among the 112 amniocenteses karyotyped. RESULTS: Following abnormal cfDNA results our karyotypes confirmed only 60% of the cfDNA results were consistent. Our cases found a normal cfDNA test result followed by a 20 weeks anatomical ultrasound detected a false negative trisomy 18 cfDNA result. One cfDNA result that reported trisomy 21 in the fetus was confirmed by karyotyping which also added an originally undetected balanced reciprocal translocation. Another reported karyotyped case followed by a repeated microarray of pure fetal DNA, together revealed one phenotypically normal newborn with a complex mosaic karyotype substantially decreasing the newborn's eventual reproductive fitness. This second case establishes the importance of karyotyping the placenta and cord or peripheral blood when inconsistent or mosaic results are identified following an abnormal cfDNA result with a normal newborn phenotype without a prenatal karyotype. CONCLUSIONS: These Maternal Fetal Medicine referrals demonstrate that positive NIPT results identify an increased abnormal karyotypic frequency as well as a substantial proportion of discordant fetal results. Our results found: (1) a normal NIPT test result followed by a 20 week anatomical ultrasound detected a false negative trisomy 18 NIPT result, (2) a substantial proportion of abnormal NIPT tests identify chromosomal mosaicism that may or may not be confined to the placenta, (3) follow up karyotyping should be completed on the newborn placenta and peripheral blood when the amniocyte karyotype does not confirm the NIPT reported abnormality in order to identify ongoing risk of developing mosaic symptoms, and (4) karyotyping all high risk fetuses tested by amniocentesis defines the 24% of chromosome abnormalities not currently screened by NIPT.

ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening.

For years, clinicians have offered gene-by-gene carrier screening to patients and couples considering future pregnancy or those with an ongoing pregnancy early in gestation. Examples include ethnic-specific screening offered to Ashkenazi Jewish patients and panethnic screening for cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy. Next-generation sequencing methods now available permit screening for many more disorders with high fidelity, quick turnaround time, and lower costs. However, instituting these technologies carries with it perils that must be addressed. The basis for the selection of disorders on expanded carrier screening panels should be disclosed. The information provided about disorders with mild phenotypes, variable expression, low penetrance, and/or characterized by an adult onset should be complete and transparent, allowing patients to opt out of receiving these test results. Patients also must be made aware of the concept of residual risk following negative test results. Laboratories have a duty to participate in and facilitate this information transfer.

Variable penetrance and expressivity of the splice altering 5T sequence in the cystic fibrosis gene.

This manuscript reviews the frequencies, symptoms, testing, and reporting of genotypes with the 5T polythymidine tract which reduces splicing efficiency in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene in congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) patients and in patients and fetuses with cystic fibrosis-like symptoms. The 5T sequence has not been included in the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) CFTR mutation panel recommended for screening pregnant women for an increased fetal risk of cystic fibrosis (CF; MIM 219700) because finding this allele would raise concern for possible CFTR gene-related symptoms in many fetuses, even though only a fraction inheriting 5T and another major CFTR mutation would develop CF-like symptoms. In contrast, 40-80% of the symptomatic patients with CBAVD (MIM 277180) are compound heterozygotes for the 5T sequence. This submission provides template report summaries for CBAVD patient results for the 5T allele when tested along with the 23 most common ACMG mutation panel. If CBAVD patients were also tested with the remaining 16 most common reported mutations in CBAVD, the derived proportion of patients with at least one CFTR mutant allele is predicted to increase from 63% to 97%. Testing for the 5T sequence in symptomatic patients and reflex 5T testing in fetuses found to carry a major CF allele are discussed because finding the 5T sequence in these patients lowers the risk of typical severe symptoms. Additional reflex testing for the number of TG repeats adjacent to a 5T allele further modifies the predicted long-term severity of disease symptoms in patients and fetuses that are compound heterozygotes for a major CF mutation and the 5T sequence. Even though patient advice can be modified currently based upon the adjacent TG-repeat number, the final most accurate risk frequencies with different 5T + TG-repeat alleles are likely to become available only after a statistically robust study of a substantially larger patient population is completed with multiple well-defined clinical and mutation categories.

Testing and reporting ACMG cystic fibrosis mutation panel results.

Testing strategies and summary reports for pregnant patients and symptomatic patients being tested for cystic fibrosis (CF; MIM 219700) were developed based upon calculated after (posterior) test risk tables incorporating patient and family histories, ethnicities, and prior testing status. This manuscript defines the proportion of all mutations detected by the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG)-recommended 23-mutation cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene core panel when testing all patient categories with severe symptoms, including pregnant couples with no family history as well as CF patients, their partners, and other family members. Reference tables incorporate prior and posterior test risks sufficient to complete >99% of all tested cases and to report the results according to HIPAA guidelines. These tables were calculated based on the assumption that all patient samples have been collected, labeled, analyzed, and reported correctly, including the patient's reported relationship to a known affected or carrier relative, even though the template letter states that the likelihood is about 99% that each reported result is accurate. Pedigrees and tables with the prior (before; a priori) test risks of patients offered CF screening with a family history of a CF patient and/or a known carrier patient are provided for ready reference with each risk frequency, dependent upon the assumption that the patient's pedigree reflects familial relationships correctly. Comparison of tables emphasizes the value of asking the tested partner to ask a relative known to have CF or who tested positive for a CF mutation to donate a sample as a DNA test control and/or to obtain a copy of a prior molecular test result and/or extracted DNA sample. These tables posterior test risks also indicate that when one partner with no family history tests negative for the 23 mutation panel, no further prenatal testing is indicated.

Targeted extended cystic fibrosis mutation testing on known and at-risk patients and relatives.

This paper reports mathematically derived residual risks of being a carrier or being affected with cystic fibrosis following various screening scenarios to assist in interpreting test results and advising patients. While parental screening with 23 American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) cystic fibrosis mutations defines the 64% of affected U.S. Caucasian fetuses with two detectable mutations, newborn screening for elevated immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and sweat chloride identifies an additional 36% of affected newborns with zero or one detected mutation. The relatives of these affected newborns with less than two detectable mutations have higher posterior (after) 23 mutation-negative test risks of carrying undetected mutations. These calculations emphasize how knowledge of the mutations in the related affected patient substantially improves upon the quality of after-test advice to patients. Furthermore, negative tests of the partner without a family history and/or more extensive cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene testing also increases the likelihood that a negative report is truly negative. When a newborn patient with zero or one detected CFTR mutation has an inconclusive sweat test result, the sweat test should be repeated before ordering additional often unnecessary CFTR gene sequencing. Given the same composite mutation panel test accuracy, a higher proportion of reported test results would be correct during parental screening than when testing at-risk fetuses or symptomatic newborns. Prenatal and newborn screening would be enhanced substantially by medical professionals offering copies of all positive parental and newborn test reports to the parents to share with their relatives. These principles are likely to be applicable to other genetic diseases as the most common mutation frequencies are reported.

One multiplex control for 29 cystic fibrosis mutations.

A simple approach is described to synthesize and clone an inexhaustible supply of any homozygous and/or heterozygous controls diluted with yeast genomic DNA to mimic human genome equivalents for use throughout the entire multiplex mutation assay. As a proof of principle, the 25 cystic fibrosis mutation panel selected by the American College of Medical Genetics and four additional mutant sequences were prepared as a single control mixture. The 29 CFTR mutations were incorporated into 17 gene fragments by PCR amplification of targeted sequences using mutagenic primers on normal human genomic DNA template. Flanking primers selected to bind beyond all published PCR primer sites amplified controls for most assay platforms. The 17 synthesized 433-933-bp CFTR fragments each with one to four homozygous mutant sequences were cloned into nine plasmid vectors at the multiple cloning site and bidirectionally sequenced. Miniplasmid preps from these nine clones were mixed and diluted with genomic yeast DNA to mimic the final nucleotide molar ratio of two CFTR genes in 6 x 10(9) bp total human genomic DNA. This mixture was added to control PCR reactions prior to amplification as the only positive control sample. In this fashion >200 multiplex clinical PCR analyses of >4,000 clinical patient samples have been controlled simultaneously for PCR amplification and substrate specificity for 29 tested mutations without cross contamination. This clinically validated multiplex cystic fibrosis control can be modified readily for different test formats and provides a robust means to control for all mutations instead of rotating human genomic controls each with a fraction of the mutations. This approach allows scores of additional mutation controls from any gene loci to be added to the same mixture annually.

Developing a sustainable process to provide quality control materials for genetic testing.

PURPOSE: To provide a summary of the outcomes of two working conferences organized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to develop recommendations for practical, sustainable mechanisms to make quality control (QC) materials available to the genetic testing community. METHODS: Participants were selected to include experts in genetic testing and molecular diagnostics from professional organizations, government agencies, industry, laboratories, academic institutions, cell repositories, and proficiency testing (PT)/external Quality Assessment (EQA) programs. Current efforts to develop QC materials for genetic tests were reviewed; key issues and areas of need were identified; and workgroups were formed to address each area of need and to formulate recommendations and next steps. RESULTS: Recommendations were developed toward establishing a sustainable process to improve the availability of appropriate QC materials for genetic testing, with an emphasis on molecular genetic testing as an initial step. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the availability of appropriate QC materials is of critical importance for assuring the quality of genetic testing, enhancing performance evaluation and PT/EQA programs, and facilitating new test development. To meet the needs of the rapidly expanding capacity of genetic testing in clinical and public health settings, a comprehensive, coordinated program should be developed. A Genetic Testing Quality Control Materials Program has therefore been established by CDC in March 2005 to serve these needs.