Advancing immunosuppression in liver transplantation: A narrative review.

Immunosuppression is essential to ensure recipient and graft survivals after liver transplantation (LT). However, our understanding and management of the immune system remain suboptimal. Current immunosuppressive therapy cannot selectively inhibit the graft-specific immune response and entails a significant risk of serious side effects, i.e., among others, de novo cancers, infections, cardiovascular events, renal failure, metabolic syndrome, and late graft fibrosis, with progressive loss of graft function. Pharmacological research, aimed to develop alternative immunosuppressive agents in LT, is behind other solid-organ transplantation subspecialties, and, therefore, the development of new compounds and strategies should get priority in LT. The research trajectories cover mechanisms to induce T-cell exhaustion, to inhibit co-stimulation, to mitigate non-antigen-specific inflammatory response, and, lastly, to minimize the development and action of donor-specific antibodies. Moreover, while cellular modulation techniques are complex, active research is underway to foster the action of T-regulatory cells, to induce tolerogenic dendritic cells, and to promote the function of B-regulatory cells. We herein discuss current lines of research in clinical immunosuppression, particularly focusing on possible applications in the LT setting.

The adverse impact of perioperative body composition abnormalities on outcomes after split liver transplantation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Split liver transplantation (SLT) increases graft availability, but it's safe and effective utilization is insufficiently documented. This study aimed to investigate the association between perioperative body composition abnormalities and outcomes in adult SLT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty recipients who underwent SLT in three centers were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Body composition abnormalities including sarcopenia, myosteatosis, visceral obesity, and sarcopenic obesity were evaluated at baseline and 1 month after surgery using computed tomography. Their impact on outcomes including early allograft dysfunction, early complications, ICU stay, graft regeneration rate, and survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Recipients with sarcopenia or myosteatosis had a higher risk of early allograft dysfunction, higher early complication rate, and longer length of ICU stay (all P <0.05), while there was no difference in graft regeneration rate. Recipient and graft survival were significantly worse for recipients with body composition abnormalities (all P <0.05). In multivariable Cox-regression analysis, sarcopenia [hazard ratio (HR)=1.765, P =0.015], myosteatosis (HR=2.066, P =0.002), and visceral obesity (HR=1.863, P =0.008) were independently associated with shorter overall survival. Piling up of the three factors increased the mortality risk stepwise ( P <0.001). Recipients experienced skeletal muscle loss and muscle fat infiltration 1 month after surgery. Postoperative worsening sarcopenia (HR=2.359, P =0.009) and myosteatosis (HR=1.878, P =0.026) were also identified as independent risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia, myosteatosis, and their progression negatively affect outcomes including early allograft dysfunction, early complications, ICU stay and survival after SLT. Systemic evaluation and dynamic monitoring of body composition are valuable.

Safety and feasibility of chemotherapy followed by liver transplantation for patients with definitely unresectable colorectal liver metastases: insights from the TransMet randomised clinical trial.

Background: Despite the increasing efficacy of chemotherapy (C), the 5-year survival rate for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) remains around 10%. Liver transplantation (LT) might offer a curative approach for patients with liver-only disease, yet its superior efficacy compared to C alone remains to be demonstrated. Methods: The TransMet randomised multicentre clinical trial (NCT02597348) compares the curative potential of C followed by LT versus C alone in patients with unresectable CLM despite stable or responding disease on C. Patient eligibility criteria proposed by local tumour boards had to be validated by an independent committee via monthly videoconferences. Outcomes reported here are from a non-specified interim analysis. These include the eligibility of patients to be transplanted for non resectable colorectal liver metastases, as well as the feasibility and the safety of liver transplantation in this indication. Findings: From February 2016 to July 2021, 94 (60%) of 157 patients from 20 centres in 3 countries submitted to the validation committee, were randomised. Reasons for ineligibility were mainly tumour progression in 50 (32%) or potential resectability in 13 (8%). The median delay to LT after randomisation was 51 (IQR 30-65) days. Nine of 47 patients (19%, 95% CI: 9-33) allocated to the LT arm failed to undergo transplantation because of intercurrent disease progression. Three of the 38 transplanted patients (8%) were re-transplanted, one of whom (3%) died post-operatively from multi-organ failure. Interpretation: The selection process of potential candidates for curative intent LT for unresectable CLM in the TransMet trial highlighted the critical role of an independent multidisciplinary validation committee. After stringent selection, the feasibility of LT was 81%, as 19% had disease progression while on the waiting list. These patients should be given high priority for organ allocation to avoid dropout from the transplant strategy. Funding: No source of support or funding from any author to disclose for this work. The trial was supported by the Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP).