Root Repair Has Superior Radiological and Clinical Outcomes Than Partial Meniscectomy and Nonoperative Treatment in the Management of Meniscus Root Tears: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To compile and analyze structural and clinical outcomes after meniscus root tear treatment as currently described in the literature. METHODS: A review was conducted to identify studies published since 2011 on efficacy of repair, meniscectomy, and nonoperative management in the treatment of meniscus root tears. Patient cohorts were grouped into treatment categories, with medial and lateral root tears analyzed separately; data were collected on patient demographics, structural outcomes including joint space width, degree of medial meniscal extrusion, progression to total knee arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome measures. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (methodological index for non-randomized studies) criteria. Heterogeneity was measured using the I-statistic, and outcomes were summarized using forest plots without pooled means. RESULTS: The 56 included studies comprised a total of 3,191 patients. Mean age among the included studies ranged from 24.6 to 65.6 years, whereas mean follow-up ranged from 12 to 125.9 months. Heterogeneity analysis identified significant differences between studies. Change in joint space width ranged from -2.4 to -0.6 mm (i.e., decreased space) after meniscectomy (n = 186) and -0.9 to -0.1 mm after root repair (n = 209); change in medial meniscal extrusion ranged from -0.6 to 6.5 mm after root repair (n = 521) and 0.2 to 4.2 mm after meniscectomy (n = 66); and event rate for total knee arthroplasty ranged from 0.00 to 0.22 after root repair (n = 205), 0.35 to 0.60 after meniscectomy (n = 53), and 0.27 to 0.35 after nonoperative treatment (n = 93). Root repair produced the greatest numerical increase in International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores of the 3 treatment arms. In addition, root repair improvements in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain (range: 22-32), Sports and Recreational Activities (range: 23-36), Quality of Life (range: 22-42), and Symptoms subscales (range: 10-19), in studies with low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The literature reporting on the treatment of meniscus root tears is heterogenous and largely limited to Level III and IV studies. Current evidence suggests root repair may be the most effective treatment strategy in lessening joint space narrowing of the knee and producing improvements in patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

Total elbow arthroplasty for tumors of the distal humerus and elbow.

INTRODUCTION: The elbow is a rare location for primary and metastatic tumors in the upper extremity. The goal of reconstruction is to provide painless motion and stability for hand function. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is commonly utilized, with either off-the-self components, modular segmental endoprosthesis, or allograft-prosthesis composites (APC). The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare commonly utilized elbow reconstructions and report outcomes of (1) patient function and (2) implant survival and complications. METHODS: We reviewed 33 patients (18 females and 15 males) undergoing elbow arthroplasty for reconstruction of an underlying oncologic process including linked TEA (n = 22, 67%), APC (n = 9, 27%), and endoprosthesis (n = 2, 6%). The most common indication was metastatic disease (n = 17, 52%), with 24 patients (73%) presenting with a pathologic fracture. RESULTS: Five-year implant survival was following elbow reconstruction was 88%. The mean most recent Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score were 84 ± 18 and 78 ± 15%. Postoperative complications occurred in 15 elbows (45%), most commonly periprosthetic fracture (n = 5, 15%), leading to reoperation in six elbows (18%). CONCLUSION: Although elbow arthroplasty is associated with a high incidence of complications, it provides a stable platform for upper extremity function in patients with oncologic processes of the elbow.

Whole-Body Vibration Improves Early Rate of Torque Development in Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Pamukoff, DN, Pietrosimone, B, Ryan, ED, Lee, DR, Brown, LE, and Blackburn, JT. Whole body vibration improves early rate of torque development in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Strength Cond Res 31(11): 2992-3000, 2017-The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of whole-body vibration (WBV) and local muscle vibration (LMV) on early and late quadriceps rate of torque development (RTD), and electromechanical delay (EMD) in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Twenty individuals with ACLR were recruited for this study. Participants performed isometric squats while being exposed to WBV, LMV, or no vibration (control) in a randomized order during separate visits. Early and late quadriceps RTD and EMD were assessed during a maximal voluntary isometric knee extension before and immediately after WBV, LMV, or control. There was a significant condition by time interaction for early RTD (p = 0.045) but not for late RTD (p = 0.11) or EMD of the vastus medialis (p = 0.15), vastus lateralis (p = 0.17), or rectus femoris (p = 0.39). Post hoc analyses indicated a significant increase in early RTD after WBV (+5.59 N·m·s·kg; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-12.72; p = 0.007). No differences were observed in the LMV or control conditions, and no difference was observed between conditions at posttest. The ability to rapidly produce knee extension torque is essential to physical function, and WBV may be appropriate to aid in the restoration of RTD after ACLR.

Immediate effect of vibratory stimuli on quadriceps function in healthy adults.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of whole body vibration (WBV) and local muscle vibration (LMV) on quadriceps function. METHODS: Sixty adults were randomized to WBV, LMV, or control groups. Quadriceps function [Hoffmann (H)-reflex, active motor threshold (AMT), motor evoked potential (MEP) and electromyographic amplitude, peak torque (PT), rate of torque development (RTD), and central activation ratio (CAR)] was assessed before and immediately after and 10 and 20 minutes after interventions. RESULTS: WBV improved PT, CAR, AMT, EMG, and MEP amplitude, and EMG amplitude and CAR were greater than control after application. LMV improved EMG amplitude and AMT, and EMG amplitude was greater than control after application. AMT remained lower 10 and 20 minutes after WBV and LMV. No differences were noted between LMV and WBV. Vibration did not influence H-reflex or RTD. CONCLUSIONS: WBV and LMV increased quadriceps function and may be used to enhance the efficacy of strengthening protocols. Muscle Nerve 54: 469-478, 2016.

Whole-Body and Local Muscle Vibration Immediately Improve Quadriceps Function in Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the immediate effects of a single session of whole-body vibration (WBV) and local muscle vibration (LMV) on quadriceps function in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN: Singe-blind, randomized crossover trial. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Population-based sample of individuals with ACLR (N=20; mean age ± SD, 21.1±1.2y; mean mass ± SD, 68.3±14.9kg; mean time ± SD since ACLR, 50.7±21.3mo; 14 women; 16 patellar tendon autografts, 3 hamstring autografts, 1 allograft). INTERVENTIONS: Participants performed isometric squats while being exposed to WBV, LMV, or no vibration (control). Interventions were delivered in a randomized order during separate visits separated by 1 week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quadriceps active motor threshold (AMT), motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) amplitude, peak torque (PT), rate of torque development (RTD), electromyographic amplitude, and central activation ratio (CAR) were assessed before and immediately after a WBV, LMV, or control intervention. RESULTS: There was an increase in CAR (+4.9%, P=.001) and electromyographic amplitude (+16.2%, P=.002), and a reduction in AMT (-3.1%, P<.001) after WBV, and an increase in CAR (+2.7%, P=.001) and a reduction in AMT (-2.9%, P<.001) after LMV. No effect was observed after WBV or LMV in H-reflex, RTD, or MEP amplitude. AMT (-3.7%, P<.001), CAR (+5.7%, P=.005), PT (+.31Nm/kg, P=.004), and electromyographic amplitude (P=.002) in the WBV condition differed from the control condition postapplication. AMT (-3.0% P=.002), CAR (+3.6%, P=.005), and PT (+.30Nm/kg, P=.002) in the LMV condition differed from the control condition postapplication. No differences were observed between WBV and LMV postapplication in any measurement. CONCLUSIONS: WBV and LMV acutely improved quadriceps function and could be useful modalities for restoring quadriceps strength in individuals with knee pathologies.

Arthroscopic Medial Meniscus Posterior Horn Direct Anchor Root Repair: Transtibial Approach With Knotless Adjustable Aperture Fixation.

