Comprehensive genotypic analysis of human prostate cancer cell lines and sublines derived from metastases after orthotopic implantation in nude mice.

We recently reported on a prostate cancer progression model which was based on repeated orthotopic implantation of human prostate cancer cell lines into athymic nude mice leading to an increase of tumor cell aggressiveness. To assess progression-associated clonal evolution of genotypic changes, we now performed comparative cytogenetic characterization of the original cell lines DU145 and PC3 with derived sublines DU145MN1 and PC3-N. Cell line PC3-125-1L, isolated from a lung metastasis after subcutaneous inoculation of PC3 into nude mice, was included in the study. Whole-genome analysis was performed using spectral karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to assess amplification of selected genes, which are supposed to play a role in prostate cancer progression. Differences in the genetic constitution between parental cell lines and sublines involved gains of genetic material at 2q, 5q, 12p/q, and 18p as well as losses at 6p, 7q, 17p, 18q, and 22q. Loss of 17p in DU145MN1 and high-level amplification of MYC in PC3-125-1L resulted in loss of p53 expression and upregulation of Myc expression, respectively, as was assessed by Western blotting. Thus, the nude mice model is very useful to follow clonal evolution of genetic changes during increase of prostate cancer aggressiveness and possibly to clone genes associated with the progression of prostate cancer.

Telomerase activity and telomerase subunit gene expression levels are not related in prostate cancer: a real-time quantification and in situ hybridization study.

Because the mechanisms of telomerase activation in prostate cancer are mainly unknown, we investigated the relationships between telomerase activity and expression levels of human telomerase RNA (hTR) and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) mRNA in benign and malignant alterations of the human prostate gland. Using the LightCycler technology, hTERT mRNA expression was quantified in 46 radical prostatectomy and 10 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) cases; hTR expression was quantified in a subset of these tissue samples. Telomerase activity was measured using a quantitative telomeric repeat amplification protocol ELISA assay. Similar to hTR, which was expressed in all tissue samples tested, hTERT mRNA was detected in 98% of the prostate cancer samples and in 30% of the BPH samples. Regarding clinicopathologic variables, telomerase activity was significantly correlated with Gleason score (<7 vs > or =7, p = 0.02). No relationships emerged between normalized hTR or hTERT expression levels and tumor stage, Gleason score, lymph node status, or preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen. Remarkably, one third of all cancer and BPH tissue samples with hTR and hTERT expression lack telomerase activity. Quantitative analyses contradict the assumption that a certain threshold level of hTR or hTERT mRNA is required for telomerase activation, thus indicating that telomerase regulation in prostate cancer occurs more likely on a posttranscriptional level. Nevertheless, the observation that hTR and hTERT mRNA levels are significantly (p < 0.002) correlated suggests some common mechanisms in the up-regulation of hTR and hTERT expression. Because in situ hybridization revealed strong hTERT expression in all cells of the tumor glands but also in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia foci, this up-regulation seems to occur early in prostate carcinogenesis.