Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Hong Kong Med J ; 26(1): 56-65, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32077861

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common type of inflammatory arthritis in children. Treatment options have been expanded since the introduction of biologics, which are highly effective. The existing local JIA treatment guideline was published more than a decade ago, when use of biologics was not as common. In this article, we review the latest evidence on using biologics in three JIA subtypes: JIA of polyarticular course (pcJIA), enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Based on the latest information, an update on eligibility, response assessment, termination, and safety information for using biologics in these patients was performed. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The JIA Work Group, which consisted of nine paediatricians experienced in managing JIA, was convened in 2016. Publications before July 2017 were screened. Eligible articles were clinical trials, extension studies, systemic reviews, and recommendations from international societies and regulatory agencies about the use of biologics in pcJIA, ERA, and PsA. Evidence extraction, appraisal, and drafting of propositions were performed by two reviewers. Extracted evidence and drafted propositions were presented and discussed at the first two meetings. Overwhelming consensus was obtained at the final meeting in May 2018. Seven practice consensus statements were formulated. Regular review should be performed to keep the practice evidence-based and up-to-date.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Consenso , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 58(2): 146-50, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15474186

RESUMO

A screening programme for expressed breast milk (EBM) revealed the alarming fact that our study group had the highest rate of contamination ever reported. The programme started in July 2002 and involved a group of Chinese women whose premature babies were in the neonatal intensive care unit. EBM was considered to be contaminated if there was any growth of pathogens, including Gram-negative bacteria, enterococci or Staphylococcus aureus, or if the total bacterial count was >10(5) cfu/mL. Of 59 samples from 23 mothers, 63% were contaminated. This high contamination rate could be due to the Chinese tradition of avoiding bathing for one month after childbirth. Previous studies have shown that feeding EBM rather than premature infant formula milk has advantages in terms of decreased incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and neonatal sepsis. However, in this population, with such a high incidence of contaminated EBM, this may not be the case. Further studies to compare EBM with premature infant formula in this population are required.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Enterocolite Necrosante/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Necrosante/microbiologia , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Leite Humano/microbiologia , Adulto , China/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Enterocolite Necrosante/etiologia , Feminino , Contaminação de Alimentos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa