RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of enterococcal bacteremia, as well as the effect of Enterococcus resistance against vancomycin on clinical outcomes in Korean children. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children diagnosed with enterococci isolated from blood cultures at Pusan National University Children's Hospital between December 2009 and November 2021. RESULTS: In total, 64 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 0 years (range 0-15), and 43 (67.2%) patients were male. Enterococcus faecalis (50%) was the most commonly identified bacterial strain. Significant underlying diseases were present in 60 patients (93.8%), and the source of bacteremia was identified in 36 patients (56.3%). Among these, intravascular device was the most common identifiable source. Fifty-six (87.5%) patients had previously received broad-spectrum antibiotics and 54 (84.4%) patients were nosocomial in origin. Twenty-nine (45.3%) strains were resistant to ampicillin, and 16 (25%) strains were resistant to vancomycin. All patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) had underlying disease (P = 0.199), and focus of bacteremia was significantly more frequent in VRE patients (P = 0.014). Of all the patients, after appropriate antibiotic treatment, five (7.8%) patients had recurrent enterococcal bacteremia, and seven (10.9%) patients were diagnosed with bacteremia, defined as other pathogens from blood culture. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.8%. CONCLUSION: Enterococcal bacteremia in children is usually nosocomial and occurs in children with serious underlying diseases. Because the number of enrolled patients and mortality were small in our study, it is difficult to identify whether the factor that determines prognosis in patients with enterococcal bacteremia is VRE or an underlying disease. Further studies with a large number of patients in a specific group are needed.
RESUMO
Owing to the high transmissibility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, the capacity of testing systems based on the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is limited. Rapid antigen tests (RATs) can substantially contribute to the prevention of community transmission, but their further assessment is required. Here, using 1503 nasopharyngeal swabs, we compared the diagnostic performance of four RAT kits (Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, SD Biosensor Standard™ Q COVID-19 Ag Test, Humasis COVID-19 Ag Test, and SG Medical Acrosis COVID-19 Ag Test) to the cycle threshold (Ct) values obtained from rRT-PCR. The precision values, area under the curve values, SARS-CoV-2 variant detection ability, and non-SARS-CoV-2 specificity of all four kits were similar. An assay using the Acrosis kit had a significantly better positive detection rate with a higher recall value and cut-off value than that using the other three RAT kits. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, the Acrosis kit is an effective tool to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in communities.