The integrity of the posterior meniscus root attachment is vital for the preservation of knee joint biomechanics. Meniscus root tears treated nonoperatively or with meniscectomy lead to poor functional outcomes and progressive knee degeneration. Repair returns knee biomechanics back to the intact state and has an established record of positive mid-term to long-term results. Although transtibial pullout repair has been the gold standard, innovation is needed to overcome the limitations inherent to traditional approaches. The latest generation of transtibial pullout repair devices is adjustable, permits suture anchor placement directly into the root footprint, and has demonstrated encouraging early results in biomechanical analysis. This Technical Note describes an arthroscopic technique for medial meniscus posterior root repair that uses a knotless adjustable implant (SutureLoc; Arthrex) for aperture fixation via a transtibial approach with intratunnel soft anchor direct fixation and rip-stop suture configuration.

Capsular Management in Hip Arthroscopy: Interportal and T-Capsulotomy, Suspension, and Closure.

Capsular management in hip arthroscopy has recently become a popular topic in the literature. Various approaches have been developed around the critical balance between safe and satisfactory exposure while maintaining hip joint stability and the restoration of capsular integrity at the conclusion of the case. Advocates for capsular closure recognize the role of the capsule in providing hip joint stability and aim to reestablish normal hip biomechanics through capsule preservation. Several recent studies have also shown capsular management strategies to influence both clinical outcomes and risk of revision surgery. We present an effective method for capsular management in hip arthroscopy that consistently allows excellent exposure and working space while allowing for facile, anatomic closure.

Arthroscopic Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Using the Iliopsoas Air Bursogram Technique to Hit the Target.

Iliopsoas tendinitis following total hip arthroplasty has been linked to retroverted acetabular cup position with associated anterior overhang. For severely malpositioned components, preferred treatment is in the form of revision arthroplasty. However, for a substantial number of cases, iliopsoas tendinitis as well as associated pain and disability are observed in the presence of modest acetabular overhang. In such cases, patients may benefit substantially from arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening. Given altered postarthroplasty anatomy, we present an arthroscopic approach employing an iliopsoas air bursogram. In such a way, safe and predictable access can be provided for efficient tendon lengthening without capsular violation or inadvertent instrumentation of the nearby medial neurovascular bundle.

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine: Current Controversies for Treatment of Meniscus Root Tears.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The role of the meniscus in preserving the biomechanical function of the knee joint has been clearly defined. The hypothesis that meniscus root integrity is a prerequisite for meniscus function is supported by the development of progressive knee osteoarthritis (OA) following meniscus root tears (MRTs) treated either non-operatively or with meniscectomy. Consequently, there has been a resurgence of interest in the diagnosis and treatment of MRTs. This review examines the contemporary literature surrounding the natural history, clinical presentation, evaluation, preferred surgical repair technique and outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Surgeons must have a high index of suspicion in order to diagnose a MRT because of the nonspecific clinical presentation and difficult visualization on imaging. Compared with medial MRTs that commonly occur in middle age/older patients, lateral meniscus root injuries tend to occur in younger males with lower BMIs, less cartilage degeneration, and with concomitant ligament injury. Subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee have been found to be associated with both MRTs and following arthroscopic procedures. Meniscus root repair has demonstrated good outcomes, and acute injuries with intact cartilage should be repaired. Cartilage degeneration, BMI, and malalignment are important considerations when choosing surgical candidates. Meniscus centralization has emerged as a viable adjunct strategy aimed at correcting meniscus extrusion. Meniscus root repair results in a decreased rate of OA and arthroplasty and is economically advantageous when compared with nonoperative treatment and partial meniscectomy. The transtibial pull-through technique with the addition of centralization for the medial meniscus is associated with encouraging early results.

Arthrofibrosis Nightmares: Prevention and Management Strategies.

Arthrofibrosis (AF) is an exaggerated immune response to a proinflammatory insult leading to pathologic periarticular fibrosis and symptomatic joint stiffness. The knee, elbow, and shoulder are particularly susceptible to AF, often in the setting of trauma, surgery, or adhesive capsulitis. Prevention through early physiotherapeutic interventions and anti-inflammatory medications remain fundamental to avoiding motion loss. Reliable nonoperative modalities exist and outcomes are improved when etiology, joint involved, and level of dysfunction are considered in the clinical decision making process. Surgical procedures should be reserved for cases recalcitrant to nonoperative measures. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current understanding of AF pathophysiology, identify common risk factors, describe prevention strategies, and outline both nonoperative and surgical treatment options. This manuscript will focus specifically on sterile AF of the knee, elbow, and shoulder.

Risk factors for long-term hip osteoarthritis in patients with hip dysplasia without surgical intervention.

Hip dysplasia is a common cause of hip pain and a known risk factor for hip osteoarthritis (OA) and early total hip arthroplasty (THA). Unfortunately, little is known about the specific factors associated with an increased risk of OA. The purpose was (i) to report the overall rate of symptomatic hip OA and THA and (ii) to identify radiographic features and patient characteristics associated with the development of symptomatic hip OA. A geographic database was used to identify all patients aged 14-50 years old diagnosed with symptomatic hip dysplasia between 2000 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the rate of symptomatic hip OA, defined as a Tönnis grade of ≥1 on hip radiograph. Univariate and multivariate proportional hazard regression models were performed to determine risk factors for OA. One hundred and fifty-nine hips (144 patients) with hip dysplasia (52 F:107 M) out of 1893 patients with hip pain were included. Of these, 45 (28%) had severe hip dysplasia with a lateral center-edge angle ≤18°. Mean age at time of presentation was 26.1 (±10.1) years. Mean follow-up time was 8.2 (±5) years. The rate of OA was 20%. THA was performed in 11% of patients. Body mass index >29 (P = 0.03) and increased age (P < 0.01) were risk factors for OA. Patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia are at significant risk of developing hip OA. Body mass index >29 and age ≥35 years at the time of presentation with hip pain were risk factors for hip OA.

Quadriceps Function and Hamstrings Co-Activation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have quadriceps dysfunction that contributes to physical disability and posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis. Quadriceps function in the ACLR limb is commonly evaluated relative to the contralateral uninjured limb. Bilateral quadriceps dysfunction is common in individuals with ACLR, potentially biasing these evaluations. OBJECTIVE: To compare quadriceps function between individuals with ACLR and uninjured control participants. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twenty individuals with unilateral ACLR (age = 21.1 ± 1.7 years, mass = 68.3 ± 14.9 kg, time since ACLR = 50.7 ± 21.3 months; females = 14; Tegner Score = 7.1 ± 0.3; 16 patellar tendon autografts, 3 hamstrings autografts, 1 allograft) matched to 20 control participants (age = 21.2 ± 1.2 years, mass = 67.9 ± 11.3 kg; females = 14; Tegner Score = 7.1 ± 0.4) on age, sex, body mass index, and Tegner Activity Scale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Maximal voluntary isometric knee extension was performed on an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (PT), rate of torque development (RTD), electromyographic (EMG) amplitude, central activation ratio (CAR), and hamstrings EMG amplitude were assessed during maximal voluntary isometric knee extension and compared between groups using independent-samples t tests. Relationships between hamstrings co-activation and quadriceps function were assessed using Pearson correlations. RESULTS: Participants with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction displayed lesser quadriceps PT (1.86 ± 0.74 versus 2.56 ± 0.37 Nm/kg, P = .001), RTD (39.4 ± 18.7 versus 52.9 ± 16.4 Nm/s/kg, P = .03), EMG amplitude (0.25 ± 0.12 versus 0.37 ± 0.26 mV, P = .04), and CAR (83.3% ± 11.1% versus 93.7% ± 3.2%, P = .002) and greater hamstrings co-activation (27.2% ± 12.8% versus 14.3% ± 3.7%, P < .001) compared with control participants. Correlations were found between hamstrings co-activation and PT (r = -0.39, P = .007), RTD (r = -0.30, P = .03), and EMG amplitude (r = -0.30, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with ACLR possessed deficits in PT, RTD, and CAR compared with control participants. Peak torque is the net result of all agonist and antagonist activity, and lesser PT in individuals with ACLR is partially attributable to greater hamstrings co-activation.